UNAM opazil "znatne spremembe" v rezultatih spletnega in osebnega izpita; odkriva uporabo mobilnih telefonov in prevaro identitete
Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki (UNAM) je objavila nov osebni test za prijavitelje, ki so bili prej izbrani ali dosegli več kot zgodovinski minimum. Tehnični odbor je med to objavo razkril pomembne spremembe v rezultatih spletnih izpitov v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti, ko je bil izpit opravljen osebno. Opozorili so, da so bili odstotni premiki minimalni, srednji in višji odstotni deleži pa so pokazali znatno povečanje. Odbor je analiziral podatke od leta 2021 do leta 2025 in opazil, da se je odstotek kandidatov, ki so dosegli 100 ali več pravilnih odgovorov, povečal s 3,5% na 16,3%, tisti, ki so dosegli 110 ali več, pa se je povečal s 0,9% na 5,5%. Te spremembe so sprožile celovit tehnični pregled zaradi zaskrbljenosti zaradi izpitov na spletu in nadzora AI. Odbor je identificiral težave, kot so uporaba pametnih telefonov, nepooblaščena pomoč, zunanja podpora in domnevna prevara identitete, kar je privedlo do preklica približno 2% iz 158.277 prijavljenih.
The University National Autonomous of Mexico (UNAM) has announced it detected “substantial changes” in results from its online and in-person exams, including the use of mobile phones and identity fraud. The institution is conducting a new in-person test for selected applicants and those who scored above historical minimums. According to Eduardo Bárzana García, president of the Technical Committee established July 27 to review the online exam, the analysis compared results from 2021 to 2025 with those obtained in this year’s 2026 exam. Bárzana García noted that while percentile shifts were relatively minor, the median and higher percentiles showed significantly greater increases. He explained that approximately 3.5% of applicants achieved 100 or more correct answers during the period 2021–2025, whereas in 2026, this proportion rose to 16.3%. Similarly, the percentage of applicants scoring 110 or more correct answers increased from 0.9% to 5.5%, representing a sixfold increase. These findings prompted the need for a comprehensive technical review, as the shift to an online format combined with the use of artificial intelligence introduced both advantages and risks. The committee identified several prohibited behaviors, including the use of mobile phones, assistance from others, external support for answering questions, and suspected identity theft. An AI-based monitoring system and human verification were used to detect these actions. As a result, nearly 2% of the 158,727 applicants had their tests canceled. Some candidates had already undergone prior verification, which revealed scores lower than those recorded in the initial online exam. The university will administer a second in-person test to around 58,000 applicants, according to officials. This measure aims to address anomalies and ensure fairness in the admissions process. The decision follows concerns raised by the Technical Committee regarding discrepancies in exam outcomes. While some applicants were already disqualified due to previous checks, the additional in-person assessment provides another opportunity for those who may have been unfairly affected. President Claudia Sheinbaum has expressed confidence in the integrity of the examination process, dismissing suggestions of malicious intent behind the online test. She emphasized her commitment to honesty and certainty in the evaluation of candidates. Her stance aligns with broader efforts to maintain transparency and accountability in academic assessments, particularly amid growing concerns over digital testing vulnerabilities. The use of AI in monitoring online exams has become increasingly common as institutions seek to prevent cheating. However, such measures are not without controversy. Critics argue that automated systems can sometimes fail to catch all instances of misconduct, especially when sophisticated methods are employed. In contrast, in-person exams offer a more direct means of supervision, though they come with logistical challenges and costs. The UNAM’s response reflects a balancing act between technological innovation and traditional oversight. By introducing a second round of testing, the university aims to reinforce its standards while addressing the complexities of remote examinations. The outcome of this process will likely influence future policies on digital assessments, particularly as more educational institutions adopt similar approaches. The university’s announcement underscores the ongoing debate surrounding the reliability of online exams. While technology offers convenience and scalability, it also introduces new avenues for potential abuse. The UNAM’s decision to implement additional safeguards highlights the importance of maintaining academic integrity in an evolving landscape. As the second in-person exam nears, attention will remain focused on how effectively the university can mitigate past issues and uphold its reputation for fair and rigorous admissions.