ON
← Nazaj na pregled
N.J. najstnica odpravi tožbo proti Facebooku, Instagramu, ki trdi, da je odvisna od spleta
United States🏛️ PolitikaBolj progresivnopred 8 dnevi

N.J. najstnica odpravi tožbo proti Facebooku, Instagramu, ki trdi, da je odvisna od spleta

Mladenič iz New Jerseyja je umaknila tožbo proti Facebooku, Instagramu, Snapchatu in YouTubu, v kateri trdi, da te platforme namerno spodbujajo spletno odvisnost in prispevajo k težavam z duševnim zdravjem. Primer, prvotno vložen leta 2023, je bil del niza podobnih tožb, katerih cilj je bil potencialno oblikovanje skupinske tožbe. Tožnica, imenovana "P.M.Y"., naj bi se poravnala s TikTokom, da bi nadaljevala s svojim življenjem. Meta, ki je lastnica Facebooka in Instagrama, je navedla, da je stanje duševnega zdravja P.M.Y. pred njeno uporabo socialnih medijev in je ugotovila, da več primerov sledi podobnemu vzorcu.

A major legal battle involving Meta Platforms Inc., the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is set to begin this week as it faces off against 29 U.S. states over allegations that its social media platforms contribute to youth addiction and mental health issues. The trial marks a pivotal moment in a growing wave of lawsuits targeting tech companies for their role in shaping user behavior, particularly among minors. The trial comes amid a broader legal landscape shaped by multiple individual lawsuits that have already resulted in settlements and judgments. One notable development occurred recently when a teenage plaintiff, identified as P.M.Y., decided to drop her lawsuit against Meta, YouTube, and Snapchat. According to her attorney, Emily Jeffcott, P.M.Y. chose to dismiss the remaining claims to help her “resume her life” after reaching a settlement with TikTok. She had previously accused the companies of contributing to her social media addiction, depression, and self-harm. P.M.Y.’s case was originally scheduled to be one of several bellwether trials in Los Angeles Superior Court, intended to serve as test cases for a larger class-action lawsuit. However, she opted to withdraw her claims against YouTube voluntarily, according to a statement from Google, which owns YouTube. Google emphasized its commitment to providing “safe, age-appropriate experiences and strong parental controls for young people and families.” Similarly, Snap Inc., the owner of Snapchat, reiterated its focus on enhancing safety features and educational resources for its users. This decision follows similar actions by other plaintiffs in the ongoing litigation. For example, R.K.C., a minor involved in another case, settled with Snapchat, TikTok, and YouTube before dropping his lawsuit against Meta last month. Meta responded to P.M.Y.'s withdrawal by stating that the plaintiff had a significant mental health condition predating her use of social media, suggesting that such cases often share common patterns. The company reaffirmed its intent to defend itself aggressively in court. The legal challenges against Meta stem from a broader initiative led by state attorneys general, who argue that the company designed its platforms to be inherently addictive, thereby harming children's well-being. These states are seeking substantial financial penalties and operational changes to how Meta conducts business. Four state attorneys general have reportedly sought up to $1.4 trillion in penalties, highlighting the gravity of the accusations. The litigation has already yielded some results. In January, the first trial commenced, resulting in a jury finding Meta and YouTube liable for negligently designing their platforms. The companies were ordered to pay a combined $6 million in damages. However, both Snapchat and TikTok reached settlements before the trial concluded. Another plaintiff, Kaley Glenn-Mills from California, secured a $6 million award after settling with TikTok and Snap, though Meta and Alphabet have signaled intentions to appeal the verdict. Meanwhile, a separate federal trial against Meta is currently underway in California federal court, with California, Colorado, Kentucky, and New Jersey serving as plaintiffs. Additional trials involving 25 more states are anticipated in the coming months. The outcome of these cases could significantly influence future regulations governing social media platforms and their impact on youth. The legal battles reflect a growing public concern over the effects of prolonged social media use on adolescents. Advocates argue that the design elements of these platforms, such as infinite scrolling, notifications, and algorithmic content curation, are engineered to maximize engagement, potentially leading to harmful psychological outcomes. Critics of the companies maintain that they have failed to adequately address these risks, despite being aware of them for years. As the trials progress, the focus will remain on whether courts recognize the companies' responsibility for the alleged harm caused by their products. Legal experts suggest that the outcomes could set precedents affecting not just Meta but also other major tech firms. The proceedings will likely involve extensive testimony from industry insiders, mental health professionals, and affected individuals, offering a comprehensive look into the intersection of technology, law, and adolescent well-being.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

6 poročil

Quartz logoQuartzNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 80pred 12 dnevi
Sodišče proti 29 državam, ki trdijo, da so otroci odvisni od socialnih medijev, se začne ta teden.

Meta se sooča s pravnim izzivom štirih ameriških državnih državnih tožilcev, ki trdijo, da so platforme družbenih medijev podjetja zasvojene za otroke.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja tožbo kot pravno zadevo, ne da bi odkrito zagovarjal katero koli določeno politično ideologijo.

Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reflects the primary source document by detailing the trial, the involvement of 29 state attorneys general, and the $1.4 trillion penalty sought. It correctly mentions the legal claims and Meta's stance without adding unverified information.

Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the facts without overt emotional language or bias. It clearly outlines the positions of both Meta and the state attorneys general without taking sides.

Quartz logoQuartzNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 78pred 17 dnevi
Meta gre na sojenje proti 29 državam zaradi obtožb, da so otroci odvisni od socialnih medijev.

V Oaklandu se je začel postopek izbora porote za sojenje, v katerem se Meta sooča z obtožbami iz 29 ameriških zveznih držav, ki trdijo, da so njene platforme družbenih medijev zasvojenost za otroke.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je tožba označena kot pomemben pravni izziv proti podjetju Meta in poudarjen potencialni finančni vpliv na podjetje.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports that Meta is facing a trial against 29 states over claims of addicting children to social media, with jury selection beginning in Oakland. It mentions potential damages approaching Meta's $1.5 trillion market cap. This aligns with cross-source reporting from reputable outlets, th

Zakaj objektivnost (78): The tone is neutral but leans slightly towards emphasizing the significance of the case, particularly by mentioning the potential financial impact. The language is informative but carries a somewhat dramatic tone regarding the 'addicted kids' claim.

The Hill logoThe HillNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 70pred 8 dnevi
Mladenič je padel v sodno tožbo zaradi odvisnosti od socialnih medijev.

Najstnica P.M.Y. se je odločila, da opusti svojo tekočo tožbo proti Meta, YouTube in Snapchat, ki so jih tožili zaradi domnevnih zasvojenosti z oblikovanjem platform, ki vodijo do težav z duševnim zdravjem.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis pravnega razvoja v zvezi s tožbami proti družbenim medijem, vključno z namenom tožnikov in odzivi obtožencev.

Zakaj dejstva (75): The article accurately reports that the teen dropped her lawsuit against Meta, YouTube, and Snapchat, citing settlement with TikTok. However, it omits key details from the primary source such as the specific claims made by the state attorneys general and Meta's response to them. The article does not

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the information neutrally but includes some subjective language such as 'move on with her life' and 'hold social media companies accountable.' These phrases suggest a certain perspective on the issue rather than being purely objective. Additionally, the article frames the situat

Politico logoPoliticoNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 65Objektivnost 70pred 9 dnevi
Kako je Jonathan Haidt preoblikoval boj za otroke in socialne medije v politično gibanje

V članku se razpravlja o tem, kako je psiholog Jonathan Haidt preoblikoval razpravo o dobrobiti otrok in vplivu socialnih medijev v širše politično gibanje. Haidtovo delo poudarja zaskrbljenost zaradi učinkov socialnih medijev na duševno zdravje mladih, pozornost in družbene vrednote.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Čeprav se članek dotakne politično nabitih vprašanj, kot sta ureditev družbenih medijev in blaginja mladih, predstavlja Haidtovo delo kot katalizator za medstranski dialog, ne pa kot jasno ideološko stališče.

