Nova turistična taksa, ki jo je vlada predlagala kot del predloga za podporo gorski kmetiji, je zelo hitro postala tema, ki zadržuje ogromno pozornosti v polemiki. Predlog uvajanja imenovanega prispevka v višini enega evra na prenočitev je bil predstavljen kot finančna pomoč za območja z omejenimi dejavniki za kmetovanje.
Predlog je vendar zelo hitro odzval zavod Gostoljubnost slovenskih domov v združenje sobodajalcev. Obe organizaciji sta opozorili na nove obremenitve in izključenost iz pogovorov. Združenje sobodajalcev Slovenije je zapisal, da je bilo precejšnje prisotnosti, da je ministrstvo že potekalo pogovore z izbranimi deležniki o delitvi sredstev, ne da bi se pred tem posvetilo z tistimi, od katerih se dejansko pričakuje financiranje. Združenje je tudi opozorilo, da so mali ponudniki nastanitev ustvarili približno četrtino vseh turističnih nočnih mest v Sloveniji, zato bi morali biti vključeni v pripravo takšnega ukrepa.
Združenje sobodajalcev Slovenije in Zavod Gostoljubnost slovenskih domov so v dopisu ministrstvu naslovili, da zavračajo vnaprejšnjo vlogo dežurne molzne krave za vsakokratne finančne apetite v nasprotju na koalicijske zaveze davčne nevtralnosti, ki predvidevajo, da se gospodarstvo ne obremenjuje z novimi obveznostmi brez ukinitve obstoječih.
Slobodajalci so nasprotovali, ker zdaj plačujejo številne davke, med njimi turistično in promocijsko davek, RTV-prispevek, prispevke za socialno varnost in prispevke za dolgotrajno oskrbo. Lani so zbrali skoraj 22 milijonov evrov turistične davke, od tega več kot pet milijonov evrov promocijske davke. Po njihovih navedbah so mali ponudniki nastanitev glede na ustvarjeni promet plačujejo več davčnih obveznosti kot hotelski sektor. Združenje opozarja tudi na pravo v izvedbena vprašanja predlagane ureditve.
Ker turistična taksa določajo občane, njena višina pa se po Sloveniji razlikuje oziroma je včasih sploh ne pobirajo, bi lahko nova dajatev po njihovem mnenju povzročila dodaten nesorazmerje. Izpostavljajo tudi, da so otroci od sedmih let turistične takse oproščeni, za stare od sedmih do 14 let pa velja polovična taksa, zato ni jasno, kako bi se novi prispevek obračunaval pri teh skupinah.
Svobodnjaki poudarjajo, da njihovi gostje pomembno prispevajo k razvoju podeželja, saj pogosteje obiskujejo lokalne gostilne, kupujejo izdelke pri kmetih in raziskujejo manj turistično razvite kraje. Po njihovem mnenju se mali ponudniki z lokalnim kmetijstvom zdaj bolj neposredno sodelujejo z velikimi turističnimi sistemi, zato bi bilo bolj učinkovito iskati načine za boljšo porabo obstoječih sredstev, namesto da bi uvajali nove obveznosti.
Ministrstvo za kmetijstvo je pozvalo k sestanku, na katerem bi skupaj poiskali rešitve za povečanje malega turizma v gorskih kmetijah in razpravljali o ciljih predlaganega ukrepa.
2 poročil
DeloNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 70pred 19 urami Nova turistična taksa razburja sobodajalceThe Slovenian government has proposed introducing a new tourist tax of one euro per night stay to support mountain farms, which has surprised tourism operators. The proposal was included in the coalition agreement and is expected to be implemented over the next four years. Tourism associations and the association of Slovenian home hosts expressed concern, noting they were not consulted before discussions began with stakeholders who would benefit from the funding. They criticized the lack of consultation and highlighted their exclusion from prior negotiations. Minister Janez Cigler Kralj responded by stating he had not yet received the letter but believes the sector will be involved in preparing the measure. He argued that tourism is a significant economic activity crucial for rural areas and that while tourism imposes burdens on infrastructure and resources, it also contributes to development.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): While the article presents the government’s proposal and the opposition from tourism groups, it does not clearly favor either side through strong language or selective sourcing. It reports both perspectives fairly, including quotes from the minister and the critics, without evident ideological slant
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 70): This article provides detailed information on the government's proposal and quotes Minister Cigler Kralj directly. It presents both sides of the debate, including the response from the associations. However, the language used to describe the associations' stance is somewhat biased, suggesting they a
Žurnal24NeodvisenLevoDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 23 urami Nov davek za turiste razburil sobodajalce: "Ne bomo dežurna molzna krava!"The article discusses opposition from Slovenia's 'sobodajalci' (small accommodation providers) against a proposed new tax aimed at supporting rural agriculture. The Ministry of Agriculture plans to introduce a €1 per tourist night contribution to fund rural development projects. Sobodajalci argue they were not consulted during the proposal's preparation despite being the ones who would collect and charge the fee. They criticize the ministry for not involving them in discussions and accuse it of violating the principle of tax neutrality. The association highlights that small accommodation providers already pay multiple taxes and stresses their role in supporting local agriculture through direct engagement with farmers. They call for dialogue and suggest that existing funds could be used more effectively rather than introducing new burdens.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the opposition from sobodajalci as justified and emphasizes their economic contributions and concerns over additional financial burdens. It criticizes the ministry for lack of consultation and perceived violation of tax neutrality principles, which aligns with left-leaning values.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 75): The article accurately reports the opposition from the Association of Self-Caterers and the Guesthouse Lovers' Society to the proposed tourist euro. It mentions their exclusion from discussions and concerns about additional burdens. The tone remains neutral but has some emotionally charged phrases l
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik