ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejšemu sistemu izstrelitve letal z letalonosilk.
United States🏛️ PolitikaKonservativnopred 12 dnevi

Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejšemu sistemu izstrelitve letal z letalonosilk.

Predsednik Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj opusti elektromagnetski sistem za izstrelitev letal (EMALS) na četrti letalski ladjici razreda Ford, USS Doris Miller, in se vrne na tradicionalne parne katapulte. Ta odločitev, opisana v memorandumu, odraža Trumpovo dolgoletno kritiko EMALS, za katero trdi, da je manj zmogljiva od starejših parnih sistemov. Ta poteza bi lahko stala milijarde in otežila operacije mornarice, saj je EMALS zasnovan tako, da je bolj učinkovit in sodoben. Direktiva prav tako poziva k zamenjavi dvižnikov elektromagnetnega orožja na letalski ladjici razreda Ford. Medtem ko Kitajska in Francija sprejemajo EMALS, Trumpov ukaz poudarja pomisleke glede stroškov, vzdrževanja in osebja ter zahtev. General Atomics, proizvajalec EMALS, je opozoril, da bi obratovanje odločitve predstavljalo izzive in tveganja. Razprava o financiranju sovpada s tekočimi razvojnimi časi in naraščajočimi vojaškimi stroški vojne z Iranom.

President Donald Trump has directed the U.S. Navy to abandon the advanced electromagnetic catapult system used on its newest aircraft carriers and revert to the older steam-powered systems he has publicly favored for years. The directive, issued on Thursday, instructs the Pentagon and the Navy to submit detailed plans within two months to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and Advanced Weapons Elevators on the USS Doris Miller, a fourth Ford-class carrier under construction, with steam catapults and hydraulic systems. This decision marks a significant reversal in naval technology and raises concerns among defense officials, manufacturers, and lawmakers about potential cost increases, project delays, and the broader implications for U.S. military modernization. The move follows years of public criticism from Trump, who has repeatedly dismissed EMALS as overly complex and inefficient compared to the traditional steam catapults. During an interview with Time magazine in 2017, Trump claimed the new system was “not good” and “doesn’t have the power” of the older steam systems, famously declaring, “You’re going to goddamned steam.” His comments have echoed at numerous campaign events and rallies, reflecting a consistent stance that has influenced military procurement decisions. The directive now formalizes this preference, targeting the USS Doris Miller, which is scheduled to enter service in 2034 after years of delays attributed to shipyard constraints and design complexities. The Navy’s Ford-class carriers represent the cutting edge of naval aviation technology, designed to replace the aging Nimitz-class fleet. These carriers feature EMALS, which uses electromagnetic propulsion to launch aircraft more efficiently than steam catapults. EMALS reduces the number of sailors required to operate the launch systems, cuts maintenance requirements, and allows for greater flexibility in launching a wide range of aircraft, from drones to heavy fighters. The system also enables faster launch rates and improved operational readiness. However, Trump’s directive aims to dismantle these advancements, reverting to steam catapults, which require more personnel, consume more space, and demand more frequent maintenance. General Atomics, the company responsible for developing EMALS, has raised alarms about the potential consequences of reversing course on the USS Doris Miller. According to a statement shared with Reuters, the company noted that work on the carrier’s catapults and arresting gear is approximately 50% complete, and changing direction now would introduce “significant cost, schedule, and integration risks.” The firm also pointed out that the decision could disrupt the entire construction process, affecting multiple components of the ship’s design and operations. Additionally, General Atomics highlighted that the company had secured a $1.2 billion contract in 2023 specifically for the Doris Miller’s launch and recovery systems, further underscoring the financial stakes involved. The directive also calls for the replacement of the Advanced Weapons Elevators (AWEs) on the Ford-class carriers with hydraulic systems. AWEs are critical for transporting ordnance from storage to the flight deck, enabling rapid deployment of weapons during combat scenarios. By removing these systems, the Navy will lose a key component of its operational capabilities, potentially impacting mission readiness and response times. The memo further notes that the U.S. shipbuilding industry faces challenges, including delays and rising costs, due to an outdated infrastructure and limited capacity to meet current demands. Trump cited these factors as justification for shifting back to proven, conventional technologies. The decision has sparked controversy among military experts and former officials, many of whom argue that EMALS represents a strategic advantage in modern warfare. For example, the system allows for the launch of heavier aircraft and unmanned drones, enhancing the Navy’s versatility in contested environments. Moreover, the technology supports the Navy’s goal of maintaining superiority over potential adversaries, including nations like China, which has deployed EMALS on its newest aircraft carrier, the Type 003 Fujian. France, too, has announced plans to incorporate EMALS into its future carrier, signaling a global trend toward adopting the technology. Meanwhile, the U.S. Congress is grappling with the challenge of securing sufficient funding for military programs, including the ongoing conflict in the Persian Gulf. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth recently estimated the war’s cost at $37.5 billion, emphasizing the urgency of allocating resources to sustain operations and modernize the armed forces. With the House having narrowly approved a $95 billion funding package, the Senate’s approval remains pending, adding another layer of complexity to the Navy’s efforts to implement Trump’s directives. The Navy has faced persistent staffing shortages, with approximately 20,000 positions unfilled across its fleet at the beginning of the year. Reverting to a system that requires more sailors to operate could exacerbate these challenges, especially as the service struggles to retain qualified personnel. The decision to prioritize steam catapults may also impact training protocols and operational efficiency, raising questions about the long-term viability of the Navy’s modernization strategy. As the Navy prepares to revise its plans for the USS Doris Miller, the broader implications of this shift extend beyond a single ship. The move reflects a growing tension between political leadership and military expertise, highlighting the influence of executive orders on technological advancement and strategic planning. The outcome of this directive will depend on how effectively the Navy navigates the logistical, financial, and operational hurdles associated with retrofitting a fully constructed carrier. The final decision on whether to proceed with the change will likely hinge on congressional support, interagency coordination, and the continued evolution of naval warfare in an increasingly competitive geopolitical landscape.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (3)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

