ZDA pravijo, da so Hormuške ožine še vedno odprte.

The United States has firmly denied recent Iranian claims that the Strait of Hormuz has been closed, stating that the critical maritime passage remains fully accessible to commercial shipping. According to the U.S. Central Command, thousands of vessels have continued to transit through the strait over the past several months, contradicting assertions made by Tehran. In a statement posted on social media, CENTCOM emphasized that Iran does not have control over the strategic waterway, which connects the Persian Gulf to the Arabian Sea and serves as a vital route for global oil trade. Iranian authorities previously announced that they had intercepted two vessels attempting to leave the strait and had turned back four additional tankers following military intervention. However, the U.S. military dismissed these claims as inaccurate, asserting that the movement of commercial traffic through the area has remained uninterrupted. The conflicting reports highlight ongoing tensions between Washington and Tehran, with both sides accusing each other of obstructing maritime freedom and escalating regional hostilities. The situation unfolded amid heightened geopolitical friction in the Middle East, where the U.S. and Iran have maintained a tense relationship since the early 2020s. The latest developments follow a series of incidents involving naval confrontations, drone attacks, and diplomatic standoffs, all of which have raised concerns about the stability of one of the world's most crucial energy corridors. The U.S. military has repeatedly stressed the importance of maintaining open access to the strait, warning against any attempts to disrupt commercial shipping. In response to the U.S. denial, Iranian officials reiterated their stance, claiming that their actions were necessary to protect national security interests and prevent unauthorized movements through the strait. They did not provide specific details regarding the intercepted vessels, nor did they clarify whether the ships were carrying goods or had violated any regulations. Despite this lack of transparency, the Iranian government has consistently portrayed itself as acting in self-defense against perceived threats posed by Western powers and regional adversaries. The dispute underscores the broader context of U.S.-Iran relations, which have been marked by cycles of escalation and de-escalation. Since the imposition of sanctions and the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq in 2021, tensions have periodically flared, often centered around issues such as nuclear proliferation, regional influence, and the safety of international shipping lanes. The current situation adds another layer of complexity to an already volatile region, with implications for global energy markets and international diplomacy. Both the United States and Iran have deployed significant military assets to the region, with the U.S. maintaining a robust presence in the Gulf to ensure the free flow of commerce and deter potential aggression. Meanwhile, Iran has bolstered its naval capabilities and strengthened alliances with groups such as Hezbollah and the Houthis, further complicating the security landscape. Analysts suggest that the recent incident could serve as a catalyst for renewed negotiations or increased militarization, depending on how the situation evolves. As the standoff continues, the international community watches closely, particularly countries reliant on the Strait of Hormuz for their energy imports. The European Union, China, and India have expressed concern over the potential disruption of oil supplies and have called for dialogue to resolve the crisis peacefully. However, neither side has shown immediate willingness to compromise, leaving the future of the strait, and the broader U.S.-Iran dynamic, in uncertain hands.