Odkrito: Popravljalec za kitajsko 'bitkoinsko kraljico', ki je vodila največjo britansko shemo pranja denarja v vrednosti 5,5 milijarde funtov, je britanski vladi vrnil 5,6 milijona funtov.

Hok Seng Ling, a 48-year-old Malaysian national residing in Matlock, Derbyshire, has surrendered £5,603,305 to the British government following a court order related to the United Kingdom’s largest money laundering scheme. Ling admitted to serving as a facilitator for Zhimin Qian, a Chinese fraudster known as the Bitcoin Queen, who orchestrated a Ponzi scheme that defrauded over 128,000 investors between 2014 and 2017. The proceeds from this fraud were converted into Bitcoin and moved to the UK. Ling acted as a butler to Qian, assisting in laundering illicit funds and evading detection by arranging accommodations and hiring assistants. He was sentenced to four years and eleven months in prison at Southwark Crown Court in November after pleading guilty to money laundering offences. A subsequent confiscation order required him to pay the specified sum, largely derived from cryptocurrency seized upon his arrest. Records from the Crown Prosecution Service indicate that the full amount, plus £1,990 in interest, has now been recovered. This recovery occurs amidst a complex legal dispute concerning 61,000 Bitcoin coins seized by the Metropolitan Police during its investigation into Qian. The value of this digital currency has surged to approximately £3.8 billion due to rising market prices. Lawyers representing the defrauded Chinese investors are contesting the retention of these assets by the UK Treasury. The central issue involves determining whether English or Chinese law should govern the victims' claims. English law is often viewed as advantageous for victims, potentially allowing them to claim ownership of all seized Bitcoin rather than just their initial investment amounts. Last week, Mr Justice Sir Mark Turner ruled that Chinese law applies to the claims. Citing arguments from prosecutors, the judge stated that the relevant damage, the parting of money, the fraudulent representations, and the immediate economic consequences all occurred in China. Consequently, the investors must demonstrate legal ownership rights under Chinese law. The English High Court will then assess whether these rights are sufficient under English law to warrant the return of the assets. Under UK proceeds of crime legislation, victims can prevent the government from retaining seized assets only by proving legal ownership. If the investors fail to establish this under Chinese law, a significant portion of the Bitcoin may remain with the state. The case will proceed in the London High Court, where legal experts on Chinese law will provide evidence, unless the ruling is overturned on appeal. The Crown Prosecution Service has suggested that victims might seek compensation through a scheme operated in China. Separate analysis highlights a broader trend involving younger individuals in financial crimes. Data indicates that more than 8,900 people under the age of 30 were arrested for money laundering offenses in England and Wales between 2020 and 2025. This group accounted for more than sixty percent of all money laundering arrests during that period. An examination of police data from thirty-six forces revealed 14,493 total arrests for money laundering between January 2020 and January 2025. Of these, 8,956 involved individuals aged eighteen to twenty-nine, while another 776 involved those under eighteen. These figures suggest a growing reliance by organized crime groups on recruiting young people as money mules, individuals who move or receive criminal funds on behalf of others. The UK government’s 2025 national risk assessment identified schools and universities as emerging risk areas for such recruitment. Students are considered particularly vulnerable due to financial pressures, limited experience in managing money, and potential unawareness of legal risks. International students face specific vulnerabilities, often receiving unsolicited messages regarding money laundering shortly after arriving in the UK. Organized crime groups exploit these conditions by using fake job advertisements and online recruitment tactics that promise easy income in exchange for the use of personal bank accounts. Many recruits may not understand the origin of the funds or recognize their actions as criminal offenses. Police officers noted that young people can be manipulated or persuaded that their activities are harmless. While some participants act knowingly, others are exploited within larger criminal enterprises. Focusing solely on the individual moving the money can obscure the directors of the operation. Universities may inadvertently facilitate money laundering through fee payments or donations from students. Currently, universities are not subject to the same mandatory identification and reporting obligations for suspected money laundering as regulated sectors such as banks, lawyers, and accountants under the UK’s Money Laundering Regulations 2017. This regulatory gap leaves educational institutions less protected against exploitation by criminal networks targeting financially pressured students. The concentration of arrests varies significantly among police forces, reflecting differences in urban scale, financial activity, and resource allocation. The data underscores the complexity of addressing modern money laundering networks, which extend beyond simple individual offenses to involve sophisticated organizational structures targeting vulnerable demographics.