Ste prejeli sporočilo ZZZS? Ne nasedajte, morda gre za poskus kraje podatkov
Članek opozarja bralce na goljufijo, ki vključuje ponarejena sporočila ZZZS (slovenske institucije socialne varnosti), ki trdijo, da so prejemniki upravičeni do povračila. Ta sporočila usmerjajo uporabnike na ponarejene spletne strani, kjer jih prosijo, da vnesejo osebne podatke, kar lahko privede do finančne izgube. Članek pojasnjuje, da je phishing oblika spletne goljufije, kjer napadalci prevarajo žrtve, da delijo občutljive podatke, kot so gesla, podatki o kreditnih karticah ali dostop do spletnega bančništva. Svetuje, naj ne kliknejo sumljivih povezav, tudi če se zdi, da prihajajo iz zaupanja vrednih institucij, kot so banke ali vladne agencije. Če je nekdo že vnesel svoje podatke na ponarejeno spletno mesto, jih pozove, naj se obrnejo na svojo banko, spremenijo ogrožene gesla in preverijo varnostne nastavitve računa. Bralcem se svetuje tudi, naj o sumljivih sporočilih poročajo nacionalnemu centru za odzivanje na kibernetsko varnost SI-CERT.
A wave of phishing scams targeting businesses and individuals has been reported across Slovenia, with fake emails claiming to offer tax refunds from the Financial Administration. The messages, which have circulated via email in recent weeks, appear to originate from the Financial Administration of the Republic of Slovenia, urging recipients to click on links to process their refund through the eDavki portal. However, these communications are fraudulent and designed to steal sensitive information. The scam was first identified after a similar message reached the email inbox of Gorenjski glas, a local newspaper. The message claimed the Financial Administration had approved a tax refund of €7,483 for the recipient’s company, requiring them to complete an administrative obligation through the eDavki portal. The email included a link for processing the refund, but the domain used, edavki-po.com, is clearly not associated with the official Financial Administration. This discrepancy immediately raises red flags for cybersecurity experts. According to the National Cyber Security Response Centre (SI-CERT), the messages are part of a broader phishing campaign that has become increasingly common in recent months. These attacks typically involve deceptive emails, SMS messages, or private messages that prompt users to click on links or provide personal data. SI-CERT emphasized that users should never open links or attachments unless they are certain the communication comes from a legitimate source. If someone has already clicked on a phishing link and entered personal information, such as passwords or banking details, they are advised to change passwords immediately and contact their bank. In addition to the tax refund scam, similar phishing attempts have targeted individuals under the guise of the Statistical Office of the Republic of Slovenia. These messages aim to gather business-related information, which can later be used in more sophisticated cyberattacks, including Business Email Compromise (BEC) schemes, CEO fraud, or changes to banking details of business partners. According to SI-CERT, the primary targets of these attacks are accounting and financial departments within companies. Meanwhile, police in Koper have reported two separate incidents involving physical encounters with potential victims. In one case, a man in Kopra was approached by a couple who claimed to be Polish citizens stranded abroad due to a lack of cash and proper credit cards. They asked him to lend €400, promising to repay it via online transfer. In another incident, a Hungarian woman at the Lom rest area was approached by a man who claimed to have lost his wallet in Zagreb and requested €500, assuring her he would transfer the money to her account within one to two days. A companion of the man showed her a phone displaying a supposedly successful transaction. Both cases were confirmed as scams by local authorities. Police in Koper issued warnings to the public, urging caution against such tactics. Anita Leskovec, a spokesperson for the Koper Police Department, stated that these incidents highlight the need for vigilance. She recommended that anyone encountering suspicious behavior should immediately report it to emergency services at 113, providing as much detail as possible about the suspects. Authorities have also reminded the public that banks and government agencies generally do not request card details or other sensitive information through unsolicited emails or text messages. If individuals suspect they have fallen victim to a scam, they should contact their bank, change affected passwords, and review the security settings of their accounts. Additionally, they are encouraged to report suspicious messages to the national cybersecurity response center, SI-CERT. Cybersecurity experts continue to monitor the situation, warning that such scams are likely to evolve and become more sophisticated over time. As awareness grows, so does the importance of educating the public on how to recognize and respond to these threats effectively.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
V članku, ki ga je objavil Gorenjski glas, so bralce opozorili na goljufijo, v kateri se zdi, da so lažni e-poštni sporočili prihajali iz slovenske finančne agencije, ki ponujajo povračilo davkov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o kibernetski nevarnosti brez političnega stališča in se osredotoča na obveščanje bralcev o goljufijah s pomočjo fišinga ter na strokovne nasvete SI-CERT, pri čemer ohranja nevtralnost pri oblikovanju.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes a phishing attempt involving a fake email from the Financial Agency, citing the false domain 'edavki-po.com' as evidence. It references SI-CERT as an authority on cybersecurity threats and explains the nature of phishing attacks. The content aligns with common knowle
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The tone remains informative and advisory, warning readers not to engage with the fake email. While the article presents the situation clearly, it slightly leans toward caution rather than neutrality, but does not introduce subjective bias or emotional language.
Članek poroča o dveh incidentih goljufij na območju Koperja v Sloveniji. V obeh primerih so posameznike pristopili neznanci, ki so trdili, da nujno potrebujejo denar. V prvem primeru sta dva moška iz Poljske domnevno prevaral moškega, da jim posodi 400 evrov, obljublja, da jih bo vrnil prek bančnega nakazila. V drugem primeru je moški pristopil madžarski ženski, trdil je, da je izgubil svojo osebno izkaznico v Zagrebu in jo prosil, naj mu posodi 500 evrov, z zagotovilom, da mu bo denar poslal nazaj. Prisotna ženska mu je pokazala ponarejeno potrditev transakcije na svojem telefonu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o goljufivih dejavnostih, ne da bi odprto kritiziral ali pohvalil katero koli politično skupino, ideologijo ali politiko.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article corroborates the previous report with similar details about the fraudulent incidents. It includes quotes from the police spokesperson, adding credibility. The information matches the other articles, reinforcing the factual consensus.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The language is alarmist, using phrases like 'predrzne goljufe' (dangerous fraudsters) which may influence reader perception. While intended to raise awareness, this phrasing introduces some bias, affecting objectivity.
Članek poroča o dveh incidentih goljufij v Kopru v Sloveniji, kjer so se posamezniki pretvarjali, da so poročeni pari iz Poljske, in moški, ki je trdil, da je izgubil denarnico v Zagrebu, je iskal finančno pomoč.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o goljufivih dejavnostih, ne da bi odkrito kritiziral ali pohvalil katero koli politično skupino, ideologijo ali uradnika.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports two incidents of fraud where individuals posing as Polish couples asked for money under false pretenses. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from the other articles, providing specific details such as amounts requested and locations. No primary source was availab
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is cautionary and informative, aiming to warn readers about fraud. While not overtly biased, there is a slight editorializing tone in the concluding statement urging vigilance, which slightly reduces objectivity.
Članek opozarja na "tujence", ki pripovedujejo razvite zgodbe, da bi ljudi prevarali za do 400 evrov. Policija opozarja javnost, naj ne pade na te prevare, ki pogosto vključujejo izmišljene pripovedi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko opozorilo policije o specifični vrsti goljufij, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli politično ideologijo.
Zakaj dejstva (60): This article is incomplete and lacks specific details about the incidents. It only mentions the police warning without elaborating on the cases, making it less reliable compared to the other articles. The lack of detail limits its factual value.
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article is brief and lacks depth, making it difficult to assess objectivity. It appears to be a summary rather than a full report, possibly leading to a more subjective interpretation due to limited context.
Članek opozarja bralce na goljufijo, ki vključuje ponarejena sporočila ZZZS (slovenske institucije socialne varnosti), ki trdijo, da so prejemniki upravičeni do povračila. Ta sporočila usmerjajo uporabnike na ponarejene spletne strani, kjer jih prosijo, da vnesejo osebne podatke, kar lahko privede do finančne izgube. Članek pojasnjuje, da je phishing oblika spletne goljufije, kjer napadalci prevarajo žrtve, da delijo občutljive podatke, kot so gesla, podatki o kreditnih karticah ali dostop do spletnega bančništva. Svetuje, naj ne kliknejo sumljivih povezav, tudi če se zdi, da prihajajo iz zaupanja vrednih institucij, kot so banke ali vladne agencije. Če je nekdo že vnesel svoje podatke na ponarejeno spletno mesto, jih pozove, naj se obrnejo na svojo banko, spremenijo ogrožene gesla in preverijo varnostne nastavitve računa. Bralcem se svetuje tudi, naj o sumljivih sporočilih poročajo nacionalnemu centru za odzivanje na kibernetsko varnost SI-CERT.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava splošno kibernetsko varnostno grožnjo (phishing) in daje praktične nasvete o tem, kako prepoznati in se odzvati na takšne prevare.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Slovenia
