ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Sachsen-Anhalt: Ali bodo zeleni stranki AfD preprečili pohod?
Germany🏛️ PolitikaSredina30. 7. 2026

Sachsen-Anhalt: Ali bodo zeleni stranki AfD preprečili pohod?

V najnovejši anketi Infratesta iz julija 2025 je razvidno, da je AfD v Saški-Anhaltu zlahka povečala svoj delež glasov na 41 odstotkov, CDU pa se je zmanjšala na 24 odstotkov. Ob istem času so Zeleni v parlamentu z več kot enim odstotkom na 5 odstotkov, kar je zmanjšalo možnosti za absolutno večino AfD. SPD je ostala stabilna pri 7 odstotkih, Linkspartei pa je dobila točko na 13 odstotkih. BSW je ostala stabilna pri 4 odstotkih, FDP pa je padla med "Sonstigen".

In the run-up to the September 6 regional election in Saxony-Anhalt, the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) continues to lead with 41 percent according to a new poll conducted by Infratest dimap. The Christian Democratic Union (CDU), which previously held 26 percent, has dropped to 24 percent. The survey, carried out between July 23 and 28 among 1,149 eligible voters, was commissioned by the regional broadcaster MDR and local newspapers Mitteldeutsche Zeitung and Volksstimme. This comes amid ongoing turmoil within the federal CDU and following the attack on the Christopher Street Day parade in Berlin on July 25. The AfD’s chances of securing an outright majority in the state parliament remain unchanged despite the CDU's decline. The Greens have regained entry into the state legislature, increasing their support by one percentage point to five percent. With more parties represented in the parliament, the likelihood of the AfD achieving sole rule diminishes. Meanwhile, the Social Democrats (SPD) maintain their position at seven percent, while the Left Party rises slightly to 13 percent. The Free Democratic Party (FDP), once a parliamentary force, is now listed under “Others” due to low approval ratings. Personal popularity rankings among potential candidates show notable shifts. AfD candidate Ulrich Siegmund has surpassed CDU candidate Sven Schulze for the first time, with 35 percent of respondents expressing satisfaction with Siegmund’s work compared to 29 percent for Schulze. This marks a departure from earlier polls in late 2025, when both were tied at 20 percent. Despite Schulze’s recent appointment as CDU’s top candidate, his approval rating has not reached the levels achieved by former long-serving leader Reiner Haseloff, who had consistently higher visibility and satisfaction scores. Schulze maintains a slight edge in overall recognition, with 65 percent of respondents identifying him, compared to Siegmund’s 63 percent. However, Schulze’s approval is lower than Haseloff’s previous figures, particularly among younger voters, men, and less-educated groups, where Siegmund leads. Schulze, however, garners stronger support among older voters and less-educated individuals, an unusual trend for a CDU candidate. Public satisfaction with the current coalition government, comprising CDU, SPD, and FDP, has also declined. It fell from 33 percent in May to 29 percent currently. This dissatisfaction reflects broader discontent with the ruling party’s performance and governance. Among CDU supporters, there is a clear divide regarding potential alliances. Eighty-two percent reject cooperation with the AfD, while only 16 percent support such a move. Conversely, AfD supporters are split, with 55 percent favoring a coalition with the CDU and 39 percent opposing it. When considering the Left Party, 52 percent of CDU supporters reject a coalition, whereas 41 percent are open to it. The Left Party’s supporters, however, overwhelmingly back a partnership with the CDU, with 91 percent in favor. The political landscape in Saxony-Anhalt remains fluid, with shifting public sentiment and internal party dynamics influencing the outcome of the upcoming election. As the campaign progresses, the interplay between established parties and rising forces will likely shape the final results.

5 poročil

Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ) logoFrankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 7530. 7. 2026
Sachsen-Anhalt: Ali bodo zeleni stranki AfD preprečili pohod?

V najnovejši anketi Infratesta iz julija 2025 je razvidno, da je AfD v Saški-Anhaltu zlahka povečala svoj delež glasov na 41 odstotkov, CDU pa se je zmanjšala na 24 odstotkov. Ob istem času so Zeleni v parlamentu z več kot enim odstotkom na 5 odstotkov, kar je zmanjšalo možnosti za absolutno večino AfD. SPD je ostala stabilna pri 7 odstotkih, Linkspartei pa je dobila točko na 13 odstotkih. BSW je ostala stabilna pri 4 odstotkih, FDP pa je padla med "Sonstigen".

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Der Artikel predstavlja rezultate ankete, ki je nevtralna in objektivno poroča o političnem položaju v Saški-Anhaltu.

Zakaj dejstva (80): The article closely mirrors the primary source document, accurately reporting the AfD’s 41% support, the CDU’s 24%, and the SPD and Greens crossing the five percent threshold. It provides detailed information without adding misleading context.

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone remains neutral, presenting the data objectively without injecting personal opinions or emotional language. It balances the report without favoring any specific political outcome.

Stern logoSternNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 6030. 7. 2026
Zakaj je Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf skeptična glede prepovedi AfD

Brosius-Gersdorf, verjetno politična osebnost ali komentator, izraža dvome o učinkovitosti ali pravičnosti takšne prepovedi, kar kaže, da lahko obstajajo osnovne zapletenosti ali alternativni pristopi k obravnavanju vpliva stranke.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo razpravo o perspektivi Brosius-Gersdorf, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli stran razprave.

Zakaj dejstva (70): This article presents a specific case where an AfD council member was convicted for Nazi-related statements but did not resign, providing a concrete example relevant to the broader discussion.

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article highlights criticism of the AfD but does not present opposing viewpoints, leading to a one-sided perspective.

Stern logoSternNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 65Objektivnost 6030. 7. 2026
Zakaj je Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf skeptična glede prepovedi AfD

Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf izraža skeptičnost do morebitnih prepovedi stranke Alternative für Deutschland (AfD).

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena perspektiva Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf o morebitni prepovedi stranke AfD, saj so njeni argumenti brez očitnega naklonjenosti eni strani, vendar pa zagotavlja uravnotežen pogled, saj se osredotoča na njen skepticizem in utemeljitev ter se izogiba močnim ideološkim okvirjem ali pristranskemu jeziku.

Zakaj dejstva (65): This article is brief and lacks detailed information. It only states that the SPD in Saxony-Anhalt opposes the five percent threshold for parties, without providing any supporting data or context. There is no primary source cited, reducing its factual reliability.

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article presents a single opinion (from the SPD) without offering alternative viewpoints or context, which limits its objectivity. It appears to promote the SPD’s stance without balancing it with other perspectives.

Die Welt logoDie WeltNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 5030. 7. 2026
Anketa: AfD ostaja najmočnejša sila v Saški-Anhaltu CDU izgublja, SPD in Zeleni presegajo petodstotno oviro

Nedavna raziskava, ki jo je izvedla Die Welt, kaže, da je Alternativa za Nemčijo (AfD) še vedno najmočnejša politična sila v Saškem-Anhaltu. Krščansko-demokratična zveza (CDU) je izgubila ozemlje, medtem ko sta socialdemokrati (SPD) in Zeleni (Grüne) presegli petodstotni prag, potreben za zastopanje v državnem parlamentu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski rezultati raziskav, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemal za katero koli določeno politično stališče. Poroča o uspešnosti več strank, ne da bi uporabila čustveno napolnjen jezik ali poudarjala eno stran nad drugo.

Zakaj dejstva (60): The article references the primary source document and discusses the political tensions around Chancellor Merkel, but it shifts focus to internal CDU conflicts rather than the election poll itself. This makes it partially relevant but less focused on the core event.

Zakaj objektivnost (50): The tone is critical of Chancellor Merkel and the CDU leadership, suggesting a bias against them. While it doesn’t outright attack the CDU, the language carries a negative undertone.

Focus Online logoFocus OnlineNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 55Objektivnost 4030. 7. 2026
Pred volitvami v Saški-Anhaltu: CDU izgublja še dva odstotka AfD z 17 točkami naprej

Pred volitvami v Saški-Anhaltu je Krščansko-demokratična zveza (CDU) izgubila dodatna dva odstotna točka v anketah javnega mnenja, medtem ko Alternativa za Nemčijo (AfD) vodi z 17 odstotki.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni dejanski podatki o anketiranju brez očitno pristranskega jezika ali selektivnega poudarka. Poroča o spremembah v preferencah volivcev, ne da bi zavzela stališča o tem, katera stranka si bolj zasluži podporo ali kritizirala katero koli določeno skupino.

Zakaj dejstva (55): The article reports that the AfD has 17 points ahead, but the primary source states AfD has 41 percent. This is a significant discrepancy. The CDU is reported to have lost two more percentage points, conflicting with the primary source which says they lost two points from May to reach 24%. The artic

Zakaj objektivnost (40): The tone is sensationalistic, using phrases like 'verliert weitere zwei Prozent' which implies a dramatic decline. It frames the AfD's lead as a major development without providing balanced context or mentioning opposition views.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe