United States🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativnopred 9 urami
Tudi če se je inflacija v juniju ohladila, strokovnjaki pravijo, da cenovni pritiski še niso končani
Inflacija naj bi se nadaljevala kljub morebitnemu upočasnitvi v juniju, saj se cene energije spreminjajo in drugi dejavniki prispevajo k stalnim cenovnim pritiskom. Urad za statistiko dela naj bi objavil najnovejše podatke o indeksu potrošniških cen, mnogi ekonomisti pa pričakujejo rahlo zmanjšanje zaradi nižjih stroškov energije. Vendar pa analitiki opozarjajo, da inflacija ostaja izziv, še posebej, če se cene energije povrnejo.
Gas prices in the United States have returned to $4 per gallon, marking a significant rebound as renewed hostilities between the U.S. and Iran escalate. According to the American Automobile Association (AAA), the national average for regular gasoline climbed to $4.003 per gallon on July 20, 2026, reflecting a 13-cent increase from the previous week. Diesel prices have also surged, reaching $5.11 per gallon, while international oil benchmarks have exceeded $90 per barrel. This development follows a brief dip in prices earlier in the year, when the national average briefly fell below $4 per gallon in mid-June, offering temporary relief to consumers grappling with persistent inflation. The resurgence in tensions between the U.S. and Iran has been marked by a series of military strikes and retaliatory actions, primarily centered around the strategic Strait of Hormuz. This critical waterway, through which approximately 20% of the world’s oil supply passes, has become a focal point of contention. On July 7, the U.S. revoked a sanctions waiver on Iranian oil, signaling a shift in policy that contributed to the subsequent rise in oil prices. Following this, President Donald Trump declared the ceasefire with Iran to be over, initiating a new phase of conflict that has led to the reinstatement of a naval blockade in the region. The U.S. military has stated that this blockade targets vessels transiting to or from Iranian ports and coastal areas, aiming to deter further aggression from Iran. The impact of these developments has been felt globally, with oil prices experiencing a notable increase. U.S. crude oil and international Brent crude oil both rose more than 15% in the preceding week, contributing to a cumulative increase of over 20% in the last two weeks. These fluctuations have been exacerbated by the ongoing conflict, which has disrupted shipping routes and created uncertainty in global energy markets. Analysts suggest that the situation has hardened into a standoff over control of the Strait of Hormuz, with Iran attempting to establish authority over navigation through mandatory transit protocols and transit fees. This has resulted in a sharp decline in ship crossings through the strait, with only eight ships recorded crossing the waterway on one particular day, compared to an average of 130 per day prior to the conflict. The economic repercussions of the rising gas prices extend beyond the immediate cost at the pump. Consumers are facing increasing financial strain, with two-thirds of households reporting difficulties in affording basic necessities such as groceries. The situation has also influenced political dynamics, with affordability becoming a central issue in the approaching midterm elections. President Trump has acknowledged the challenges posed by the conflict, stating that he expects oil prices to drop significantly once the war concludes. However, the ongoing nature of the conflict has cast doubt on this prediction, with experts noting that the stability of the region remains uncertain. The geopolitical landscape has further complicated matters, with the Russia-Ukraine war contributing to additional pressures on energy markets. Restrictions on Russian oil exports, coupled with the destruction of refining capacity within Russia, have reduced supply while increasing demand for diesel and other refined products. This has led to a rise in jet fuel prices, which have increased by nearly 43% since the onset of the Iran conflict. The combination of these factors has created a volatile environment for energy markets, with prices fluctuating based on the evolving situation in the Middle East and beyond. Efforts to mitigate the impact of the conflict on global energy supply have included diplomatic initiatives, such as the involvement of Pakistan in mediating discussions between the U.S. and Iran. Despite these efforts, the situation remains tense, with both sides continuing to engage in military actions that have further strained relations. The U.S. has warned that it will respond to any threats against American interests, including potential actions by Iranian-backed groups in the region. As the conflict continues, the global community watches closely, aware that the stability of energy markets hinges on the resolution of these escalating tensions.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Ameriška vlada je poročala, da se je inflacija v juniju zmanjšala, kar je največji mesecni padec od aprila 2020. Ta padec je bil predvsem posledica padca cen energije, čeprav bi nedavni vrhovi cen nafte zaradi obnovljenih napetosti med ZDA in Iranom lahko obrnili ta trend.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski gospodarski podatki brez očitnega ideološkega nagibanja, pri čemer se uravnotežujejo tako sedanja sprostitev inflacije kot potencialna prihodnja tveganja.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the 0.4% decrease in CPI for June 2026 and the 3.5% year-over-year increase. It correctly attributes the drop to lower energy prices and mentions the 5.7% decrease in energy prices. The article also notes the core CPI increase of 2.6% and the impact of rising oil price
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, providing facts without overtly emotional language. It acknowledges both the positive aspects of the CPI report and the potential negative impacts of rising oil prices, maintaining balance in its reporting.
