Srb je režiral škandal na UFC v Beogradu:

Serbian fighter Milovan Nikolic caused controversy during his victory at the UFC event in Belgrade by choosing a song with nationalist undertones. The match took place before a home crowd, and Nikolic's decision to perform the Serbian folk song “Sini jarko sunce sa Kosova” by Danica Crnogorčević sparked widespread criticism. The lyrics of the song mention Kosovo, as well as Croatian cities Dubrovnik and Knin, which many viewed as a promotion of Serbian nationalism on a large international sporting stage. This choice led to backlash on social media, with critics accusing Nikolic of endorsing a form of ethnic chauvinism. The fight itself was intense, though not without its dramatic moments. Nikolic, who had entered the octagon as a substitute, faced immediate challenges against Russian fighter Mark Vologdin. In the opening round, Vologdin delivered a powerful left hook that sent Nikolic to the canvas, attempting to finish the bout with a guillotine choke. However, Nikolic managed to escape the hold and gradually regain control of the fight. His ability to recover quickly impressed the audience and judges alike. In the second round, Nikolic became more dominant, using his reach advantage to land effective strikes. Vologdin struggled to find a response, taking heavy damage throughout the exchange. Despite the pressure, Vologdin remained standing, showing resilience despite the toll of the battle. The third and final round saw Nikolic take complete control, repeatedly driving Vologdin to the mat. He locked the Russian in a full mount position and unleashed a series of punches to the body. Though Vologdin endured until the final bell, the judges had no doubt, Nikolic’s performance was decisive. The outcome of the match was clear, with all three judges scoring the bout 29–27 in favor of Nikolic. The decision was unanimous, reflecting the overwhelming dominance he displayed in the later rounds. While the fight itself was a showcase of skill and endurance, the selection of the nationalistic song overshadowed much of the praise. Social media platforms were flooded with reactions, some supportive of Nikolic’s cultural expression, while others condemned the perceived political messaging embedded in the music. Despite the controversy, Nikolic’s performance inside the octagon was impressive. His technical skills and composure under pressure earned him respect from fans and analysts. The combination of a controversial entrance and a hard-fought victory created a memorable night at the event. As the dust settled, the focus shifted back to the sport, with many acknowledging Nikolic’s ability to adapt and overcome early adversity. Looking ahead, the incident has raised questions about the role of cultural and political symbolism in professional combat sports. Whether such choices are appropriate in a global arena remains a topic of debate. For now, however, the spotlight remains on Nikolic’s win, a result that will be remembered for both its athletic merit and the broader implications of its context.