The Senate of the Philippines has confirmed that it is fully prepared for the upcoming impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, which is set to commence on Monday, July 6, 2026. According to Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Ret. Maj. Gen. Alfred Corpus, extensive security measures have been implemented to ensure the smooth conduct of the proceedings. Various units from the Philippine National Police (PNP) have been mobilized to support the Senate’s security apparatus during the trial. Corpus emphasized that sufficient personnel would be stationed throughout the Senate building, including inside the chambers where the trial will take place. Additionally, members of the public interested in observing the proceedings are encouraged to register via the Senate’s Visitor Management System (VMS). Registration will be available starting at 2 p.m. the day before the trial begins, ensuring that the process is orderly and accessible to those wishing to witness the historic event.
One of the most contentious issues leading up to the trial concerns the handling of the so-called "BIR Green Box," a sealed container containing the tax records of Vice President Sara Duterte and her husband, Manases Carpio. This box was originally submitted by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to the House committee on justice during hearings in April 2026. Despite attempts to open it during pre-trial proceedings, the box remained sealed due to legal and procedural disputes. Senator Panfilo "Ping" Lacson, a prominent figure in the Senate, argued that the impeachment court has no authority to retain or handle such evidence. He stated that the responsibility of unsealing the box lies with the prosecution or the defense, not the court itself. Lacson further warned that the Senate could face accusations of grave abuse of discretion if it attempted to decide whether to open the box independently.
Despite the defense team's initial resistance, recent developments indicate a shift in their stance. House prosecutors, including Mamamayang Liberal party-list Representative Leila de Lima, reported that the defense has agreed in principle to allow the box to be marked as evidence before the Senate impeachment court. However, the defense insists that this process should occur in an executive session, away from public view. De Lima expressed skepticism about the necessity of such secrecy, emphasizing that the prosecution has the right to inspect and catalog the contents of the box. Lawyer Benjamin Tolosa Jr., the prosecution’s legal spokesperson, viewed this agreement as a positive step toward transparency, noting that it marks a departure from the defense’s previous opposition to even marking the box as evidence.
The issue of the BIR box has become a focal point in the broader context of the impeachment trial. Prosecutors argue that the tax records contained within the box are essential to proving the allegations of unexplained wealth and failure to disclose assets accurately. These allegations form the basis of Article II of the articles of impeachment, which accuse Vice President Duterte of acquiring wealth disproportionate to her lawful income. The defense, however, contends that the records in question pertain to periods when Duterte was not an impeachable officer, thus rendering them irrelevant to the current proceedings. Their legal team has consistently maintained that the documents cannot serve as a foundation for any impeachable offense, given the timeline of her tenure in public office.
Another critical aspect of the impending trial is the determination of the presiding officer. As of now, the Senate has not officially designated who will oversee the proceedings once the trial commences. Senate Secretary and Impeachment Clerk of Court Renato "Rey" Bantug Jr. indicated that the decision would be made on Monday, the day the trial begins. Under the amended Rules of Procedure on Impeachment Trials, the Senate president, currently Senator Sherwin "Win" Gatchalian, is expected to preside unless a majority of senators opt to select another senator-judge. Some senators, including Raffy Tulfo, have suggested that experienced legal figures such as Senators Francis "Kiko" Pangilinan or Francis "Chiz" Escudero might be suitable candidates for the role. Gatchalian himself has acknowledged the possibility of stepping aside if deemed necessary, stating that the focus should be on ensuring the trial proceeds efficiently and fairly.
The political landscape surrounding the trial is complex, with various stakeholders expressing differing views on the potential outcomes. While the Palace has urged Vice President Duterte to personally attend the trial to demonstrate her innocence, legal experts have highlighted the constitutional requirements for conviction or acquittal. According to the Constitution, a two-thirds vote of the senators who actually sit as judges in the impeachment court is required for a conviction. This means that the number of participating senators could significantly influence the outcome. Legal analysts suggest that the defense’s primary challenge will be securing enough votes to achieve an acquittal, given the gravity of the charges and the public interest in the proceedings.
