Naseeruddin Shah želi oslabiti demokracijo v državi: BJP
Politični spor se je povečal zaradi študentskega protesta na Inštitutu za film in televizijo Satyajit Ray (SRFTI). Veteran igralec Naseeruddin Shah je javno podprl študente, ki so po nasilnih spopadih na kampusu organizirali nedoločen protest, medtem ko je Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) obtožil, da cilja posameznike, ki se ne ujemajo z njeno ideologijo. V odgovor na to so voditelji BJP v Zahodnem Bengalu kritizirali Shahja, član Rajya Sabhe Rahul Sinha pa je zahteval preiskavo igralčevih komentarjev in domnevno povezave z mednarodnimi zaroti. Drugi predstavniki BJP, vključno z poslancem Riteshem Tewarijem, so podvomili v Shahove motive, tako da so poudarjali družinske povezave z opozicijskimi strankami in opazili njegovo prejšnje molčenje med drugimi lokalnimi polemikami. Temeljni konflikt se je začel po spopadu desničarske organizacije in študentov 4. oktobra, kar je privedlo do suspenzije šestih študentov zaradi domnevnega vandalizma in napada. Uprava SRFTI trdi, da so disciplinski ukrepi utemeljeni na posebnih primerih nepravilnosti, ne pa na zatiranju pravic do protestov.
Veteran Indian actor Naseeruddin Shah has accused the Bharatiya Janatra Party of seeking revenge against individuals who oppose its policies, prompting sharp backlash from party leaders in West Bengal. The dispute centers on an indefinite sit-in staged by students at the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute in Kolkata. Shah released a video message urging citizens to back the students, whom he described as aspiring filmmakers targeted for demanding administrative accountability. He alleged that the students faced show-cause notices, surveillance, threats, and orders to vacate their hostels. BJP Rajya Sabha member Rahul Sinha responded by questioning Shah’s motives, suggesting the actor aimed to weaken democracy in the country. Sinha called for a full investigation into the veteran’s comments, alleging potential links to an international conspiracy. He noted that Shah had emerged from a long period of inactivity to issue political statements against the party. State-level BJP MLA Ritesh Tewari attacked Shah’s personal connections, claiming the actor opposed the BJP and the Sangh by lineage. Tewari stated that Shah’s daughter is married in Kolkata to the son of a Communist Party of India (Marxist) leader who has contested elections. Tewari further asked why Shah remained silent when West Bengal ministers and the Kolkata mayor raised the slogan of Dawat-e-Islam. He characterized the actors as dancing to the tune of foreign money while domestic observers watch. The underlying conflict began after a clash occurred on the SRFTI campus on October 4, 2026, involving a right-wing organization and a group of students. Earlier reports cited the initial incident date as September 27, 2026. Following the violence, six students were rusticated on October 15, 2026, for allegedly vandalizing the Vice-Chancellor’s office and physically assaulting him. On October 25, 2026, a section of protesting students claimed that power supply to their sole classroom, used for internet and workstations, was cut off. They accused the administration of intensifying pressure to end the agitation. SRFTI Registrar Deepak Kumar issued a statement on October 25, clarifying that disciplinary actions were based on specific acts of misconduct, vandalism, defacement, and physical assault. He denied that the penalties were related to the students' right to protest, stating that linking the actions to legitimate protest misrepresented the facts. The institute emphasized that the proceedings were grounded in documented violations rather than political expression. Filmmaker Payal Kapadia also voiced solidarity with the students, alleging that individuals affiliated with the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh entered the campus and assaulted students, including women. She questioned the punitive measures taken against those seeking accountability. Shah’s video message framed the situation as part of a broader vendetta following the BJP-led government’s victory in the Bengal elections. He argued that the current administration targets anyone who does not subscribe to its beliefs. The exchange highlights a deepening rift between cultural figures supporting the student movement and regional political leaders defending the institutional response. The students continue their sit-in, while the administration maintains that order and discipline require strict enforcement of rules regarding property damage and physical safety. No immediate resolution to the standoff has been announced.
Politični spor se je povečal zaradi študentskega protesta na Inštitutu za film in televizijo Satyajit Ray (SRFTI). Veteran igralec Naseeruddin Shah je javno podprl študente, ki so po nasilnih spopadih na kampusu organizirali nedoločen protest, medtem ko je Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) obtožil, da cilja posameznike, ki se ne ujemajo z njeno ideologijo. V odgovor na to so voditelji BJP v Zahodnem Bengalu kritizirali Shahja, član Rajya Sabhe Rahul Sinha pa je zahteval preiskavo igralčevih komentarjev in domnevno povezave z mednarodnimi zaroti. Drugi predstavniki BJP, vključno z poslancem Riteshem Tewarijem, so podvomili v Shahove motive, tako da so poudarjali družinske povezave z opozicijskimi strankami in opazili njegovo prejšnje molčenje med drugimi lokalnimi polemikami. Temeljni konflikt se je začel po spopadu desničarske organizacije in študentov 4. oktobra, kar je privedlo do suspenzije šestih študentov zaradi domnevnega vandalizma in napada. Uprava SRFTI trdi, da so disciplinski ukrepi utemeljeni na posebnih primerih nepravilnosti, ne pa na zatiranju pravic do protestov.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnoteženo strukturo "on je rekel, on je rekel", značilno za glavno indijsko novinarstvo, ki pokriva partijske spore. Posebne obtožbe neposredno pripisuje imenovanim uradnikom BJP (kot so trditve o mednarodni zaroti in osebni napadi na igralčevo družino) in nasprotuje
BJP-jev poslanec Ritesh Tiwari je kritiziral veterana igralca Naseerudina Shahja, ker je podprl študentske protestnike na filmskem in televizijskem inštitutu Satyajit Ray (SRFTI) v Kolkati. Tiwari je Shah označil za vseživljenjskega nasprotnika BJP in Sangh Parivarja, pri čemer je navedel družinske vezi s Komunistično stranko Indije (marksistično) in ga obtožil, da je bil pod vplivom tujih sredstev, medtem ko je bil tiho o drugih vprašanjih. V odgovoru na MLA-jeve komentarje je Shah objavil video, v katerem trdi, da se vlada Zahodne Bengalske, ki jo vodi BJP, maščuje študentom, ki so zahtevali odgovornost glede domnevnega nasilja na kampusu. Shah je trdil, da so se študenti soočali z obvestili o vzrokih, nadzoru, grožnjami in zahtevami za izselitev, ter opisal dejanja vlade kot maščevanje. Filmska ustvarjalka Payal Kapadia je tudi izrazila solidarnost s študenti in trdila, da so posamezniki, povezani z Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), med začetnim protestom napadli študente.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je konflikt prikazan skozi lečo BJP-jevega zakonodajalca, ki napade pomembnega kulturnega predstavnika, povezanega z levičarsko opozicijo. S tem, da se začne z MLA obtožbami, da je igralec 'po liniji' nasprotnik BJP-ja in da ga poganja 'tuji denar', članek poudarja partizansko
Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) je pred prihodnjimi občinskimi volitvami v Kolkati izrecno izključila možnost zavezništva z uporniki Trinamool Congress, ki podpirajo Nacionalistično civilno stranko Initiative (NCPI). Samik Bhattacharya, državni predsednik BJP, je jasno povedal, da so vrata stranke zaprta za te kandidate. Ta odločitev poudarja trdno stališče, ki ga BJP zavzema glede koalicijskih partnerjev v lokalni politiki Zahodnega Bengala.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Zagotavljeno besedilo je zgolj neposredni citat politične osebnosti, ki navaja dejstvo o strategiji svoje stranke. Ne vsebuje pridevk, vrednotnih sodb ali kontekstualnega oblikovanja, ki bi nakazovalo naklonjenost BJP ali proti BJP. Besedilo je čisto informativno in nevtralno.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.