ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Srbija se je prebudila po zgodovinski porazi Vučića, in to so njegovi mediji. Težko jih je premagati.
Croatia🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativno

Srbija se je prebudila po zgodovinski porazi Vučića, in to so njegovi mediji. Težko jih je premagati.

Koalicija "Študenti zmagajo" je na parlamentarnih volitvah v Srbiji osvojila odločilno zmago, saj je osvojila približno 53 odstotkov glasov in naj bi osvojila 139 od 250 sedežev, kar jim zagotavlja samostojno večino. V nasprotju s tem je vladajoča koalicija, ki jo vodi predsednik Aleksandar Vučić, dobila približno 39,9 odstotka glasov, kar je v primerjavi z opozicijo povzročilo primanjkljaj več kot 535.000 glasov. Kljub tej pomembni volilni porazi je več glavnih srbskih medijev, ki so povezani z vlado, v svojih jutranjih izdajah zmanjšalo rezultate. Mediji, kot so Blic, Informer in B92, so prednostno obravnavali Vučićeve izjave po volitvah, govorice o zvezdnikih in porabe tujcev za turizem, ne pa obseg političnega premika. V članku je poudarjeno, kako so te publikacije osredotočile pozornost na predsednika in njegove zaveznike, kar je učinkovito zmanjšalo vpliv zgodovinske zmage opozicije.

The Student List, known as "Students Win," secured a decisive victory in Serbia’s early parliamentary elections held on Sunday, October 25, according to preliminary results from the Republic Electoral Commission. With 95.4 percent of polling stations processed, the student coalition captured 2,164,808 votes, representing 53 percent of the total. This result projects them winning 139 of the 250 seats in the National Assembly, granting them a standalone majority capable of forming a government independently. The opposing list, led by former President Aleksandar Vučić under the banner "Aleksandar Vučić, United Serbia," received 1,629,647 votes, or 39.9 percent, which translates to approximately 104 mandates. The margin of victory exceeded 535,000 votes. Other political entities failed to clear the three percent threshold required for parliamentary entry, with the exception of small ethnic minority parties who are exempt from this rule. Vučić appeared on live television via the public broadcaster RTS to acknowledge his defeat, marking a significant shift after months of tension. He stated that while definitive results were pending, projections indicated his side had lost, with the Student List securing between 135 and 140 seats against his party's 105. He described the student campaign as incorrect and filled with lies, yet recognized their victory. Following his admission, celebrations erupted across Belgrade, with car convoys driving through the streets and large crowds of young people gathering near central shopping areas to cheer. The turnout was historic, approaching 70 percent, a level not seen since at least 30 years ago and close to the record set during the 2000 parliamentary elections. The election served as a referendum on Vučić’s leadership, having governed Serbia in various capacities since 2012. Critics have long accused him of corruption and ties to organized crime. He resigned as president in September to run for prime minister, challenging the student movement directly. The student initiative emerged following protests that began in 2024 after 16 people died in the collapse of a train station canopy in Novi Sad. For nearly two years, hundreds of thousands of citizens demonstrated against corruption and authoritarianism. Radomir Sajčić, a candidate for the Student List, declared that Serbia has finally taken its destiny into its own hands, rewarding almost two years of struggle. Ilija Srdjanović, the top card on the student list and a cardiologist, stated that the country has turned its face away from a tyrant and is moving toward a better Serbia. Reactions from media aligned with the outgoing government highlighted a disconnect between the official results and their reporting. Several pro-government outlets focused heavily on Vučić’s image and statements rather than the scale of the loss. The tabloid Blic featured Vučić’s statement about his structure being "very firm" alongside stories about foreign tourists spending up to 600 euros daily and personal anecdotes involving a TV presenter’s family. Informer, owned by Dragan J. Vučićević, published data from a small sample of polling stations before final results showed Vučić’s list leading with 54.21 percent, labeling the student movement with derogatory terms. After the defeat became apparent, Vučićević expressed disbelief, stating he did not know how they would survive the outcome. He had previously dismissed rumors that Vučić might leave Serbia if he lost. Public frustration directed itself significantly at the public broadcaster RTS. Although RTS aired a segment showing the student celebration, social media users flooded the channel’s posts with angry comments. Many recalled months of protests outside the RTS building, accusing the service of systematically ignoring the student movement and using pejorative language such as "blockers." Commentators mocked the sudden change in tone, noting that the channel had previously given minimal airtime to the students. One user sarcastically asked if the staff had just heard that students existed. Others demanded radical changes, including the shutdown of the service, criticizing the broadcast of a feature film on election night instead of comprehensive coverage. Some predicted that the current director, Manja Grčić, would hold the shortest mandate in the history of RTS. Political analysts noted the magnitude of the shift. Dejan Jović, a professor at the Faculty of Political Sciences in Zagreb, called the result excellent news for democracy and a model of resistance to authoritarian systems. He emphasized the need to monitor the transition of power carefully, noting that the Student List is not a traditional party, creating questions about future governance structures. The Socialist Party, a recent ally of Vučić, failed to enter parliament, losing its previous 18 seats. European leaders congratulated Serbia on the democratic outcome. The atmosphere in Belgrade remained tense even after polls closed, with heavy police presence in the city center amid fears of provocations. The election concluded a period defined by high political polarization and sustained civic mobilization.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listNeodvisenProgresivno
Srbija se je prebudila po zgodovinski porazi Vučića, in to so njegovi mediji. Težko jih je premagati.

