Before the ruling by the court of appeal concerning Marine Le Pen, the National Rally finds itself caught between hope and resignation. In Liévin, during her final speech before her fate was decided, the leader of the far-right party emphasized the strength of her partnership with Jordan Bardella, vowing to support him with conviction should he run for president in 2027. This moment marked a critical juncture for the party, which has been navigating the implications of Le Pen’s legal troubles while preparing for future political battles.
Marine Le Pen announced her appeal to the Court of Cassation following her conviction in the appellate court for embezzling public funds. The sentence included a 15-month period of ineligibility, but the appeal suspends its execution, allowing Le Pen to remain eligible for the presidential election. Rémy Heitz, the prosecutor general near the Court of Cassation, stated on France Inter that the court would make every effort to render its decision before the first round of the presidential election. He emphasized that the court had already set a schedule and would follow the same approach as the appellate court. However, he acknowledged that it was too early to determine precise timelines, noting that the case was still in an early stage and that the number of appeals and complexity of arguments were unknown.
For her appeal to the Court of Cassation, Marine Le Pen selected the former lawyer of François Fillon. This choice highlights the strategic considerations behind her legal strategy, aiming to bolster her chances of overturning the appellate court's decision. Meanwhile, the issues raised by this appeal have sparked discussions about the broader implications for the political landscape and the judicial process.
The appeal has allowed Le Pen to continue campaigning freely until at least the end of 2026, giving her time to prepare for the 2027 election. Her statements on TF1 emphasized her belief in her innocence and her determination to pursue all available legal avenues to prove it. However, it is important to note that the Court of Cassation does not judge the facts of the case but rather examines whether there were errors in the reasoning or application of law by the lower courts. Therefore, the court will not directly address Le Pen’s guilt or innocence.
As for potential scenarios, if the appellate court's judgment is overturned, the case would be sent back to another court of similar jurisdiction for retrial. However, this retrial would likely occur after the presidential election, meaning Le Pen could campaign without hindrance until then. Alternatively, she might rely on the typical delays associated with such cases, which usually take between eight months and a year for the Court of Cassation to decide.
Marion Maréchal, Le Pen’s niece and an elected official, expressed her support for her aunt ahead of the verdict. She praised Le Pen’s resilience and highlighted how her efforts have contributed to the growth of the nationalist movement. Despite past disagreements and political rifts within the family, Maréchal emphasized that the Le Pen legacy is rooted in decades of political struggle and that their influence remains significant despite controversies surrounding their name.
Looking forward, the outcome of the Court of Cassation’s decision will shape the trajectory of both Le Pen and the National Rally. If the appeal is successful, it could reinforce her position as a leading figure in French politics. If not, the party will need to adapt its strategies accordingly, ensuring continuity in leadership and maintaining momentum toward the upcoming elections. Regardless of the result, the political landscape in France appears poised for continued tension and transformation in the coming years.
6 poročil
Le MondeNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 4 dneviMarine Le Pen, vodja skrajno desne stranke Reconquête (RN), je v svojem zadnjem javnem govoru pred razglasitvijo sodbe pritožbenega sodišča o svojem primeru poudarila povezanost svojega dvojice z Jordanom Bardellom, pri čemer je dejala, da ga bo v primeru kandidature zadnjega v predsedniških volitvah leta 2027 z zaupanjem spremljala.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanja in izjave Marine Le Pen, ne da bi sprejel jasen strankarski ton. Osvetlil je politični položaj skrajno desne stranke, ne da bi izrecno obtožil eno stran ali drugo.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article highlights Marine Le Pen’s public statements and her pressure on judges, but the tone is slightly more emotive and confrontational, suggesting a less objective stance.
Le FigaroNeodvisen🔒Sredinapred 5 urami9. julija 2026 je Rémy Heitz, generalni tožilec pri kasacijskem sodišču, na France Interu potrdil, da bo sodišče naredilo vse, da bo odločilo o pritožbi Marine Le Pen pred prvim krogom predsedniških volitev. Marine Le Pen je vložila pritožbo v kasaciji, potem ko je bila obsojena na pritožbo za izkoriščanje javnih sredstev, kar je povzročilo neizpolnjevanje 15 mesecev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja objektivne dejstva v zvezi s pritožbo Marine Le Pen in odgovorom generalnega tožilca, ne da bi bil jasen.
LibérationNeodvisenSredinapred 21 uramiMarine Le Pen je izbrala nekdanjega odvetnika Françoisa Fillona, da jo zastopa v pritožbi pred kasacijskim sodiščem. Ta odločitev je del njene pravne strategije po obsodbi v primeru korupcije, povezanem z zlorabo javnih sredstev med njenim časom kot predsednica Nacionalne fronte. Izbira odvetnika poudarja politične povezave v francoskih pravnih krogih in poudarja pomembnost primera.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o izbiri pravnega zastopnika Marine Le Pen, ne da bi odkrito zagovarjal katero koli politično stran, ne vključuje pristranskega jezika, enostranskega vira ali uredništva, ki bi kazalo jasno ideološko nagnjenost.
La CroixStrankarsko povezanSredinavčerajV članku se razpravlja o pritožbi, ki jo je vložila Marine Le Pen, vodja Nacionalnega zbora (RN), zoper sodno odločbo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja pritožbo in povezana pravna vprašanja, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, osredotoča se na pravni postopek in posledice za francosko politiko ter zagotavlja uravnoteženo pokritost situacije brez jasnih ideoloških pristranskosti.
France 24 (Français)Državni / javniSredinavčerajMarine Le Pen, voditeljica stranke Rassemblement National (RN), je po obsodbi na pritožbi dobila odlog zaradi pritožbe v kasaciji. Ta pritožba ji omogoča, da začasno opusti zaporno kazen in se izogne srečanju s sodnikom, ki izvršuje kazni, s čimer ji daje svobodo gibanja do leta 2026. Trdi, da je nedolžna in nadaljuje prizadevanja za dokazovanje svoje pravice do kandidiranja na predsedniških volitvah leta 2027.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja dejstva o Marine Le Penini pritožbi in njene pravne posledice, ne da bi sprejel politični položaj ali da bi favoriziral katero koli posamezno stranko; pojasnjuje pravne postopke in posledice za njeno kandidaturo, ne da bi obtožil zadevo ali izrazil mnenje;
Le FigaroNeodvisen🔒Konservativnopredvčerajšnjim "Ne glede na odločitev, nič te ne bo ustavilo": Marion Maréchal pred sodno razsodbo poklonila svojo tetoMarion Maréchal, evropska poslanka iz skupine Identité-Libertés, časti svojo teto Marine Le Pen, ko se približuje sodba pritožbenega sodišča o njenem statusu kandidata za predsednika republike leta 2027. Poudarja "tenačnost" Marine Le Pen, ki trdi, da si zasluži spoštovanje svojih podpornikov, trdnost svojih nasprotnikov in zaupanje Francozov. Marion Maréchal opozarja, da je družina Le Pen vedno branila državo in narod brez parlamentarnega mandata in trdi, da je družina vztrajala kljub notranjim spopadom. Prav tako praznuje preoblikovanje Nacionalne fronte v Nacionalno združenje in močan položaj gibanja glede na predsedniške volitve.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek poudarja vztrajnost in legitimnost nacionalističnega gibanja, ki ga vodi Marine Le Pen, z vrednotljivimi izrazi, kot so "trdnost", "spoštovanje svojih podpornikov" in "zaupanje milijonov Francozov".
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
France
