Tensions in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) have escalated dramatically as clashes between security forces and activists from the banned Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC) continue, coinciding with regional elections. On July 30, 2026, the situation worsened in the Rawalkot region, where security forces engaged in violent confrontations with protesters. These clashes, which have already claimed dozens of lives this week, have drawn international attention and condemnation. Demonstrators, aligned with the JAAC, a coalition of civil society groups, have been marching toward Muzaffarabad, demanding that Islamabad recognize their demands and accept the results of the so-called legislative assembly elections. The protests, which have lasted nearly two months, center on the alleged manipulation of 12 contentious seats in the regional assembly, which the JAAC claims are used to install a government of Pakistan’s choosing. The conflict has deepened amid the ongoing elections, which India has consistently criticized as a "cosmetic exercise" designed to legitimize Pakistan’s illegal occupation and conceal its "grave" human rights violations. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson, Randhir Jaiswal, reiterated India’s stance that the entire Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, including areas under Pakistan’s control, are integral and inalienable parts of India. He emphasized that the protests are a direct result of Pakistan’s economic exploitation, denial of fundamental rights, and administrative oppression. The MEA’s position aligns with previous statements, framing the elections as an attempt to mask the occupation rather than address the legitimate grievances of the local population. The violence has intensified since Monday, particularly in Rawalkot and Mirpur, where security forces reportedly fired upon unarmed protesters, resulting in numerous casualties. According to the JAAC, at least 37 individuals, including women and children, were killed in the violence, though the exact number of injured remains unclear. The organization has vowed to continue its peaceful struggle against what it describes as systemic oppression. However, the Pakistan government has denied civilian deaths, attributing the violence to the presence of militants from the Tehrik-e Taliban and stating that the crackdown will continue. Pakistan State Minister for Interior Affairs Talal Chaudhary asserted that the government will not engage with the protesters and that the law will take its course. Both Amnesty International and the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan have expressed concern over the escalating violence, urging authorities to investigate the incidents independently. Meanwhile, the elections in PoK have faced significant disruptions. The Election Commission of Pakistan postponed voting in two districts, Sudhnoti and Rawalakot, until August 10, citing the ongoing sit-in led by the Public Action Committee (PAC). The delay reflects the impact of the protests on the electoral process, with political parties reporting that campaign activities have been severely hindered. Candidates have expressed uncertainty about voter turnout, noting that public interest in the elections has sharply declined. Many residents believe that addressing longstanding grievances and securing basic rights should take precedence over electoral politics. The protests, which have entered their 52nd day, have become a focal point of contention, drawing both domestic and international scrutiny. The situation has also sparked diplomatic friction between India and Pakistan. India has repeatedly condemned the use of force against protesters, accusing Pakistan of violating human rights and suppressing democratic expression. In response to a New York Times article referring to PoK as "Pakistani Kashmir," the Indian Embassy in the United States issued a sharp rebuke, insisting that such terminology is misleading and incorrect. The embassy reaffirmed that the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh are an inseparable part of India, emphasizing that Pakistan’s occupation is illegal and that the violence against civilians is a violation of international law. Pakistan, in turn, has accused India of attempting to divert attention from its own human rights abuses in the region, maintaining that Kashmir is an internationally recognized disputed territory and that India’s claims are based on historical and legal grounds. Amid the turmoil, the JAAC has remained a central figure in the protests, demanding the abolition of the 12 legislative assembly seats reserved for Kashmiri refugees. The group argues that these provisions undermine the political rights of local residents and enable Islamabad-based political parties to exert undue influence over the region’s governance. Protest leaders have also accused authorities of systematically suppressing dissent through arrests, intimidation, and heavy security deployments. The recent clashes, which saw security forces open fire on a large gathering of JAAC supporters in Rawalkot, have further inflamed tensions. According to the JAAC, at least 14 activists were killed in the incident, while Pakistani authorities claim that the protesters were armed and targeted security personnel, prompting a defensive response. As the situation continues to evolve, the international community is watching closely. India has called on the global body to hold Pakistan accountable for its actions, while Pakistan maintains that its actions are lawful and necessary to maintain order. The upcoming phases of the elections will likely face further disruption, with the prospect of more violence and political instability looming. For now, the focus remains on the ground in PoK, where the struggle for autonomy and self-determination continues to unfold amidst a backdrop of heightened tension and unresolved conflict.
19 poročil
NDTVStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 75pred 4 dneviV članku se razpravlja o uporabi peletnih pištol v Jammu in Kašmirju od njihove uvedbe leta 2010, ki so bile namenjene kot manj smrtonosna alternativa živo strelivo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je uporaba peletnih pištol označena kot sporen varnostni ukrep, ki lahko škoduje civilistom, kar kaže na skeptičnost glede njihove uporabe s strani oblasti.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that pellet guns were introduced in Jammu and Kashmir in 2010 and were used extensively in 2016. These facts are consistent with cross-source consensus and historical records regarding the use of non-lethal weapons in the region.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): While the article provides factual information, it includes emotionally charged language such as 'pellet gun horror,' which introduces a biased perspective. The narrative focuses on the victim’s experience, potentially skewing the reader's perception toward a more critical view of the policy.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 70pred 3 dneviMinistrstvo za zunanje zadeve (MEA) je kritiziralo volitve za zakonodajno skupščino, ki so potekale v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoJK), kot "kozmetično vajo", namenjeno prikrivanju pakistanske nezakonite okupacije in kršitev človekovih pravic.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so kritike zunanjega ministrstva o dejanjih Pakistana označene kot legitimna obramba indijske suverenosti, poudarjajo pa nezakonitost pakistanske okupacije in kršitev človekovih pravic.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article presents the MEA's official position on the PoJK elections as a 'cosmetic exercise' with supporting quotes from the spokesperson. It aligns with other sources reporting similar statements from the MEA. The information is consistent across multiple articles and reflects the official Indi
Zakaj objektivnost (70): While the article presents the MEA's position, it frames the issue in a way that implies Pakistan's actions are illegitimate. The language suggests a firm stance against Pakistan's governance in the region, though it remains within the bounds of official statements.
The HinduNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 65včerajNapetosti so se v Pakistansko okupirani Kašmirju (PoK) povečale 30. julija 2026, ko so se nadaljevali spopadi med varnostnimi silami in aktivisti prepovedanega Skupnega odbora za akcijo Awami (JAAC). Neuravnoteženost je sovpadala z regionalnimi volitvami v PoK, kjer so demonstranti, povezani z JAAC, korakali proti Muzaffarabadu, da bi pritisnili na Islamabad na svoje zahteve. JAAC, ki je organiziral proteste že dva meseca zaradi spornih sedežev v zakonodajnem zborovanju, trdi, da Pakistan manipulira s temi sedeži, da bi namestil priljubljenega vodjo. Indija je obsodila volitve kot del prizadevanja Pakistana, da bi prikril svojo "nezakonito" okupacijo in domnevne kršitve človekovih pravic. Indijski uradniki so poudarjali, da so Jammu in Kašmir, vključno z območji pod pakistanskim nadzorom, sestavni del konflikta v Indiji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je situacija predstavljena skozi lečo Indije, ki obsoja dejanja Pakistana, poudarja nezakonitost pakistanske okupacije in poudarja kršitve človekovih pravic.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides detailed information about the ongoing clashes in PoK, including the involvement of the banned JAAC group and the timing of the protests relative to the elections. It includes quotes from the External Affairs Ministry spokesperson, which are likely sourced from official stateme
Zakaj objektivnost (65): While the article presents factual information, it includes India's official statements which frame the conflict through an Indian diplomatic lens. This introduces a geopolitical perspective that may affect neutrality, though the overall reporting remains focused on the events themselves.
Times of IndiaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 68pred 4 dneviProtesti v Kašmirju, ki ga okupira Pakistan, so se povečali, saj je na tisoče demonstrantov po neuspešnih pogajanjih med Skupnim odborom za akcijo Awami (JAAC) in oblastmi marširalo proti Muzaffarabadu. Volilna komisija je odložila volitve za zakonodajno skupščino v dveh okrožjih Sudhnoti in Rawalakotu do 10. avgusta zaradi nenehnih nemirov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo poročilo o protestih, pri čemer navaja obtožbe JAAC in zunanje organizacije, kot je Amnesty International.
Zakaj dejstva (88): The article accurately describes the MEA's use of a South Park meme to counter misinformation about J&K and Ladakh. It aligns with other articles that report the MEA's consistent position on the territorial integrity of these regions.
Zakaj objektivnost (68): The tone is dismissive of Pakistan's claims, using terms like 'repeated falsehoods' and 'cosmetic electoral exercise'. While the facts are presented, the language suggests a biased interpretation of the situation.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70včeraj Pakistan reagira na izjavo Indije, da "ni pakistanskega Kašmira"Indija je kritizirala New York Times, ker je poklical Kašmir, ki ga okupira Pakistan, kot "pakistanski Kašmir", in trdila, da takega entiteta ni in da je regija del Indije. V odgovoru je pakistansko veleposlaništvo v ZDA imenovalo stališče Indije "nezakonito in neutemeljeno", poudarjalo je, da je Džamu in Kašmir sporno ozemlje pod mednarodnim priznanjem. Pakistan je Indijo obtožil, da preusmeri pozornost od domnevnih kršitev človekovih pravic v regiji in ponovil svoj poziv k resoluciji na podlagi resolucij Varnostnega sveta Združenih narodov in plebiscita. Ta izmenjava sledi nedavnim spopadom v Kašmirju, ki ga okupira Pakistan, kjer so bili ubiti vsaj dva človeka, kar je spodbudilo zahteve po neodvisni preiskavi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča Indije in Pakistana glede kašmirske zadeve, ne da bi se očitno naklonjena katerikoli strani. Vključuje neposredne citate ambasad obeh držav in zagotavlja kontekst o nedavnih spopadih in diplomatskih izmenjah.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides detailed accounts of the protests in PoK, including the breakdown of talks and the postponement of elections. These events are consistently reported across multiple articles, confirming the factual basis of the claims.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): While the article presents the sequence of events objectively, it emphasizes the impact of the protests on the electoral process, which could be interpreted as subtly supporting India's stance on the legitimacy of the elections.
FirstpostStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 4 dneviPrva faza volitev v pokrajini Pakistansko okupiranega Kašmira (PoK) je bila zaznamovana z nasiljem in spopadi, kar je znatno vplivalo na volilni proces.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski opis izzivov, s katerimi so se soočili med prvo fazo volitev PoK, vključno z nasiljem in smrtjo delavca PPP.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article provides factual reporting on the impact of violence on the first phase of elections in PoK, mentioning the death of a PPP worker. It aligns with cross-source consensus regarding the escalation of violence during the electoral process. No specific numbers are given, but the general acco
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, focusing on the events and their impact on the election without overtly taking sides. However, it does include some political commentary about the PPP worker being killed, which slightly skews the narrative toward the political implications.
Times of IndiaNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 65predvčerajšnjim Indijsko veleposlaništvo v ZDA kritizira tuje medije zaradi zavajajočega naslova o umorih v PoKIndijsko veleposlaništvo v Združenih državah je kritiziralo New York Times zaradi tega, kar je imenovalo zavajajoč naslov glede nedavnih umorov v pakistansko okupirani Kašmirju (PoK).