Koalicija "Študenti zmagajo" je na parlamentarnih volitvah v Srbiji osvojila odločilno zmago, saj je osvojila približno 53 odstotkov glasov in naj bi osvojila 139 od 250 sedežev, kar jim zagotavlja samostojno večino. V nasprotju s tem je vladajoča koalicija, ki jo vodi predsednik Aleksandar Vučić, dobila približno 39,9 odstotka glasov, kar je v primerjavi z opozicijo povzročilo primanjkljaj več kot 535.000 glasov. Kljub tej pomembni volilni porazi je več glavnih srbskih medijev, ki so povezani z vlado, v svojih jutranjih izdajah zmanjšalo rezultate. Mediji, kot so Blic, Informer in B92, so prednostno obravnavali Vučićeve izjave po volitvah, govorice o zvezdnikih in porabe tujcev za turizem, ne pa obseg političnega premika. V članku je poudarjeno, kako so te publikacije osredotočile pozornost na predsednika in njegove zaveznike, kar je učinkovito zmanjšalo vpliv zgodovinske zmage opozicije.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so rezultati volitev označeni s kritičnim pogledom na državne medije, z izrazi, kot so "zgodovinski poraz" in opis kritja kot poskus prikrivanja izida. Izrecno označuje nekatere medije kot "izredno pro-vladno uredniško politiko" in kritizira

tportal logotportalNeodvisenKonservativno
RTS je po porazu Vučića naredil nekaj nepredstavljivega: Srbi so jih napolnili z besnimi komentarji.

Srbska javna televizija RTS se je po objavi poročila, ki je proslavljalo volilno zmago Študentske liste na nedavnih parlamentarnih volitvah, soočila z močnim nasprotovanjem na družbenih omrežjih. Mnogi državljani so kritizirali postajo, ker je prej ignorirala študentsko gibanje in označevala protestnike kot "blokirce", zaradi političnega premika po porazu Aleksandra Vučića pa so na nenadno pozitivno pokritost gledali kot na neiskreno. Komentaristi so se norčevali iz spremembe tona, saj so opozorili, da je postaja protestom pred izidom volilnih rezultatov predhodno dala le minimalni čas. Nekateri uporabniki so zahtevali radikalne spremembe, vključno z zaprtjem izdajatelja, drugi pa so napovedali kratke mandate za sedanje vodstvo. Polemika poudarja napetosti med državnimi mediji in segmenti javnosti, ki jih vidijo kot politično pristranske.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je dogodek prikazan skozi lečo javnega ogorčenja nad državnimi mediji, v glavnem pa so citati kritikov, ki RTS obtožujejo predsodkov in hinavščine v preteklosti. Z osredotočanjem izključno na negativne reakcije in izpuščanjem kakršne koli obrambe iz RTS ali nevtralne perspektive, kos sprejme kritično,

Jutarnji list logoJutarnji listNeodvisenKonservativno
VIDEO Tako sta Vučićević in zloglasni Informer spremljala Vučićev potop, najbolj noro je, da sta objavila minuto pred rezultati

Članek poroča o reakciji Dragana J. Vučićevića, lastnika in glavnega urednika srbskega tabloida Informer, na poraz srbske napredne stranke (SNS) predsednika Aleksandra Vučića na nedavnih parlamentarnih volitvah. Poudarja, da je Informer predhodno objavil podatke iz majhnega vzorca volilnih mest, ki kažejo, da je SNS vodil z znatno razliko, hkrati pa zavračal trditve, da bi Vučić lahko zapustil Srbijo, če bi izgubil. V članku je navedeno, da je Informer od začetka leta 2012 dosledno podpiral Vučićevo politiko, pogosto pa je napadel njegove nasprotnike in študentsko gibanje. Po uradni objavi poraza na volitvah je Vučićević izrazil šok nad zmago študentske liste, kar je za publikacijo pomenilo pomemben politični premik.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je tema obravnavana s zelo kritičnim in ponižujočim jezikom, lastnik časopisa pa je opisan kot "glasen in zloglasen medijski bralnik", časopis pa kot "zloglasen tabloid". V njem je poudaril vlogo publikacije kot "doslednega zagovornika" vladajoče stranke in kritiziral njeno predhodno stališče.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe