ZDA in Savdska Arabija bosta razkrila sporazum o jedrski energiji, poročajo mediji

The United States is poised to announce a landmark nuclear energy agreement with Saudi Arabia, according to multiple media reports. The deal, expected to be unveiled soon, would grant the Gulf kingdom access to uranium enrichment capabilities for its civilian nuclear program. According to U.S. media outlets, the proposed agreement spans 30 years and involves American companies in its development. The arrangement is anticipated to inject billions of dollars into the U.S. nuclear sector, aligning with broader economic interests under the Trump administration. The potential agreement emerges amid ongoing tensions involving Iran, where U.S. concerns over Tehran’s nuclear ambitions have fueled regional instability. This context adds complexity to the current negotiations, particularly as stalled peace talks continue to highlight deep-seated disagreements. However, the proposal has drawn criticism from various quarters. Both U.S. political factions and Israeli officials have raised alarms regarding the risks of nuclear proliferation should Saudi Arabia gain enrichment capabilities. These fears stem from the possibility that such technology might later be repurposed for military ends. U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was present in Manila, refrained from confirming the specifics of the deal but emphasized that the U.S. would not enter into agreements perceived as posing a proliferation risk. He stated that the United States would not engage in arrangements with any nation that could potentially lead to the spread of nuclear weapons. Despite his comments, the deal is reportedly being prepared for submission to Congress, though its passage is not mandatory for implementation. Saudi Arabia has consistently asserted its right to develop a civilian nuclear program, reflecting its broader aspirations for technological advancement and energy diversification. The kingdom's leadership, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, has previously hinted at the potential for nuclear capabilities, especially in response to perceived threats from Iran. This stance complicates international efforts to ensure strict adherence to non-proliferation standards. Alexander Bollfrass, a nuclear expert from the International Institute for Strategic Studies, noted that the proposed agreement represents a significant shift in U.S. non-proliferation strategy. Unlike previous deals, such as the one with the United Arab Emirates in 2009, this arrangement appears to offer less stringent safeguards. The UAE currently operates a nuclear plant but does not engage in uranium enrichment. In contrast, the new deal with Saudi Arabia could allow for more sensitive technologies to be transferred without the usual levels of international oversight. Israeli former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett criticized the agreement, calling it a "severe strategic failure" that jeopardizes national security. He argued that allowing nuclear enrichment in Saudi Arabia could trigger a regional arms race and reduce control over nuclear materials. His remarks underscored growing anxieties within Israel about diminishing influence in shaping regional dynamics. The situation is further complicated by recent incidents affecting nuclear infrastructure in the region. A drone attack in May targeted a generator near the UAE’s Barakah nuclear plant, leading to a fire. Such events highlight the vulnerability of nuclear facilities to external threats, raising questions about the feasibility of maintaining secure operations in politically unstable regions. As the details of the U.S.-Saudi nuclear deal take shape, the implications for global non-proliferation efforts remain unclear. With the U.S. preparing to submit the agreement to Congress, the path forward will depend heavily on legislative responses and continued international scrutiny. The outcome of these developments could significantly impact the balance of power in the Middle East and beyond.