9 poročil

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 60pred 15 dnevi
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejšemu sistemu izstrelitve letal z letalonosilk.

Predsednik Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj opusti elektromagnetski sistem za izstrelitev letal (EMALS) na četrti letalski ladjici razreda Ford, USS Doris Miller, in se vrne na tradicionalne parne katapulte. Ta odločitev, opisana v memorandumu, odraža Trumpovo dolgoletno kritiko EMALS, za katero trdi, da je manj zmogljiva od starejših parnih sistemov. Ta poteza bi lahko stala milijarde in otežila operacije mornarice, saj je EMALS zasnovan tako, da je bolj učinkovit in sodoben. Direktiva prav tako poziva k zamenjavi dvižnikov elektromagnetnega orožja na letalski ladjici razreda Ford. Medtem ko Kitajska in Francija sprejemajo EMALS, Trumpov ukaz poudarja pomisleke glede stroškov, vzdrževanja in osebja ter zahtev. General Atomics, proizvajalec EMALS, je opozoril, da bi obratovanje odločitve predstavljalo izzive in tveganja. Razprava o financiranju sovpada s tekočimi razvojnimi časi in naraščajočimi vojaškimi stroški vojne z Iranom.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se odloča, da je nadaljevanje Trumpovega skepticizma do sodobne vojaške tehnologije, ki poudarja njegovo prednost pred tradicionalnimi sistemi.

Zakaj dejstva (85): This article discusses a policy directive from President Trump regarding the Navy's use of EMALS technology, which is unrelated to the primary source document about the USS Abraham Lincoln's sailors. While the facts about Trump's order are accurate based on public records, the article does not refer

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone of the article is highly political and biased towards criticizing Trump's policies. It frames the decision as a negative move, implying that the old steam catapult system is preferable, which reflects a partisan perspective rather than a neutral reporting style.

ABC News (US) logoABC News (US)NeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 15 dnevi
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejšemu sistemu izstrelitve letal z letalonosilk.

Predsednik Donald Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj na svojih najnovejših letalonosilkah zamenja napredni elektromagnetni sistem za lansiranje letal (EMALS) s starejšim parnim katapultnim sistemom, ki ga je javno preferiral. Ta direktiva, ki jo je navedel v memorandumu, ki ga je izdala Bela hiša, zahteva, da Pentagon in mornarica predložijo načrte za odstranitev EMALS v dveh mesecih. Odločitev sledi letih Trumpove kritike nove tehnologije, za katero trdi, da je manj zmogljiva od tradicionalnih parnih sistemov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je Trumpova odločitev predstavljena kot nadaljevanje njegove dolgoletne preference za starejše sisteme na osnovi pare nad sodobno tehnologijo EMALS. Poudarja Trumpove javne kritike novega sistema in poudarja njegovo usklajenost z zaskrbljenostjo industrije glede stroškov in kompleksnosti.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports on Trump's directive regarding the Navy's catapult systems and mentions the USS Abraham Lincoln's deployment. However, it focuses primarily on the policy change rather than the sailors' conditions, which limits its alignment with the primary source document.

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article maintains a neutral tone regarding the sailors' conditions but emphasizes Trump's dismissal of concerns, which could be seen as subtly biased towards the administration's position.

Newsweek logoNewsweekNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 50Objektivnost 50pred 13 dnevi
Trumpova sprememba letalskega prevoznika opozarja na višje stroške in zamude.

Predsednik Donald Trump je ukazal Pentagonu in mornarici, naj razmislijo o zamenjavi sistema za lansiranje elektromagnetnih letal (EMALS) in naprednih dvigala za orožje na USS Doris Miller s parnimi katapulti in hidravličnimi sistemi. Obrambni analitiki, izvajalci in nekdanji uradniki opozarjajo, da bi ta sprememba lahko povzročila povečane stroške, zamude in preklic oblikovalskih odločitev, ki jih je mornarica izvajala več let. Predlog prihaja med širšimi razpravami o preoblikovanju otoka (komandnega stolpa) na nosilcih razreda Ford, da bi se uskladili s Trumpovimi estetskimi preferencami, za katere nekateri trdijo, da bi lahko motili operacije in dodali znatno finančno breme. Mornariški uradniki so navedli, da je bila trenutna postavitev otoka izbrana zaradi operativnih koristi, vključno z izboljšanjem učinkovitosti in varnosti letal, in da predhodne študije kažejo, da bi taka preoblikovanje lahko stalo milijarde in povzročilo znatne zamude.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko članek razpravlja o politično nabitem vprašanju, ki vključuje predsedniški vpliv na vojaška naročila, je okvir uravnotežen.

Zakaj dejstva (50): This article diverges significantly from the primary source, focusing on naval policy debates and aircraft carrier redesigns rather than the mental health concerns or overboard incidents on the USS Abraham Lincoln.

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article is highly politicized, focusing on presidential policies and industry responses rather than the sailors' experiences. It lacks balance and fails to address the core event.

Newsweek logoNewsweekNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 50Objektivnost 50pred 15 dnevi
Parne katapulte proti elektromagneti: primerjava načinov izstrelitve mlažnikov

Predsednik Donald Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj opusti elektromagnetski sistem za lansiranje letal (EMALS), sodobno tehnologijo, ki se uporablja na nekaterih letalonosilkah razreda Ford, in se vrne na tradicionalne parne katapulte. Ta direktiva vpliva na USS Doris Miller, četrto letalonosilko razreda Ford, ki ne bo opremljena z EMALS. Odločitev prihaja med dolgoletno kritiko Trumpa, ki je EMALS imenoval "zahteven" in "ne dober", kljub trditvam ameriške vojske, da so EMALS zanesljivejši, učinkovitejši in stroškovno učinkovitejši. General Atomics, proizvajalec EMALS, je izrazil zaskrbljenost zaradi obrnitve, ki bi lahko privedla do pomembnih finančnih in logističnih izzivov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je odločitev o vrnitvi na parne katapulte označena kot pozitiven korak, ki je v skladu s Trumpovo kritiko EMALS in njegovo preferenco za tradicionalne sisteme.

Zakaj dejstva (50): This article is entirely focused on the technical debate around aircraft carrier launch systems and does not mention the overboard incidents or mental health concerns on the USS Abraham Lincoln.

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article is completely off-topic and does not engage with the core event. It lacks any connection to the sailors' experiences or the broader deployment issues.

The Hill logoThe HillNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 50Objektivnost 30pred 12 dnevi
Mornarica razmišlja o prenovi letalonosilke, da bi bolje ustrezala Trumpovi estetici.

Ameriška mornarica razmišlja o pomembni prenovi svoje nove vrste letalonosilk, da bi se bolj uskladila z željami, ki jih je izrazil predsednik Donald Trump.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je potencialna preoblikovanje letalonosilke kot neposredni odziv na predsedniške vložke, ki kažejo usklajenost s prednostnimi nalogami administracije.

Zakaj dejstva (50): The article references a 'major revamp' of the aircraft carrier design to align with President Trump's aesthetic, but the primary source document does not mention any such design changes related to aesthetics or political preferences. The memo focuses on technical upgrades like replacing electromagn

Zakaj objektivnost (30): The article frames the potential revamp as being influenced by presidential preferences, suggesting a political motive rather than a purely operational or strategic decision. This introduces bias by implying that design choices are driven by personal taste rather than military necessity.

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanKonservativnoDejstva 5Objektivnost 10pred 15 dnevi
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se znebi elektromagnetnih katapultov in se vrne na parno energijo.

Predsednik Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj opusti namestitev elektromagnetnih katapultov (EMALS) na prihodnjih letalonosilkah, vključno z USS Doris Miller, in se vrne na tradicionalne lansirne sisteme na parni pogon. Ukaz, naveden v memorandumu z naslovom "Obnova mornarice Združenih držav Amerike in ameriške industrijske baze za ladjedelništvo", naroča obrambnemu sekretarju Peteu Hegsethu, naj v 60 dneh predloži načrt za zamenjavo EMALS z parnimi in hidravličnimi sistemi. Trump je kritiziral EMALS, ker je drag in nezanesljiv, in je navedel pomisleke glede njegove zapletenosti in finančnega vpliva. Odločitev sledi njegovi pretekli kritici sistema, vključno s pripombami med intervjujem z revijo Time, kjer je izrazil skepticizem glede njegovega razvoja. Medtem ko zagovorniki trdijo, da EMALS ponuja večjo prožnost in učinkovitost, so kritikovi, kot je senator Mark Kelly, zavrnili Trumpovo vključenost v pomorsko inženiring.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je Trumpova odločitev označena kot korektivni ukrep proti tehnološko zapletenim in dragim sistemom, v skladu s konzervativno kritiko sodobnih vojaških izdatkov in birokratske neučinkovitosti.

Zakaj dejstva (5): This article discusses a completely different topic, Trump's order regarding naval catapult systems, not related to the USS Abraham Lincoln sailors' mental health or deployment conditions. As such, it contains no factual information about the primary source document.

Zakaj objektivnost (10): The article is entirely unrelated to the subject matter of the primary source document and therefore cannot be assessed for objectivity in relation to the event covered in the primary source.

The Hill logoThe HillNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 0Objektivnost 0pred 13 dnevi
Mornarica raziskuje preoblikovanje vojaških ladij kot del Trumpovih zahtev

Ameriška mornarica naj bi razmislila o prenovi načrtovanja letalonosilk, da bi bila usklajena z željo predsednika Trumpa za videz iz druge svetovne vojne.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku se odloči za preoblikovanje v kontekstu predsednikovih preferenc, kar pomeni namerno usklajevanje z njegovimi stilskimi izbori.

Zakaj dejstva (0): This article discusses a completely different topic unrelated to the USS Abraham Lincoln sailors' mental health issues or overboarding incidents. It focuses on potential Navy redesigns for aircraft carriers based on Trump's preferences, which is not mentioned in the primary source document. Therefor

Zakaj objektivnost (0): The article is not about the same event as the primary source document, so objectivity assessment is irrelevant. However, the tone is neutral as it presents information without emotional language.

The Hill logoThe HillNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 0Objektivnost 0pred 15 dnevi
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k parnim katapultom na letalonosilkah.

Predsednik Donald Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj elektromagnetske katapultne sisteme, ki se uporabljajo na letalonosilkah, nadomesti s starejšo tehnologijo katapulta na parni pogon. Ta odločitev prihaja kljub zaskrbljenosti vojaških uradnikov in strokovnjakov, ki opozarjajo, da bi se vrnitev na parne katapulte lahko znatno povečala operativne stroške in zmanjšala učinkovitost.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek predstavlja odločitev kot neposredni predsedniški ukaz, poudarja Trumpovo avtoriteto in spremembo označuje kot obrat prizadevanj za modernizacijo.

Zakaj dejstva (0): This article discusses a different topic entirely, Trump's directive to return to steam catapults on aircraft carriers. This is unrelated to the USS Abraham Lincoln sailors' mental health issues or overboarding incidents covered in the primary source document. Thus, it cannot be evaluated for factua

Zakaj objektivnost (0): As the article is not about the same event, objectivity assessment is irrelevant. However, the tone remains neutral as it presents policy decisions without emotional language.

Associated Press logoAssociated PressNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 0Objektivnost 0pred 15 dnevi
Trump je mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejšemu sistemu izstrelitve letal z letalonosilk.

Predsednik Donald Trump je ameriški mornarici ukazal, naj se vrne k starejši metodi za izstrelitev letal z letalonosilk. Direktiva vključuje uporabo tradicionalnega katapultnega sistema namesto novejšega elektromagnetnega sistema za izstrelitev (EMALS).

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja izvršilni nalog kot dejansko posodobitev, ne da bi odkrito kritiziral ali pohvalil odločitev.

Zakaj dejstva (0): This article covers a different subject, Trump ordering the Navy to return to an older system of launching jets. It is unrelated to the USS Abraham Lincoln sailors' mental health issues or overboarding incidents detailed in the primary source document. Hence, it cannot be assessed for factuality reg

Zakaj objektivnost (0): Since the article is not about the same event, objectivity assessment is irrelevant. However, the tone is neutral as it presents policy decisions without emotional language.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe