ON
← Nazaj na pregled
V poročilu demokratov v senatu piše, da so velike banke na Epsteina gledale drugače.
Qatar🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnopred 7 urami

V poročilu demokratov v senatu piše, da so velike banke na Epsteina gledale drugače.

Poročilo ameriškega senatora Rona Wydena, najvišjega demokrata v senatnem finančnem odboru, trdi, da so velike banke na Wall Streetu "gledele na drugo stran" v zvezi z dejavnostmi osramočenega finančnika Jeffreyja Epsteina. V poročilu se trdi, da so te banke ignorirale jasne dokaze o trgovini z ljudmi in pranju denarja, da bi Epsteina ohranili kot stranko, kar bi lahko kršilo zvezne zakone o preprečevanju pranja denarja. Wyden kritizira Ministrstvo za pravosodje in zakladnico za nezadostno skrbnost v primeru Epsteina in ugotavlja, da je, medtem ko je Epstein umrl v priporu leta 2019, bilo proti drugim vpletenih vloženih le nekaj obtožb. V poročilu so posebej navedeni JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank in Bank of America, obtoženi pa so olajšali Epsteinove finančne operacije in nakazali kršitve pravnih standardov.

Senator Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee, has released a detailed report alleging that major U.S. banks turned a blind eye to the financial activities of Jeffrey Epstein, the late disgraced financier accused of running a sex-trafficking ring. The report, issued on Tuesday, claims that institutions such as JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America facilitated Epstein's ability to move large sums of money, potentially enabling his criminal operations. According to Wyden, the banks' actions allowed Epstein to maintain access to substantial funds, which were reportedly used to attract, shelter, and transport his victims. The senator's office stated that bank records and public court documents reviewed by his team reveal a consistent pattern of behavior among the largest Wall Street banks, which chose to overlook clear signs of sex trafficking and money laundering to retain a high-profile client. The report suggests that these banks might have violated federal anti-money laundering laws, which require financial institutions to report suspicious transactions. Wyden criticized the Department of Justice and the Department of the Treasury for not conducting thorough investigations into Epstein's activities. Epstein was discovered dead in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal sex trafficking charges. Despite this, the number of criminal charges brought against individuals connected to Epstein has remained limited, primarily targeting Epstein himself and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. In contrast, several international law enforcement agencies have launched investigations into individuals suspected of having ties to Epstein, including the former British royal Prince Andrew. Wyden described the report as a critical resource for prosecutors, investigators, and lawmakers seeking to hold those associated with Epstein accountable. The document specifically names JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank, and Bank of America, suggesting that certain employees within these institutions should face scrutiny. It also identifies several individuals who allegedly helped Epstein transfer significant amounts of money globally. The report alleges that Bank of America likely breached federal anti-money laundering regulations by failing to report $170 million in payments made to Epstein by billionaire investor Leon Black. Additionally, it claims that JPMorgan Chase executives advised Epstein on methods to withdraw cash using shell companies rather than his personal accounts, thereby concealing information from compliance officers and government regulators. In response to the report, a representative from Bank of America emphasized the institution's commitment to legal and regulatory responsibilities, stating that the bank did not assist in any wrongdoing. A spokesperson for Deutsche Bank expressed regret over its past association with Epstein and noted cooperation with regulatory bodies and law enforcement agencies during their investigations. JPMorgan Chase, which had settled with Epstein survivors in 2023, did not provide immediate comments on the report. As midterm elections approach, Democrats have leveraged criticisms surrounding the Trump administration's management of Epstein-related investigative files as a point of contention. However, the issue has garnered uncommon bipartisan backing, reflecting broader concerns about transparency and accountability in handling such sensitive matters. Last November, both the Senate and House of Representatives initiated efforts aimed at scrutinizing the handling of these files, indicating a growing interest in ensuring that all relevant parties are held responsible for their roles in the Epstein case.

1 poročil

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishDržavni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 7 urami
V poročilu demokratov v senatu piše, da so velike banke na Epsteina gledale drugače.

Poročilo ameriškega senatora Rona Wydena, najvišjega demokrata v senatnem finančnem odboru, trdi, da so velike banke na Wall Streetu "gledele na drugo stran" v zvezi z dejavnostmi osramočenega finančnika Jeffreyja Epsteina. V poročilu se trdi, da so te banke ignorirale jasne dokaze o trgovini z ljudmi in pranju denarja, da bi Epsteina ohranili kot stranko, kar bi lahko kršilo zvezne zakone o preprečevanju pranja denarja. Wyden kritizira Ministrstvo za pravosodje in zakladnico za nezadostno skrbnost v primeru Epsteina in ugotavlja, da je, medtem ko je Epstein umrl v priporu leta 2019, bilo proti drugim vpletenih vloženih le nekaj obtožb. V poročilu so posebej navedeni JPMorgan Chase, Deutsche Bank in Bank of America, obtoženi pa so olajšali Epsteinove finančne operacije in nakazali kršitve pravnih standardov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku se ta problem obravnava kot sistemski neuspeh velikih finančnih institucij in vladnega nadzora, s poudarkom na korporativni soudeleženosti in institucionalnem zanemarjanju.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on a Senate Democrat's findings regarding major banks' involvement with Epstein, citing specific claims made by Senator Ron Wyden. While there is no primary source document to verify these claims directly, the article aligns with broader reporting on the Epstein case, including a

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the senator's findings as credible but also criticizes the DOJ and Treasury for insufficient due diligence. This critique introduces a level of editorializing, particularly in suggesting that these agencies failed in their responsibilities. The tone leans toward questioning inst

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe