ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Trump je z eno besedo nenamerno razkril svojo veliko šibkost. Iranci zdaj vedo, kaj potrebujejo.
Croatia🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 5 urami

Trump je z eno besedo nenamerno razkril svojo veliko šibkost. Iranci zdaj vedo, kaj potrebujejo.

V članku se razpravlja o nedavnih komentarjih ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa glede možnih vojaških ukrepov proti Iranu, poudarja pa njegovo trditev, da so ZDA pripravljene na takšen ukrep, vendar so se dogovorile, da ga odložijo zaradi zahtev Irana in drugih držav Bližnjega vzhoda. Ta izjava je sprožila reakcije na trgu, vključno s nihanjem cen nafte in delniških indeksov, saj vlagatelji špekulirajo o možnosti pogajanj, ki bi olajšali napetosti v regiji. V članku so navedene analize strokovnjakov, kot sta F. Gregory Gause III in Vali Nasr, ki razpravljajo o zapleteni dinamiki regionalne politike in izzivih doseganja trajnega miru med ZDA in Iranom.

In less than 24 hours after expressing optimism that a deal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz was within reach, US President Donald Trump sharply criticized the Iranian regime, casting doubt on its willingness to achieve a significant agreement that would end the conflict. In a series of posts on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump accused the Iranian leadership of being "unbelievably duplicitous," noting that while they sought meetings and even appeared to beg for them, new talks were already scheduled for the near future, despite openly claiming there were no negotiations and that communication was exclusively with Oman. He continued, stating that Iran persistently claimed the Strait of Hormuz would be under their firm control, although the US Navy already fully controlled it, and the so-called "blockade" or "American steel wall" prevented anything from passing through unless permitted by the United States. Trump emphasized that nothing would pass through the Strait until a deal was reached or complete surrender was achieved. He reiterated that the US was indeed negotiating a solution to a problem Iran had created over decades and stated simply, "IRAN WILL NEVER HAVE NUCLEAR WEAPONS!" This assessment was significantly harsher than the diplomatic efforts Trump had outlined just a day earlier, when he acted convinced that negotiations would bear fruit, according to CNN. Earlier that evening, Trump announced to reporters aboard Air Force One that a deal on the Strait of Hormuz would be reached first, followed by discussions on the nuclear issue, adding that negotiations with Iran on the latter should begin today. Iran has rejected Trump's previous claims, stating that they are not negotiating with the United States and instead conducting talks with Oman to establish a secure, temporary maritime corridor through this strategically important waterway. Trump announced new talks with Iranian representatives following the cancellation of further attacks on Iran. Negotiations are set to take place on Monday, Trump told reporters late Sunday evening aboard Air Force One as he traveled from New Jersey to Washington. The American president did not specify where the talks would occur, how long they might last, or who would participate. Trump also reiterated that the US military had recently abandoned plans for another wave of attacks on Iran following appeals from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, and Iran itself. The planned attack "would have been the largest since World War II and would have been catastrophic for them," Trump said. He stated that he canceled the attacks after his American allies told him it seemed a deal was close. Iran also indicated it wanted to reach an agreement, he added. Iran and the United States reached an agreement mid-June on a framework agreement aimed at ending the conflict that began at the end of February. Further details were supposed to be worked out during a 60-day transition period, although doubts about the durability of the agreement emerged early on, and both sides have since carried out repeated large-scale attacks. Trump said on Saturday that he was halting another wave of attacks because the "parameters of the agreement" had been established. So far, there has been no confirmation from Iran that the agreement is near. The situation regarding Iran and the Strait of Hormuz once again found itself at a turning point. On the same day, there were discussions about the possibility of a soon-to-be-reached diplomatic agreement and the threat of new devastating attacks. According to Trump’s statements, negotiations with Iran lasted all day and were very constructive, and their result could be the quick reopening of one of the world's most important maritime passages. However, Tehran has not confirmed Trump's version of events. Tehran emphasizes that key negotiations are conducted through Oman, not directly with the United States, and seeks to downplay Washington's claims about progress in talks. As a result, it remains uncertain whether the region is heading toward a diplomatic resolution or a new escalation of the conflict. According to data published by the company Kepler, specialized in monitoring maritime traffic, freight traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remained almost unchanged compared to the previous day on Tuesday. According to the company's report, eight ships passed through the strait, five oil tankers and three cargo ships, which is approximately the same level as the day before. President Trump, speaking in an interview with Fox News on Tuesday, stated that the Strait of Hormuz will open "very quickly," otherwise Iran will suffer a "heavy blow." "We are having very good talks," Trump added, saying from California that Iran wants to reach an agreement. "I have time," he added, referring to the conflict lasting more than five months. According to the website Axios, citing "sources from the region," there are discussions about a provisional 60-day agreement between Iran and Oman to regulate passage through the strait. This preliminary agreement, which could be published as early as Wednesday, predicts that all maritime traffic entering the strait will use the northern route through Iranian waters, while all ships leaving will follow the southern route through Omani waters, without paying fees. During this sixty-day period and until a final agreement is reached, the central part of the strait will be cleared of mines, according to Axios, which warns that this compromise is not yet finalized. "There is a possibility that we can reach an agreement on the reopening of the strait and move towards normalization today or tomorrow," said US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in an interview with CNBC on Tuesday. Tensions in the strait, which has become a key battleground in the Middle East conflict, remain high. On Tuesday, the British maritime agency UKMTO reported that a ship was struck by an "unknown projectile." Iran and Oman have agreed on a route through the Strait of Hormuz, the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced. Tehran claims that the United States was not involved in reaching this agreement, while current US President Donald Trump says negotiations with Iran "are progressing very well." Spokesperson for the Iranian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Esmail Baghaei, said that the two countries are preparing a joint statement that will cover technical, legal, security, and environmental issues. "If certain third parties do not interfere with the process, the joint statement of the two countries, which contains the main considerations and agreed points, is in the final phase of revision and preparation," Baghaei said. By "third parties," he meant the United States. The key disagreement concerns Iran's demand that ships pay tolls to pass through the strait. Tehran claims it has sovereign rights over part of the waterway, while the US and Gulf states insist on free passage in accordance with international law. Oman previously presented Iran with a plan supported by Gulf states, under which Tehran could charge voluntary tolls for maritime and security services. Iran and Oman still formed a joint working group in June to negotiate the management of shipping and costs of maritime services. Baghaei warned that the agreement between Iran and Oman alone cannot guarantee safe passage as long as the US naval blockade and other measures against Iran continue. "The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz depends on a change in American behavior and correcting its violations," the Iranian state television reported. Trump said in an interview with Fox News that the US is participating in negotiations and that they "are progressing very well." "The strait will open very quickly or they will suffer a heavy blow, and then the strait will open," Trump said. Trump also indicated that the agreement could be published in the coming days. According to available information, negotiations are taking place on a temporary agreement whereby Iran and Oman would coordinate the passage of ships, but questions remain about tolls and the US demand for completely free passage. Iran claims that these negotiations have no connection with the United States, although they present them as a continuation of implementing a memorandum signed with Washington in June. The US and Iran interpret this document differently. Washington believes it guarantees free passage, while Tehran claims it gives them the right to oversee traffic through the strait. The Strait of Hormuz, through which nearly a fifth of global trade in oil and liquefied natural gas passed before the conflict, has been almost closed to commercial navigation for months.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (3)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

11 poročil

Index.hr logoIndex.hrNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 60predvčerajšnjim
Trump: Iransko vodstvo je neverjetno dvoumno

Donald Trump, ameriški predsednik, je ponovno napadel iranski režim na družbenem omrežju Truth Social, ocenil ga je kot "dvoličnega" in trdil, da Iran ni pripravljen za sporazum, ki bi se končal z ratom. Trump je poudaril, da Iran išče sestanke, vendar odprto trdi, da ne bo pogajal in da bo komuniciral izključno z Omanom. V istem besedilu je Trump izrazil obtožbo proti Iranu zaradi nadzora nad Hormuškim vrhom, ki ga šteje za pod nadzorom ameriške mornarice.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Trump je izrazil dvome o sposobnosti Irana za diplomatske pogovore, poudaril je geopolitični konflikt in nevarnost jedrskega orožja.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports Trump's statements as quoted from his social media post, aligning with the cross-source consensus that he criticized Iran's stance and claimed control over the Strait of Hormuz. It also mentions Iran's rejection of these claims, which is corroborated by CNN. However, there is no

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article presents Trump's criticism of Iran in strong terms, using emotionally charged language such as 'nevjerojatno je dvolično' and 'ponosno tvrde'. The tone leans towards supporting Trump's perspective while downplaying Iran's position, showing bias in favor of the U.S. stance.

Večernji list logoVečernji listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjim
Trump je napovedal nove pogovore z Iranom v ponedeljek.

Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je napovedal nove pogovore z iranskimi predstavniki, ki so predvideni za ponedeljek, potem ko je v zadnjem trenutku odpovedal načrtovane napade na Iran. Odločitev je prišla po posvetovanjih z zalivskimi zavezniki, ki so pokazali napredek v smeri dogovora. Trump je dejal, da se je ameriška vojska umaknila iz načrtov za nov val napadov zaradi znakov bližnjega sporazuma.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije iz več pogledov, vključno z izjavami Trumpa in njegovih zaveznikov, hkrati pa je opozoril na pomanjkanje potrditve iz Irana.

Zakaj dejstva (80): The article provides a straightforward report of Trump’s announcement regarding new talks with Iran following the suspension of attacks. It accurately reflects the cross-source consensus on the suspension of attacks and the ongoing negotiations. It does not include speculative or emotive language.

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone remains neutral and factual, focusing on the reported statements without adding personal opinion or emotional weight. It avoids sensationalism and sticks closely to the information provided by official sources.

tportal logotportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjim
Trump je po preklicu napada napovedal, da bo danes začel nove pogovore z Iranom.

Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je najavil nov krog pogovorov z iranskimi predstavniki po tem, ko je zasebno razkril načrtovanje serije napadov na Iran. Pogovori naj bi potekali v ponedeljek, vendar Trump ni dal podrobnosti o lokaciji, vremenskih razmerah in južnih območjih. Ameriška vojska je po napadu na otok, ki ga je napadla Savdska Arabija, Združeni arabski emirati in Katar, navedla, da je napad bil "največji svetovni napad".

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav je Trump politično pristran, ta tekst ne kaže jasnega pristranstva v okviru poročila. Vestica se osredotoča na dogovore in napade, brez jasnega izražanja stališča. Čeprav se uporabljajo opisne besede, kot je 'katastrofalan', se lahko šteje za nevtralen opis situacije. Izvedba

Zakaj dejstva (80): Similar to item 2, this article reports Trump's statements about new talks with Iran and the suspension of attacks. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and does not introduce unsupported claims or speculation. It maintains consistency with other reports.

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the information as reported without injecting personal bias or emotional language. It focuses on the factual content of Trump's statements without editorializing.

HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija) logoHRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 65predvčerajšnjim
Trump napovedal nove pogovore z Iranom

V nedeljo zvečer, ko je Donald Trump odpotoval iz New Jerseyja v Washington, je novinarjem povedal, da bi se pogajanja z Iranom morala danes nadaljevati. Ni pojasnil, kje se bodo odvijala, kako dolgo bodo trajala ali kdo bo sodeloval. Trump je tudi poudaril, da so ameriške vojaške sile opustile načrt za nov napad na Iran po tem, ko so njegovi zavezniki, vključno s Savdsko Arabijo, Združenimi arabskimi emirati, Katarjem in Iranom, izraelsko prepovedali. Trump je dejal, da se bo odzval na napad po tem, ko so njegovi zavezniki predlagali, da je dogovor blizu, Iran pa je tudi izrazil željo po dogovoru.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske izjave Trumpa glede morebitnih pogajanj z Iranom in preklica načrtovanih vojaških ukrepov.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports Trump's statement about potential talks with Iran and the suspension of attacks based on statements from American allies. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that the US has suspended attacks due to diplomatic efforts. However, it lacks specific details on the location, dur

Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, particularly in the headline 'Trump najavio nove razgovore s Iranom; Iran tvrdi da nema pregovora' which implies conflict where there may not be clear evidence. The article also uses emotionally charged language like 'katastrofalan' to describe potential Iranian

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 65predvčerajšnjim
Trump razkril, kdo ga je prosil, naj neha z napadom na Iran: "Verjamejo, da je dogovor"

Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je objavil, da bo začasno prekinil nadaljnje napade na Iran, potem ko so njegovi zavezniki, kot so Savdska Arabija, Združeni arabski emirati in Katar, rekli, da je dogovor blizu. Trump je dejal, da bo novi napad "največji na svetovni ravni" in "katastrofalen za Iran", vendar pa je ameriška vojska odložila načrt zaradi pritožbe na varnostnike. Iran je tudi napovedal, da želi prekiniti dogovor, predhodno dogovorjen sporazum med državami članicami z namenom končanja rata.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Član neutralno prikazuje Trumpove izjave o otkazu napada na Iran, uz citiranje apela saveznika i iranskih izjav. Nema jasno izraženog političkog slanja, niti preferencije za jednu stranu. Prikazuje razlike između ameriškega i iranskog stava bez evidentnog opterećenja reči.

Zakaj dejstva (70): While the article reports Trump's statements accurately, it includes some vague phrasing such as 'dogovoreni

Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article occasionally uses emotive language, such as describing the planned attack as 'katastrofalan,' which adds subjective interpretation. It also lacks clarity on the exact nature of the 'perimetri dogovora' mentioned by Trump.

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 50predvčerajšnjim
Trump je z eno besedo nenamerno razkril svojo veliko šibkost. Iranci zdaj vedo, kaj potrebujejo.

V članku se razpravlja o nedavnih komentarjih ameriškega predsednika Donalda Trumpa glede možnih vojaških ukrepov proti Iranu, poudarja pa njegovo trditev, da so ZDA pripravljene na takšen ukrep, vendar so se dogovorile, da ga odložijo zaradi zahtev Irana in drugih držav Bližnjega vzhoda. Ta izjava je sprožila reakcije na trgu, vključno s nihanjem cen nafte in delniških indeksov, saj vlagatelji špekulirajo o možnosti pogajanj, ki bi olajšali napetosti v regiji. V članku so navedene analize strokovnjakov, kot sta F. Gregory Gause III in Vali Nasr, ki razpravljajo o zapleteni dinamiki regionalne politike in izzivih doseganja trajnega miru med ZDA in Iranom.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so Trumpove dejanja in izjave postavljene v kritični luči, poudarjajo pa se tveganja in neuspehi njegovega zunanjepolitičnega pristopa do Irana.

Zakaj dejstva (60): This article contains speculative commentary and quotes attributed to The Wall Street Journal as if it were an authoritative source. It includes phrases like 'farsa' and 'Nobelovu nagradu za mir', which are not supported by primary sources. These elements reduce its factual reliability compared to m

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article is highly subjective, using strong editorializing such as 'farsa' and implying that Trump deserves a Nobel Prize for peace. It presents a biased view of the situation, focusing on market reactions and political implications rather than presenting facts objectively.

N1 Hrvatska logoN1 HrvatskaNeodvisenSredinapred 5 urami
Iran trdi, da je z Omanom sklenil dogovor o poti skozi Hormuško ožino.

Iran in Oman sta sklenili sporazum o geografskih koordinatah za plovbo skozi Hormuški preliv, kar je Teheranu omogočilo nadzor ladij, ki plujejo po Zaljevu skozi preliv, poroča Reuters. Glavnogovornik iranskega zunanjega ministrstva Esmail Bagai je pogajanja opisal kot "profesionalna" in poudaril, da sta obe strani sklenili medsebojno razumevanje ključnih vidikov dogovora.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Podatki o dvostranskih sporazumih med Iranom in Omanom brez jasno izražene politične volje. Podobno ameriškemu stališču, vendar ne podrije niti ju, kar kaže na nevtralnost. Nasprotne informacije o Trampovih trditvah niso izražene kritično ali podprto, kar potrjuje centristično perspektivo

Index.hr logoIndex.hrNeodvisenProgresivnopred 5 urami
Iran in Oman dogovorili pot skozi Hormuz, Trump grozi z napadom

Teheran trdi, da SAD ni sodeloval v tem sporazumu, Trump pa trdi, da se bo pogajal z Iranom "kakor dobro napreduje". Iran zahteva naknado za prehod skozi Tjesnac, ob predpostavki suverene pravice plovnega toka, medtem ko ZDA in zaljevne države vztrajajo na svobodni plovbi. Oman je predstavil načrt, ki podpira zaljevne države, Iran in Oman pa sta ustanovili skupno svetovno skupino za pogajanja o upravljanju plovnega toka in pomorskih storitvah. Trump je trdil, da bo Tjesnac kmalu odprt ali da bo težko dostopen, iranski mediji pa trdijo, da ZDA nimajo zveze s pogajanji.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članki so se osredotočili na iransko pozicioniranje, ki podpira njihove zahteve po naknadu in suverenosti, medtem ko sta ameriška stališča nasprotna kot "sudjelovanje" in "napredak", kar kaže na večji naglasak na iransko agresivnost.

Večernji list logoVečernji listNeodvisenSredinapred 6 urami
Hormuška ožina na robu velikega preobrata

V članku se razpravlja o morebitnem ponovnem odprtju Hormuškega preliva pod iranskim nadzorom in o diplomatskih pogovorih med ZDA in Iranom. Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je trdil, da so bili pogajanja zelo konstruktivna in bi lahko privedla do hitrega ponovnega odprtja preliva, ki je ključna globalna pomorska pot. Teheran pa je te trditve zanikal in navedel, da se ključna pogajanja odvijajo prek Omana in ne neposredno z ZDA.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja nasprotujoče se pripovedi ZDA in Irana glede napredka pogajanj, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.

tportal logotportalNeodvisenSredinapred 14 urami
Donald Trump: "Hormuška preliva se bo odprla zelo hitro, sicer ... "

Predsednik Donald Trump je v intervjuju za Fox News dejal, da se bo Hormuški preliv odprl "zelo hitro", opozarjal pa je, da bo Iran dočakal "težak udarec", če tega ne bo storil. Po besedah Axiosa, ki navaja vire iz regije, bi se lahko začasni 60-dnevni sporazum objavil že v sredo. Ta sporazum bi usmerjal vhodni pomorski promet skozi iranske vode in odhodni promet skozi omanske vode brez cestnin. V tem obdobju bi bil osrednji del preliva očiščen min. Ameriški minister za finance Scott Bessent je izrazil optimizem glede doseganja sporazuma o ponovnem odprtju preliva in normalizaciji. Napetosti ostajajo visoke, pri čemer preliv služi kot kritično bojišče v bližnjem vzhodu. V torek je britanska pomorska trgovinska organizacija poročala, da je ladjo zadel neznani projektil.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, ki vključuje ZDA, Iran in regionalne deležnike.

Telegram.hr logoTelegram.hrNeodvisenKonservativnopred 15 urami
Trump: "Iran bo dojel močan udarec, če se Hormuški preliv ne odpre kmalu"

Ameriški predsednik Donald Trump je v intervjuju za Fox News dejal, da bo Hormuški napad odprl "vrlo hitro", saj bo Iran "pretrpjeti težak udarec". Izvori iz Bliskog istoka navajajo, da se razpravlja o zasebnem 60-dnevnem sporazumu o normalizaciji procesa skozi napad med Iranom in Omanom.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek poudarja Trumpovo grožnjo kot odziv na situacijo v Hormuškem napadu, ki spodbuja politično agresivnost.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe