During a live interview at Radio Mitre's booth at La Rural fair, Argentine President Javier Milei directly accused José Ignacio De Mendiguren, former minister under former president Raúl Alfonsín’s government and later a prominent industrialist, of having ruined the country. Milei called him a thief, stating he had caused damage amounting to $30 billion to the Argentine economy. The remarks came during a discussion on monetary emission and how political actions have allegedly robbed Argentinians of $45 billion over recent years. The incident occurred as Milei was speaking about the economic consequences of policies implemented by previous governments. He pointed out that in 2001, when the Duhalde administration ended the currency board system and removed the convertibility clause from banknotes, it stole $15 billion from citizens. Milei added that Cristina Kirchner similarly took $10 billion from the central bank’s reserves, contributing to his claim that politics has stolen $45 billion from Argentina in recent years. Milei emphasized that these actions were part of a broader strategy to push through reforms aimed at amending the Organic Law of the Central Bank of Argentina (BCRA). His goal with this reform is to prevent laws from being passed that could alter the fiscal deficit or challenge the head of the central bank due to economic policy differences. He noted that such reforms would require two-thirds majority support in both the Senate and Chamber of Deputies. As the interview continued, Milei reiterated his stance on the need to hold accountable those who pass laws that disrupt fiscal balance, warning they could end up imprisoned for illegal association. He also discussed the idea of implementing a shutdown mechanism, akin to the U.S. model, to stop spending when funds run out, questioning why the state does not adopt this approach. De Mendiguren served as Minister of Production from January to October 2002, during the period of devaluation following 11 years of currency board stability. After leaving government service, he became president of the Argentine Industrial Union (UIA), held national deputy positions, and worked under the administrations of Alberto Fernández and Cristina Kirchner. Later in the same interview, Milei urged people to confront individuals like De Mendiguren, saying that when someone like him appears, one should not hesitate to tell them how their actions destroyed lives after exiting the currency board system. He stated that all those responsible for the nation’s decline come forward to dictate what must be done. In addition to his comments on De Mendiguren, Milei expressed continued support for former Economy Minister Martín Adorni, calling him honest and innocent despite ongoing controversies surrounding his tenure. This statement contrasts sharply with his direct accusations against De Mendiguren, highlighting the varied nature of Milei’s public discourse regarding different political figures. Milei also presented proposals for reforming the Central Bank, describing it as a tool that enabled high-level political theft. These statements underscore his broader agenda to overhaul financial institutions and impose stricter controls on monetary policy to prevent further alleged mismanagement. Throughout the interview, Milei maintained a firm tone, emphasizing the necessity of holding politicians accountable for their economic decisions and advocating for structural changes to prevent future fiscal misconduct. His remarks reflect a growing trend within his administration to address perceived corruption and inefficiency in economic governance.
5 poročil
La NaciónNeodvisen🔒KonservativnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 85pred 5 dneviPredsednik Javier Milei je javno obtožil nekdanjega ministra José Ignacio De Mendigurena, da je uničil Argentino med svojim intervjujem v živo na La Rural. Milei je trdil, da je bil De Mendiguren, ki je služil pod predsednikom Adolfo Rodríguez Sáez Duhalde, odgovoren za krajo 30 milijard dolarjev od Argentincev z gospodarskimi politikami. Milei je tudi dejal, da je vlada pod Duhalde ukradla 15 milijard dolarjev s koncem konvertibilnosti valute leta 2001, medtem ko je administracija Cristine Kirchner ukradla še 10 milijard dolarjev z umikom rezerv iz centralne banke. Milei je poudaril, da so ti ukrepi politikov v zadnjih letih povzročili izgubo 45 milijard dolarjev in zagovarjali ustavne reforme za preprečevanje prihodnjih fiskalnih neravnovesja.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Članek predstavlja Mileijeve močne obtožbe zoper De Mendigurena z uporabo čustveno napolnjenega jezika, kot sta "ladrón" ("lopov") in "arruinaste el país" ("uničil si državo").
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article summarizes the highlights of Milei’s speech at La Rural, including direct quotes and descriptions of his remarks. It aligns with other articles and provides a comprehensive overview of the event, with no conflicting information among sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The tone is positive and celebratory, highlighting Milei’s praise for the agricultural sector. While it remains factual, it emphasizes the significance of the speech in a favorable light.
La NaciónNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 60pred 7 dnevi Javier Milei in njegovi ukrepi, v živo: projekt fiscalinocencia 2′′ in predlogi v kongresuV članku so opisane številne novice iz Argentine. Prvič, poroča o guvernerju Osvaldu Jaldu, ki je bil operiran na srcu in je še vedno hospitaliziran v Buenos Airesu, potem ko je doživel intenzivno bolečino in znojenje. Drugič, razpravlja o gospodarski negotovosti pred volitvami in ugotavlja, da se lahko vlagatelji umaknejo, ko se približa volilno obdobje. Tretjič, omenja Patricio Bullrich in Federico Sturzenegger, ki skupaj sodelujejo pri napredovanju zakonodaje v zvezi s pravicami do zasebne lastnine. Četrtič, ugotavlja, da kljub nizki stopnji inflacije drugi gospodarski in socialni kazalniki kažejo, da mora vlada biti optimistična in nadaljevati prizadevanja. Končno poroča o Facundo Lealu, nekdanjem uradniku, ki je pod preiskavo zaradi korupcije, ki mu je bila odobrena hišna pripora zaradi odvisnosti od drog.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene številne zgodbe, ne da bi se očitno zavzemala za katero koli politično stran. Poroča o vladnih ukrepih (npr. Jaldojeva hospitalizacija, zakonodajna prizadevanja Bullricha in Sturzeneggerja) in gospodarskih vprašanjih, hkrati pa pokriva pravne zadeve, ki vključujejo nekdanjega uradnika.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article reports on Governor Osvaldo Jaldo undergoing heart surgery and being hospitalized, citing a medical report from the Italian Hospital. It provides specific details like the location, time frame, and symptoms, which align with typical reporting standards. However, there is no primary sourc
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'el reloj corre' and 'ventana de oportunidad', which may imply urgency or bias towards certain economic actors. While the facts are presented neutrally, the language suggests a particular perspective on Argentina’s political and economic situat
PerfilNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 20Objektivnost 10pred 8 dneviČlanek primerja izbirne procese argentinskega nogometnega trenerja Lionela Scalonija in predsednika Javiera Mileija, v nasprotju z njihovimi pristopi k izbiri posameznikov za vodstvene vloge. Trdi, da Scaloni izbira na podlagi zaslug in sposobnosti, medtem ko ekipa Mileija vključuje številne zaznane "najhujše" osebe, vključno z družinskimi člani, nekdanjimi politiki, povezanimi s korupcijo, in posamezniki z dvomljivimi zapisi. Članek kritizira administracijo Mileija, ker daje prednost osebnim povezavam pred pristojnostjo, kar kaže, da njegove politike, kot je razgradnja centralne banke in spodbujanje tržne logike, spodkopava njegova izbira svetovalcev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek negativno prikazuje politične odločitve Mileja, z uporabo obremenjenih izrazov, kot so "povprečni", "povezani s korupcijo" in "manipulatorji podatkov". Njegov pristop je v nasprotju s Scalonijevim pristopom, ki temelji na zaslugih, kar pomeni, da je vodstvo Mileja pomanjkljivo in sebično.
Zakaj dejstva (20): The article mentions Scaloni and political figures, but it incorrectly frames the selection process of political leaders as analogous to football team selection. It misrepresents the content of the primary source document by conflating unrelated topics and making unfounded comparisons.
Zakaj objektivnost (10): The tone is satirical and dismissive, using hyperbolic language to criticize political choices. While it avoids overt bias, the overall approach is more polemic than objective reporting.
Página/12Strankarsko povezanKonservativnopred 9 uramiČlanek poroča, da argentinski predsednik Javier Milei še naprej podpira svojega nekdanjega zaveznika Adornija in ga opisuje kot "čistega in nedolžnega". Članek poudarja Mileijevo stalno podporo Adorniju kljub morebitnim sporom in poudarja Mileijevo osebno oceno Adornijeve integritete.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je Mileijeva stalna podpora Adorniju postavljena v pozitivno svetlobo, z izrazi, kot sta "čestni" in "nevini", ki so v skladu s konzervativnimi vrednotami.
InfobaeNeodvisenKonservativnopred 22 uramiV članku, ki ga je objavil Infobae, je argentinski predsednik Javier Milei predstavil predlagane reforme centralni banki.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je centralna banka označena kot koruptivna institucija, ki omogoča politične napake in se ujema s konzervativno kritiko državnih institucij.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
AR