Po podatkih Ministrstva za delo so se potrošniške cene v ZDA junija znižale za 0,4%, kar je največji padec od leta 2020. Cene energije so se znatno znižale, cene bencina pa so padle za 9,7%.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so podatki o inflaciji predstavljeni kot pozitivne novice, ki izpodbijajo kritike demokratske stranke glede Trumpove politike, zlasti glede carin.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reflects the CPI-U decline of 0.4% and the 3.5% annual increase, matching the primary source document. It also correctly notes the energy price drop of 5.7% and the impact on the broader CPI. Minor omissions exist, such as the exact contribution of different sectors, but the o
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner, avoiding strong emotional language or clear bias. It focuses on reporting the data without injecting personal opinions or emphasizing one side over the other.
Cene plina v ZDA so ponovno narasle in dosegle 4 dolare na galon, saj se je nacionalno povprečje povečalo za 13 centov v primerjavi s prejšnjim tednom. Cene dizla so zdaj na 5,11 dolare na galon, cene surove nafte pa so presegle 90 dolarjev na sod.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski podatki o cenah plina in surove nafte, ne da bi se očitno zavzemal za kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on rising gas prices and oil prices, aligning with the cross-source consensus that U.S.-Iran tensions have contributed to increased energy costs. It provides specific figures (e.g., $4 a gallon, $5.11 for diesel, $90 per barrel) which are typical in such reporting. However, it do
Zakaj objektivnost (72): The tone is somewhat alarmist, using phrases like 'back at $4 a gallon' and 'resuming' which imply a cyclical pattern and potential instability. While it presents facts neutrally, the emphasis on price increases could be seen as subtly highlighting economic concern rather than presenting a balanced
Cene plina v Združenih državah so ponovno presegle 4 $ na galon, zaradi obnovljenih napetosti med ZDA in Iranom. Situacija se je okrepila po ponovnem boju v Hormuškem prelivu, zaradi česar so ZDA ponovno uvedle pomorsko blokado, ki je motila promet tankerjev in prispevala k dvigu cen nafte. Nacionalno povprečje je po podatkih AAA doseglo 4,00 $ na galon, kar je povečanje za 86 centov v primerjavi z enakim obdobjem lani.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je povečanje cen plina in eskalacija napetosti med ZDA in Iranom označeno kot neposredna posledica politike predsednika Trumpa in morebitnih vojaških ukrepov.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports the U.S. launching more airstrikes against Iran after the death of another service member. It correctly mentions the risk of the conflict spreading to neighboring Israel and the impact on global energy markets. However, it does not provide detailed information about th
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a balanced approach, presenting the facts without overtly favoring either side. It avoids using emotionally charged language and focuses on the factual aspects of the situation, ensuring a fair and objective presentation.
Nacionalna povprečna cena rednega bencina v Združenih državah je spet dosegla 4 $ na galon, saj so se napetosti med ZDA in Iranom povečale, kar je vplivalo na svetovne energetske trge. To je prvič od 17. junija, da so se cene plina vrnile na 4 $ ali več.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so v ospredju predvsem politike in izjave nekdanjega predsednika Donalda Trumpa, ki poudarjajo njegove odločitve glede Irana in Ormuške ožine, ter Trumpove napovedi in dejanja, kot je konec premirja in ponovno vzpostavitev iranskega "bloka".
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article confirms the U.S. airstrikes in response to the attack on Jordan and cites CENTCOM and Pentagon data. It provides specific details about the strikes and casualty numbers, aligning with the primary source documents.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is factual and neutral, focusing on the military actions and their consequences. It presents the U.S. perspective without overt bias, maintaining a balanced approach.
The Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 6 dnevi
Ameriške delnice so se v sredo dvignile, kar je posledica močnih četrtletnih dobičkov velikih podjetij, kot so BlackRock, Bank of New York Mellon in Morgan Stanley. S&P 500, Dow Jones in Nasdaq so v prihodnjih mesecih zabeležili skromne dobičke v ozadju optimizma o korporativnih dobičkih. Vendar pa se je Elevance Health zmanjšal, kljub temu, da je premagala pričakovanja o dobičku. Medtem so nedavni podatki o inflaciji pokazali upočasnitev v povečanju veleprodajnih in potrošniških cen, kar je olajšalo zaskrbljenost zaradi agresivnih zvišanj obrestnih mer Federal Reserve. To je privedlo do nižjih donosov obveznic in zmanjšalo pričakovanja za neizogibno zvišanje obrestnih mer.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek zagotavlja uravnotežen pregled gospodarskih dejavnikov, ki vplivajo na borzni trg, vključno z dobički podjetij, podatki o inflaciji in geopolitičnimi napetostmi, ki vplivajo na cene nafte.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports on the performance of U.S. stocks and the impact of oil prices on the market. It references inflation data and its effect on the stock market, aligning with known economic indicators and trends.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a generally neutral stance, focusing on market movements and economic data. However, it uses phrases like 'pressure off the Federal Reserve' which may imply a subtle preference for certain economic outcomes without explicitly stating so.
ZDA so ponovno uvedle pomorsko blokado Irana in povečale zračne napade na iranske vojaške položaje v odgovor na zaprtje Ormuškega preliva, kritične vodne poti za globalne oskrbe z energijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so dejanja ZDA označena kot maščevalna in eskalacijska, poudarjajo pa se geopolitični interesi in gospodarske posledice blokade.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports on the rising oil prices and the impact of Trump's decision to drop the reimbursement fee. It references the International Maritime Organization and shipping companies, which adds credibility. However, it does not delve deeply into the specifics of the military actions
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, discussing the economic impacts of the conflict without taking sides. It provides a balanced view of the situation, though it occasionally highlights the U.S. perspective more prominently.
Promet skozi Hormuško ožino je dosegel dvomesečno najnižjo raven po iranskih napadih na komercialne ladje in naknadnih ameriških zračnih napadih. Pomorska obveščevalna družba Kpler je poročala, da je v ožini manj ladij, nekatere pa so onemogočile svoje sisteme AIS, zaradi česar je natančno sledenje izziv. Britanski Gibson Shipbrokers je opozoril na možne hude gospodarske vplive zaradi motenj v ladijskem prometu in nizkih svetovnih zalog nafte.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je situacija označena kot ameriški vojaški uspeh proti iranski agresiji, poudarjajo pa trden položaj CENTCOM-a in Trampovo močno retoriko.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately describes the fall in Hormuz traffic due to attacks and includes relevant data from maritime intelligence firms like Kpler and Gibson Shipbrokers. It references the impact on oil prices and the IAEA report, aligning with the primary source documents.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, providing multiple viewpoints including warnings from financial institutions and the IAEA. However, it slightly leans towards highlighting potential negative outcomes of the conflict.
Christian Science MonitorStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 6 dnevi
Ameriška inflacija je junija padla na 3,5%, kar je najnižja raven od začetka leta 2022, predvsem zaradi padca cen energije. To zmanjšanje je bilo povezano s začasnim zmanjšanjem napetosti med ZDA in Iranom, ki je predhodno prekinilo pošiljke nafte skozi Ormuško ožino. Vendar pa je nedavno prekinitev premirja 17. junija privedla do ostrega okrevanja cen nafte, pri čemer je cena surove nafte Brent v samo enem tednu narasla iz manj kot 70 dolarjev na več kot 85 dolarjev na sod. Mark Zandi, glavni ekonomist pri Moody's Analytics, opozarja, da bi lahko to oživitev ponovno sprožila inflacijske pritiske na svetovni ravni, ki bi vplivale na energetsko odvisne sektorje, kot sta kmetijstvo in tehnologija.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na geopolitično situacijo in njene gospodarske posledice, pri čemer navaja tako začetno umirjanje napetosti kot tudi naknadno eskalacijo.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article references Mark Zandi's statement accurately, citing him as the chief economist of Moody’s Analytics. It mentions the drop in inflation and links it to the U.S.-Iran deal and subsequent breakdown of the ceasefire. However, it does not provide specific details from Zandi's primary source
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents information in a relatively neutral manner, focusing on the impact of the U.S.-Iran conflict on inflation. However, it uses phrases like 'gave a glimpse into a brighter future' and 'clouded the next few weeks with rising uncertainty,' which introduce mild subjective framing.
Inflacija naj bi se nadaljevala kljub morebitnemu upočasnitvi v juniju, saj se cene energije spreminjajo in drugi dejavniki prispevajo k stalnim cenovnim pritiskom. Urad za statistiko dela naj bi objavil najnovejše podatke o indeksu potrošniških cen, mnogi ekonomisti pa pričakujejo rahlo zmanjšanje zaradi nižjih stroškov energije. Vendar pa analitiki opozarjajo, da inflacija ostaja izziv, še posebej, če se cene energije povrnejo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na inflacijske pritiske, pri čemer navaja več strokovnih mnenj in gospodarskih kazalcev, ne da bi odkrito zagovarjal katero koli določeno politično ideologijo.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports on the renewed U.S.-Iran strikes and their impact on the memorandum of understanding. It includes specific details about the attacks and the U.S. response, aligning with the primary source's focus on the economic and geopolitical consequences.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the sequence of events and their implications without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the factual progression of the conflict and its economic ramifications.
Število tankerjev, ki potujejo skozi Hormuško ožino, je padlo na najnižjo raven v dveh mesecih, glede na podatke o ladijskih prevozih, v ozadju obnovljenih napetosti med ZDA in Iranom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis geopolitičnih napetosti med ZDA in Iranom, s poudarkom na vplivu na pomorsko trgovino in energetsko varnost.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports the rise in gas prices linked to the conflict, citing oil market data. It connects the conflict to economic impacts, which is consistent with the primary source documents.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the economic consequences of the conflict without emotional language. It focuses on cause and effect without taking sides, maintaining a neutral tone.
Ameriška vojska je začela z zračnimi napadi na iranske tarče v bližini Hormuškega preliva kot odgovor na raketni napad iranske revolucionarne garde (IRGC), ki je poškodoval komercialno tovorno ladjo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis ukrepov, ki so jih sprejeli tako ZDA kot Iran, in navaja uradne izjave CENTCOM in IRGC.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article identifies the victims and reports on the attack, but lacks contextual information about the broader conflict over Hormuz and the MOU. It focuses narrowly on the casualties without linking them to the larger geopolitical tensions described in the primary sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone but leans towards the U.S. military perspective by emphasizing the identification of the fallen soldiers and quoting defense officials, which could be seen as supporting the U.S. position.
V juniju se je veleprodajna inflacija v Združenih državah prvič od prejšnjega poletja zmanjšala, predvsem zaradi nižjih cen plina.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja ekonomske podatke, pri čemer se osredotoča na tržne trende in zunanje dejavnike, kot so geopolitični dogodki.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article accurately reports on the movement in oil prices and its effect on the stock market. It includes specific data on stock indices and company performance, aligning with the primary source's focus on economic indicators.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the market reactions and economic data without taking a clear ideological stance. It focuses on the interplay between geopolitical events and financial markets.
V juniju so se veleprodajne cene v ZDA prvič v skoraj enem letu znižale, predvsem zaradi znižanja cen bencina. Vendar pa je splošna inflacija še vedno visoka in negotovost, ali se bo to začasno upočasnitev nadaljevala.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na gospodarski položaj, poudarja pa tako pozitiven razvoj padajočih veleprodajnih cen kot tudi stalni izziv visoke inflacije.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article accurately reports on the June inflation rate and its relation to energy prices. It includes data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and expert commentary. It aligns with the primary source's focus on economic indicators without introducing new or conflicting information.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is neutral, presenting the data and expert opinions without taking a clear ideological stance. It acknowledges the complexity of the inflation situation and the potential for future volatility.
The Daily WireNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 70Objektivnost 60pred 5 dnevi
Inflacija je doživela največji padec od leta 2020, vendar se mnogi Američani še vedno borijo s cenovno dostopnostjo živil. Anketa Washington Posta je pokazala, da dve tretjini anketirancev meni, da je živil neprimerna, pri čemer se je ta številka povečala za 21 odstotne točke od začetka vojne v Iranu. Cene živil so se od leta 2021 povečale za več kot 20%, stroški hrane pa so se povečali za 3%. Predsednik Trump trdi, da bo konec vojne privedel do padca cen, tiskovna predstavnica Bele hiše Karoline Leavitt pa je nedavno padce cen navedla kot dokaz uspešnosti njegovih gospodarskih politik.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je pad inflacije prikazan kot dokaz uspešnosti Trumpove gospodarske politike, pri čemer se navajajo izjave Bele hiše in poudarjajo znižanje cen Walmarta kot pozitiven razvoj.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article mentions Walmart lowering prices this summer but provides limited specific details. It accurately states that the savings are intended to help customers spend less on products they need. However, it lacks specific product examples and pricing information present in the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article presents facts but includes commentary on inflation trends and quotes White House officials. While generally neutral in tone, it emphasizes the political context of inflation and explicitly praises Walmart's actions, showing some bias toward the company.
