ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Sainsbury's bo naredil velike spremembe v 150 trgovinah, o katerih bi morali vedeti vsi kupci.
United Kingdom🏛️ Politikavčeraj

Sainsbury's bo naredil velike spremembe v 150 trgovinah, o katerih bi morali vedeti vsi kupci.

Sainsbury's razširi uporabo tehnologije za prepoznavanje obraza, znane kot Facewatch, na do 150 trgovin v Veliki Britaniji za boj proti kraji v trgovinah in antisocialnemu vedenju. Sistem, trenutno aktiven v 55 trgovinah, opozarja osebje, ko posamezniki z zgodovino nasilja, agresije ali kraje vstopijo v prostore. Trdi, da ima 99,98% stopnjo točnosti in je pokazala učinkovitost pri zmanjševanju kraje in škodljivega vedenja med preskusi.

A significant shift is underway within Sainsbury's, one of the UK's leading supermarket chains, as it prepares to implement a new security measure across 150 of its stores. This initiative involves expanding the use of facial recognition technology, specifically the Facewatch system, which has already been trialed in 55 locations. The rollout aims to enhance safety by identifying individuals with prior histories of shoplifting, aggression, or other forms of misconduct.

The decision comes amid growing concerns over rising incidents of theft and antisocial behavior in retail environments. Sainsbury's claims that the system has shown promising results during its initial trials. Reports indicate that the technology successfully deterred approximately 90% of repeat offenders from returning to the stores where it was implemented. Additionally, there was a noticeable decline in incidents related to theft, harm, aggression, and antisocial behavior in those locations.

Facial recognition technology operates using advanced artificial intelligence algorithms designed to detect and identify individuals based on their facial features. According to Sainsbury's, the Facewatch system boasts a high accuracy rate of 99.98%, ensuring minimal chances of false identification. However, the company emphasizes that the technology is not meant to monitor regular customers or employees but rather focus on those flagged for previous misconduct.

Despite the potential benefits, the implementation of such technology has raised ethical questions and sparked debate among consumers and privacy advocates. One notable incident occurred earlier this year when Warren Rajah, an innocent shopper, was mistakenly identified as a known offender at a Sainsbury's store in Elephant and Castle. He was subsequently escorted out of the premises, leading to a public apology from the supermarket chain. Sainsbury's attributed the error to human oversight rather than a flaw in the technology itself.

Warren described his experience as deeply humiliating, expressing concern about the psychological impact such incidents could have on vulnerable individuals. His comments highlight the broader implications of deploying facial recognition systems in public spaces, particularly regarding the balance between security measures and personal freedoms.

Other retailers have also adopted similar technologies to combat shoplifting and ensure staff safety. Companies such as B&M, Budgens, Morrisons Daily, Sports Direct, Flannels, and even some pharmacies utilize the Facewatch system. These implementations reflect a wider trend in the retail sector towards leveraging advanced surveillance techniques to address ongoing challenges related to crime and disorder.

As Sainsbury's moves forward with its expansion plan, it remains crucial to consider both the effectiveness of the technology and the potential risks associated with its deployment. While the supermarket asserts that each alert generated by the system undergoes review by human personnel before any action is taken, the incident involving Warren Rajah underscores the need for rigorous protocols to minimize errors and protect consumer rights.

Looking ahead, the continued use and refinement of facial recognition technology in retail settings will likely remain a topic of discussion among stakeholders including retailers, law enforcement agencies, and civil liberties organizations. As the technology evolves, so too must the frameworks governing its application to ensure they align with societal values and legal standards.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

2 poročil

Daily Mirror logoDaily MirrorNeodvisenSredinavčeraj
Sainsbury's bo naredil velike spremembe v 150 trgovinah, o katerih bi morali vedeti vsi kupci.

Sainsbury's razširi uporabo tehnologije za prepoznavanje obraza, znane kot Facewatch, na do 150 trgovin v Veliki Britaniji za boj proti kraji v trgovinah in antisocialnemu vedenju. Sistem, trenutno aktiven v 55 trgovinah, opozarja osebje, ko posamezniki z zgodovino nasilja, agresije ali kraje vstopijo v prostore. Trdi, da ima 99,98% stopnjo točnosti in je pokazala učinkovitost pri zmanjševanju kraje in škodljivega vedenja med preskusi.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko je vprašanje nadzora in zasebnosti politično nabito, članek predstavlja koristi tehnologije pri izboljšanju varnosti in pomisleke, ki so jih izrazili kritiki, kot je Warren Rajah.

New Statesman logoNew StatesmanNeodvisenLevovčeraj
Ne gre za telefone.

Članek New Statesmana z naslovom "To niso telefoni" se zdi, da se osredotoča na temo, povezana s tehnologijo ali skrbmi za zasebnost, čeprav posebna vsebina članka ni v celoti zagotovljena. Naslov nakazuje kritiko ali razpravo o mobilnih napravah ali njihovi vlogi v družbi, ki lahko izpodbija skupne predpostavke o nadzoru ali zbiranju podatkov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): Čeprav posebna vsebina članka ni v celoti na voljo, naslov nakazuje kritično stališče do tehnologij, ki so pogosto povezane s korporativnim ali vladnim nadzorom, kar se ujema s progresivnimi ali levičarskimi pogledi.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe