After sustained pressure from a lawyer representing the Israeli Prime Minister’s party, the Haaretz newspaper withdrew its ad campaign from billboards across central Israel. The campaign, which featured critical commentary on political figures and policies, was reportedly removed following intervention by legal representatives of the ruling Likud party. This action underscores ongoing tensions between media organizations and government entities regarding freedom of expression and political influence. The removal of the Haaretz ads came amid broader scrutiny of the Netanyahu administration, including recent legal challenges involving members of the family. A 61-year-old former employee of the Prime Minister’s Residence in Jerusalem has filed a lawsuit against Sara Netanyahu, the prime minister’s wife, seeking damages of approximately $98,000. The plaintiff, Yehiel Ohev-Ami, alleges that he endured verbal and physical abuse during his tenure as a cleaner and cook for the couple. According to the lawsuit, Ohev-Ami was subjected to harsh criticism, including being shoved against walls and called derogatory names. He also claims that Sara Netanyahu insulted him by suggesting he had autism, referencing the fact that his son was diagnosed with the condition. Following this alleged diagnosis, Ohev-Ami was asked to surrender three paychecks as payment. The lawsuit further states that Ohev-Ami worked long hours, often from early mornings until the pre-dawn hours of the following day, accumulating over 100 overtime hours in a single month. As a result of these conditions, he claims his health deteriorated significantly. On the day of the alleged diagnosis, he sought medical attention for chest issues and eventually required a pacemaker. The complaint also includes allegations against the prime minister’s son, Yair Netanyahu, who is said to have thrown Ohev-Ami out of the residence for not changing his bedsheets. The case also targets Efi Azulai, the plaintiff’s de facto supervisor within the Prime Minister’s Residence. Azulai was previously disciplined by the Civil Service’s Disciplinary Tribunal but is now reportedly employed there through an external contractor. The Prime Minister’s Office responded to the lawsuit by stating that Ohev-Ami failed in his duties after a brief period of employment, citing difficulties in cooperation with colleagues and meeting job requirements. It added that the decision to terminate his employment was based solely on professional grounds. Furthermore, the office noted that the lawsuit was filed after the plaintiff requested to return to work at the residence. Separately, the Haaretz ad campaign’s removal has sparked discussions about the intersection of media freedom and political power. While the exact nature of the pressure exerted by the Netanyahu party lawyer remains unclear, the withdrawal of the ads highlights the growing sensitivity surrounding public discourse in Israel. The situation reflects a pattern of increasing legal and administrative actions aimed at curbing independent journalistic efforts, particularly those perceived as critical of the government. The Haaretz campaign, which initially appeared on billboards in central Israel, was part of a broader effort to engage the public with investigative journalism and political analysis. Its sudden removal suggests that the administration views such initiatives as threats to its authority. Legal experts suggest that the move could set a precedent for future interactions between media outlets and governmental bodies. Meanwhile, the ongoing legal battle involving Sara Netanyahu continues to draw public attention, with implications for both personal accountability and institutional integrity. The outcome of the case may influence how public servants are held accountable for their conduct and whether such cases can serve as a check on executive power. The situation remains under active legal review, with further developments anticipated.
5 poročil
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 85včerajIzraelski časopis Haaretz je po pritisku odvetnika, ki zastopa premierja Benjamina Netanjahuja, svojo politično kampanjo odstranil iz oglasnih plošč. Kampanja, ki je promovirala stališče Haaretzja o različnih vprašanjih, naj bi bila odstranjena zaradi pravnih pomislekov ali ustrahovalnih taktik, namenjenih zatiranju neskladnih glasov v medijih. Ta incident poudarja tekoče napetosti med izraelsko vlado in neodvisnimi mediji, zlasti tistimi, ki kritizirajo Netanjahujevo politiko.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je odstranitev Haaretzove kampanje označena kot dejanje zatiranja s strani Netanjahujeve pravne ekipe, kar nakazuje na konflikt med vlado in neodvisnimi mediji.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The removal of the Haaretz ad campaign from billboards due to pressure from Netanyahu's party lawyer is directly reported and corroborated by other sources. This event is clearly documented with no conflicting information.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting the facts without taking sides or using emotionally charged language. It focuses on the sequence of events rather than expressing opinion.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 5 dnevi Ali lahko verski sionisti rešijo Netanjahua ali ga potopijo?Članek raziskuje potencialni vpliv verskih sionističnih strank na politično prihodnost premierja Benjamina Netanjahua. Preučuje, ali bi te skupine lahko bodisi podprle Netanjahua s krepitvijo njegove koalicije ali ga spodkopale s pritiskom na bolj radikalne politike, ki so v nasprotju z njegovim sedanjim pristopom. Članek analizira ideološke napetosti v izraelski politiki, zlasti med Netanjahovim srednjo desničarskim stališčem in bolj trdnimi stališči verskih sionistov. Poudarja strateški pomen teh volivcev na prihajajočih volitvah in tveganja, povezana s pre tesnim usklajevanjem z njihovimi zahtevami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je potencialni vpliv verskih sionistov označen kot destabilizirajoča sila, ki bi lahko potopila Netanjahuja, kar pomeni negativne posledice njihovega vpliva.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The question posed about whether religious Zionists will save or sink Netanyahu is framed as an analysis rather than a definitive statement. It aligns with other analyses regarding the role of religious groups in Israeli politics.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article adopts an analytical approach without taking a clear stance, thus maintaining a degree of neutrality. However, the phrasing implies a focus on potential outcomes that might favor Netanyahu.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 10 dnevi Analiza • Stalni kampanjist: Netanjahu se za ponovno izvolitev kandidira od 7. oktobraČlanek analizira neprekinjeno kampanjo Benjamina Netanjahua za ponovno izvolitev od 7. oktobra, poudarja pa njegove vztrajne prizadevanja za ohranitev politične moči kljub nenehnim izzivom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled Netanyahuovih političnih dejavnosti, ne da bi odkrito zagovarjal kakršno koli posebno ideološko stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The claim that Netanyahu has been running for reelection since October 7 is supported by multiple sources including Haaretz and i24NEWS, which report on his ongoing political activities and campaign strategies. However, the exact timeline of when he began campaigning is not explicitly detailed in an
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the information in an analytical tone, avoiding overtly biased language. While it frames Netanyahu as a 'constant campaigner,' it does not take a clear stance on whether this is positive or negative, maintaining a relatively neutral perspective.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenProgresivnopred 9 urami61-letni nekdanji uslužbenec rezidence izraelskega predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua je vložil tožbo proti njegovi ženi, Sari Netanjahua, ki je zahtevala 300.000 šeklov (98.000 dolarjev). Tožnik trdi, da ga je Sara Netanjahua verbalno in fizično zlorabljala, vključno s tem, da ga je potisnila proti stenam, uporabljala ponižujoč jezik in grozila zdravju. Tožba vključuje trditve, da ga je "diagnosticirala" z avtizmom in zahtevala plačilo za "terapijo", ki je po navedbah tožnika povzročila znatno čustveno stisko.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so obtožbe zoper Saro Netanjahu postavljene na način, ki poudarja osebno nedovoljeno ravnanje in zlorabo, s čimer bi se lahko poudarila dinamika moči v politični družini.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒Sredinavčeraj Katargate • Shin Bet: Netanyahujevi pomočniki so škodovali nacionalni varnosti, mnenje pa ostaja nesigniranoIzraelska obveščevalna agencija Shin Bet je domnevno ugotovila, da so pomočniki predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua ogrozili nacionalno varnost zaradi vpletanja v škandal Qatargate. Vendar pa agencija ni uradno podpisala te ocene, zato je zaključek nepovržen in nepotrjen.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena notranja ocena Shin Beta, ne da bi sprejela jasno stališče ali uporabila pristranski jezik.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
IL