As the trial approaches, the Senate has continued to prepare meticulously for the proceedings. A walk-through of the Senate building was recently conducted by Senate President Gatchalian to assess the readiness of the venues and facilities. Despite logistical challenges such as space limitations, the Senate has ensured that both the prosecution and defense will have the opportunity to inspect their assigned areas within the coming weeks. Security arrangements have been reinforced, and the overall atmosphere remains tense yet focused on conducting the trial in accordance with established procedures. With the trial set to begin on Monday, all eyes are on the Senate as it prepares to address one of the most significant legal and political moments in recent Philippine history.
8 poročil
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90včerajČlanek poroča o varnostnih pripravah filipinskega senata za prihajajoče sojenje za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte, ki naj bi se začelo v ponedeljek.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o varnostnih ureditvah za proces obtožbe, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni politični strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports Lacson's statement about returning the BIR box. It remains objective and presents the facts without taking sides.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90predvčerajšnjim Senat še vedno ne imenuje predsednika, ko se v ponedeljek začne sojenje Sari Duterte.Filipinski senat še ni odločil, kdo bo predsedoval sojenju za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte, ki naj bi se začel 6. julija. Sekretar senata in sodni uradnik za impeachment Renato Bantug Jr. je izjavil, da bo odločitev sprejeta v ponedeljek, čeprav ni bilo prejeto nobenih končnih navodil. Po spremenjenih pravilih je predsednik senata, senator Sherwin Gatchalian, imenovan za predsednika, razen če večina izbere drugega senatorja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o postopku, ki poteka v zvezi z izbiro predsednika za sojenje za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte. V članku so citati več senatorjev in uradnikov, ki zagotavljajo uravnotežene poglede, ne da bi očitno podpirali katero koli stran.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article accurately reports De Lima's statement on the BIR box. It remains objective and presents the facts without taking sides.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 5 dneviPravna ekipa podpredsednice Sare Duterte je izrazila pripravljenost odpreti zapečateno škatlo, ki vsebuje njene davčne zapise pred odborom za pravosodje, vendar vztraja, da se mora to zgoditi na zaupnem izvršilnem zasedanju. Trdijo, da se dokumenti, ki zajemajo obdobja, ko Duterte ni bil uradnik, ki ga je mogoče obtožiti, ne morejo uporabiti kot dokaz za kakršne koli kaznive dejanja, ki jih je mogoče obtožiti. Tožilstvo pa je dvomilo v potrebo po tajnosti in predlagalo, da bi lahko škatlo odprli javno z ustreznimi zaščitnimi ukrepi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja stališče obrambe, ki poudarja zaupnost in nepomembnost preteklih davčnih evidenc za sedanje obtožbe, in nasprotne argumente tožilstva, ki sprašujejo o potrebi po tajnosti.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 90): The article provides detailed and accurate reporting on the defense team's position regarding the BIR box. It remains objective and avoids taking sides in the debate.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 88pred 5 dnevi VP OK za odprtje škatle BIR v zaprtih prostorih De LimaV pripravah na senatske postopke impeachmenta proti podpredsednici Sari Duterte so tožilci predstavniškega doma objavili, da se je Dutertejeva pravna ekipa strinjala, da bo zaprta škatla, ki vsebuje njene davčne evidence, označena kot dokaz, čeprav obramba raje postopek poteka v zasebnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja stališča obtožnice in obrambe glede ravnanja s škatlo BIR, ki vsebuje davčne zapise podpredsednice Sare Duterte.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 88): Reports accurately on the legal team's change of position regarding the BIR box. Maintains objectivity by presenting both the prosecution's stance and the defense's request for executive session.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 6 urami Palača: Bolje, da se podpredsednica Sara Duterte pojavi na sojenju, da dokaže nedolžnostV članku so razpravljali o pripravah na obtožbeno sojenje podpredsednice Sare Duterte, s poudarkom na njenem morebitnem osebnem videzu, da bi dokazala nedolžnost. Senat, ki deluje kot sodišče za obtožbo, naj bi pričel sojenje s ključnimi vprašanji, vključno z ravnanjem z Bureauom za notranje prihodke (BIR), ki vsebuje Dutertejeve davčne evidence. Malacañangova tiskovna predstavnica Claire Castro je predlagala, da bi lahko Dutertejevo osebno pojavljanje pomagalo dokazati nedolžnost. Medtem senator Panfilo Lacson trdi, da bi bilo treba škatlo BIR vrniti tožilstvu hiše, s poudarkom na tem, da bi morali dokaze predstaviti obe strani, ne pa jih sodišče.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja več pogledov, ne da bi očitno naklonil eni strani, vključuje izjave predstavnikov Malacañanga, ki zagovarjajo Dutertejevo osebno prisotnost, in senatorja Lacsona, ki se zavzema za vrnitev škatle BIR tožilstvu.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article presents factual information about the Palace's stance on Duterte appearing at her trial. It maintains a neutral tone but subtly suggests the importance of her presence without overt bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85včeraj Lacson says impeach court has no business keeping BIR box, orders returnSenator Panfilio 'Ping' Lacson, representing the Senate's impeachment court, stated that the Senate has no legal authority to keep the sealed BIR green box containing Vice President Sara Duterte's tax records. He argued that the box should be returned to the House prosecution panel, emphasizing that evidence should be presented by either side during the trial. Lacson noted that keeping the box violates the law and warned that unsealing it could lead to accusations of misuse of power. He cited the National Internal Revenue Code, stating that tax records can only be disclosed with presidential authorization or a waiver from Duterte. The box was originally submitted by the BIR during a House hearing and later sent to the Senate after attempts to open it failed. The impeachment trial is scheduled to begin on June 6.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): While the article discusses a politically sensitive impeachment proceeding, the framing remains neutral. It presents both sides of the argument—Lacson's call for returning the box and the legal rationale behind his stance—without overtly favoring one side. The focus is on procedural legality rather
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article accurately reports the Senate's uncertainty about the presiding officer. It maintains a neutral tone while presenting the situation objectively.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 4 dnevi Gatchalian: Podpredsednikova davčna dokumentacija ni prednostna naloga v postopku opozarjanjaPredsednik senata Sherwin Gatchalian je izjavil, da odprtje zapečatene škatle Urada za notranje prihodke (BIR), ki vsebuje davčne zapise podpredsednice Sare Duterte, morda ne bo glavna prednostna naloga v dnevnem redu sojenja za opozarjanje, ki se začne 6. julija. Sodišče za opozarjanje bo odločilo, ali bo obravnavalo to vprašanje med sojenjem, če ga bo tožilstvo sprožilo. Škatla BIR, ki vključuje davčne zapise Duterte in njenega moža, ni bila odprta med konferenco pred sojenjem, vendar ostaja del dokazov v skladu s členom II pritožbe za opozarjanje. Tožilci menijo, da so dokumenti ključni za povezovanje Dutertejevih finančnih razkritij z obtožbami o neobjasnjenem bogastvu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o postopku opozarjanja, ne da bi očitno naklonjene katerikoli strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 85): The article accurately conveys Gatchalian's comments on the BIR box not being the top priority. It maintains a neutral tone while presenting his perspective without bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 2 urama Sara Duterte bi lahko še vedno odstopila pred sodnim postopkom. odvetnikiPodpredsednica Sara Duterte lahko še vedno odstopi, preden se začne proces obtožnice, je dejal odvetnik Howard Calleja, ki je navedel precedente, kot so tisti bivšega varuha človekovih pravic Merceditasa Gutierreza in bivšega predsednika Komisije za volitve Andresa Bautiste. Vendar odvetnik Neri Colmenares trdi, da odstop ne bi preprečil, da bi bil Duterte trajno diskvalificiran zaradi predložitve člankov o obtožnici Senatu. Duterte se sooča z obtožbami, vključno z zlorabo zaupnih sredstev, neobjasnjenim bogastvom, domnevnimi grožnjami proti predsedniku Ferdinandu Marcosu Jr. in podkupovanjem izobraževalnih uradnikov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni oba stališča: odvetnik Howard Calleja predlaga odstop kot možnost, odvetnica Neri Colmenares pa trdi, da to ne bi preprečilo trajne diskvalifikacije, ne da bi tako nagrajila katero koli stran.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 80): The article accurately reports legal arguments regarding Duterte's potential resignation and the implications of impeachment. However, it leans slightly toward the opposition's perspective by emphasizing the permanence of disqualification.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
PH
