The U.S. military has launched a new wave of strikes against Iranian targets, including the strategic port city of Bandar Abbas, using advanced drone technology. This comes nearly a month after a temporary ceasefire agreement between the U.S. and Iran collapsed, reigniting tensions in the region. On Tuesday, the U.S. imposed a fresh naval blockade on Iranian ports, while President Donald Trump reiterated threats of targeting civilian infrastructure unless Tehran returns to negotiations. However, the operation marks a shift in tactics, as the U.S. has deployed a novel weapon, naval drones, to strike critical Iranian facilities. According to reports, the U.S. Central Command (CentCom) revealed the use of “Corsair” surface drones, developed by Texas-based Saronic Technologies, during an attack on a suspected submarine and ship maintenance base in Bandar Abbas. The drones, capable of carrying up to 450 kilograms of payload over a range of 1,860 kilometers at speeds reaching 65 kilometers per hour, were showcased in a black-and-white video posted on social media. This method echoes similar operations conducted by Ukrainian forces in the Black Sea against Russian vessels, highlighting a growing trend of unmanned systems in modern warfare. Bandar Abbas, located on the northern shore of the Strait of Hormuz, has been a recurring target for U.S. airpower since the conflict began. With a population exceeding half a million and housing the largest container terminal in Iran, the city plays a pivotal role in the nation’s logistics and maritime trade. It serves as a hub for both the Iranian navy and the Revolutionary Guards’ naval branch, making it a strategic asset. From late February through the announcement of the temporary ceasefire, at least 96 U.S. airstrikes have targeted the area, according to data compiled by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED). Of these, one-third were directed at military infrastructure, including missile sites and naval bases. In March, an Israeli airstrike reportedly killed Rear Admiral Alireza Tangsiri, commander of the Revolutionary Guards’ naval forces. The city’s location on the north side of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital chokepoint for global oil and liquefied natural gas exports, has made it a focal point for both sides. After the war between Israel and the U.S.-backed coalition against Iran began, Téhéran effectively blockaded the strait, turning it into a tool of deterrence. If the conflict escalates further, the strait could become a source of revenue for Iran should it emerge victorious. Under the June agreement, Iran committed to ensuring safe passage for commercial ships through the strait for 60 days. During this period, however, the situation remained volatile. The Iranian and Omani authorities have continued to monitor the situation, with Omani officials expressing concerns over the impact of the ongoing hostilities on regional stability. Meanwhile, the U.S. has intensified its efforts to disrupt Iranian military capabilities, particularly in areas like Bandar Abbas, which remain under constant threat. Recent reports indicate that U.S. forces have struck multiple locations in southwestern Iran, including the city of Bouchehr, where local officials confirmed three points were hit by American strikes. The Iranian military has responded by reporting the deaths of seven soldiers in separate attacks. These incidents underscore the escalating violence and the lack of progress in diplomatic channels. As the conflict continues, the use of drones and other advanced weaponry suggests a broader shift in how conflicts are being fought, with implications for future engagements in the region.
4 poročil
France 24 (Français)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 60pred 3 dnevi Zakaj ZDA ciljajo iransko pristanišče Bandar Abbas z mornariškimi dronovi?Članek obravnava obnovljene napetosti med ZDA in Iranom, s poudarkom na nedavnih vojaških dejanjih. En mesec po začasnem mirovnem sporazumu sta obe državi nadaljevali sovražnosti. Iran je napadel tovorne ladje z uporabo nepooblaščenih poti skozi Ormuško ožino, medtem ko so ZDA sprožile zračne napade na iransko vojaško infrastrukturo, kar je povzročilo odvetne ukrepe proti zalivskim državam, ki gostijo ameriške objekte. V torek so ZDA uvedle novo pomorsko blokado, ki je ciljala iranska pristanišča. Predsednik Trump je ponovno zagrozil, da bo ciljal civilno infrastrukturo, če se Teheran ne vrne na pogajanja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo poročilo o spopadu med ZDA in Iranom, ki podrobno opisuje dejanja obeh strani, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni katerikoli od njih.
Zakaj dejstva (70): The article accurately mentions the temporary ceasefire and the resumption of hostilities. It references the Iranian attacks on unauthorized ships and the US strikes on military infrastructure. However, it adds details about the deployment of 'Corsair' drones that are not mentioned in the BBC articl
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article provides a relatively balanced account of both sides' actions but includes some biased language, such as referring to the US as having 'innovated operationally,' which implies a positive evaluation of US military tactics.
France 24 (English)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 60Objektivnost 55pred 6 dnevi Tretji dan sta ZDA in Iran v stiku.Članek poroča o aktualnih napetostih med ZDA in Iranom in ugotavlja, da sta si dve državi tretji dan zapored izmenjali napade. Članek poudarja naraščajoči konflikt na Bližnjem vzhodu, omenja nedavne vojaške akcije, vendar ne zagotavlja posebnih podrobnosti o naravi, obsegu ali času teh napadov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja informacije o napetostih med ZDA in Iranom, ne da bi očitno zagovarjal katero koli stran.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article briefly covers the ongoing exchanges of strikes between the US and Iran. While it aligns with the general timeline of events described in the BBC article, it lacks specific details about Bandar Abbas and the Strait of Hormuz, which are central to the original report. This limits its fact
Zakaj objektivnost (55): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone but includes elements that suggest a focus on the conflict's intensity, potentially influencing the reader's perception of the situation.
Le MondeNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 60Objektivnost 50pred 5 dnevi V živo, vojna na Bližnjem vzhodu: novi ameriški napadi na Bušehr v jugozahodnem IranuIranska državna agencija Fars je po poročanju guvernerja provincije Bušer, ki ga je citirala iranska državna agencija, sporočila, da so ameriške sile ciljale na tri lokacije v mestu Bušer.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so dejanja ZDA označena kot "teroristična" in odgovornost pripisana ameriškim silam, kar je v skladu z levičarsko perspektivo, ki pogosto kritizira ameriške vojaške intervencije v tujini.
Zakaj dejstva (60): The article reports on new American airstrikes against Bushehr, citing the governor of the province and the Fars agency. However, the primary source document does not mention any such attacks in Bushehr, focusing instead on Bandar Abbas and the Strait of Hormuz. The article introduces new informatio
Zakaj objektivnost (50): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'terrorist army' to describe the United States and presents the situation as a continuation of hostilities rather than a ceasefire. This framing shows bias and lacks neutrality.
France 24 (English)Državni / javniSredinavčeraj Bližnji vzhod v živo: ZDA sprožijo napade, da bi "kaznovale" Iran po smrti svojih vojakovZdružene države so začele zračne napade proti Iranu po poročanju o smrti ameriškega člana službe med nadzorovanim detonacijo neeksplodiranega streliva v severnem Iraku.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis vojaških dejanj in diplomatskih odzivov, ne da bi očitno naklonil eni strani.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik