CroatiaThe article discusses criticism of proposed amendments to Croatia’s Higher Education Law and Scientific Activity Act, which has sparked dissatisfaction among students and academics. Students argue that extending the study period to 15 years, retroactively applied only to exceptional students, is unfair, particularly since they lose their right to continue studying after the maximum period, even if they have completed most of their program. Academics criticize the provision allowing permanent professors and scientific advisors to work until 67, arguing it discriminates against other teaching staff who are denied this option. They emphasize that some researchers entered the system later, gained significant expertise, and were unable to secure permanent positions due to timing, yet are now being treated less favorably. The National Union of Science and Higher Education (NSZVO) warns that the proposed changes bypass many systemic issues and shift responsibility onto universities and faculties. Critics also question the rushed nature of the legislative process and suggest that the reforms could have been used to address broader flaws in the current law.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the issue as a matter of fairness and equality, highlighting perceived discrimination against students and academic staff. It emphasizes the voices of affected individuals and criticizes the rushed legislative process and the prioritization of certain groups over others. The tone,
