Dolgo pričakovana sodba o štirih nekdanjih voditeljih Osvobodilne vojske Kosova (UÇK) je končno nastala, čeprav je njen natančen čas še vedno negotov.
Njihovo sojenje je trajalo več kot tri leta in je bilo zaznamovano z obsežnimi zaslišanji, številnimi pričami in številnimi dokazi, ki so jih predložili tako tožilci kot tudi zagovorniki.
Prvostežni senat je prvotno določil rok za izdajo sodbe za 19. maj 2026. Vendar pa je sodišče zaradi zapletenosti primera to datum odložilo do 20. septembra 2026. Kljub temu podaljšanju se lahko končna odločitev še naprej odlaša.
Vsi štirje obtoženi so bili v priporu od novembra 2020, ko je bila uradna obtožba objavljena. Obtožbe zoper njih trdijo, da so sodelovali v "kriminalnem podjetju", katerega cilj je bil zaseg in nadzor nad ozemljem z ustrahovanjem, zlorabami in izgonom nasprotnikov.
V celotnem postopku je tožilstvo zahtevalo dosmrtno zaporno kazen za vsakega od štirih. 9. januarja 2026 je specializirani tožilec Kimberly West izjavil, da je pisarno zahtevalo sodbo na podlagi desetih točk obtožnice, kar je privedlo do ene kazni 45 let zapora, ki je temeljila na posameznih prispevkih k domnevnim zločinom. "Tožilce je obtožil, da poskušajo diskreditirati visoke uradnike iz Nata, ZDA, Velike Britanije in Organizacije za varnost in sodelovanje v Evropi (OVSE), ki so bili ob njem med konfliktom.
Podpora za obrambo je prišla od nekaterih najvidnejših osebnosti v diplomaciji in varnosti iz časa konflikta, vključno z nekdanjim uradnikom ameriškega zunanjega ministrstva Jamesom Rubinom in nekdanjim poveljnikom Nata Wesleyjem Clarkom. Ti posamezniki so trdili, da UÇK ni deloval kot centralizirana organizacija in da je imel obtoženi veliko manj vpliva in nadzora, kot je bilo navedeno v obtožnici.
Za druge pa poudarek na preganjanju članov UÇK ustvarja dojemanje enakovrednosti med nasiljem, ki ga pripisuje UÇK, in agresijo, ki jo je Srbija izvedla med konfliktom.
Medtem se je v Srbiji razvil še en podoben primer. 1. julija 2026 je bil Osman Selmani, kosovski državljan, aretiran na mejni kontrolni točki v Mutivodë, obtožen vojnih zločinov. Po navedbah srbskih oblasti je Selmani obtožen umora srbskega para Vladimir in Persa Stanisavljević v vasi Sofalia blizu Prištine 14. junija 1999 v sodelovanju z člani UÇK. Njegova družina je obtožbe opisala kot neutemeljene in neutemeljene, izrazila zaupanje v njegovo nedolžnost in zahtevala preglednost. Trdijo, da je obiskal svoje rojstno mesto Tupallë v Medvegji in se s svojo družino vrnil v Prištino.
Družina je tudi obvestila oblasti na Kosovu o njegovi aretaciji, s čimer je poudarila čezmejno naravo primera.
Poleg tega potekajo razprave o možnih množičnih grobnicah na območju Pasuljanske Livade v Srbiji. Nataša Kandiq, ustanoviteljica Sklada za humanitarne pravice, je izrazila zaskrbljenost zaradi možnosti velikega pokopališča na tej lokaciji.
Pasuljanske Livade se šteje za eno glavnih baz srbske vojske in naj bi bila uporabljena za usposabljanje srbskih teroristov, vključenih v napad na Banjsko.
Odvetnik Artan Qerkini je kritiziral zamudo pri objavi sodbe in trdil, da dolgotrajno pridržanje obtoženega spodkopava načelo sodne učinkovitosti. Predlaga, da bi sodišče moralo ukrepati hitro, še posebej glede na pravne okvire, ki zahtevajo hitro ukrepanje, ko so osumljenci v priporu.
5 poročil
Gazeta ExpressNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 17 uramiVrhovno sodišče v Srbiji je določilo 30-dnevni pridržek za Osmanija Selmanija, državljana Kosova, ki ga je 1. junija aretirala srbska policija. Ministrstvo za notranje zadeve Srbije je poročalo, da je bil Selmani pridržan na mejni kontrolni točki v Mutivodë pod sumom vojnih zločinov. Po izjavi ministrstva obstajajo obtožbe, da je 14. junija 1999 v vasi Sofali, blizu Prištine, sodeloval s člani OVK pri umoru dveh srbskih civilistov, Vladimira in Perse Stanisavljeviča, z uporabo hladnega orožja in strelnega orožja na način, ki je opisan kot "mučen" in "barski".
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o sodnih postopkih zoper Osmana Selmanija, vključno z obtožbami, ki so jih vložile srbske oblasti, in odgovorom družine.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 85): The article accurately reports the 30-day pre-trial detention order by the Serbian High Court against Osman Selmani, citing the Ministry of Internal Affairs' statement. It includes direct quotes from both the ministry and Selmani’s family, presenting their opposing views. The facts align with cross-
Koha.netNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 80pred 17 uramiOn July 3, 2026, the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs announced that the Belgrade High Court had ordered a month of pre-trial detention for Kosovar Osman Selmani (born 1953), who was arrested on Wednesday under charges of war crimes. According to the ministry, Selmani is accused of participating in the killing of the couple Vladimir and Persa Stanisavljevic on June 14, 1999, in the Sofalia neighborhood of Pristina, in collaboration with members of the Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA). Selmani was arrested at the border checkpoint in Mutivoda. In recent years, Serbia has repeatedly arrested Kosovo citizens under allegations of war crimes committed during the 1998–1999 conflict. Selmani’s family stated he was arrested while returning home from his hometown of Tupallë in Medvegje, where he had visited. They claim the charges against him are unfounded and unjustified, expressing belief in his innocence and stating they will support him until the truth is fully revealed.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents the arrest and charges against Selmani without overtly favoring either side. It includes both the official statement from the Serbian Ministry of Internal Affairs and the family's response, providing a balanced view of the situation. There is no clear indication of biased word选择
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 95 · Objektivnost 80): This article accurately details the 30-day pre-trial detention of Osman Selmani and includes statements from his family. It remains largely objective but shows some bias in emphasizing the family’s belief in his innocence.
RTKDržavni / javniLevoDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 6 dneviThe article discusses the upcoming judicial ruling by the Special Courts in The Hague regarding four former leaders of the Kosovo Liberation Army (UÇK): Hashim Thaçi, Kadri Veseli, Jakup Krasniqi, and Rexhep Selimi. These individuals are accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity committed during and immediately after the Kosovo War in 1998–1999. The court initially had until May 19 to issue a verdict but extended the deadline to August 2026 due to the complexity of the case. The Special Courts indicated that further delays might occur if deemed necessary. All four defendants have been in custody since November 2020, facing charges of being part of a 'criminal enterprise' aimed at gaining control through intimidation, mistreatment, and expulsion. Victims included Serbs, Roma, and Albanians who did not support the UÇK. Prosecutors requested 45 years of imprisonment for each defendant based on their leadership roles. Thaçi has rejected the accusations, calling them entirely false and absurd, and criticized the prosecutors for attempting to discredit high-ranking officials from NATO, the United States, Britain, and the OSCE who were present during the conflict.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the prosecution of the former UÇK leaders as a legitimate legal process, emphasizing the gravity of the alleged crimes and the international involvement in the investigation. It highlights the prosecutors' stance and the formal procedures followed, which aligns more closely with a
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): The article gives a clear overview of the ongoing trial of four UCK leaders in The Hague. It is factually accurate but has a slight leaning towards the prosecution’s narrative due to the emphasis on the crimes alleged.
Koha.netNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 75včeraj Odlog za razglasitev obsodbe je izgubil smisel.2. julija 2026 je albanski odvetnik Artan Qerkini kritiziral zamudo pri objavi sodbe proti nekdanjim voditeljem Osvobodilne vojske Kosova (OVK), ki so jim sodili v Haagu za vojne zločine in zločine proti človeštvu. Qerkini je trdil, da je preložitev izgubila svoj pomen, ker so bili vsi štirje obtoženi v pridržanju pred sojenjem od 5. novembra 2025. Poudaril je, da bi moral sodišče po lokalnem in mednarodnem pravu ukrepati takoj, ko so osumljenci pridržani, vendar se to ni zgodilo med celotnim procesom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni pravni argumenti in pomisleki, ki jih je izrazil odvetnik obrambe glede postopkovnih zamud in morebitnih pristranskosti v sojenju nekdanjim voditeljem OVK.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 75): The article provides detailed legal arguments from attorney Artan Qerkini regarding the delay in the trial of UCK leaders. While factually sound, it presents a strong opinion on the court’s inefficiency, reducing neutrality.
Koha.netNeodvisenLevoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 5 dnevi Kandiqi ngre dyshime për një varr masiv në Pasuljanske LivadeOn June 28, 2026, Natasha Kandic, founder of the Foundation for Human Rights, mentioned the possibility of a mass grave in Pasuljanske Livade, Serbia. She stated this issue was discussed during a meeting she had with Serbia’s then-Minister of Defense, Dragan Shutanovac, in 2008. Kandic said she informed Shutanovac about her conversation with someone who claimed to have been the driver of a refrigerated truck used to transport bodies from Kosovo to the military base in Pasuljanske Livade. The individual reportedly asked for money in exchange for additional information but was never heard from again. Kandic claims she immediately informed Shutanovac about the information she received, but he also never followed up.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article highlights concerns over potential war crimes and human rights violations linked to Serbian military activities, which are typically associated with left-leaning narratives focused on justice and accountability. The framing emphasizes the historical context of conflict and possible cover
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article discusses the potential mass grave in Pasuljanske Livade based on statements from Natasha Kandic. While it cites her claims, it lacks sufficient corroboration and appears more opinionated than factual.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
XK