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki (UNAM) je objavila nov osebni test za prijavitelje, ki so bili prej izbrani ali dosegli več kot zgodovinski minimum. Tehnični odbor je med to objavo razkril pomembne spremembe v rezultatih spletnih izpitov v primerjavi s prejšnjimi leti, ko je bil izpit opravljen osebno. Opozorili so, da so bili odstotni premiki minimalni, srednji in višji odstotni deleži pa so pokazali znatno povečanje. Odbor je analiziral podatke od leta 2021 do leta 2025 in opazil, da se je odstotek kandidatov, ki so dosegli 100 ali več pravilnih odgovorov, povečal s 3,5% na 16,3%, tisti, ki so dosegli 110 ali več, pa se je povečal s 0,9% na 5,5%. Te spremembe so sprožile celovit tehnični pregled zaradi zaskrbljenosti zaradi izpitov na spletu in nadzora AI. Odbor je identificiral težave, kot so uporaba pametnih telefonov, nepooblaščena pomoč, zunanja podpora in domnevna prevara identitete, kar je privedlo do preklica približno 2% iz 158.277 prijavljenih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske ugotovitve v zvezi z vprašanji akademske integritete med spletnim izpitom na UNAM, s poudarkom na statističnih anomalijah in ugotovljenih nepravilnostih.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on the UNAM's findings regarding changes in exam results between online and in-person formats, citing specific percentages and trends from 2021 to 2026. It provides data and quotes from officials, aligning with the cross-source consensus that there were significant anomalies dete
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is informative but leans toward presenting the issue as a problem requiring technical review, which may imply a certain level of concern. While it remains neutral in reporting facts, the emphasis on the need for a technical review suggests a slight editorial bias towards acknowledging the s
La JornadaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 85pred 3 dnevi
Izvoljena predsednica Claudia Sheinbaum je zavrnila obtožbe o "slabih namenih" v zvezi z virtualnimi izzivi, ki jih je izvedla Nacionalna avtonomna univerza Mehike (UNAM). V izjavi je poudarila svojo zavezanost poštenosti in preglednosti v akademskih ocenah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja Sheinbaumovo stališče o akademski integriteti, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral določene politike.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article presents the statement by Sheinbaum dismissing 'mal intent' and emphasizing honesty, which aligns with the broader narrative of the event. It lacks detailed data but reflects common positions among officials, maintaining consistency with other sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on Sheinbaum’s statements without introducing personal opinions or emotional language. It presents the position of a high-level official without taking sides or adding subjective commentary.
La JornadaNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 7 dnevi
Članek poroča, da je strokovnjak izrazil zaskrbljenost glede legitimnosti digitalnega sprejemnega izpita UNAM (Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki), kar kaže na morebitne pasti ali napake v zasnovi testa.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): S tem, ko je poudaril kritiko institucionalnega procesa (digitalni izpit UNAM), ki je pogosto povezan z izobraževalnimi sistemi, ki jih nadzoruje država, je poudaril, da je poudarek na vprašanju o legitimnosti izpita nakazal na kritiko birokratskih ali sistemskih vprašanj, ki se ujemajo s progresivnimi
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article includes quotes from an academic expert who discusses concerns about the legitimacy of the exam and mentions specific examples like the increase in scores in Medicine. These details align with the general consensus but lack direct evidence or official confirmation, reducing its factualit
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The language used by the expert carries some criticism and skepticism, which introduces a degree of subjectivity. The article frames the issue as a credibility crisis, suggesting a potential bias toward highlighting the negative implications of the exam results.
Članek poroča, da bo Nacionalna avtonomna univerza Mehike (UNAM) izvedla še en pregled zaradi anomalij, odkritih v prejšnjih ocenah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja informacije o institucionalni odločitvi v zvezi z akademskimi vrednotenji, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral kakršno koli politično stališče.
Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki (UNAM) bo izvedla obvezni osebni izpit za približno 58.000 prosilcev, je sporočil Arámburo. Ta ukrep je verjetno namenjen zagotavljanju integritete postopka sprejemanja z preverjanjem identitete kandidatov in preprečevanjem akademskih goljufij. Izpit bo služil kot korak preverjanja za tiste, ki se prijavijo na različne programe na univerzi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o standardnem upravnem postopku, ki ga izvaja javna institucija, brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja ali pristranskega jezika.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
MX