V članku z naslovom 'Kako lahko ZDA in Iran rešijo Hormuški preliv', ki ga je objavila Foreign Policy, se raziskujejo morebitne diplomatske rešitve strateškega spora o Hormuškem prelivu, kritični vodni poti, skozi katero poteka pomemben del svetovne nafte.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo razpravo o dinamiki med ZDA in Iranom okoli Ormuške ožine, s poudarkom na strateških posledicah, ne pa na jasnem ideološkem stališču.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article discusses the slowdown in Hormuz traffic and links it to the U.S.-Iran conflict, which aligns with the primary source. However, it lacks specific details about the strikes and focuses more on economic implications, reducing factual depth.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is neutral, discussing the economic impact of the conflict without taking sides. It presents the situation from a global perspective, maintaining a balanced approach.
Inflacija v Združenih državah je pokazala znake ohlajanja, delno zaradi padca cen plina. Na ta upad je vplivala začasna pauza v sovražnostih, povezanih z iranskim spopadom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o inflacijskih trendih, cenah plina in vplivu geopolitičnih dogodkov na cene nafte.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article accurately notes the cooling of inflation and the temporary dip in gas prices following a lull in the Iran war. However, it doesn't provide detailed information about the current escalation or specific events described in the primary source documents.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article maintains a balanced perspective, focusing on economic trends without overtly favoring either side of the conflict.
Cene nafte so v zadnjih štirih mesecih doživele največje dvodnevno odstotno zvišanje zaradi pomislekov na morebitno eskalacijo napetosti med Združenimi državami in Iranom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o gibanju cen nafte, ki ga vodijo geopolitične skrbi, vendar ne zavzema stališča o razmerah na Bližnjem vzhodu ali posledicah za zunanjo politiko ZDA.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article correctly identifies the rise in oil prices due to the U.S.-Iran conflict. However, it lacks specific details from the primary source documents and does not mention the broader geopolitical developments outlined in the original event description.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, focusing on market reactions without injecting strong opinions or biases.
V ZDA je povprečna cena plina v ZDA narasla nad 4 $ na galon, zaradi naraščajočih napetosti med ZDA in Iranom. Konflikt je prekinil pošiljke nafte skozi Ormuško ožino, kar je prispevalo k višjim stroškom goriva. Cene so se nekoliko znižale od nedavnega najvišjega višine več kot 4,50 $, vendar so še vedno visoke v primerjavi s prejšnjim tednom. Država kot Kalifornija in Havaji poročajo o nekaterih najvišjih cenah, pri čemer Kalifornija doseže 5,50 $ na galon.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled situacije, razpravlja o geopolitičnih vzrokih naraščajočih cen plina in notranjih političnih odzivov.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article correctly links rising gas prices to the U.S.-Iran conflict and references the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. However, it omits specific details from the primary source documents, such as missile launches or the funeral preparations, and makes generalizations about the situation.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone but focuses on economic impacts and political responses, potentially emphasizing certain consequences over others without clear bias.
Združene države so izvedle svoj deveti zaporedni dan zračnih napadov na Iran v okviru kampanje, katere cilj je prisiliti Teheran, da ustavi napade na naftne tankerje in obnovi dostop do strateškega Ormuškega preliva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so vojaške ukrepe ZDA predstavljene kot neposredni odziv na iranske grožnje, ne da bi jih javno podprli ali kritizirali.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article makes a claim that the US conducted a ninth straight day of airstrikes on Iran, which is not directly supported by the primary source documents. While the conflict involves airstrikes, the specific duration and frequency are not clearly documented in the provided sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (40): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'campaign to reopen Hormuz' and frames the US actions as a proactive effort, potentially favoring the US perspective. This lack of neutrality affects the overall objectivity score.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
United States
