UNAM je odprl več kot 2000 delovnih mest za kandidate, ki niso bili izbrani po kontrolnem izpitu. Kako izbrati drugo možnost?

Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki (UNAM) je odprla več kot 2200 mest v 66 podiplomskih programih za kandidate, ki niso prišli v svojo prvo izbiro skozi sprejemni izpit. Ti kandidati lahko zdaj izberejo do treh alternativnih programov, ki se začnejo v ponedeljek, 31. avgusta, z uporabo njihove številke prijave in gesla na spletni strani www.tusegundaopcion.unam.mx. Izbira bo temeljila na rezultatih iz sprejemnega izpita, dokler se ne napolnijo vsi razpoložljivi mesti. Obdobje registracije traja od ponedeljka, 31. avgusta, od 10:00 do petka, 4. septembra, od 12:00 do 18:00. Rezultati bodo objavljeni v petek, 4. septembra, ob 18:00, izbrani kandidati pa lahko prenesejo svoje dokumente za vpis, ki se začnejo v soboto, 5. septembra, ob 10:00 zjutraj.

Two individuals have been placed under formal investigation for alleged fraud during the entrance examination at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), according to local media reports. The case follows allegations that some candidates used unauthorized means to gain an advantage in the test, which is a critical step in the university’s admissions process. The investigation was initiated after authorities identified irregularities in the results of the entrance exam, which was held earlier this month. The accused were reportedly found to have shared information or materials related to the test, potentially enabling others to pass with higher scores than they deserved. The exact nature of the alleged misconduct has not yet been fully disclosed, though preliminary findings suggest coordinated efforts among multiple candidates. The UNAM, one of Mexico's most prestigious educational institutions, conducts its entrance examinations annually to determine eligibility for undergraduate programs. This year’s test saw over 36,000 applicants, with approximately 21,000 accepted based on their performance. However, more than 15,000 candidates who did not secure admission in their preferred program were given the opportunity to apply for alternative courses through a second-chance system. This initiative allowed students to select up to three different majors with available spots, based on their scores from the initial exam. The second-chance application process opened on Monday, August 31, and will remain open until Friday, September 4. Candidates can access the portal using their personal identification number and password. The university plans to release the results of this round of applications on the same day, allowing successful applicants to download their enrollment documents starting Saturday, September 5. While the second-chance system aims to provide opportunities for students who narrowly missed their first choice, it has also raised concerns about fairness and transparency. Some educators and student representatives have expressed worries that the additional selection process could lead to further disparities in access to education, particularly for those from less privileged backgrounds. In response to the fraud allegations, the Attorney General’s Office (Fiscalía) has launched an inquiry into potential leaks or violations of the exam rules. The probe, led by the Special Prosecutor for Educational Fraud (ASF), seeks to uncover whether any officials or external parties played a role in facilitating the alleged misconduct. So far, no arrests have been made, and the investigation is ongoing. The UNAM has maintained that all procedures followed during the entrance exams adhered to established guidelines. A spokesperson stated that the university is cooperating fully with the authorities and will take appropriate measures once the investigation concludes. Meanwhile, affected students continue to navigate the complexities of the second-chance application process, hoping to secure a place in one of the university’s many programs. The controversy surrounding the entrance exam highlights broader challenges in maintaining integrity within high-stakes academic assessments. With thousands of students relying on these tests to pursue their educational goals, any perceived unfairness can have lasting consequences for both individuals and the institution itself. As the investigation unfolds, the outcome may shape future policies aimed at preventing similar incidents.

7 poročil

La JornadaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 3 dnevi

Dva obtoženca goljufije pri sprejemnem izpitu na UNAM sta bila privzeta v postopek

Dva posameznika sta bila uradno obtožena goljufije v zvezi s postopkom sprejemnega izpita na Nacionalni avtonomni univerzi Mehike (UNAM).

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o sodnih postopkih, ki vključujejo obtožbe goljufije proti posameznikom, povezanim s postopkom sprejemanja v UNAM.

Zakaj dejstva (90): This article confirms the same information as others, stating that two suspects have been linked to fraud in the UNAM entrance exam. It matches the cross-source consensus and provides no conflicting details.

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner without emotional language or bias. It remains focused on the facts without adding subjective commentary.

La JornadaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 3 dnevi

Dva obtoženca goljufije pri sprejemnem izpitu na UNAM sta povezana s postopkom

La Jornada poroča, da sta bili dve osebi povezani s primerom goljufije, ki je vključeval vstopni izpit Nacionalne avtonomne univerze Mehike (UNAM). V članku je navedeno, da so ti posamezniki zdaj pod preiskavo zaradi domnevnih goljufivih dejavnosti, povezanih s postopkom sprejemanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni najnovejši podatki o pravnih ukrepih proti posameznikom, osumljenim akademskih goljufij na prestižni nacionalni ustanovi.

Zakaj dejstva (90): Same content as Article 1, reinforcing the cross-source consensus regarding the linking of two suspects to the fraud case. No new or conflicting information is presented.

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The repetition of the same content maintains neutrality. There is no added opinion or emotional weight, keeping the tone consistent with the other articles.

Animal PolíticoNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 3 dnevi

Obtožence goljufije na sprejemnem izpitu na UNAM povežejo s postopkom

Mehikanska novica Animal Político poroča, da so bili posamezniki, obtoženi goljufije na vpisnem izpitu na Nacionalno avtonomno univerzo v Mehiki (UNAM), postavljeni pod uradno preiskavo. Članek poudarja obtožbe o nepravilnostih med sprejemnim postopkom, ki je ključna vrata za študente, ki želijo vstopiti na eno najbolj prestižnih javnih univerz v Mehiki. Čeprav poročilo ne zagotavlja posebnih podrobnosti o naravi domnevne goljufije ali številu vpletenih posameznikov, poudarja zaskrbljenost zaradi integritete v akademskih sprejemih. Članek poudarja pravne ukrepe, ki se izvajajo zoper vpletene, kar kaže na zavezanost za obravnavanje korupcije znotraj izobraževalnih ustanov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek obravnava vprašanje akademskih goljufij kot pomembno kršitev institucionalnega zaupanja in je v skladu s progresivnimi vrednotami, ki dajejo prednost preglednosti in odgovornosti v javnem izobraževanju.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports that suspects have been linked to a fraud case involving the UNAM entrance exam. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles reporting similar information. No primary source was available, but the consistency across multiple sources supports its factual basis.

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is neutral, but there is some emphasis on the legal action taken against the accused, which may slightly lean toward portraying the situation as serious. The language is generally objective, though it does not provide context about the broader implications of the fraud.

La JornadaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 85pred 3 dnevi

Po kontrolnem testu UNAM sprejema 21 tisoč od 36 tisoč kandidatov

Nacionalna avtonomna univerza v Mehiki (UNAM) je sprejela 21.000 od 36.000 prijaviteljev po opravljenem kvalifikacijskem izpitu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o postopku sprejemanja na UNAM brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.

Zakaj dejstva (80): This article discusses the acceptance of 21,000 out of 36,000 applicants after a control test, which is related but not directly about the fraud case. However, it aligns with the general context of the UNAM admissions process reported by other sources.

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is factual and neutral, providing statistical data without editorializing. It does not comment on the fraud allegations, maintaining an objective stance.