Tadej Pogacar secured his fourth stage victory of the 2024 Tour de France on a dramatic day in the Vosges mountains, where the Slovenian rider launched a late attack to claim the win at Le Markstein. The stage, spanning 166 kilometres, featured seven categorized climbs, culminating in the challenging Col de Haag. Pogacar’s decisive move came 1.6 kilometres from the summit, leaving Jonas Vingegaard, Paul Seixas, and Florian Lipowitz far behind. Despite the efforts of Seixas, who matched Vingegaard on the descent, the young French rider ultimately fell short in the sprint to the finish, finishing second and securing the lead in the young rider’s classification. The stage marked a significant setback for Tom Pidcock, who struggled on the early slopes of the Col de Haag. His challenge unraveled as the Decathlon team, led by Seixas, set a relentless pace, breaking the main peloton. Within minutes, Pidcock dropped from second overall to ninth, unable to recover from the early loss. Meanwhile, Richard Carapaz remained a persistent threat, closing in on a stage win as he had done on Bastille Day. However, Pogacar’s relentless pursuit ensured that Carapaz’s hopes were dashed once more, with the Ecuadorean rider falling to the Slovenian’s final surge. Throughout the day, the peloton faced extreme weather conditions, transitioning from scorching heat to torrential rain. On Saturday, heavy rainfall flooded the finish line at Le Markstein just as Pogacar’s team began to close down the breakaways. The storm intensified on the descent of the Col de Page, where Pogacar and his team briefly distanced themselves from Vingegaard. Though the Danish rider responded swiftly, the incident foreshadowed the intensity of the upcoming battle. As the skies cleared, the early advantage of a six-rider breakaway, including Ireland’s Ben Healy, began to dwindle. By the time the group reached the final climb to Le Markstein, Pogacar had already taken control of the situation, effectively ending the breakaway’s chances. Healy, who had been part of the breakaway, finished third in the stage, moving up significantly in the overall standings from 118th to 62nd. The controversy surrounding Pogacar continued beyond the race itself. French cycling fans, particularly those in the Massif Central, reportedly booed the Slovenian rider during Stage 10, which ended in Le Lioran. Pogacar, known for his aggressive style, extended his overall lead over Vingegaard to three minutes and 36 seconds, seemingly putting his quest for a record-equalling fifth Tour victory on track. Some French fans, however, felt that the Bastille Day should have belonged to Paul Seixas, the 19-year-old rising star who finished third on the stage, 34 seconds behind Pogacar. Pogacar addressed the criticism in a post-win interview, expressing frustration with the negative reception but maintaining his focus on the race. “I enjoyed the day, and I didn’t know if I was going to win until the last kilometre,” he said. “Then I remembered this festive day and tried to honour the yellow jersey.” Despite the backlash, Pogacar remained composed, attributing the booing to the intensity of the competition rather than personal animosity. Meanwhile, concerns over fairness resurfaced as anti-doping authorities dismissed claims of favoritism toward Seixas. The 19-year-old French rider, part of the Decathlon CMA CGM team, was not subjected to the same night-time testing as Pogacar and Vingegaard. Slovenian rider Matej Mohoric, who was tested at 5am, criticized the lack of equal treatment, arguing that the decision should be based purely on performance and risk assessment. The International Testing Agency defended its approach, emphasizing that decisions were made based on factual data and scientific analysis, free from external influences. The day’s events concluded with a thrilling sprint finish, where Jasper Philipsen claimed his first stage win of the year. The Dutch rider, who had previously been beaten by Tim Merlier and Olav Kooij, triumphed in a chaotic 175-kilometre stage from Chambéry to Voiron. Meanwhile, Adam Yates, a key support rider for Pogacar, struggled with a severe stomach bug, finishing third from last and visibly unwell. Pogacar acknowledged his teammate’s condition, noting that he had appeared pale and exhausted throughout the race. With three mountain-top finishes under his belt, Pogacar continues to dominate the Tour de France, setting the stage for further challenges ahead.
5 poročil
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 75pred 4 dnevi Tadej Pogacar je pozno napadel, da bi osvojil četrto etapo Tour de FranceTadej Pogacar je v četrti etapi Tour de France 2023 osvojil zmago s kasnim napadom na zadnjem vzponu v regiji Vosges, ko je osvojil etapo v Le Markstein. Njegov korak je prišel 1,6 km od vrha Col de Haag, tako da so za seboj pustili tekmece, kot sta Jonas Vingegaard in Florian Lipowitz.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športni dogodek - Tour de France - brez omembe političnih osebnosti, politik ali spornih vprašanj.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article provides detailed information about Tadej Pogacar's stage win, including specific details about the race dynamics and positions of other riders like Jonas Vingegaard and Paul Seixas. It includes timing and performance metrics, which are consistent with the cross-source reporting on the
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article presents the race outcomes and rider performances with a somewhat celebratory tone towards Pogacar's dominance, which could be interpreted as favoring his success. There is less balance in discussing the implications for other riders like Seixas and Vingegaard.
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 70pred 4 dnevi Ian O'Riordan: Je vodja Tour de Francea Tadej Pogacar preprosto preveč dober za svoje dobro?Članek obravnava odziv francoskih kolesarskih oboževalcev na nastop Tadeja Pogacarja na Dirki po Franciji, zlasti med 10. etapo na dan Bastilleja. Kljub zmagi v etapi za 32 sekund in podaljšanju njegove splošne vodilnosti se je Pogacar soočil z buji iz delov množice. Članek poudarja Pogacarjevo spoštljivo gesto do tradicije Tour de France na dan Bastilleja, s tem da je pokazal na znak rumene majice, namesto da bi praznoval na svoj običajni način. Prav tako opozarja na močno uspešnost mladega francoskega kolesarja Paula Seixasa, ki je končal tretji na etapi. Pogacar je na bujanje odgovoril z izražanjem hvaležnosti za energijo oboževalcev in dejal, da mu kritika daje več motivacije.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športno pokritost Dirke po Franciji, ki je predvsem športni dogodek. V vsebini ni pomembnega političnega okvirja, polemike ali ideološkega poudarka. Razprava se osredotoča na športne dosežke, odzive navijačev in kulturne tradicije, s tem, da je Tour de France v glavnem športni dogodek.
Zakaj dejstva (88): The article discusses Tadej Pogacar's performance and mentions Paul Seixas' achievements, providing historical context and quotes from journalists. It references specific stages and times, which are consistent with other reports. The inclusion of a quote from David Walsh adds credibility, though it
Zakaj objektivnost (70): There is a noticeable bias in favor of Pogacar, with a more positive portrayal of his victories and a critical tone towards the French fans' reaction. The article seems to highlight Pogacar's dominance more than the challenges faced by other riders.
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 87Objektivnost 75pred 5 dnevi Tom Pidcock napreduje, Mauro Schmid pa zmaga 13. etapo Tour de France.Na 13. etapi Tour de France 2026 je švicarski kolesar Mauro Schmid osvojil etapno zmago, kar je označilo njegovo prvo zmago na tekmovanju. Britanski kolesar Tom Pidcock je igral ključno vlogo pri uspešnem izbruhu, ki se je začasno premaknil na drugo mesto.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek in ne vključuje politično nabitih tem, kot so vlada, volitve ali javna politika.
Zakaj dejstva (87): The article covers Tom Pidcock's rise in the standings and Mauro Schmid's stage win, providing specific details about the race and Pogacar's position. It includes quotes from Pogacar and other riders, which are consistent with other reports. The information aligns with the cross-source consensus on
Zakaj objektivnost (75): While the article is mostly factual, it leans slightly towards highlighting Pogacar's progress and the significance of the stage win for Pidcock. There is a minor imbalance in the narrative, focusing more on the outcomes rather than the broader implications for the race.
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 86Objektivnost 70pred 7 dnevi Wærenskjold zmaga najhitrejšo etapo na Dirki po Franciji v divjem sprintu v NeversNa 11. etapi Tour de France je norveški kolesar Søren Wærenskjold postavil nov rekord za najhitrejšo cestno etapo, ko je zmagal v divjem šprintu v Nevers. To je sledilo dramatičnemu tednu, v katerem je njegov kolega Torsten Træen padel iz dirke, medtem ko je nosil rumeno majico. Medtem se je Julian Alaphilippe, nekdanji svetovni prvak in nacionalni junak, boril med etapo in bi lahko končal svojo kariero na Tour de France. Tom Pidcock, ki se je vrnil na dirko po padcu v začetku tedna, je varno končal s pelotonom. Vodja dirke Tadej Pogacar je še naprej prevladoval, njegovi tekmeci pa so priznali njegovo premoč. Kljub Pocargovi prevladi so nekateri kolesarji izrazili razočaranje zaradi njegove agresivne taktike in nadzora ekipe Emiratov nad dirko.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športne dogodke in ne obravnava političnih vprašanj, politik ali številk neposredno.
Zakaj dejstva (86): The article reports on Søren Wærenskjold's record-breaking stage win and mentions other race events, including Julian Alaphilippe's performance. It includes specific details about the race and rider actions, which are consistent with other articles. The information aligns with the cross-source conse
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat enthusiastic about the record-breaking stage and the performance of the sprinters, which could be seen as favoring the sprinters' success. There is less attention given to the challenges faced by other riders and the broader implications of the race.
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 6 urami Protidopinški voditelji zavračajo trditve o Paul Seixasovi favoriziranju, medtem ko tekmeci na Tour de France kričijo prekršek.Protidopinški organi na Tour de Franciji so zavrnili obtožbe favorizma do francoskega kolesarja Paula Seixasa, ki je trenutno četrti v splošnem lestvici. Seixas in njegova ekipa so opravili testiranje biološkega potnega lista, vendar se je izognil nočnim testom, ki so jih opravili vodja dirke Tadej Pogacar in umaknjen kolesar Jonas Vingegaard. Slovenski kolesar Matej Mohoric je kritiziral pomanjkanje enakega obravnavanja, trdil pa je, da je položaj Seixasa v splošni razvrstitvi postal tarča za pregled. Mednarodna testna agencija (ITA) je branila svojo testno strategijo in poudarila, da so odločitve temeljile na znanstvenih podatkih in ocenah tveganja in da UCI podpira nočni testni režim kljub motnjam v voznikovih načrtih. UCI je priznal vpliv na počitek in okrevanje, vendar je ohranil potrebne ukrepe za boj proti takšnemu dopingu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko je vprašanje nadzora nad dopingom in pravičnosti v profesionalnem kolesarjenju politično nabito, članek predstavlja uravnoteženo poročanje, saj vključuje stališča tako kolesarjev kot protidopinških organov.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes the situation around Paul Seixas' lack of night-time testing compared to other riders, citing statements from the International Testing Agency and the UCI. It provides context about the biological passport testing program and the roles of different anti-doping bodies
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone is generally neutral, presenting the allegations and responses from the authorities without overt emotional language. However, there is a slight emphasis on the riders' concerns about fair treatment, which could be seen as slightly biased toward the cyclists' perspective.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik