Devet let po vrhu G20 v Hamburgu se je končno začel prvi pravni postopek proti policistom zaradi domnevnega policijskega nasilja. To je pomemben mejnik, saj so bili v preteklih letih obravnavani številni primeri, v katerih so bili vključeni demonstranti, vendar je to prvič, da se policisti sami soočajo s sodnim postopkom zaradi svojih dejanj med vrhom.
Incident se je zgodil v bližini Bismarckovega spomenika nad pristaniščem v Hamburgu. Po videoposnetku, ki je na voljo na spletu, sta dva policista iz hamburške enote za ohranjanje dokazov in aretacijo (BFE) uporabila palice, da sta Marvina H. potisnila na ploščad spomenika. H., ki se ni upiral in poskušal zaščititi glavo, je bil večkrat udarjen. Tretji policist se je nato pridružil in ga udaril v obraz s pestjo, ki mu je sledil eden od drugih policistov.
Med sojenjem je tožilstvo izjavilo, da so policisti izdali ukaz za razpršitev "motnikov". Jürgen S. je pričal, da je verjel, da je H. morda metal kamne na policijo, ko ga je prej opazil v parku. Ko je ponovno srečal H. pri spomeniku, je uporabil palico in ga udaril s pestjo, čeprav je trdil, da ga ni udaril v obraz.
Dr. Christoph je tudi priznal, da je bila uporaba sile, prikazana v videu, neupravičena. Obžaloval je škodo, ki je bila povzročena H. Med sojenjem je H. opisal, kako je hitro spoznal, da je policija nameravala napadati, namesto da bi ga aretirala.
Ko so ga vprašali, ali je razmišljal o prijavi policistov, je H. odgovoril, da je to idejo takoj zavrnil, ker se je želel izogniti nasprotni tožbi, ki bi po njegovem mnenju povzročila finančne kazni za vsakogar, ki bi takšno tožbo vložil proti policiji.
Sojenje je pritegnilo pozornost zaradi svoje brez primere narave. V letih po vrhu G20 so se stotine demonstrantov soočale s pravnimi posledicami, vključno z denarnimi kazni in zaporom.
Na začetku sojenja je Jürgen S. vstal pred sodiščem in Marvinu H. podal pet 100-eurovih bankovcev kot odškodnino za bolečino in trpljenje.
Sodišče je poudarilo dolgo pričakovano obračunavanje z dogodki na vrhu G20, kjer je bil policijski odziv široko kritiziran zaradi pretirane sile. Medtem ko se je veliko demonstrantov soočalo s pravnimi posledicami, se je pravni sistem prej izognil odgovornosti policije za podobne ukrepe. Zdaj, skoraj devet let kasneje, poteka prvi in verjetno edini sojenje v zvezi s policijskim nasiljem med vrhom, ki ponuja redko priložnost za pravico za žrtve, kot je Marvin H., in postavlja precedens za prihodnjo odgovornost.
2 poročil
taz – die tageszeitungNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 88Objektivnost 65pred 6 dneviNine years after the G20 summit in Hamburg, the first and likely only trial related to police violence during the event has begun. The case involves three officers accused of common dangerous bodily harm against demonstrator Marvin H., whose mistreatment is documented on video. Despite numerous legal proceedings against anti-G20 protesters and over 150 complaints against police, all but one were dismissed. After a lengthy process, prosecutors finally brought charges in one case, leading to this trial. During the hearing, the officers admitted their actions were inappropriate, acknowledging that their use of force was unjustified despite claiming they acted under chaotic conditions.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): The article frames the police action as excessive and unjustified, emphasizing the lack of proportionality and the eventual admission by officers of wrongdoing. It highlights the prolonged legal process and the dismissal of most cases, suggesting systemic issues with police conduct during protests.雖
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 88 · Objektivnost 65): This article provides detailed information about the single ongoing case against police officers and mentions the general prosecutor's review. It accurately notes the number of cases dismissed and the delay. However, it uses loaded terms like 'misshandelt' and emphasizes the police's perspective, sh
Die ZeitNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 6 dneviNine years after the 2017 G20 summit in Hamburg, police officers are facing trial for alleged excessive force during the protests, marking the first such case. The article recounts a courtroom scene where Policeman Jürgen S. offers 500 euros in compensation to protester Marvin H., citing being 'overwhelmed' at the time. This follows former Hamburg Mayor Olaf Scholz’s earlier assertion that there was no police violence during the event. The incident highlights ongoing legal repercussions from the chaotic protests that followed the summit.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents a balanced account of the historical context and current legal proceedings without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from both the former mayor and the policeman, providing a neutral narrative of the situation. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing or
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article accurately reports the delayed prosecution of police officers involved in G20 protests and references Olaf Scholz's past statement. It includes specific details like the 500 euro apology and the timeline. However, it uses emotionally charged language ('schwere Krawallen') and frames the
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
Germany