Zakaj dejstva (65): The article discusses Jonathan Haidt's role in turning the debate over children and social media into a political movement, but lacks specific citations or references to primary sources. It aligns with broader narratives about Haidt's influence, but without direct evidence, the factual claims remain

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on Haidt's impact without overtly taking sides. However, the phrasing 'turned the fight...into a political movement' implies a certain narrative about the politicization of the issue, which may subtly frame Haidt as a catalyst rather than presenting mult

The Washington Times logoThe Washington TimesStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 65Objektivnost 60pred 8 dnevi
N.J. najstnica odpravi tožbo proti Facebooku, Instagramu, ki trdi, da je odvisna od spleta

Mladenič iz New Jerseyja je umaknila tožbo proti Facebooku, Instagramu, Snapchatu in YouTubu, v kateri trdi, da te platforme namerno spodbujajo spletno odvisnost in prispevajo k težavam z duševnim zdravjem. Primer, prvotno vložen leta 2023, je bil del niza podobnih tožb, katerih cilj je bil potencialno oblikovanje skupinske tožbe. Tožnica, imenovana "P.M.Y"., naj bi se poravnala s TikTokom, da bi nadaljevala s svojim življenjem. Meta, ki je lastnica Facebooka in Instagrama, je navedla, da je stanje duševnega zdravja P.M.Y. pred njeno uporabo socialnih medijev in je ugotovila, da več primerov sledi podobnemu vzorcu.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije o pravnem sporu o odgovornosti platforme družbenih medijev, ne da bi se odkrito zavzemala za katero koli politično ideologijo.

Zakaj dejstva (65): The article mentions the New Jersey teen dropping her lawsuit against Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, and YouTube but provides incomplete information compared to the primary source. It fails to mention the broader context of the federal trial involving multiple states and the $1.4 trillion damage cla

Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'mental health crisis' and 'addicted' without providing balanced context or counterpoints. It also frames the situation as a 'New Jersey teen' dropping a lawsuit without adequately explaining the broader legal landscape or the positions taken by

Breitbart News logoBreitbart NewsNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 20Objektivnost 95pred 15 dnevi
Mark Zuckerberg se bo na sodišču soočil s pritožbami mladih za odvisnost od socialnih medijev iz 29 držav

Meta, matična družba Instagram, WhatsApp in Facebook, se pripravlja na sodno obravnavo na zveznem sodišču v Oaklandu v Kaliforniji, kjer se sooča z zahtevki 29 državnih državnih tožilcev glede odvisnosti mladih od socialnih medijev. Tožba, vložena oktobra 2023, obtožuje Meta, da je oblikovala aplikacije za pretirano vključevanje mladih uporabnikov s funkcijami, kot so neskončno brskanje in sporočila, medtem ko je domnevno kršila zvezne zakone o zasebnosti z zbiranjem podatkov od mladoletnikov brez soglasja staršev. Države zahtevajo tako finančne kazni kot regulativne spremembe za omejitev škodljivih funkcij za uporabnike, mlajše od 18 let.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je tožba predstavljena kot zakonita pravna tožba, namenjena zaščiti otrok pred škodo podjetij, s poudarkom na odgovornosti držav za varovanje mladih.

Zakaj dejstva (20): This article discusses a completely different topic, Meta facing legal action over youth social media addiction, and has nothing to do with the North Carolina man accused of assault. There is no mention of Di-Quan Schafar Hunt, his arrests, or the Charlotte incident. The facts presented are unrelate

Zakaj objektivnost (95): The article presents the information in a neutral and factual manner, without any obvious bias or emotional language. It provides details about the legal proceedings against Meta and quotes from officials involved.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe