Suša in vročina Rekordne vročine Švicarski gozdovi trpijo
27. julija 2026 je Švica izdala opozorila o vročini na stopnji 3 (značilna nevarnost) za večino države, nekatere območja pa so dosegla najvišjo stopnjo nevarnosti 4. Zvezna vlada je zaradi ekstremne vročine in suše uvedla popolno prepoved ognjemeta in ognjemetov v večjih delih države. Kljub stalni sušini in zmanjšanju proizvodnje energije iz hidroelektrarne energije je Švicarska oskrba z električno energijo po navedbah zvezne komisije za električno energijo (Elcom) še vedno varna. Medtem so v Franciji in Španiji izbruhnili novi gozdni požari, vključno s francoskim mestom Brignoles in španskim nacionalnim parkom blizu portugalske meje. Dodatna poročila poudarjajo resen vpliv suše na švicarske gozdove, zlasti v regijah Baselbieter in Jura, s pomanjkanjem vode, ki vpliva na gorske koče in rekordne temperature v Baslu.
The Swiss government has issued a heat warning level 3 (significant danger) for much of the country, with some areas facing the highest danger level 4 due to prolonged drought and extreme temperatures. Across large parts of Switzerland, there is now an absolute ban on fire and fireworks. Despite ongoing dry conditions and reduced energy production from hydropower, the electricity supply in Switzerland remains secure, according to the Federal Electricity Commission (Elcom). Meanwhile, new wildfires have erupted in France and Spain, including in the French town of Brignoles and near a Spanish national park close to the Portuguese border. In Basel, official fireworks displays have been canceled due to the heightened risk of fires. The heatwave gripping Switzerland has led to record-breaking temperatures, with local highs reaching up to 38 degrees Celsius. The situation has prompted several cantons to implement strict fire bans, including Solothurn, Schaffhausen, and Vorarlberg. In addition, the city of Rorschach has canceled its planned fireworks display before August 1st. The Rhine Falls, typically a major attraction, are flowing with less than a third of their usual July water volume due to the persistent drought. This has also affected the temperature regulation of the surrounding area. Wildfires have spread across Europe, with particularly severe outbreaks in France and Spain. In southwestern France, near Bordeaux, thousands of residents were evacuated as flames consumed vast areas of forest and farmland. Although many have returned home, the situation remains tense, with renewed flare-ups reported. In Spain, the capital Madrid and the region of Castellón have also faced significant wildfire threats, prompting evacuations and restrictions on movement. The European Union's civil protection mechanism has been activated in both countries, a move previously taken by Switzerland following the Crans-Montana disaster. In response to the escalating threat of wildfires, Switzerland has taken preventive measures, including the deployment of helicopters and increased coordination with neighboring countries. The Swiss military has sent helicopters to Corsica to assist in firefighting efforts. Additionally, the canton of Aargau has imposed an absolute fire and fireworks ban, while the canton of Zurich has extended its ban into August. These measures come amid growing concerns over the increasing frequency and intensity of wildfires linked to climate change. The impact of the heatwave extends beyond wildfires, affecting infrastructure and public safety. In the canton of Aargau, a field fire broke out and spread to nearby woods, requiring a large-scale response from firefighters. In the canton of Glarus, authorities have banned high-altitude fires and fireworks to mitigate risks. The situation has also raised alarms about the structural integrity of trees under extreme heat, leading to warnings against staying beneath large trees and the closure of certain parks and recreational areas. Experts warn that the combination of prolonged drought, high temperatures, and strong winds creates ideal conditions for wildfires. Fire ecologist Johann Georg Goldammer explains that current wildfires differ significantly from past ones due to extended periods of heat and dryness, which make landscapes more susceptible to burning. He emphasizes that aerial firefighting methods are limited in effectiveness, as they primarily cool the immediate vicinity rather than extinguishing the fire itself. Ground-based efforts remain crucial, especially in dense forested areas where access is challenging. As the heatwave continues, the focus shifts to managing the immediate risks and preparing for potential future challenges. Authorities are monitoring the situation closely, implementing emergency protocols, and enhancing public awareness campaigns. The long-term implications of these events highlight the need for sustained investment in fire prevention strategies and climate resilience measures. With temperatures expected to remain high and the risk of wildfires persisting, the coming days will test the preparedness and response capabilities of communities across Switzerland and Europe.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Članek poroča o hudih gozdnih požarih, ki so zaradi suše prizadela Francijo in Španijo. V jugozahodni Franciji, okoli Bordeauxa, je bilo evakuiranih več kot 167.000 ljudi, več kot 57.000 pa je bilo premaknjenih na varno čez noč.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o vplivih gozdnih požarov v Franciji in Španiji, ne da bi se očitno zavzemal za kakršno koli politično stališče, temveč se je osredotočil na obseg krize, prizadevanja za evakuacijo in gasilne operacije, pri čemer je uporabil nevtralen jezik in navedel uradne številke, ne da bi komentiral politične razmere.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately describes the severe wildfires in France and Spain, including the large-scale evacuations. It also mentions the ongoing drought in Switzerland and aligns with the information from the primary source document from Bafu.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article presents the information in a neutral and balanced manner, avoiding emotional language and providing a factual account of both the wildfires abroad and the drought in Switzerland.
Švica doživlja hudo sušo to poletje, s suho zemljo, rjavo travo in rekordno nizkim nivojem vode v rekah in potokih. Kljub nekaterim močnim dežjem in nevihti prejšnji teden se stanje ni bistveno izboljšalo. Meteorologi kažejo, da je nujno potrebno razširjeno, dolgotrajno padavine v več dneh, vendar se ne pojavljajo v trenutnih vremenskih modelih. Napoved kaže predvsem sončno in suho vreme do vikenda, ki mu sledijo razpršene padavine ali nevihti med sobotom popoldne in ponedeljkom. Vendar pa obseg in količina dežja ostajajo negotovi in nekatera območja bi lahko ostala popolnoma suha.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o obstoječi suši v Švici, ki se osredotočajo na meteorološke podatke in napovedi, ne da bi zavzeli jasno stališče ali pokazali pristranskost do kakršne koli politične perspektive.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports on the ongoing drought in Switzerland, mentioning the lack of significant rainfall and the continued high temperatures. It aligns closely with the information provided in the primary source document from Bafu.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a neutral and objective tone throughout, presenting the facts without emotional language or bias. It provides a balanced view of the current drought situation based on meteorological forecasts and observations.
Švica se sooča z naraščajočim tveganjem gozdnih požarov zaradi dolgotrajne suše in naraščajočih temperatur. V državi so se v zadnjih letih že pojavili pomembni gozdni požari, kot je bil dogodek v vasi Bitsch v Valaisu pred tremi leti, ki je zahteval obsežna prizadevanja za gašenje požarov v enem mesecu. Trenutno je tveganje še posebej visoko na območjih, kot je gozd Aargau, kjer nizka vlažnost, visoke temperature in močni vetrovi ustvarjajo idealne pogoje za požare. Gasilci se usposabljajo prek pobud, kot je združenje "@fire", da bi izboljšali svojo pripravljenost. Preventivni ukrepi vključujejo spodbujanje raznolikosti dreves, da se zmanjša ranljivost za požare, in uveljavljanje strogih prepovedi požarov v gozdovih. Kljub tem prizadevanjem se veliki deli Švice soočajo z visokim ali zelo visokim tveganjem gozdnih požarov, pri čemer nekatere regije, vključno z deli Valaisa in Züricha, doživljajo najvišjo stopnjo nevarnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava okoljska vprašanja, povezana z gozdnimi požari in podnebnimi dejavniki, vendar ne predstavlja nobenih političnih stališč, razprav ali predlogov politik.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately describes the upcoming heatwave and its potential record-breaking temperatures, aligning with the primary document’s forecast of continued dry weather and high temperatures.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article is neutral in tone, presenting meteorological forecasts and historical comparisons without overt bias or emotional language.
27. julija 2026 je švicarska zvezna vlada izdala opozorila o vročini za večino države, pri čemer so se nekatera območja zaradi ekstremnih temperatur soočala z najvišjo stopnjo nevarnosti 4. MeteoSchweiz je poročal, da bi deli Švice lahko dosegli do 38 ° C, kar je v mnogih regijah povzročilo absolutno prepoved ognja in ognjemetov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o nevarnostih, povezanih z vremenom, in njihovih vplivih na več regijah, ne da bi se očitno zavzemali za kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on drought conditions and heat warnings in Switzerland, aligning with the primary source document which mentions the highest danger level (Stage 4) across the country. However, it also includes information about wildfires in France and Spain, which are not mentioned in the primar
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is generally informative, but there is some emphasis on the impact of the drought on energy production and local events like fireworks bans, which could be seen as slightly more focused on societal impacts rather than purely factual reporting.
27. julija 2026 je Švica izdala opozorila o vročini za večino regij, nekatere območja pa so se zaradi ekstremne vročine soočale z najvišjo stopnjo nevarnosti 4. Država je uvedla stroge prepovedi požarov v več kantonih, vključno s Solothurnom, Schaffhausenom in Vorarlbergom, zaradi obstoječih sušnih razmer. Kljub tem izzivom je bila varnost oskrbe z energijo ohranjena, glede na Federalno komisijo za električno energijo (Elcom). Medtem so v Franciji in Španiji izbruhnili novi požari, vključno z Brignolesom v Franciji in nacionalnim parkom blizu portugalske meje. Podobni požari so bili poročani v južni regiji Antalya v Turčiji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o izrednih razmerah, povezanih z vremenom, in njihovih vplivih, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemal za kakršen koli politični stališč.
Zakaj dejstva (75): Similar to item 0, this article accurately reflects the drought and heat warnings from the primary source. It also references wildfires in France and Spain, which are not part of the primary source. The mention of energy supply security from Elcom is included, though not explicitly cited in the prim
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article maintains a similar tone to item 0, focusing on the broader implications of the drought, such as fire restrictions and public safety measures, which may lean towards a more community-focused narrative.
Članek poroča o gozdnih požarih v Švici, za prikaz razsežnosti uničenja pa uporablja posnetke brezpilotnih letal. Poudarja obseg škode, ki jo povzročajo gozdni požari, s poudarkom na vizualnem vplivu, zajetem z zračnimi fotografijami. Osredotočen je na okoljske posledice in resnost položaja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski poročilo o vplivu gozdnih požarov na okolje, ne da bi se očitno zavzel za politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports on temperature forecasts and heat warnings, matching the primary source. It also mentions fire restrictions and related issues, which are consistent with the primary source’s content.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, focusing on weather updates and public safety measures without introducing additional context or emotional weight beyond what is necessary for informing the reader.
V Švici je bila za večino države izdana stopnja opozorila na vročino 3, v delih severozahoda, regije Ženeva in južnega Tirola pa zaradi ekstremne vročine in suhih razmer opozorila na stopnjo 4. Ti pogoji so privedli do strogih prepovedi požarov na velikih območjih države. Vendar pa so nekatere skupnosti okoli jezera Zurich uradno dovolile ognjemete kljub omejitvam.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o okoljskih razmerah in ukrepih javne varnosti, ne da bi odkrito zagovarjal kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article mentions the heatwave and drought but does not provide specific details from the primary document such as the exact rainfall deficits or the highest danger level (Stage 4) for the entire country. It references fire bans and a fire incident in Koblenz but lacks detailed hydrological data.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents facts neutrally but includes some subjective elements like mentioning 'offizielles Feuerwerk' being allowed in some communities, which could imply a positive framing of local policies during a crisis.
Država v jugozahodni in južni Evropi, vključno s Francijo, Španijo in Italijo, se trenutno borijo proti hudim gozdnim požarom. Glavni vzrok teh požarov je dolgotrajna suša, ki jo poslabša podnebne spremembe, kar vodi do daljših in bolj intenzivnih suhih obdobij. To naredi gozdove in kmetijska območja bolj dovzetna za požar. Johann Georg Goldammer, požarni ekolog in strokovnjak za upravljanje gozdnih požarov, pojasnjuje, da dolgotrajni vremenski vzorci, ki povzročajo sušo in vročinske valove, povečujejo ranljivost pokrajin na požar. Opozarja, da medtem ko lahko zračna gašenje z kapljicami vode iz helikopterjev ali letal, začasno ohladi območje, ne more popolnoma ugasniti velikih požarov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo razpravo o vzrokih in izzivih gozdnih požarov, pri čemer navaja znanstveno strokovno znanje brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article accurately describes the connection between prolonged dry periods and increased wildfire risk. It references scientific perspectives on climate change and drought effects, aligning with the primary source's emphasis on ongoing drought conditions in Switzerland. However, it doesn't expli
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral tone and presents both scientific and expert viewpoints without bias. It avoids taking sides and provides balanced coverage of the issue.
Članek obravnava prihajajoči vročinski val, ki naj bi dosegel vrhunec 1. avgusta, kar bi lahko postalo zgodovinsko pomembno.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na okoljske razmere in njihov vpliv na določeno industrijo brez političnega stališča ali pristranskosti do katere koli strani.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article accurately reflects the drought conditions described in the primary source document, mentioning the highest danger level (Stufe 4), the lack of significant rainfall, and the impact on water levels and forests. It also cites the Elcom statement, which aligns with the BAFU report.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is neutral and factual, presenting the situation without emotional language or bias. It clearly separates different topics (fireworks ban, reservoir levels, etc.) without imposing a particular viewpoint.
27. julija 2026 so švicarske oblasti izdala opozorila o morebitni nevarnosti vročine od 29. julija do 5. avgusta zaradi visokih temperatur, ki presegajo 30 stopinj Celzija, in obstoječih suhih pogojev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske posodobitve o vladnih prepovedih požarov in opozorilnih opozorilnih
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article provides relevant context about forest fires and preparedness in Switzerland, aligning with the primary document’s emphasis on the high danger level (Stage 4) and the risk of wildfires due to drought conditions.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a balanced tone, discussing both the risks and preparedness measures without showing clear bias toward any particular perspective.
Le TempsNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 75pred 4 dnevi
Članek poroča, da sta Francija in Španija aktivirala mehanizem civilne zaščite EU kot odziv na gozdne požare, kar je vzporedno z aktiviranjem istega sistema v Švici med nesrečo Crans-Montana leta 2019. Članek poudarja vlogo EU pri usklajevanju čezmejnih odzivov na izredne razmere in predlaga, da nedavna aktivacija odraža tekoče izzive z gozdnimi požari po vsej Evropi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o aktiviranju mehanizma civilne zaščite EU s strani Francije in Španije, s sklicevanjem na pretekle dogodke v Švici.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article accurately reports on the expected heatwave and its implications, aligning with the primary document’s forecast of high temperatures and ongoing drought conditions.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a balanced and objective tone, focusing on the meteorological predictions and their impacts without injecting personal opinions or biases.
Švicarski mediji so 27. julija 2026 poročali o suši in vročinskih valovih, ki so prizadele več evropskih držav. Kljub tem pogojem je bila varnost oskrbe z energijo v Švici ohranjena, je sporočila zvezna komisija za električno energijo (Elcom).
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o okoljskih razmerah in njihovih vplivih na več regijah, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemali za kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article provides details on wildfires in Europe, including specific locations and numbers of people evacuated, which are not covered in the primary source. While it mentions the drought and heat, it does not reference the detailed meteorological data or hydrological assessments present in the p
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article has a more dramatic tone, emphasizing the severity of the situation with specific examples of fires and evacuations, which could be seen as more emotionally charged compared to the more neutral tone of the primary source.
27. julija 2026 je Švica doživela ekstremno vročino s temperaturami, ki naj bi lokalno dosegle do 39 ° C. Zvezna vlada je za večino države izdala opozorilo o vročini stopnje 3, z najvišjo stopnjo nevarnosti 4 v delih severozahoda, regije Ženeva in južnega Tessina.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o nacionalni vremenski krizi brez očitnega ideološkega okvirja.
Zakaj dejstva (70): This article covers the reduced flow at the Rhine Falls due to drought, which is mentioned in the primary source. It also includes temperature forecasts and fire restrictions, which are consistent with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): While factual, the article emphasizes the impact on tourism and recreation, which adds a layer of subjective relevance not found in the primary source, potentially affecting objectivity.
Zaradi dolgotrajne suše je v Renskih slapovih manj kot tretjina običajnega julijskega obsega vode, kar vpliva na lokalne temperature. Švica doživlja ekstremno vročino, kjer temperature presegajo 30 stopinj Celzija in dosegajo do 39 stopinj na lokalni ravni. Zvezna vlada je izdala opozorilo o visoki vročini, ki kaže na veliko nevarnost v večini države. V več regijah, vključno s Schaffhausenom in Vorarlbergom, so za preprečevanje požarov uvedli popolne prepovedi požarov. Dodatni ukrepi vključujejo rezanje dreves v Uerkheimu zaradi vročine in povečane previdnosti pred gozdnimi požari.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o okoljskih razmerah in ukrepih vlad, ne da bi se očitno zavzemali za kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article highlights the risk of falling branches due to drought and heat, which is not directly addressed in the primary source. It also includes local responses and mitigation efforts, which are not detailed in the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone leans toward caution and warning, focusing on public safety concerns, which may introduce a more alarmist perspective compared to the more measured tone of the primary source.
Tretji gasilski delavec je umrl med bojem proti gozdnim požarom v Grčiji. Incident poudarja nevarnosti, s katerimi se srečujejo reševalci v času intenzivnih gozdnih požarov. Gozdni požari divjajo v več regijah Grčije, kar je povzročilo obsežne napore za njihovo obvladovanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o tragičnem dogodku, v katerem so bili vpleteni gasilci, in ne predstavlja nobenega očitno pristranskega jezika, okvirja ali vira.
Zakaj dejstva (65): This article states that a third firefighter died in wildfires in Greece. While this matches the cross-source consensus, it lacks specific details such as location, date, or broader context of the fires. It also doesn't mention other regions affected, which are covered in other articles.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The language is straightforward, but there is a slight emphasis on the tragic outcome, which may lean toward emotional framing. However, it remains relatively objective overall.
V članku se obravnava povečano tveganje za požare v Švici zaradi naraščajoče sušine, primerjava pristopa države do uporabe helikopterjev in ukrepov preprečevanja z odvisnostjo Francije od letal. Vprašuje se, ali mora Švica sprejeti lastne požarne letala, da bi se bolje spopadla z naraščajočo grožnjo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja tako trenutno strategijo Švice (helikopterji in preprečevanje) kot alternativno strategijo Francije (letalstvo), ne da bi očitno favoriziral eno nad drugo.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article mentions increasing wildfire danger and compares Switzerland’s strategy with France’s use of aircraft. It references the drought but does not directly cite the primary source document. While it aligns with general information about the drought and wildfires, it lacks specific data from t
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, discussing both Switzerland’s approach and France’s situation without overt bias. However, there is some emphasis on the challenges faced by Switzerland, which could be seen as slightly more focused on domestic concerns.
V članku so obravnavane pripombe zveznega svetnika Röstija glede suše v Švici, poudarjene so njegove izjave o trenutnih sušnih razmerah, ki vplivajo na državo, ki se morda dotaknejo vzrokov, vplivov in možnih odzivov na sušo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene izjave zveznega svetnika, ki so po naravi politične, vendar ni očitnega oblikovanja, ki bi favoriziralo eno stran nad drugo.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article discusses the upcoming heatwave and its impact on fireworks and energy supply. It references the drought but does not directly cite the primary source document. It includes some relevant context about the weather and its consequences.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains objective, discussing the potential impacts of the heatwave without taking a stance or injecting personal views. It focuses on practical effects like fireworks and energy supply.
Obiskovalcem svetujemo, naj se izogibajo obalnim območjem, ker bi lahko temperatura, ki se začne v torek, poslabšala stanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o naravnih nesrečah in z njimi povezanih varnostnih nasvetih, ne da bi sprejel jasno ideološko stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (65): This article mentions President Macron calling an emergency session due to the fires, which is consistent with other reports. However, it lacks specific details about the impact or scale of the fires, reducing its factual depth.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is neutral, reporting the government’s response without indicating any particular stance or emotion.
Lastnik čolna v Švici je bil zaradi pomanjkanja vode prisiljen ostati na kopnem. Ta situacija poudarja naraščajočo zaskrbljenost zaradi pomanjkanja vode v regiji, kar bi lahko vplivalo na rekreacijske dejavnosti in lokalne ekosisteme.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o posebnem incidentu, povezanem z pomanjkanjem vode, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli določeno politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article reports that boat owners must remain ashore due to water shortages, but lacks specific details about the cause or scale of the shortage. It aligns with the general consensus that water restrictions are affecting local boating activities, but does not provide sufficient evidence or contex
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the impact of water shortages on boat owners without expressing strong opinions or taking sides. However, the phrasing 'muss an Land bleiben' (must stay ashore) carries a slightly negative connotation about the situation.
V Švici se pričakuje, da se bodo temperature do sredine tedna dvignile nad 30 stopinj Celzija na številnih območjih, kar bo še naprej obdobje suhega vremena.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o okoljskih razmerah in sorodnih političnih odzivih, kot so prepovedi požarov in prilagoditve infrastrukture.
Zakaj dejstva (65): The article focuses on the fire in Bordeaux and the French government’s response but omits key details from the primary document about the drought severity and the highest danger level (Stage 4) in Switzerland.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article is relatively neutral but emphasizes events outside of Switzerland, potentially downplaying the domestic drought situation in favor of international developments.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
CH