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je vprašanje postavljeno skozi lečo indijske suverenosti nad spornimi ozemlji, s poudarkom na nezakoniti okupaciji Pakistana in njegovi vlogi pri spodbujanju nasilja.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the Indian Embassy's criticism of The New York Times for its headline on the killings in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. It aligns with other articles regarding the Indian stance on the legality of Pakistan's occupation and the protests.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): While the article presents factual information, it uses strong language such as 'misleading' and 'violence against the occupied people,' which may reflect a biased interpretation of events without considering alternative perspectives.
India TodayNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 65pred 8 dneviIndija je kritizirala Pakistan v Varnostnem svetu Združenih narodov, obtoževala Islamabad za zatiranje človekovih pravic v Pakistansko okupiranem Kašmirju (POK). Med razpravo Varnostnega sveta je Indijski veleposlanik poudaril sistematično zatiranje svoboščin v POK, ki navaja, da ti pogoji odražajo širši vzorec nadzora pakistanske vlade nad regijo skoraj osem desetletij. Indija je opozorila tudi na notranje izzive v Pakistanu, kot so zapiranje opozicijskih osebnosti in ustavne spremembe, ki spodkopavajo demokratične institucije. Indijski predstavnik je pozval Pakistan, naj se osredotoči na reševanje svojih notranjih vprašanj, namesto da bi uporabil vprašanje Kašmira za preusmeritev globalne pozornosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so indijske obtožbe proti Pakistanu predstavljene na način, ki poudarja domnevne kršitve človekovih pravic v Pakistanu in pomanjkljivosti notranjega upravljanja, v skladu s stališčem, ki kritizira pakistanske politike in jih označuje kot zatiralne.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on India's speech at the UN Security Council where India accused Pakistan of human rights violations in POK. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that India has consistently claimed Jammu and Kashmir as part of India and criticized Pakistan's actions in the region. The artic
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'blistering attack,' 'systematically crushing,' and 'stifling of fundamental freedoms.' It frames Pakistan's actions negatively without presenting counterarguments or alternative perspectives, showing a clear pro-Indian bias.
NDTVStrankarsko povezanProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 60včeraj Kakšno je razliko med Ravalakotskim prelivanjem krvi in Pakistanskim "Azad Kašmirjem"V članku se razpravlja o nasilnem incidentu v Ravalakotu v Kašmirju pod pakistanskim upravljanjem (PoK), ki poudarja grafične podobe krvavih ulic, poškodovanih protestnikov, žalujočih družin in spopadov med civilisti in oboroženimi varnostnimi silami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek uporablja čustveno nabite podobe in nasilje označuje kot pokazatelj globljih strukturnih težav znotraj pakistanske uprave Azad Kašmirja.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article describes the situation in PoK with reference to visual evidence and contextualizes the violence within broader political narratives. While it doesn't provide specific casualty figures, it aligns with other reports about the intensity of the clashes. The mention of 'bloodstained streets'
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article takes a somewhat critical stance toward Pakistan's governance and its 'Azad Kashmir' narrative, suggesting a bias toward supporting the aspirations of the local population. The inclusion of India's official statements adds a geopolitical dimension that may influence the reader's percepti
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 55predvčerajšnjim Volitve v J&K, ki jo okupira Pakistan, so poskus prikrivanja nezakonite okupacije: IndijaIndija je nedavne volitve, ki so bile v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju, obsodila in jih označila za "kozmetični" poskus Pakistana, da bi prikril svojo nezakonito okupacijo in kršitve človekovih pravic. Indijska vlada trdi, da nasilje med volitvami izvira iz pakistanskega gospodarskega izkoriščanja in zanikanja pravic lokalnemu prebivalstvu. Več kot 40 ljudi je umrlo v spopadih med pakistanskimi varnostnimi silami in protestniki, ki so zahtevali odstranitev rezerviranih sedežev za kašmirske begunce v lokalni skupščini.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so pakistanske dejanja označeni za nezakonite in zatiralne, poudarjena je indijska suverenost in obsojene pakistanske politike.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports the MEA spokesperson's statements dismissing Pakistan's elections in Jammu and Kashmir as an attempt to cover up illegal occupation and human rights violations. It aligns with other articles regarding the protests and the MEA's stance.
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article maintains a clear pro-Indian bias, using phrases like 'grave human rights violations' and 'economic exploitation' without offering opposing viewpoints or contextualizing the situation from Pakistan's perspective.
India TodayNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 50pred 3 dnevi Khawaja Asif zagovarja umor 14 aktivistovV Pakistansko okupiranem Kašmirju (POK) je pakistanski obrambni minister Khawaja Asif zagovarjal umor 14 aktivistov med protestom, ki ga je vodil Skupni odbor za akcijo Awami (JAAC).
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so predstavljene izjave Khawaje Asifa, visokega pakistanskega uradnika, ki je protestnike označil za "sovražnike, kot je Indija" in upravičil smrtonosno silo proti njim.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports the statements made by Pakistan's Defence Minister Khawaja Asif regarding the protesters in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. It aligns with other articles about the protests and the Indian perspective on the situation.
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article presents a highly biased viewpoint, portraying the Pakistani defense minister's statements as inflammatory without providing context or counterarguments, thus reinforcing a pro-Indian narrative.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 60predvčerajšnjim Indijsko veleposlaništvo v ZDA: Ni pakistanskega Kašmira, samo pakistansko okupiranega KašmiraIndijsko veleposlaništvo v ZDA je kritiziralo New York Times, ker je v poročanju uporabil izraz "pakistansko Kašmir", in ga označilo za zavajajoč in nepravilen.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je vprašanje obravnavano z vidika indijske suverenosti, z uporabo močnega jezika, kot so "nezakonito zasedeno" in "upravni zatiranje" za kritiziranje dejanj Pakistana.
Zakaj dejstva (75): This article includes quotes from Pakistan's defense minister and mentions Amnesty International's concerns, but it primarily focuses on the Indian perspective. The information is partially supported by other articles, but the emphasis on Pakistan's actions may skew the narrative.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is critical of Pakistan's handling of the protests, using strong language like 'enemies' and 'unlawful violence'. This suggests a biased view rather than a balanced assessment of the situation.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi Indija se posmehuje lažnim volitvam v PoK, pravi, da je kozmetična vaja za prikrivanje kršitevIndija je kritizirala nedavne volitve, ki so bile v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoK), in jih označila za "kozmetično vajo", namenjeno prikrivanju pakistanske nezakonite okupacije regije in kršitev človekovih pravic. Indijski uradniki so izjavili, da nasilni protesti med volitvami izvirajo iz pakistanskega gospodarskega izkoriščanja in zatiranja temeljnih pravic na tem območju.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je predstavljena Indijska perspektiva na situacijo v PoK, s poudarkom na domnevnih kršitvah Pakistana in označevanjem volitev kot nezakonitih.
Zakaj dejstva (75): This article introduces a new topic about Chinese projects in J&K, which is not covered in other articles. While it cites the MEA spokesperson, the focus shifts to a different geopolitical issue, making it less aligned with the cross-source consensus on the main event.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article takes a confrontational tone toward China, using strong language like 'illegally occupying' and 'violate India's sovereignty'. This suggests a clear bias rather than a balanced discussion of the issue.
NDTVStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 45predvčerajšnjim 'Oni so sovražniki kot Indija': Khawaja Asif zagovarja umor 32 protestnikov PoKČlanek poroča o nemirih v Kašmirju pod pakistanskim nadzorom (PoK), kjer je od 5. junija umrlo več kot 90 ljudi. Na družbenih omrežjih naj bi video prikazoval pakistanske varnostne sile, ki streljajo na civiliste v mestu Mirpur in prevažajo trupla v svojih vozilih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o nemirih v PoK, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article references 'videos surfaced on social media showing Pakistani security personnel openly firing on civilians', but no primary source documents were available for verification. While the claim aligns with reports from other sources about violence in PoK, the specific mention of 'killing of
Zakaj objektivnost (45): The article presents a highly biased perspective, using loaded language such as 'Enemies Like India' and implying a direct connection between the killings and Indian interests. This suggests a strong pro-Indian stance and potential editorializing rather than presenting facts objectively.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenProgresivnopred 7 urami Indija ponovno obsoja Pakistanovo zatiranje v PoJK, poziva k globalnemu ukrepanjuIndija je obsodila pakistanske vojaške ukrepe proti civilnim protestnikom v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoJK), obtožila Islamabad, da je uporabil "neusmiljeno silo", zaradi katere je umrlo več kot 40 ljudi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so pakistanske dejanja označeni kot neupravičene in zatiralne, z uporabo močnega jezika, kot so "brezsrčna sila" in "absolutno prezir".
The PrintNeodvisenSredinapred 8 uramiČlanek poroča o nasilnem incidentu v sporni regiji Kašmir, ki jo upravlja Pakistan, kjer pakistanska vojska trdi, da je ravnala z zadržanjem.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena izjava pakistanske vojske glede njenega vedenja med nasilnim incidentom, ki poudarja državni nadzor nad nasiljem.
Times of IndiaNeodvisenProgresivnopred 8 urami "Pakistanski pripravljeni mudžahedinci so obrnili orožje v notranjost": MEA kritizira Islamabad zaradi zatiranja PoKIndijsko ministrstvo za zunanje zadeve (MEA) je kritiziralo Pakistan za njegovo domnevno vlogo pri usposabljanju in oboroževanju militantov, ki so se kasneje obrnili proti pakistanski državi, obtoževali Islamabad za državno sponzoriran terorizem. MEA je posebej obsodil brutalni zatiranje Pakistana nad protidržavnimi protestniki v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoK), ki je trdil, da je bilo ubitih več kot 40 civilistov. Tiskovni predstavnik MEA Randhir Jaiswal je navedel pripombe posebnega pomočnika pakistanskega predsednika vlade Ranaullah Sana, ki je priznal, da militanti, ki jih je treniral Pakistan, zdaj nasprotujejo državi. MEA je kritiziral tudi nedavne volitve v PoK, ki jih je označil za zavrnitev pakistanskega ustanavljanja in pozval k mednarodnemu pregledu nasilja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so dejanja Pakistana označena za terorizem, ki ga podpira država, zatiranje protestnikov pa kot pretirano nasilno in nepravično.
Hindustan TimesNeodvisenKonservativnopred 9 urami Mujahideeni, ki so bili poslani v Indijo, da bi krvavili, so obrnili orožje proti sebi:: Indija želi, da se svetovno preverijo pakistanski ukrepi v PoJKPredstavnik ministrstva za zunanje zadeve Indije Randhir Jaiswal je kritiziral pakistanske ukrepe v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoJK), obtožil Islamabad, da je izvajal "brezsrčni" zatiranje protestnikov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so dejanja Pakistana označena kot "brezsrčna" in predstavljena pakistanska uprava kot odgovorna za nasilje nad civilisti.
Times of IndiaNeodvisenKonservativnopredvčerajšnjim "Oni so sovražniki kot Indija": Khawaja Asif opravičuje ubijanje protestnikov v PoKPakistanski obrambni minister Khawaja Asif je po nasilnih spopadih, v katerih je umrlo več kot 30 protestnikov, protestnike v pakistansko okupirani Jammu in Kašmirju (PoK) opisal kot "sovražnike", podobnih Indiji. Protesti so izbruhnili po neuspešnih pogajanjih med Skupnim odborom za akcijo Awami (JAAC) in oblastmi, ki so sovpadali z zamudnimi zakonodajnimi volitvami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku so dejanja pakistanske vlade utemeljena in protestniki prikazani kot nasprotniki, kar je v skladu z desničarskimi narrativi, ki poudarjajo nacionalno varnost in državno avtoriteto.
India
