Sodniku sem rekel, da se bo obrnil, če ne bo vsaj pogledal na posnetek te akcije.
V dramatični nogometni tekmi med Hajdukom in Istro 1961 v Poljudu leta 1961, ki se je končala z 2-2 neporavnano, je igralec Istre Hamzha Jaganja trdil, da ga je sodnik v kritičnem trenutku v 89. minuti nepošteno ravnal. Po mnenju Jaganje ga je zagovornik Hajduka Alec Van Hoorenbeeck udaril v glavo z komolcem, kar je opisal kot jasen kazen. Glavni sodnik Mateo Erceg pa mu kazen ni dodelil.
Hajduk has received a significant boost in their European campaign after the Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) imposed severe sanctions on Polish club Raków Częstochowa. The decision comes just days after Hajduk secured a crucial 2–1 victory over Gorica in the third round of the Croatian First League (HNL). This win marks Hajduk’s first success of the season and brings them closer to qualifying for the Conference League, with the upcoming match against Raków serving as the final hurdle. The UEFA penalty includes a financial fine of €68,000, with €60,000 attributed to the unauthorized use of pyrotechnics during a previous match and €8,000 to the blocking of spectator access. Additionally, UEFA has partially closed sections B1 to B7 of the stadium for the upcoming encounter against Hajduk. These measures were activated due to a conditional fine previously issued against Raków, which will now restrict the presence of their most fervent fans. The small capacity of the Częstochowa stadium, only 5,500 spectators, means that Hajduk will face fewer hostile supporters, with the exception of potential fans in other sectors. This move is considered favorable for Hajduk, given the history of incidents involving Polish fans, including a planned brawl between Gorica and Zrinjski Mostar fans during last season's Conference League tie. Hajduk’s recent performance against Gorica was marked by early momentum, with Michele Šego scoring within three minutes to give the home side an early lead. However, Gorica equalized through a penalty, and Bruno Bogojević later restored the advantage with a spot-kick in the 78th minute. The decisive goal came in the 87th minute, scored by Marko Livaja, who capitalized on a defensive error to secure the win. Despite the victory, some fans expressed concerns about Hajduk’s performance in the second half, noting that they appeared sluggish compared to their usual intensity. Coach Gonzalo García acknowledged the challenges of maintaining high tempo in the league, calling it “very difficult” to compete every three days, and emphasized the importance of balancing domestic and European commitments. The match also saw controversy surrounding a disputed penalty decision. In the 81st minute, Rokas Pukštas fell in the penalty area following a challenge from Jakov Filipović, prompting Hajduk players to appeal for a penalty. However, referee Patrik Pavlešić did not award the free kick, nor did the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) intervene. The situation sparked frustration among Hajduk fans, especially since Gorica had recently equalized via a penalty. Despite this, Hajduk managed to close the game with a late goal from Livaja, securing their first win of the season. Fan reactions have been overwhelmingly positive, with supporters from all parts of Croatia gathering at the stadium in Velika Gorica. The atmosphere was electric, with traditional songs and chants echoing throughout the venue. Notable among the attendees was Ante Baraba, a long-time Hajduk supporter known for his loyalty to the club. He expressed optimism about the upcoming match against Raków, suggesting it could be a turning point for Hajduk’s direction. “Raków might be the match that changes the course of our season,” he remarked, reflecting the hopes of many fans. Meanwhile, the Croatian Football Association (HFA) has faced criticism over its handling of controversial decisions. During the match, there was a dispute involving a tackle by Luka Hodak on Pranjić, which led to a penalty for Gorica. The HFA’s disciplinary committee confirmed that the contact constituted a clear foul, though it noted that the referee’s initial decision was based on insufficient evidence. This highlights ongoing concerns about the consistency and transparency of officiating in the HNL. As Hajduk prepares for the critical clash against Raków, the stakes have never been higher. With UEFA’s sanctions limiting the support available to Raków, Hajduk faces a more manageable opponent. The outcome of this match will determine whether the club can continue its upward trajectory in European competition. Fans remain hopeful, believing that the recent win against Gorica signals the beginning of a stronger run in both domestic and international football.
Pojdite k primarnim virom (5)
Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.
Tihomir Pejin, VAR sodnik, ki je bil napadn v Osijeku med potovanjem, je bil odpeljan v bolnišnico, vendar je kmalu odpuščen. Dva dni po napadu bo Pejin spet v VAR sobi na utakmici 2. kola med Slaven Belupa in Varaždina. Sudačka komisija Hrvatskog nogometnog saveza je odločila, da ga ne zamenja, ker se Pejin počuti psihično dobro in pripravljen za vrnitev na delo. VAR sobi bo bit i Ante Čuljak, a glavnim sodcem je bilo določeno, da bo Du Strukanje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Tematika članka je športna in ne podrijetvena iz politične sfere. Napad na sodko ni predstavljen kot politični incident, ampak kot naključni dogodek, ki je zadeval športnega sodnika. Zato se članek šteje za apolitičen in nima politične vsebine.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately summarizes the attack, Pejin's recovery, and his return to duty as a VAR referee. It matches the primary source closely and avoids adding unverified information.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article remains objective, presenting the facts without bias or emotional language. It focuses on the timeline of events and the HNS's decision-making process.
Sodnik Tihomir Pejin, ki so ga fizično napadli med potovanjem v Osijeku, se je vrnil na delo le dva dni po incidentu. Napadniki so bili dve maskirani osebi, ki sta ga izudarali teleskopsko palico, preden sta pobegnila. Pejin je bil takoj prevezen v bolnišnico, kjer je prejel pomoč, kasneje pa odpuščen v svojo hišo. Čeprav je doživel travmatično rojstvo, je Pejin potrdil, da se počuti psihološko stabilno in pripravljeno za rad, ko je sodna komisija Hrvatskog nogometnog saveza odločila, da ga bo zadržala v delegaciji. Sodnik bo sodil tekmico med Slaven Beljakom in Varaždinom v Koprivnici, z drugo pomočjo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športnem dogodku, ki vključuje vrnitev sodnika na dolžnost po napadu, kar je bolj stvar športne uprave kot politične polemike.
Zakaj dejstva (95): This article closely matches the primary source, providing accurate details about the attack, Pejin’s condition, and his return to duty. It references HNS confirmation and includes relevant match details without embellishment.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains an impartial tone, presenting the facts without emotional language or subjective commentary. It focuses on verified information and official decisions.
VAR sudac Pejin je bil napaden v petek v Osijeku, kjer sta ga dva maskirana človeka z teleskopsko palico. Ni imel nobenega ozljede in je bil ujet v KBC v Osijeku, vendar ni iskal nobenega poštnega sporočila od sudaških obveznikov. HNS je odločil, da bo ostal v službi kot VAR sudac za utakmicu 2. kola SHNLa med Slavenom Belupo in Varaždino, ki se igra nedelju v Koprivnici. Sudaška organizacija je potrdila, da bo načrt ostal nepremeden, in ni imela informacij o motivah za napad ali o njegovih službenih funkcijah.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Tematska zgodba je športna, politična pa je minimalna. Člani poročajo nevtralne informacije o dogodkih brez očitne strasti. Povratna veza s poslancem VAR ni bila predstavljena kot politična zadeva, ampak kot profesionalna posledica.
Zakaj dejstva (95): This article closely mirrors the primary source document, confirming Pejin’s lack of serious injuries, his return to duty, and HNS confirmation. It provides accurate information about the match schedule and other officials without adding speculative content.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on facts and official statements. While it mentions the attack briefly, it avoids emotional language and sticks to verified information.
V članku so razpravljali o nasprotnih reakcijah nogometnih trenerjev Federika Bessoneja iz Osijeka in Alena Peternaca iz Rudeša po tekmi, v kateri je Osijek porazil Rudeša 6-1 v Veliki Gorici. Bessone je izrazil zadovoljstvo z nastopom svoje ekipe, ko je opozoril, da je zadel šest golov in je bil dominanten po zadetku prvega gola. Priznal je nekaj začetnih oklevanja, vendar je poudaril pomen streljanja golov v nogometu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športno tekmo med dvema nogometnima moštvoma in reakcije njihovih trenerjev.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek), lists the scorers, and includes direct quotes from both coaches. It aligns perfectly with the cross-source consensus and provides precise details about the match progression and player contributions.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article remains largely neutral in tone, presenting both coaches' perspectives without bias. However, it slightly emphasizes the severity of the loss for Rudeš when quoting Peternac, which introduces a minor imbalance in neutrality.
Članek poroča o nogometni tekmi med Hajduk Split in Istro 1961, ki poteka na stadionu Poljud v okviru drugega kroga SHNL (Split-Herceg Novi League).
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja preprost poročilo o športnem dogodku brez kakršnega koli očitnega ideološkega ali političnega okvirja. Osredotoča se izključno na podrobnosti o tekmi, priprave ekipe in logistične informacije, kot so sestave, sodniki in kanali za oddajanje.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article provides basic factual information about the match including teams, time, and location. It does not make any claims beyond what is stated in the primary source document and accurately lists the lineups and officials involved in the match.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article maintains a highly objective tone throughout, simply reporting facts without taking sides or using emotive language. It focuses on providing logistical information rather than commentary or analysis.
Članek poroča o prihajajoči nogometni tekmi med LOKOMOTIVO in GORIKO v drugem krogu lige SHNL. LOKOMOTIVA, ki jo trenira Nikica Jelavić, si prizadeva za svojo drugo zmago v sezoni po porazu Istre 3:2 v prvem krogu. GORICA, ki je doma utrpela poraz pred Osijekom, upa, da bo izboljšala svojo uspešnost. Tekma se bo začela ob 21:00 na stadionu Maksimir.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so navedeni dejanski podatki o športnem dogodku brez politične obtožbe, osredotočeni pa so izključno na podrobnosti o tekmah, sestavo ekip in informacije o sodnikih, informacije pa so objektivno predstavljene, ne da bi zavzeli stališče ali pokazali pristranskost.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports on a different match between Lokomotiva and Gorica, providing correct information about the teams, time, and location. It includes the lineup details and officials for this particular match, matching the factual content found in the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article maintains an objective tone throughout, presenting only factual information without any personal opinions or biased language. It serves as a clear and unbiased report on the match details.
Tihomir Pejin, nekdanji sodnik HNL in trenutni direktor Zračne luke Osijek, je bil napaden in obtožen za dva napadalca v petek. Čeprav je napaden, bo Pejin še vedno sodeloval kot sodnik VAR v tekmi 2. kola SHNL med Slaven Belupa in Varaždina. Tekma bo predvidena 9. oktobra ob 18:30. Pejin je potrdil svojo prisotnost v tekmi in je razkril, da se počuti dobro po incidentu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o fizičnem napadu na športnega sodnika in njegovi odločitvi, da bo kljub incidentu sodeloval na tekmi.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that Pejin was attacked, suffered no serious injuries, and will continue as a VAR referee. It includes direct quotes from Pejin and confirms the HNS decision to keep him as a VAR referee. It aligns closely with the primary source document.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the facts in a neutral manner, focusing on the timeline of events and Pejin's statements. It avoids emotional language and provides a balanced account of the situation.
Tihomir Pejin, nekdanji nogometni sodnik in trenutni direktor Zračne luke Osijek, je bil v petek zjutraj napadnjen z dvojico maskiranih ljudi, ki so ga pretekli na palici dok je trčao blizu stadiona Gradski vrt. Napad je ponovno osredotočil pozornost na njegovo kariero, ki je v preteklih letih izzvala polemiko. Pejin je znan po nadimku 'Mr. Respect', ki je ustvaril kontroverzo leta 2017, ko je namesto izključiti napadnika dal znak 'Respect'.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis kontroverzne Pejinove kariere, vključno z njegovo vlogo v nogometu in kasnejših poslovnih podvigov.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article aligns well with the primary source, confirming Pejin’s return to duty, the nature of the attack, and the involvement of HNS. It does not include unverified speculation about motives or connections to legal matters.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the facts of the incident and Pejin’s return to work. It avoids emotional language and presents the information objectively.
V nogometni tekmi med Rudešem in Osijekom na stadionu Velika Gorica je Osijek na začetku tekme prevzel vodstvo z golom mehiškega napadalca Armandoja Leona, ki je izkoristil natančen prehod Vrbančića. Tekma se je začela z Rudešem, ki je pokazal več pobude, vendar ni uspel ustvariti jasnih možnosti, medtem ko je Osijek uspel nadzorovati posedovanje med obdobji igre.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo poročilo o nogometni tekmi, ki se osredotoča na dogodke v igri, nastop igralcev in taktične odločitve, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni ekipi.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article offers a live match report with precise timing, player names, and goal details. It accurately describes the sequence of play and includes specific scoring moments. The information is factual and matches standard sports reporting conventions. No significant inaccuracies were found.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article remains objective throughout, focusing on the game action without injecting personal bias or emotional language. It reports events neutrally and avoids taking sides, maintaining a balanced perspective.
V prvi tekmi drugega kroga Hrvaške prve nogometne lige (HNL) je Osijek na stadionu Velika Gorica z 6:1 premagal novince Rudeša. V Zagrebu je tekmo gostila zagrebaška ekipa. Trije zadetki za Osijek je zadel Nail Omerović, dva Armando Leon in eden Arnel Jakupović, za Rudeša pa je zadel Lenny Ilečić. Osijekov trener Federico Bessone je priznal nekatere izbrisane napake, vendar je izrazil zadovoljstvo z nastopom ekipe po tem, ko je prevzel nadzor nad tekmo in pokazal svoj polni potencial.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na nogometno tekmo med dvema ekipama, razpravlja o izidu tekme, nastopih igralcev in reakcijah trenerjev.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek) and includes specific player names who scored. It quotes both coaches, providing direct statements from Bessone and Peternac, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. All key facts are supported and consistent with other artic
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents both sides fairly, quoting both coaches with their contrasting views. While it acknowledges the heavy defeat for Rudeš, it avoids overly negative language and maintains a relatively neutral tone in reporting the events.
Osijek je v prvi tekmi SuperSport HNL-a v Veliki Gorici z 6:1 močno premagal Rudeša. Domači so povezali rezultat v prvem polčasu, zadel štiri gole, gostje pa so potrdili svojo dominacijo v nadaljevanju. Največji doprinos ekipi je dal Nail Omerović, ki je zadel hat-trick, dok so Armando Leon in Ilenyčić podvojili zmago. Trener Osijeka, Federico Bessone, je izrazil zadovoljstvo z rezultatom, vendar je po zmagi svoje ekipe še vedno želel popraviti nekaj napak.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Vijest ni politička ni kontroverzna, već opisuje športni rezultat in trenutne dogodke na nogometu. Trenutak je nevtralen in se osredotoča na dejanske podatke o tekmici, brez očitnega političnega okvira ali tuje perspektive.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports the match result (6:1 win for Osijek), identifies the scorers, and includes direct quotes from Bessone. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides clear details about the match outcome and coach's comments.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the coach's perspective objectively but includes some subjective language like 'sretan sam zbog igrača' which reflects his personal satisfaction. It remains mostly neutral but has slight leanings toward the positive outcome for Osijek.
Hajduk je odstranil eno oviro na poti do kvalifikacij za Konferenčno ligo, potem ko je UEFA poljski klubu Raków Czestochowa naložila znatno kazen. Kazen vključuje globo v višini 68.000 € in delno zaprtje oddelkov B1 do B7 na njihovem stadionu za prihajajočo tekmo proti Hajduku. To je posledica incidentov, ki vključujejo pirotehnico in blokade navijačev med prejšnjo tekmo proti Hammarbyju.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na nogometno tekmo in s tem povezane disciplinske ukrepe UEFA, ki so standardni v športnem novinarstvu.
Zakaj dejstva (90): This article accurately reports the UEFA's disciplinary action against Raków, including the financial penalty and stadium restrictions, which aligns with the primary source. It also correctly notes the implications for Hajduk's upcoming match, providing specific details about the sanctions and their
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article has a clear positive bias towards Hajduk, emphasizing the 'dobra vijest' and suggesting that the sanctions will benefit them. While factual, the tone is celebratory and less neutral, focusing on the advantages for Hajduk rather than presenting both sides equally.
Članek poroča o nogometni tekmi med Osijekom in Rudešem, kjer je Osijek zmagal 6-1. Trener Osijeka Federico Bessone je o zmagi komentiral in izrazil zadovoljstvo z igralci in rezultatom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljen preprost poročanje o športnem dogodku brez kakršne koli očitne ideološke ali politične podpore.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article reports on the coach's reaction to the win over Rudine, citing the score and the coach's comments. It aligns with the cross-source consensus about the result and the coach's statement. The information is presented clearly and supported by the reported outcome.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article remains neutral in tone, focusing on the coach's professional assessment without adding personal opinion or emotional language. It presents the facts as stated by the coach without bias.
Prvih sedem tekem Hrvaške prve nogometne lige (HNL) je preseglo pričakovanja, prineslo igre z visokimi točkami, dramatične obrne, mlade igralce in nepredvidljive izide.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športne dosežke in se ne ukvarja s političnimi vprašanji, uradniki ali javno politiko.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides detailed statistics about the first seven matches of the season, including goal totals, match outcomes, and player performances. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding high-scoring games and lack of draws. However, it lacks specific data from official league sources
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is enthusiastic and promotional, using emotionally charged language like 'najviše žele' and 'osjećaj da će bodovi ponovno biti skupi'. The article frames the season as exciting and full of potential, which may reflect a positive bias towards the league.
Tihomir Pejin, nekdanji hrvaški sodnik in trenutni sodnik VAR, je bil v petek zjutraj med običajnim tekom z dvema moškima v maskah, ki sta uporabljala teleskopsko palico, brutalno napadnjen. Naslednji dan je bil to resen fizični in psihološki šok, vendar je Pejin že naslednji dan, v soboto, vrnil na delo kot sodnik VAR na tekmi med Slavenom Belupo in Varaždinom v Koprivnici.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Povratak Pejina na posao ni predstavljen kot politična stvar, ampak kot profesionalna reakcija na incident.
Zakaj dejstva (85): Article accurately reports that Pejin was attacked but not seriously injured, confirms he will return to work as planned, and cites HNS confirmation. It includes details about his role in the upcoming match and the other officials involved. However, it uses emotionally charged language like 'brutaln
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone leans towards sympathy for the victim, using emotive language such as 'brutalno' and quoting a potentially fabricated statement. The focus on personal grievances rather than objective reporting reduces objectivity.
Novi listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 75pred 20 dnevi
Nogometni sodnik Tihomir Pejin je bil v petek zjutraj v Osijeku med voženjem z dvema maskiranima osebama, ki sta uporabljala teleskopsko palico. Po napadu je bil Pejin prepeljan v bolnišnico, vendar je bil kmalu odpuščen in se odločil, da se vrne v akcijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o športnem incidentu, v katerem je sodeloval sodnik, in se osredotoča na njegovo telesno varnost in vrnitev na dolžnost.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Matches the primary source in stating Pejin will return as VAR despite being attacked. It includes his quote about feeling fine and plans to continue working. It also mentions the other VAR official and the match schedule, aligning with the primary source.
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone is positive and supportive of Pejin, highlighting his resilience. While not overtly biased, it leans toward a favorable portrayal of him.
Tihomir Pejin, hrvaški nogometni sodnik, ki trenutno dela kot sodnik VAR in direktor Zračne luke Osijek, je bil napadnjen in aretiran na Wilsonovi ulici v Osijeku. Po incidentu so ga prejeli na KBC Osijek.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o incidentu, v katerem je sodeloval športni uradnik, s poudarkom na njegovem poklicnem ozadju in polemikih, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral kakršno koli politično stališče.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Provides detailed background on Pejin’s career and reputation, which is relevant. It includes his statement about the attack and confirms he wasn’t seriously injured. However, it goes beyond the primary source by adding historical context about his nickname 'Mr. Respect'.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article has a more narrative style, focusing on Pejin’s background and reputation. While informative, it introduces subjective elements about his character and past decisions.
V članku se obravnava nogometna tekma med Hajdukom in Istro 1961, ki je predvidena za nedeljo ob 21:00 v prvem krogu Hrvaške prve nogometne lige (SHNL).
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča izključno na športni dogodek brez političnih posledic ali polemike.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Article discusses the match against Varaždin and criticizes coach Garcia's treatment of captain Livaja. It aligns with the primary source document by referencing the match outcome and player reactions. However, it focuses more on criticism than factual reporting.
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article has a strong critical tone toward the coach and captain, showing clear bias. While it reports on events, it leans into opinionated commentary rather than maintaining neutrality.
V članku se razpravlja o nogometni tekmi med Hajdukom in Istro, s poudarkom na nastopu sodnika Mateja Ercega.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča na športni dogodek in ne vključuje političnih tem, zaradi česar je nepolitičen.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports the expert opinion from Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan regarding Mateo Erceg’s performance in the match. It includes specific moments like the 4th minute incident involving Podrug and Bamba, and mentions the final score of 2:2. However, it adds an extra sentence about Ivaniš
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The tone remains largely neutral, reporting the expert's comments without overt bias. However, the inclusion of unrelated content about Ivanišević introduces a slight imbalance, suggesting a possible editorial insertion.
V članku se razpravlja o nogometni tekmi med Hajduk Splitom in Istro leta 1961, s poudarkom na spornih odločitvah, ki jih je sodnik Mateo Erceg sprejel med tekmo. Domača ekipa, Istra 1961, je izrazila nezadovoljstvo z dvema kazenskima klicoma, pripisanima Ercegu, medtem ko je nekdanji nacionalni sodnik Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan, zdaj kontrolor tekme, branil sodnikovo igro.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo oceno delovanja sodnika, pri čemer priznava kritike in pohvale. Ne zavzema jasnega ideološkega stališča o tej zadevi, temveč ponuja objektivno oceno, ki temelji na strokovnem mnenju nekdanjega sodnika.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports the match between Hajduk and Istra ending in a 2:2 draw and includes quotes from Tomislav Kujundžić Lujan regarding the officiating by Mateo Erceg. However, it omits some specific details from the primary source such as the 4. minute incident involving Podruga and the
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article presents the match outcome neutrally but frames the situation with a slight bias towards Istra's perspective by suggesting that Erceg may have missed penalties. It uses emotionally charged phrases like 'nezadovoljniji nakon susreta bili su gosti' which indicates a partial stance.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.
Croatia
