CroatiaAna Mandac, nekdanja uslužbenka na ministrstvu za gospodarstvo, je pričala, da so ji ukazali, naj vrne nepoglašeni plačilni nalog za podporo tja, kjer ga je našla, kar poudarja postopkovne nepravilnosti. Tožilstvo trdi, da so nekdanji minister Andrej Plenković in drugi nepravilno dodelili 2,6 milijona kuna podjetjem, ki so jih osebno zanimali, medtem ko so drugi obtoženi, kot sta Borislav Milošević in Tomislav Tolušić, obtoženi, da so tiskovne družbe, za katere so imeli osebne interese.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis sodnih postopkov proti več nekdanjim uradnikom, ki podrobno opisujejo obtožbe in izide.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on a witness account from Ana Mandac, who describes an incident involving an unsigned payment order for support and a list of 20 subjects, some of whom had rejected support. It mentions the legal proceedings against former ministers and the involvement of USKOK. While the details
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone leans towards presenting the witness testimony as part of a larger corruption case, with a focus on the allegations against the ministers. There is some editorializing in the framing of the events, particularly in the way the case is described as an 'afera' (scandal), which may imply a cert
