Združenje izgnancev vložilo pritožbo proti odločitvi vrhovnega sodišča, da jim odvzame volilno pravico
Center za združene potomce Špancev (Ce.DEU), organizacija, ki zastopa španske izgnance in njihove družine, je vložila pravne ugovore proti odločitvi španskega vrhovnega sodišča, ki je začasno ukinilo glasovalne pravice tistih, ki so imeli koristi od zakona o demokratičnem spominu. Skupina trdi, da bo ta odločitev vplivala na približno 163.000 državljanov pred prihodnjimi splošnimi volitvami.
The Spanish Supreme Court has upheld measures that prevent approximately 163,000 citizens who obtained their nationality through Spain’s Law on Democratic Memory from voting in the upcoming general elections on November 29. This decision was made by the court's Administrative Contentious Division, with five judges voting in favor and one judge dissenting. The affected individuals are those who gained Spanish citizenship via the eighth additional provision of the law, which allows descendants of emigrants to claim nationality based on their ancestors' exile during the Franco regime. According to the ruling, these individuals will only be allowed to vote if they obtain a certificate from a consulate confirming that their ancestors had been exiled. However, the administration has stated that it is unable to issue such certificates within the required timeframe. The measure has drawn criticism for its potential impact on the right to vote, particularly given the lack of evidence of wrongdoing against the affected individuals. The legal challenge stems from a dispute over the competence of the Central Election Board to audit registrations of absent residents. The Supreme Court's decision relies on a 2022 instruction from the Ministry of Justice regarding the implementation of the law, which has remained in effect for four years without being challenged. Critics argue that this measure goes beyond the scope of a precautionary measure and effectively preempts the outcome of the legal proceedings. A key point of contention lies in the interpretation of a 2020 Supreme Court ruling, which states that precautionary measures should not extend beyond the act being appealed unless necessary to avoid frustration of the judicial process. The current measure, however, applies to acts prior to the legal proceedings and does so without proportionality, according to critics. The affected individuals have not been formally notified of the proceedings nor were they given the opportunity to present their arguments before the measure was adopted. Although the court acknowledges this procedural flaw, it proposes a remedy involving public notices in the official gazette, allowing those affected to appear before the Supreme Court with legal representation within five business days. The Center for United Descendants of Spaniards (Ce.DEU), an organization representing exiled Spaniards and their families, has filed objections against the Supreme Court's decision. They emphasize their role in securing the recognition of nationality for the children and grandchildren of emigrants after 12 years of parliamentary deliberation. The group seeks to ensure that all Spanish citizens can exercise their right to vote, especially ahead of the upcoming general elections. The Central Election Board has ordered the Office of Electoral Census to send voting documents to the 2.7 million registered voters abroad, including the 163,020 individuals affected by the Supreme Court's decision. These documents will be sent between October 24 and 30, providing more time for embassies to locate and certify the numerous cases under scrutiny. In addition, the Central Election Board rejected a request from the Popular Party to review mail-in voting, citing a recent report by Correos indicating that the existing system provides sufficient guarantees for the voting process. The Council of Spaniards Abroad has expressed concerns that the Supreme Court's decision could inadvertently affect citizens not involved in the legal challenge, potentially disenfranchising them without due process.
Vrhovno sodišče Španije je potrdilo ukrepe, ki preprečujejo nekaterim državljanom glasovanje na prihajajočih volitvah 29. novembra, na podlagi pravne določbe, povezane s španskim državljanstvom, pridobljenim z dodatnim osmim odstavkom zakona o spominu na demokracijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je odločba vrhovnega sodišča označena kot politično motivirana in nesorazmerno vplivajoča na pravice volivcev, pri čemer se v članku uporablja kritični jezik in poudarja morebitno kršitev ustavnih jamstev.
Center za združene potomce Špancev (Ce.DEU), organizacija, ki zastopa španske izgnance in njihove družine, je vložila pravne ugovore proti odločitvi španskega vrhovnega sodišča, ki je začasno ukinilo glasovalne pravice tistih, ki so imeli koristi od zakona o demokratičnem spominu. Skupina trdi, da bo ta odločitev vplivala na približno 163.000 državljanov pred prihodnjimi splošnimi volitvami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja položaj in se osredotoča na pravne ukrepe, ki jih je Ce.DEU sprožil proti odločitvi vrhovnega sodišča.
Španski nacionalni volilni odbor je naročil Uradu za popis prebivalstva, da pošlje volilne dokumente vsem 2,7 milijona registriranim volivcem v tujini pred volitvami 29. novembra. To vključuje več kot 160.000 posameznikov, ki so bili naturalizirani po "zakonu o vnuki" in so zdaj pod sumom vrhovnega sodišča. Vrhovno sodišče je nedavno potrdilo previdnostne ukrepe, ki zahtevajo, da ti posamezniki predložijo dokazilo, ki ga je potrdilo konzulato, o dokumentih svojih prednikov v izgnanstvu, da bi glasovali. Odločitev ustvarja zapleten birokratski izziv zaradi tesnih rokov, vendar daje veleposlaništvam več časa za preverjanje zadevnih primerov. Poleg tega je volilni odbor zavrnil zahtevo Ljudske stranke za ponovno glasovanje po pošti, pri čemer je navedel nedavno poročilo španske poštne službe, ki potrjuje, da sedanji sistem zagotavlja dovolj jamstev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, podrobno opisuje dejanja volilnega odbora, sodbo vrhovnega sodišča in izzive pri izvajanju odločitve.
Odločitev vrhovnega sodišča glede volilnega postopka je povzročila zaskrbljenost, da bi španski državljani v tujini, ki jih pravni izziv ni neposredno prizadel, lahko še vedno bili izključeni iz glasovanja, glede na Svet Špancev v tujini.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene pomisleke Sveta Špancev v tujini glede odločitve vrhovnega sodišča, ne da bi se očitno zavzemal za katero koli stran.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.