The Sandiganbayan Fifth Division has rejected Senator Jinggoy Estrada’s motion to set bail in his plunder case, according to court documents released on Tuesday. The ruling, dated July 24 but made public later, was signed by Associate Justice Gener Gito and supported by Justices Zaldy Trespeses and Maryann Corpus-Mañalac. Estrada faces charges related to alleged kickbacks from flood control projects between 2024 and 2025. The court stated that Estrada’s motion lacked legal foundation and was submitted too early in the proceedings. The decision comes amid a series of rulings against Estrada in recent months. On July 9, the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division denied his request to attend the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte. The court cited the lack of merit in his motion and noted his current suspension due to his graft case. Earlier, on June 24, the same division turned down Estrada’s attempt to merge his plunder and graft cases into one division, arguing that such a move would hinder the progress of the trials. On June 4, the Sandiganbayan Second Division dismissed Estrada’s motions challenging his graft case, clearing the way for his arraignment and pre-trial conference. However, Estrada did not enter a plea during his arraignment. His arraignment was initially scheduled for June 1 but was postponed to June 4 after his legal team requested a delay. Estrada returned to custody on June 1 following the issuance of an arrest warrant by the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division for his plunder and graft cases. The Philippine National Police-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group executed the warrant at the Senate, where Estrada had been holding a press briefing. His arrest prompted the Senate majority, led by Alan Peter Cayetano, to boycott a scheduled plenary session in protest. Earlier, on May 29, the Sandiganbayan Second Division ordered Estrada’s arrest for his graft case linked to the flood control scandal. He attempted to secure bail for the charge, offering P90,000, which is considered a bailable offense. Despite these efforts, the court has consistently denied his requests for release. Meanwhile, former Senator Bong Revilla received a different outcome. The Sandiganbayan Third Division granted his bail petition on July 31, allowing him temporary release from jail. According to Dennis Pulma, the Third Division clerk of court, the court accepted Revilla’s P1-million bail but denied the same relief to other accused individuals. Revilla was released at 6:14 pm after completing necessary clearances with the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology. Ombudsman Jesus Crispin Remulla announced that the preliminary investigation into non-bailable malversation charges against CWS party-list Representative Edwin Gardiola has progressed. These charges, totaling more than 20 counts and involving over P879 million, are now in the stage preceding formal charges before the Sandiganbayan. Estrada’s continued detention highlights the ongoing legal battles surrounding high-profile figures in the Philippines. His case involves multiple charges, including plunder and graft, all tied to the alleged mismanagement of flood control projects. The court has emphasized that while Estrada can still file a proper bail petition, the prosecution must first present evidence to demonstrate the strength of their case against him. The denial of Estrada’s bail request underscores the judiciary’s strict adherence to procedural requirements. The court has repeatedly stressed that bail cannot be granted without first addressing the fundamental issue of whether it should be allowed at all. This approach ensures that the prosecution has ample opportunity to build its case before any consideration of releasing the accused. As the legal proceedings continue, the focus remains on the evidentiary burden placed on the prosecution. The court’s latest ruling reinforces the need for thorough preparation and presentation of evidence before any bail determination can be made. For Estrada, this means remaining in custody until further legal steps are taken, potentially leading to a more comprehensive review of his case.
8 poročil
GMA News OnlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 95pred 3 dneviFilipinski protikorupcijski sodišče Sandiganbayan je zavrnilo predlog sina nekdanjega predsednika Josepha Ejercita Estrade, Jinggoya Estrade, za prilagoditev pogojev varščine v primeru ropanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o sodni odločitvi v zvezi s politično občutljivim primerom, v katerem je vpletena pomembna oseba.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports that the Sandiganbayan denied Jinggoy Estrada's motion to fix bail in his plunder case. This aligns with other articles covering Estrada's legal proceedings.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article presents the information in a straightforward manner, focusing on the legal outcome without expressing opinion or bias.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 7 dneviOdvetniki Romualdeza trdijo, da so ta poročila zavajajoča in škodujejo njegovemu ugledu, trdijo, da so izjave BI nepošteno namenile, da se je skušal izogniti pristojnosti Sandiganbayan. Poudarjajo, da trditve nimajo dejanske podlage in kršijo domnevo nedolžnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe strani spora: BI trdi, da je prejel informacije o morebitnem odhodu Romualdeza, pravna ekipa pa potrjuje, da so poročila lažna in škodljiva.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports that the Romualdez camp demanded an apology from the Bureau of Immigration over allegations of spreading false information regarding Romualdez's attempts to leave the country. This aligns with the broader narrative presented in other articles.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the facts without taking sides in the dispute between Romualdez and the BI.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 6 dnevi BI zanika širjenje lažnih informacij o domnevni ponudbi Romualdeza, da bi zapustil PHUrad za priseljevanje (BI) je zanikal obtožbe, da je širil lažne informacije o domnevnem poskusu bivšega predsednika predstavniškega doma Martina Romualdeza, da bi zapustil Filipine. Romualdezov pravni tim je trdil, da so izjave BI zavajajoče in zahteval opravičilo, trdil pa je, da so lažno predlagali, da je zakonodajalec poskušal pobegniti iz države, da bi se izognil kazenskim preiskavam. BI je navedel, da je zagotovil dejanske informacije na podlagi medijskih preiskav in pojasnil, da se domnevni potovalni načrti nanašajo na načrtovani potovanje aprila 2026, ki je bilo odobreno, vendar ni potekalo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe strani spora: BI trdi, da je delovala odgovorno in se odzvala na zakonite poizvedbe, medtem ko pravna ekipa Romualdeza trdi, da so bile informacije zavajajoče.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the BI's denial of spreading false information about Romualdez's alleged attempts to leave the country. It includes direct quotes from BI Commissioner Joel Anthony Viado and mentions the specific date (April 2026) of the alleged travel plans. The article also reference
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents both sides of the issue, quoting BI officials and Romualdez's spokesperson. While it uses terms like 'alleged' and 'supposed,' it avoids overtly biased language. However, the title implies the BI denied spreading false information, which may slightly frame the narrative in favor
RapplerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 93Objektivnost 95pred 3 dneviV sodbi z dne 24. julija, ki je bila objavljena 28. julija, je sodnik Gener Gito izjavil, da Estradov predlog nima pravne podlage in je bil vložen prehitro. Sodišče je poudarilo, da varščina ne more biti določena, ne da bi najprej ugotovilo, ali bi jo bilo treba odobriti. Odločitev sledi več prejšnjim zavrnitvam Estradovih predlogov, vključno z njegovim poskusom, da se udeleži sojenja za impeachment podpredsednice Sare Duterte in njegovo prošnjo za združitev več obtožb v enem oddelku.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja sodne odločitve in postopkovne odločitve v zvezi s pravnimi zadevami senatorja Jinggoya Estrade brez očitnega ideološkega nagibanja.
Zakaj dejstva (93): The article provides specific details such as the date of the ruling (July 24, released July 28), the names of the justices involved (Gener Gito, Zaldy Trespeses, Maryann Corpus-Mañalac), and the legal reasoning behind the denial of bail. These details align with the cross-source consensus found in
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article presents the information in a neutral manner, using direct quotes from the court's decision and avoiding any overt bias or emotional language. It reports facts without injecting personal opinion or framing the story in a particular ideological direction.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 92pred 3 dnevi Jinggoy Estrada ostane v zaporu, Sandiganbayan pa zavrne prošnjo za varščino.Senator Jinggoy Estrada ostaja v priporu, saj je Sandiganbayan Fifth Division zavrnil njegovo prošnjo za plačilo varščine v primeru ropanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o sodni odločitvi, ne da bi se očitno zavzemali za katero koli politično stran, poročajo pa o sodnem ukrepu in njegovih posledicah, ne da bi komentirali Estradino krivdo ali nedolžnost, pri čemer ohranjajo nevtralnost.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately states that Estrada's bail request was denied by the Sandiganbayan Fifth Division and includes the relevant dates (July 24 ruling, uploaded July 28). While it is less detailed than the Rappler article, it aligns with the cross-source consensus and does not introduce conflictin
Zakaj objektivnost (92): The article maintains an objective tone, presenting the court's decision without taking sides or using biased language. It focuses on the factual outcome of the bail denial without adding subjective commentary or emotional framing.
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinazdaj Remulla se zavrača več kot 20 obtožb zlorab proti Gardioli.Varuh človekovih pravic, Jesus Crispin Remulla, je objavil, da je pritožba zaradi zlorabe denarja, ki ni pod pogojem varščine, proti predstavniku stranke CWS Edwin Gardiola, vredni več kot 879 milijonov PHP, vstopila v fazo predhodne preiskave.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o pravnem postopku, v katerem je sodeloval politik in o obtožbah goljufije.Predstavlja dejanske informacije o stanju preiskave brez očitne pristranskosti, uporablja nevtralen jezik in se osredotoča na postopkovne korake, namesto da bi se odločil o krivdi ali nedolžnosti
Philippine Daily InquirerNeodvisenSredinapred 7 urami Bong Revilla je dobil varščino, odobrena začasna izpustitev.Nekdanji senator Bong Revilla je prejel varščino in ga je tretja divizija Sandiganbayan določila za začasno izpustitev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena sodna odločba o varščini za Bonga Revilla, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za katero koli politično stran.
RapplerNeodvisenSredinapred 12 urami Bong Revilla je po plačilu varščine na prostostiRamon 'Bong' Revilla Jr., filipinski senator, je 31. julija dobil varščino od 3. oddelka Sandiganbayan, kar mu je omogočilo, da je po vložitvi obveznice v višini P1-milijonov svoboden.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena sodna odločba o odobritvi varščine za Revillo, ki temelji na neuspehu tožilstva pri ugotavljanju trdnih dokazov o krivdi.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
PH
