ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Senat je odobril CDC-ja, ki je bil izbran za HHS.
United States🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 5 dnevi

Senat je odobril CDC-ja, ki je bil izbran za HHS.

Senatski odbor za zdravje je odobril dve nominaciji za Ministrstvo za zdravje in socialne storitve (HHS): Erica Schwartz za direktorja CDC in Sean Kaufman za pomočnika sekretarja za pripravljenost in odziv. Oba kandidata sta se soočila s preiskovanjem zaradi preteklih sporov. Schwartzova potencialna občutljivost za politični vpliv in Kaufmanova zgodovina anti-vakcinskih pripomb.

The Senate health committee approved the nomination of Erica Schwartz for director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Sean Kaufman for assistant secretary for preparedness and response (ASPR) on Thursday. These confirmations represent a critical step in filling key positions within the Trump administration's health infrastructure, which has long struggled with staffing shortages and ideological conflicts. Both nominees now await final approval by the full Senate, although no specific dates have been announced for such votes. The committee's decisions reflect a willingness among Republican members to support the administration despite concerns over the qualifications and past statements of some candidates. The vote on Erica Schwartz passed 12-10, with all Republicans and one Democrat supporting her nomination. For Sean Kaufman, the vote was closer, 12-11, with all Republicans backing him and all Democrats opposing. Committee chairman Bill Cassidy (R-La.) voiced reservations about Kaufman's past anti-vaccine comments but ultimately supported the nomination after receiving assurances from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). According to Cassidy, HHS officials promised unspecified personnel changes and a commitment to keep Kaufman away from vaccine-related policymaking. Cassidy acknowledged that Kaufman had previously made "stupid and irresponsible" remarks about immunizations but emphasized that he had since taken responsibility for those views. The senator stressed that he would monitor future actions to ensure that science, not ideology, guides decision-making. He also warned that the committee might exert influence over future appointments if these commitments are not honored. Erica Schwartz, who served as deputy surgeon general under the first Trump administration, faced scrutiny during her July 15 confirmation hearing. She was questioned about her ability to avoid political interference and her plans for revitalizing the CDC, which has suffered from low morale and staffing issues due to prolonged leadership gaps. Schwartz pledged to prioritize scientific integrity and rebuild public trust in the agency. However, she remained vague about whether she would inform Congress if directed to implement unscientific or harmful policies, stating she believed neither President Trump nor Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would pursue such measures. Schwartz succeeded Susan Monarez, who was removed from her position after just days in office, reportedly for refusing to endorse Kennedy's vaccine policies. Her appointment marks a shift toward a less polarizing figure compared to previous Trump health nominees. Public health experts suggest she faces considerable challenges in restoring stability to the CDC amid ongoing controversies surrounding vaccine safety and misinformation. Sean Kaufman's nomination drew particular controversy due to his history of expressing skepticism about vaccines. His past statements, initially reported by STAT, raised concerns about his suitability for a role responsible for pandemic preparedness. Despite these reservations, Cassidy decided to support Kaufman after negotiations with HHS officials, who reportedly offered assurances about limiting his involvement in vaccine policy. However, the effectiveness of these assurances remains uncertain, especially given previous instances where HHS has deviated from commitments made to Cassidy. The broader context includes ongoing tensions between Cassidy and HHS leadership, particularly Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Earlier agreements between the two have been partially broken, including the removal of a panel of vaccine advisers and the appointment of individuals skeptical of vaccines. Additionally, HHS has proposed reducing the number of recommended pediatric vaccines, a move Cassidy opposes. Changes to the CDC's website, which previously stated vaccines do not cause autism, have also drawn criticism, with Cassidy calling the revisions insufficient. As the full Senate prepares to consider the nominations, the focus remains on ensuring that the confirmed officials adhere to the commitments made during the confirmation process. The outcome of these votes will have implications for the direction of U.S. public health policy, particularly in addressing current health challenges such as measles outbreaks and foodborne illnesses. Meanwhile, the committee continues to evaluate other nominees, including Nicole Saphier for surgeon general, whose stronger support for vaccines has been noted as encouraging.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

2 poročil

Axios logoAxiosNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 86Objektivnost 80pred 5 dnevi
Senat je odobril CDC-ja, ki je bil izbran za HHS.

Senatski odbor za zdravje je odobril dve nominaciji za Ministrstvo za zdravje in socialne storitve (HHS): Erica Schwartz za direktorja CDC in Sean Kaufman za pomočnika sekretarja za pripravljenost in odziv. Oba kandidata sta se soočila s preiskovanjem zaradi preteklih sporov. Schwartzova potencialna občutljivost za politični vpliv in Kaufmanova zgodovina anti-vakcinskih pripomb.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pogled na politične napetosti, ki obkrožajo nominacije, in poudarja tako polemiko kot kompromis, ki je bil dosežen.

Zakaj dejstva (86): This article provides detailed information on the approval process, including vote counts and quotes from Senator Cassidy. It accurately reflects the situation with both nominees, noting the controversy around Kaufman's past statements and the concessions from HHS. It aligns closely with the cross-s

Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting both sides of the issue without overt bias. Phrases like 'not a slam dunk' and 'future leverage points' suggest some strategic framing, but overall the reporting remains objective and focused on the facts.

STAT News logoSTAT NewsNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 78pred 5 dnevi
Ključna senatska skupina podpira Trumpove izbire za CDC, pripravljenost na pandemijo

Senatski odbor za zdravje je odobril dva kandidata Trumpove administracije za kritične zdravstvene vloge: Erica Schwartz kot direktor CDC in Sean Kaufman kot pomočnik sekretarja za pripravljenost in odziv (ASPR). Oba imenovanja sta dobila dvostransko podporo, vsi republikanci so glasovali za in nekateri demokrati so nasprotovali. Senator Bill Cassidy (R-La.) je podprl oba kandidata kljub prejšnjim nesoglasjem, pri čemer je navedel izzive javnega zdravja, kot so bolezni, ki jih je mogoče preprečiti s cepivom, in pripravljenost na pandemijo. Cassidy je prej podprl Roberta F. Kennedyja Jr., ki se je zanašal na obljube uradnikov HHS, čeprav so te obljube poročali, da so bile porušene. Članek poudarja tekoče napetosti glede ceplinskih politik, vključno z zmanjšanjem priporočenih pediatričnih cepiv HHS in spreminjanjem spletnih strani CDC, da bi vprašali povezave med cepivom in avtizmom, ki mu je Cassidy močno nasprotoval.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav članek obravnava politično nabite teme, kot so cepivska politika in stranske potrditve, predstavlja več pogledov.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports the approval of both nominees by the Senate health committee, citing specific votes and quotes from Senator Cassidy. It references the controversy around Kaufman's past anti-vaccine comments and mentions the role of HHS officials in influencing Cassidy's decision. Whil

Zakaj objektivnost (78): The tone remains largely neutral, presenting facts about the approvals and the controversies surrounding the nominees. However, phrases like 'some pretty stupid things' and 'irresponsible things' introduce a slight subjective judgment, affecting objectivity.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe