A heated diplomatic exchange erupted at the United Nations in Geneva after France criticized the United States for its stance on the reappointment of Volker Türk as U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights. Following a contentious vote, France’s U.N. mission took to social media to accuse the U.S. of abandoning its traditional leadership in human rights. On X, the French mission stated, "The US used to be a beacon of human rights. Not anymore." It claimed that the U.S. now stands alongside North Korea, Nicaragua, Mali, and Russia, and that the international community no longer listens to Washington. The post included the hashtag #AmericaAlone, highlighting the perception of isolation. U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. Michael Waltz responded strongly, accusing France of attempting to divert attention from its support for Türk. He stated that France’s actions were an attempt to deflect blame for its decision to back someone who has been critical of free, sovereign democracies like the U.S., the UK, and Israel, while aligning with some of the world's worst human rights violators. During the vote, U.S. Representative for U.N. Management and Reform, Ambassador Jeff Bartos, argued that the U.N. human rights system has lost credibility over the years. He claimed that Volker Türk has led it to its decline and warned that reappointing him for another four-year term would lead to its collapse. Bartos accused Türk of disproportionately criticizing democracies while failing to address abuses by authoritarian regimes. He cited examples of countries including the U.S., Britain, France, Australia, Italy, and Israel, which were frequently targeted by Türk’s reports. Bartos also highlighted that Türk remained silent for 12 days after the Iranian government allegedly initiated a new wave of violence against its citizens, yet quickly condemned U.S. military action against Iran. Additionally, he criticized Türk’s office for urging Washington to lift sanctions on Cuba and for maintaining a discriminatory database that targets American companies, thereby supporting the U.N.'s "anti-Israel machinery." France’s U.N. Ambassador, Jérôme Bonnafont, presented a contrasting viewpoint during the General Assembly debate. He praised Türk for demonstrating "rigor and impartiality" and described him as a "voice of conscience" confronting states with their realities and responsibilities. Bonnafont emphasized that Türk had faced challenges in a period marked by increasing attacks on multilateral institutions and the universality of human rights. An official close to the U.S. position revealed that American officials were taken aback by France’s bold public critique and dismissed the notion that opposing the reappointment of one U.N. official equates to opposing human rights. This official noted that Washington and other delegations were also surprised by the accelerated vote, given that Türk's current term does not expire until October 11. At the United Nations, Volker Türk faces a vote for a second four-year term but encounters resistance from critics and certain countries. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres quietly nominated the Austrian lawyer for a second term after private discussions with member states and regional groups. The 193-member General Assembly scheduled a vote on his reappointment for Friday afternoon. Former head of Human Rights Watch, Ken Roth, referred to the process as a "stealth procedure" designed to avoid public scrutiny. The role of the U.N. rights chief is inherently complex, requiring confrontation of rights violations by member states. Türk has previously criticized Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and raised concerns regarding China’s treatment of the Uyghur minority. Russia proposed extending Türk’s term only until December 31, coinciding with Guterres’ second five-year term as secretary-general. Russia deemed Guterres’ move to grant Türk four additional years as the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights "unprecedented." None of Türk’s predecessors have held two complete terms since the position was established in 1993. Israel’s Foreign Ministry criticized Guterres’ decision to seek a second term for Türk, calling it the U.N. secretary-general's “latest moral failure.” The ministry insisted that the choice should be left to Guterres’ successor. U.N. spokesman Stephane Dujarric defended Guterres, stating that the secretary-general followed the 1993 resolution establishing the U.N. high commissioner for human rights and adhered to the rules and procedures. Türk expressed willingness to serve a new term, according to a statement from the U.N. rights office. He emphasized the need to promote and protect human rights globally and engage with all states. As the U.N. rights chief, Türk has addressed various issues concerning China, including the fates of detained individuals and the treatment of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang, Inner Mongolia, and Tibet. Critics argue that Türk could have done more to follow up on a report issued by his predecessor, former Chilean President Michelle Bachelet, which suggested that China’s discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang might constitute crimes against humanity. Türk has refrained from joining independent U.N. rights experts who have accused Israel of committing genocide against Palestinians during its conflict with Hamas in Gaza. Israel categorically denies these allegations. Ken Roth criticized Türk, calling him “a disaster” and pointing out that the most significant blemish on Türk’s record is his neglect of the plight of the Uyghurs. He described them as victims of the most severe state persecution that Türk has overlooked. The Chinese government denies any persecution of the Uyghurs, asserting that its policies in Xinjiang are based on legitimate security measures.
3 poročil
Fox News (World)NeodvisenKonservativnopred 7 urami Waltz kritizira Francijo po osupljivem napadu socialnih medijev na ZDA po glasovanju ZNFrancoska misija pri ZN je na družbenih omrežjih kritizirala ZDA, potem ko je ZN podaljšal mandat Volkerja Turka kot Visokega komisarja za človekove pravice, obtoževal Ameriko, da je opustila svojo vodilno vlogo pri človekovih pravicah. Francoski račun je navedel, da se ZDA zdaj ujemajo z državami, kot sta Severna Koreja in Rusija, z uporabo hashtaga #AmericaAlone. V odgovoru je ameriški veleposlanik Mike Waltz obtožil Francijo, da je odvrnila kritiko zaradi podpore Turku, trdil pa je, da je Francija glasovala za komisarja, ki kritizira demokracije, medtem ko ignorira zlorabe avtoritarnih režimov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je odgovor ZDA utemeljen in poudarjene so kritike Francije in sistema človekovih pravic ZN, poudarjene pa so tudi pomisleki glede tega, da je Visoki komisar ciljno usmerjen proti zahodnim državam.
ABC News (US)NeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi Predsednik ZN za človekove pravice se sooča z nasprotovanjem pri glasovanju za podaljšanje mandata za še štiri letaVodja Združenih narodov za človekove pravice Volker Türk se bo uprl glasovanju o podaljšanju svojega štiriletnega mandata, kljub nasprotovanju različnih držav in kritikov. Kritiki trdijo, da je Türk kritično dojel dejanja Izraela v Gazi in Kitajsko ravnanje z ujgurskimi muslimani, kar je povzročilo zaskrbljenost zaradi morebitne pristranskosti. Generalni sekretar Antonio Guterres je tiho imenoval Turka za drugi mandat, Generalna skupščina pa je načrtovala glasovanje. Nekateri narodi, vključno z latinskoameriškimi državami, so izrazili ugovore, drugi, kot je Afrika, pa ne. Izraelovo zunanje ministrstvo je obsodilo Guterresovo odločitev in jo imenovalo "moralno neuspeh".
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so Turkove kritike Izraela in Kitajske postavljene na način, ki kaže na levičarsko perspektivo, s poudarkom na mednarodnih standardih človekovih pravic nad nacionalnimi interesi.
The Daily WireNeodvisenProgresivnopred 3 dnevi Ali Kitajska zmaguje v PR vojni?Članek razpravlja o dojemanju naraščajočega vpliva Kitajske na globalne odnose z javnostjo, kar kaže, da morda zmaga v "PR vojni" proti ZDA. V članku se sklicuje na poročilo raziskovalnega centra Pew, ki kaže, da ima več držav zdaj ugodno stališče o Kitajski v primerjavi z ZDA, čeprav mnogi še vedno verjamejo, da ZDA bolje spoštujejo individualne svoboščine. Članek poudarja strateško sporočilo Kitajske, zlasti pri obravnavanju vprašanj človekovih pravic s sklicevanjem na zgodovino ZDA, in ugotavlja povečano pozitivno čustvo med Američani do Kitajske. Avtor, strokovnjak za odnose z javnostjo, ta premik pripisuje učinkovitim komunikacijskim strategijam Kitajske in njeni sposobnosti oblikovanja globalnih pripovedi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se povečuje svetovni vpliv Kitajske kot pozitiven razvoj, poudarjajo pa se njeni strateški prizadevanja za odnose z javnostmi in jo primerjajo z domnevno ameriško hinavščino na področju človekovih pravic.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik