Več kot 600.000 razseljenih se je po premirju vrnilo domov v Libanonu
Več kot 600.000 razseljenih Libanoncev se je vrnilo v svoje domove, odkar je bil konec junija sklenjen nemiren premirje med Izraelom in proiranskim Hezbolahom. Konflikt se je začel po tem, ko je Hezbolah 2. marca začel napade proti Izraelu, pri čemer je navedel maščevanje za smrt vrhovnega vodje Irana v ameriško-izraelskih napadih, ki so ciljali interese Islamske republike, ki so začeli 28. februarja. Izrael je odgovoril z obsežnimi zračnimi in kopenskimi operacijami ter intenziviral ukaze za evakuacijo v južnem Libanonu v več mesecih spopadov. Po navedbah lebanonskih oblasti je bilo ubitih okoli 4.300 ljudi in več kot milijon razseljenih, predvsem na jugu in predmestjih Bejruta. V poročilu Mednarodne organizacije za migracije je navedeno, da se je 646.107 oseb vrnilo domov, medtem ko je približno 500.000 ostalo razseljenih.
Save the Children, an international organization focused on child welfare, has released a report stating that at least 21,000 minors have been killed in Gaza over the course of 1,000 days of ongoing conflict. This figure, however, is believed to be significantly lower than the actual number due to the uncertainty surrounding the number of children buried beneath the rubble caused by the extensive destruction in the region. According to the organization, approximately 80% of Gaza's children have been displaced, with around 7,000 children either separated from their families or left without parental accompaniment. Additionally, an estimated 245,000 children are at risk of or suffering from malnutrition, while the majority of school-age children have missed three years of formal education. Save the Children has urged for an immediate and permanent cessation of hostilities, the suspension of arms transfers to Israel by governments, and full accountability for crimes committed against children.
In a related development, more than 646,107 displaced individuals have returned to their homes in Lebanon following a fragile ceasefire that took effect on June 21, 2026. However, approximately 500,000 people remain displaced, primarily in the south and southern suburbs of Beirut. The International Organization for Migration (IOM) reported that this return has accelerated since the ceasefire, although many residents in border communities still cannot return due to the continued presence of Israeli forces within a declared security zone and ongoing strikes. A framework agreement, backed by the United States, was signed between Lebanon and Israel on June 26, aiming to establish a permanent ceasefire, including the gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces and the deployment of the Lebanese army in southern areas. Nevertheless, the agreement does not specify a timeline for Israel's withdrawal, linking it instead to the disarmament of Hezbollah, a condition the group has refused to accept.
The conflict in Gaza, which began with a Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023, has resulted in a severe humanitarian crisis. Despite a fragile ceasefire that took effect in October 2025, efforts to bring the war to a definitive end have stalled. The war has led to significant displacement, with over 2 million Palestinians affected, many living amidst the ruins of their homes. The Gaza Health Ministry, part of the Hamas-run government, reports that more than 73,000 people have been killed in the conflict, including over 350 women and children since the ceasefire. The impact on children has been particularly profound, with many losing access to education and basic necessities, leading to widespread malnutrition and psychological trauma.
The situation in the broader Middle East has also seen a shift in focus as the United States and Iran engage in diplomatic talks aimed at achieving a fragile peace. The war in Gaza, which initially drew global attention, has increasingly faded from the international spotlight as the focus turns towards resolving tensions between the two nuclear powers. Analysts suggest that this shift reflects a decline in Hamas' strategic importance in Iran's eyes, given the perceived betrayal during the 2023 conflict. Meanwhile, the Lebanese conflict has drawn international concern, with reports indicating that some Christian villages in southern Lebanon have reportedly requested annexation by Israel for protection against Hezbollah militants. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that certain Christian villages had sought annexation to ensure their safety, a claim denied by the mayor of one such village, Rmeish, who stated that the notion was entirely unfounded.
As the conflict continues, the international community faces mounting pressure to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and the ongoing instability in Lebanon. The need for a comprehensive resolution that ensures the safety and well-being of civilians, particularly children, remains urgent. With the situation evolving rapidly, the role of international mediation and the potential for further escalation remain critical factors in shaping the region's future.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
levo
sredina
desno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.
Organizacija Save the Children je poročala, da je bilo v Gazi v 1000 dneh spopadov ubitih vsaj 21.000 otrok, dejansko število pa je verjetno veliko večje, saj je veliko otrok pokopanih pod ruševinami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni podatki in izjave humanitarne organizacije Save the Children, ki ne podpira nobene politične strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): Accurate in reporting the Israeli strikes and Hezbollah's condemnation. References the agreement and provides context about the ceasefire. Balanced tone with quotes from both sides.
28. junija 2026 je izraelska vojska uničila podzemno infrastrukturo, ki je pripadala libanonski militantni skupini Hezbollah v južni libanonski vasi Majdal Zoun. Po skupni izjavi izraelskega predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahuja in ministra za obrambo Izraela Katza je bil napad usmerjen v 200-metrski predor, ki je vseboval na stotine orožja in izstrelkov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, pri čemer navaja izjave izraelskih uradnikov in vodstva Hezbolaha.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 80): The article accurately reports the destruction of Hezbollah tunnels and references the US-brokered agreement. It maintains a neutral tone, though it slightly leans towards presenting the Israeli perspective. The details align closely with the primary source document.
Novi listNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 75pred 7 dnevi
Izraelske sile so uničile podzemno infrastrukturo, ki jo je uporabljala libanska militantna skupina Hezbollah v južnem Libanonu, so sporočili v skupni izjavi izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu in obrambni minister Yoav Gallant.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, navaja izjave izraelskih uradnikov glede njihovih vojaških dejanj in zavrnitev varnostnega sporazuma s strani Hezbolaha.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 75): Accurate in detailing the destruction of Hezbollah infrastructure and references the security agreement. Balances quotes from both Israeli officials and Hezbollah leaders. Maintains neutrality in tone.
Izraelska vojska je izvedla zračni napad na podzemni predor v južnem Libanonu in uničila objekt, ki naj bi vseboval na stotine orožja in izstrelkov. Ta napad se je zgodil kmalu po tem, ko sta Libanon in Izrael dosegla varnostni sporazum, ki ga je posredovala ZDA in katerega cilj je bilo zmanjšanje napetosti vzdolž njune skupne meje. Po sporazumu se je Izrael postopoma umikal iz nekaterih območij, medtem ko je dovolil prevzemanje libanonskih vojakov, čeprav so izraelske sile lahko ostale v razširjenem varnostnem območju.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene izraelske in Hezbollahove perspektive, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 70): Accurate in reporting the tunnel destruction and referencing the security agreement. Provides some context about the ceasefire and Hezbollah's response. Tone leans slightly towards Israel's position.
Analitiki trdijo, da predlagani sporazum med Izraelom in Libanonom morda ne bo rešil trenutnega spopada, ampak bi lahko podaljšal zastoj. Poročilo naj bi vključevalo, da se je libanski Hezbollah strinjal, da bo prenehal z napadi proti izraelskim silam v zameno za Izraelovo ustavitev vojaških operacij v južnem Libanonu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni pogledi analitikov, ne da bi očitno zagovarjali katero koli stran, poudarjeni pa so tudi pomisleki strokovnjakov, ne da bi se zavzeli stališča o veljavnosti njihovih trditev, temveč z uravnoteženim tonom.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 80): Article reports on recent incidents in southern Lebanon with specific details and quotes from officials. Maintains neutrality in reporting facts without overt bias.
V članku se razpravlja o stalnem konfliktu v Gazi, ki je zabeležil 1000 dni od napada Hamasa na Izrael oktobra 2023. Vojna je povzročila obsežno uničenje, razseljevanje družin, uničenje domov in motnjo izobraževanja in zdravstvenega varstva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis človeških žrtev in uničenja, ki jih je povzročil konflikt, pri čemer navaja palestinske perspektive in številke žrtev iz Ministrstva za zdravje Gaze.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): Article accurately analyzes the potential implications of the Israel-Lebanon deal, referencing the primary source. It presents a balanced view but has slight editorial leanings.
Dne 23. junija 2026 sta se ZDA in Iran dogovorili, da bosta kljub nedavnim sovražnostem prekinila nadaljnje napade in nadaljevala pogajanja. Poleg tega bi lahko ladje potencialno prosto potovale skozi Ormuški preliv. Po izraelskih vojaških poročilih je Izrael uničil tunel, ki je pripadal miliciji Hezbolaha v južnem Libanonu. Izrael in Libanon sta podpisali okvirni sporazum pod posredovanjem ZDA za podporo obstoječemu premirju v iranskem spopadu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni številni pogledi in dogodki, povezani z mednarodnimi odnosi in konflikti na Bližnjem vzhodu, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni kateri koli strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): The article mentions the US-Iran discussions and the Israeli-Lebanese agreement but mixes it with unrelated reports about Hormuz and other conflicts. It lacks clarity on the main event and presents some information without sufficient context. Objectivity is compromised by the inclusion of multiple u
The Irish TimesNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 7 dnevi
Izraelska vojska je uničila podzemno infrastrukturo, ki je pripadala libanonski militantni skupini Hezbollah v južnem Libanonu, so sporočili v skupni izjavi izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu in obrambni minister Izrael Katz.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, vključno z izjavami izraelskih uradnikov in vodstva Hezbolaha, ne da bi očitno naklonil eni strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): Reports on the explosion and connects it to the ceasefire agreement. Provides some context about the agreement but lacks detailed analysis. Tone remains neutral.
BBC News (World)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 8 dnevi
Israeli air strikes in southern Lebanon resulted in one death and multiple injuries, occurring shortly after Israel and Lebanon signed a U.S.-brokered agreement intended to establish a path toward lasting peace. The Israeli military stated the strikes targeted individuals posing a threat to its forces, while Lebanon's state news agency reported drone attacks in the town of Nabatieh al-Fawqa. Hezbollah, which did not participate in the negotiations, condemned the agreement, accusing the Lebanese government of compromising national sovereignty. Under the four-point framework, Israel will withdraw from the South Litani region, allowing the Lebanese army to take control, but Israeli forces may remain in an expanded security zone within southern Lebanon. Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem criticized the agreement as 'humiliating' and 'shameful,' vowing continued armed resistance. Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz announced preparations for an extended military presence in the security zone. The conflict, which began in March 2024, has caused significant casualties and displacement, with ongoing tensions despite previous ceasefire agreements.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents the situation in Lebanon and Israel with balanced reporting, including perspectives from both Israeli and Lebanese authorities, as well as Hezbollah. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of key viewpoints. The framing remains neutral, with
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): Reports on ongoing fighting and the agreement, but lacks detailed context about the agreement's terms. Focuses more on military actions and less on the political implications. Tone leans toward criticism of the agreement.
Po poročilih so izraelske sile ubile borce Hezbolaha v Libanonu kljub sporazumu o prekinitvi ognja. Incident se je zgodil med stalnimi napetostmi med Izraelom in Hezbolahom, ki je bil ponavljajoči se konflikt v regiji.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o vojaških dejanjih, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani. Ne vključuje pristranskega jezika ali enostranskega vira, osredotoča se na sam dogodek, namesto da bi zavzel stališče o širših geopolitičnih posledicah.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 65): Provides basic facts about the agreement and Israeli actions, but the headline and content suggest a critical stance toward the deal. Limited contextual information on the agreement's implications.
Izraelske sile so detonirale tunel, ki ga je zgradil Hezbollah v južnem Libanonu, so sporočili izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu in obrambni minister Israel Katz. Napad se je zgodil kljub nedavnemu tristranskemu sporazumu med Izraelom, Libanonom in ZDA, katerega namen je bil doseči mir in razorožiti Hezbollah. Libanonski državni mediji so poročali o več napadih v regiji, kar je povzročilo dve poškodbi zaradi izraelske omamljive granate.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni izraelski in libanonski pogledi, navedeni so izjave izraelskih uradnikov, libanonskih državnih medijev in vodstva Hezbolaha.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 60): Article reports on Israeli actions but lacks context about the recent agreement. It mentions the tunnel and strikes but doesn't clarify the connection to the trilateral deal. Language suggests tension without balancing Hezbollah's perspective.
Boji med izraelsko vojsko in Hezbolahom, ki ga podpira Iran, so se v južnem Libanonu nadaljevali čez vikend, kljub nedavno podpisanemu sporazumu, namenjenemu zmanjšanju napetosti. Izraelska vojska je trdila, da je ciljala tri vodstvene centre Hezbolaha in onemogočila izstrelko orožja v regiji. Hezbolah je odgovoril z obtožbo Izraela, da je napadel civilne strukture in kršil premirje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene izraelske in Hezbollahove trditve, ne da bi očitno zagovarjali eno stran.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 75): Accurate reporting on ongoing conflict in Lebanon and the US-Iran negotiations. Maintains balance by covering both sides' actions and statements.
Izraelska vojska (IDF) je poročala o ubijanju več članov proiranske šiitske skupine Hezbollah v bližini mesta Nabatieh v soboto, kljub prekinitvi ognja. Incident se je zgodil po tem, ko so Izrael, Libanon in Združene države Amerike dosegli okvirni sporazum, katerega cilj je bil odpreti pot za mirovni sporazum med Izraelom in Libanonom. Po navedbah IDF so bili borci Hezbollah oboroženi z protitankovskimi izstrelki in so delovali znotraj izraelskega deklariranega varnostnega območja. IDF je trdila, da so napadli, da bi nevtralizirali grožnjo in uničili strelno platformo Hezbollah v procesu. Medtem je bil med spopadi v južnem Libanonu ubit izraelski častnik, ko se je njegova enota srečala s osumljenim teroristom Hezbollah, ko je vstopila v sumljivo stavbo na območju Deir al-Seraj.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o vojaških dejanjih in diplomatskih dogajanjih, ne da bi očitno podpirali katero koli stran.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 65): Reports on Israeli actions in southern Lebanon but uses translated text with potential inaccuracies. Mentions the agreement but focuses more on casualties and military actions. Lacks balance in presenting perspectives.
Izrael je napadel vas v južnem Libanonu in trdil, da je uničil podzemno infrastrukturo, ki jo je uporabljala libanonska militantna skupina Hezbollah. Po izraelskih premier Benjamin Netanyahu in obrambni minister Israel Katz, je bil napad usmerjen v tunel v mestu Majdal Zoun, ki je vseboval na stotine orožja in raketometov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene izraelske trditve o uničenju infrastrukture Hezbolaha in zavrnitev sporazuma o umiku s strani Hezbolaha, s čimer je zagotovljen uravnotežen pogled na situacijo, ne da bi se odkrito naklonjena katerikoli strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 60): Article discusses an Israeli attack on a village in southern Lebanon, claiming destruction of Hezbollah infrastructure, but this contradicts the primary source document which focuses on a withdrawal agreement. Article lacks contextual accuracy and presents a biased narrative.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed in an interview with Fox News that some Christian villages in southern Lebanon had requested to be annexed by Israel, citing their desire for protection from the Iranian-backed group Hezbollah. This statement comes amid ongoing Israeli military operations in southern Lebanon, where Israel has occupied territory since the ceasefire agreement signed in June 2026. The Israeli army has promised decisive action against Hezbollah and emphasized readiness for offensive operations if the ceasefire is violated. Recently, Israeli forces captured the ancient city of Beaufort and discovered a network of tunnels belonging to Hezbollah beneath the fortress. The conflict between Israel and Hezbollah resumed in March 2026 after Hezbollah launched attacks in support of Iran, prompting Israeli airstrikes and ground offensives. A fragile ceasefire was established in late June following negotiations between Tehran and Washington.
Ocena pristranskosti (Desno): The article presents Netanyahu’s claim in a manner that emphasizes his narrative of protection and justification for military actions, without providing counterpoints or critical perspectives from Lebanese authorities or international observers. The framing highlights Israeli military objectives and
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 80): Article accurately reports on the number of displaced Lebanese returning home and the ongoing situation, aligning with the primary source. Maintains a neutral tone.
Middle East EyeNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 80predvčerajšnjim
Po podatkih Mednarodne organizacije za migracije (IOM) je skoraj pol milijona Libanoncev še vedno razseljenih kljub prekinitvi ognja med Izraelom in Libanonom. Več kot 640.000 razseljenih oseb se je vrnilo domov od začetka prekinitve ognja 21. junija, s čimer se je skupno število vrnitve povečalo na 646.107 od vrhunskega razseljenosti več kot milijona med konfliktom. Vrnitve so bile najbolj izrazite v južnem Libanonu in južnih predmestjih Bejruta, čeprav se obmejne skupnosti še vedno soočajo z izzivi vrnitve zaradi stalne izraelske vojaške prisotnosti v razglaseni varnostni coni in nadaljnjih zračnih napadov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o številkah izseljenih, stopnjah vrnitve in statusu sporazuma o prekinitvi ognja, ne da bi očitno naklonjene katerikoli strani.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 75 · Objektivnost 80): Article provides analysis of the war's impact on Israel, focusing on strategic gains. While it references the broader context, it leans slightly towards an Israeli perspective without overt bias.
The ongoing conflict in Gaza, which began with Hamas' attack on Israel in October 2023, has led to a broader regional war involving Iran and Israel. As U.S.-Iran negotiations aim to establish a new regional order, Gaza has increasingly fallen out of the international spotlight. Palestinians describe feeling abandoned by the global community, with Israel continuing its military operations in the region. While a temporary ceasefire was reached between Israel and Hamas in late 2025, progress toward ending the war has stalled. Analysts suggest that Iran now views Hamas as less strategically valuable, shifting its focus to maintaining alliances like Hezbollah. This evolving dynamic highlights a changing geopolitical landscape in the Middle East.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): The article presents multiple perspectives, including quotes from Palestinian civilians, Israeli analysts, and an external analyst from the European Council on Foreign Relations. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The framing is neutral, focusing on geopolitical realt
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 70 · Objektivnost 85): Article focuses on Gaza and the shift in international attention away from it, which is relevant but not directly related to the main event. It maintains a neutral tone and avoids taking sides.
Proto ThemaNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 70Objektivnost 85predvčerajšnjim
Več kot 600.000 razseljenih Libanoncev se je vrnilo v svoje domove, odkar je bil konec junija sklenjen nemiren premirje med Izraelom in proiranskim Hezbolahom. Konflikt se je začel po tem, ko je Hezbolah 2. marca začel napade proti Izraelu, pri čemer je navedel maščevanje za smrt vrhovnega vodje Irana v ameriško-izraelskih napadih, ki so ciljali interese Islamske republike, ki so začeli 28. februarja. Izrael je odgovoril z obsežnimi zračnimi in kopenskimi operacijami ter intenziviral ukaze za evakuacijo v južnem Libanonu v več mesecih spopadov. Po navedbah lebanonskih oblasti je bilo ubitih okoli 4.300 ljudi in več kot milijon razseljenih, predvsem na jugu in predmestjih Bejruta. V poročilu Mednarodne organizacije za migracije je navedeno, da se je 646.107 oseb vrnilo domov, medtem ko je približno 500.000 ostalo razseljenih.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o spopadu, premirju in številkah razseljenih, ne da bi se očitno naklonil nobeni strani. Vključuje citate mednarodnih organizacij in omenja izraelske in Hezbollahove ukrepe brez očitne pristranskosti.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 70 · Objektivnost 85): Article focuses on the human cost of the war in Gaza, which is relevant but not directly related to the main event. It maintains a neutral tone and avoids taking sides.
Libanonski minister za kulturo Gasan Salame trdi, da so izraelske vojaške operacije proti Hezbollahu uničile zgodovinske kraje v južnem Libanonu, vključno z srednjeveškim dvoracem Beaufort in starimi naselji različnih verskih skupnosti.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): Članek poudarja uničenje kulturne dediščine zaradi izraelskih vojaških dejanj, citira libanonskega ministra za kulturo, ki izraža zaskrbljenost zaradi poškodovanja zgodovinskih znamenitosti, in poudarja mednarodne reakcije, kot je obsodba Unesca.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 70 · Objektivnost 60): The article contains significant inaccuracies, such as claiming Israel destroyed 'ancient cities' and historical sites, which are not supported by the primary source. It also uses emotionally charged language and omits key context about the agreement, leading to a biased portrayal.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu claimed that some Christian villages in southern Lebanon had requested annexation by Israel for protection from Hezbollah militants. This statement came amid ongoing conflict between Israel and Lebanon, which began after Hezbollah retaliated against Israeli strikes that killed Iran's supreme leader. Israel has conducted airstrikes and invaded southern Lebanon, occupying areas near the border. Netanyahu did not specify which villages made the request, but the mayor of the Christian village of Rmeish denied the claim, stating that 15 Christian towns had issued a joint denial. The villages have emphasized their loyalty to Lebanon and refused to consider annexation, despite enduring Israeli military actions including shelling and evacuation orders. Meanwhile, Israel continues its military operations in southern Lebanon, despite a US-brokered ceasefire agreement.
Ocena pristranskosti (Desno): The article presents Netanyahu's claim in a manner that emphasizes Israel's protective role and frames the situation as a matter of security and self-defense, while downplaying the denial from Lebanese Christian village leaders. The framing suggests a pro-Israel perspective, focusing on the threat来自
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 50 · Objektivnost 55): Article repeats the false claim about Lebanese Christian villages requesting annexation by Israel, which is not supported by the primary source. It presents a biased and inaccurate account.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
