tportalNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 98Objektivnost 95pred 14 dnevi Gasilci so prišli zaradi dima v znamenitem hotelu v Dubrovniku.Gasilci so posredovali v hotelu More v Dubrovniku, potem ko so bili opozorjeni na dim, ki prihaja iz kotlarne. Deset gasilcev je odgovorilo v štirih vozilih in potrdilo, da se je zaradi preobremenitve sistema vžgala distribucijska škatla.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanski poročilo o tehničnem incidentu, v katerem so bili vključeni gasilci, ki so se odzvali na požar v kotelnici.
Zakaj dejstva (98): The article accurately reports the fire incident at Hotel More, citing the primary source document. It mentions the ten firefighters, four vehicles, the cause being an overloaded system leading to a circuit box fire, and confirms everything was resolved. Only minor details like 'poznatom' (well-know
Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article remains largely neutral, using straightforward reporting. The only slight deviation from strict neutrality is the phrase 'poznatom dubrovačkim hotelu,' which adds context but doesn't imply bias.
Net.hrNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 97Objektivnost 90pred 14 dnevi Požar v hotelu v Dubrovniku.Požar je izbruhnil v kotelnici hotela More v Dubrovniku zaradi preobremenjenega električnega sistema. Deset gasilcev je prispelo na kraj dogodka s štirimi vozili, da bi ga pogasili.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je neposredno opisano požar v hotelu, pri čemer je poudarek na tehničnem vzroku (preobremenjen električni sistem) in odzivu lokalnih gasilcev.
Zakaj dejstva (97): The article accurately summarizes the event based on the primary source, including the number of firefighters, the cause of the fire, and the resolution. However, it uses exclamation marks and bold text ('POZNAT I UZROK') which slightly deviate from the neutral tone of the original source.
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article uses more emotionally charged language such as 'Požar u dubrovačkom hotelu!' and 'POZNAT I UZROK' which introduce some level of emphasis and excitement not present in the original report. This reduces its overall objectivity.