United States🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativnopred 11 urami

Meta je morala plačati 25 milijard dolarjev New Mexicu zaradi odločbe o zasebnosti podatkov.

Sodnik v Novi Mehiki je Meta odredil, naj državi plača 25 milijard dolarjev, potem ko je porota ugotovila, da je družba prekršila zakone o varstvu potrošnikov z zavajajočimi praksami glede zasebnosti podatkov. Sodba je sledila ugotovitvam, da so vodje Meta, vključno z Markom Zuckerbergom in Sheryl Sandberg, sodelovali v usklajeni strategiji za zavajanje uporabnikov o tem, kako se z njihovimi osebnimi podatki ravna in jih deli z oglaševalci. Pravni ukrep je izhajal iz obtožb v zvezi s kršitvijo podatkov Cambridge Analytica, kjer so bili uporabniški podatki domnevno zbrani prek aplikacije tretje osebe in uporabljeni za ciljno politično oglaševanje. Generalni tožilec New Mexika Raul Torrez je kazen označil kot zgodovinski ukrep, namenjen preprečevanju korporativnega slabega vedenja, in poudaril, da bodo sredstva usmerjena v državno izobraževanje v skladu z ustavnimi določbami. Pravna ekipa Meta je zavrnila sodbo, ki jo je opisala kot neustaven poskus obdavčitve govora in izrazila zaupanje, da bo odločitev razveljavljena v pritožbi.

A New Mexico judge ordered Meta Platforms Inc. to pay $25 billion to the state on Wednesday, concluding a legal battle rooted in the Cambridge Analytica data scandal. Judge Francis Mathew set the penalty following a September jury verdict that found the social media giant guilty of deceiving users regarding their data privacy. The ruling marks the largest financial penalty imposed on the tech company to date. Mathew initially calculated a potential liability of $219.5 billion based on statutory maximums but reduced the final award to $25 billion. The funds are designated for New Mexico’s public school system under state constitutional provisions governing consumer protection fines. The case originated from allegations that Facebook misled consumers about how their personal information was shared with third parties. A jury of jurors determined that the company committed approximately 43.9 million willful violations of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act. Each violation carried a potential penalty of $5,000. The jury’s findings indicated that Facebook’s privacy controls failed to provide users with meaningful control over their data. Furthermore, the court found that third-party application developers could access user information through the platform’s systems despite assurances given to the public. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez described the judgment as potentially the largest state verdict against a corporation in American history. Speaking at a news conference in Albuquerque, Torrez stated that the ruling serves as an unambiguous message to Silicon Valley. He emphasized that the litigation focused on whether corporations could mislead consumers about their personal data without facing significant consequences. Torrez noted that the money awarded would likely fund school construction for decades, though he acknowledged the funds might remain tied up if Meta pursues an appeal. Meta’s response to the ruling was swift and critical. C.J. Mahoney, the company’s chief legal officer, issued a statement asserting that the enforcement approach makes it nearly impossible to conduct business in New Mexico. Mahoney characterized the lawsuit as an attempt to impose a tax on speech to regulate online expression. The company expressed confidence that it would prevail on appeal. Mahoney added that Meta intends to continue building a platform that connects Americans and supports small businesses while maintaining the country’s competitive edge. The underlying facts of the case trace back to the discovery that Cambridge Analytica, a political consulting firm, had harvested data from millions of Facebook users. Investigations revealed that the firm accessed data from approximately 87 million profiles, many of whom had not directly interacted with the associated personality quiz app. The data was used to create targeted political advertisements during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. While Facebook became aware of the data acquisition in late 2015, the issue remained undisclosed to the public until 2018, when investigative reporting exposed the extent of the breach. Judge Mathew’s ruling highlighted specific internal communications within the company. The judge noted that Mark Zuckerberg, Meta’s CEO, had previously written that users probably did not understand their privacy settings or care about who saw their updates. The ruling further cited a comment suggesting the company should allow users to change settings but not actively encourage them to do so. Mathew concluded that these actions formed part of a coherent strategy designed to mislead the public. The judge also found that senior leadership, including former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, participated in making misrepresentations about the service’s privacy policies. Legal proceedings in this matter differed significantly from parallel cases in other jurisdictions. Forty-eight other states settled with Facebook in a nationwide class action, agreeing to an $18 billion payment and implementing stricter child safety measures. New Mexico declined to participate in that settlement, opting instead to litigate its claims independently. During the trial, New Mexico attorneys sought a penalty ranging from $35 billion to $40 billion, arguing that only such a substantial sum would impact the company’s stock price and compel behavioral change. Conversely, Meta’s lawyers argued that any award exceeding $3.4 billion would violate due process and fail to withstand appellate review. The broader context includes previous regulatory actions against the company. In 2019, the Federal Trade Commission fined Facebook $5 billion for its role in allowing Cambridge Analytica to collect user data without consent. More recently, in March of this year, a separate New Mexico jury ordered Meta to pay $375 million for endangering children by making them vulnerable to predators on its platforms. That earlier ruling contributed to a combined penalty of nearly $1 billion in a distinct case concerning harms to minors. Market reaction to the Wednesday ruling was muted. Meta shares rose $13.56, or 2 percent, to close at $707.81 in afternoon trading. The company simultaneously reported quarterly revenue of $64.6 billion, which exceeded Wall Street expectations of $63.37 billion. Despite the immediate financial impact, analysts and observers note that the outcome hinges on the upcoming appeal process. The legal team for New Mexico expects the funds to eventually flow into the state’s educational infrastructure, pending the resolution of the appellate challenge. The case underscores the ongoing tension between corporate data practices and state-level consumer protection statutes.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (2)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

3 poročil

AxiosNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 11 urami

Meta je dobil 25 milijard dolarjev kazni za zavajanje uporabnikov Facebooka.

Zvezni sodnik v Novi Mehiki je Meta odredil, naj plača kazen v višini 25 milijard dolarjev, potem ko je porota ugotovila, da je družba storila približno 43 milijonov namernih kršitev zakona o nepoštenih praksah v zvezi z zasebnostjo uporabniških podatkov. Odločitev sledi septembrski razsodbi, v kateri je porota ugotovila, da nadzor zasebnosti Facebooka uporabnikom ne zagotavlja smiselnega nadzora nad njihovimi osebnimi podatki, saj aplikacijam tretjih oseb omogoča dostop do podatkov brez ustreznega soglasja. Sodnik Francis Mathew je na podlagi števila kršitev izračunal, da bo odškodnina 219,5 milijarde dolarjev, končni znesek pa je zmanjšal na 25 milijard dolarjev. Glavni pravni uradnik družbe Meta je kritiziral odločitev, trdil je, da de facto uvaja davek na govor in izjavil, da namerava družba pritožiti odločitev. Primer izhaja iz škandala Cambridge Analytica, ki je razkril zbiranje podatkov milijonov uporabnikov za namene političnega oglaševanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je v okvir regulativnih ukrepov proti veliki tehnološki korporaciji uporabljen jezik, ki poudarja resnost korporativnih kršitev (" zavajanje ", " izkoriščanje ", " namerne kršitve ") in poudarja notranje navedke, ki nakazujejo namerno zavajanje. Medtem ko je del vključuje citat iz

Zakaj dejstva (95): Accurately reflects the cross-source consensus regarding the $25 billion penalty, the specific judge, the violation count (approx 43.9M), and the reduction from the theoretical maximum ($219.5B). It correctly attributes quotes to Meta's legal officer and provides precise details on the calculation m

Zakaj objektivnost (90): Maintains a neutral, journalistic tone using standard 'Why it matters' and 'Driving the news' structures. Presents both the state's victory and Meta's strong objection/appeal plans without injecting editorial bias or emotional language.

CBS News (US)NeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 11 urami

Meta je morala plačati 25 milijard dolarjev New Mexicu zaradi odločbe o zasebnosti podatkov.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek pripoveduje zgodbo predvsem iz perspektive državnega tožilca, ki za opis korporativnega vedenja uporablja močan normativni jezik, kot so "prevarani", "zlaganci" in "neenakega sporočila". Medtem ko vključuje Meta-jevo zavrnitev, poudarek na obsegu kazni in

Zakaj dejstva (95): Factually sound, aligning with other sources on the penalty amount, judge, and jury findings. Correctly identifies the connection to the Cambridge Analytica scandal and includes specific quotes from the Attorney General and references to executive involvement (Zuckerberg/Sandberg) supported by the b

Zakaj objektivnost (85): Slightly less neutral due to the inclusion of highly charged quotes from the Attorney General ('unambiguous message', 'Silicon Valley') and the description of the strategy as 'designed to mislead'. While these are attributed, the selection emphasizes the punitive nature of the ruling more than the t

TechCrunchNeodvisenKonservativnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 75pred 11 urami

Meta mora plačati 25 milijard dolarjev v primeru, povezanem s škandalom Cambridge Analytica.

Sodnik v Novi Mehiki je Meta odredil, naj državi plača 25 milijard dolarjev, kar je največja finančna kazen, povezana s škandalom Cambridge Analytica. Odločitev je sledila dvotedenskem sojenju, kjer je porota ugotovila, da je Meta zagrešila 43 milijonov kršitev državnih zakonov o varstvu potrošnikov v zvezi z zasebnostjo podatkov, kar je privedlo do globe v višini 5.000 dolarjev na kršitev. Tožba se je osredotočila na ravnanje družbe Meta z aplikacijo tretje osebe, povezana s kršitvijo Cambridge Analytica, skupaj s širšimi vprašanji v zvezi s politikami zasebnosti podatkov in zmanjševanjem dezinformacij. Generalni tožilec New Mexico Raul Torrez je opisal znesek poravnave kot enakovreden financiranju šolske gradnje za stoletje. Meta je napovedala, da bo pritožila odločitev, glavni pravni uradnik C.J. Mahoney pa trdi, da sodba uvaja neustaven davek na govor in da je delovanje v državi neizvedljivo.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): Medtem ko se naslov osredotoča na kazen za podjetja, članek obravnava pravni spor skozi lečo svobode govora in presežka zakonodaje. Z poudarkom na argumentu Meta, da tožba "nalaga davek na govor" in navaja njihovo trditev, da sodba to naredi "vse, vendar nemogoče storiti",

Zakaj dejstva (90): Core facts (amount, date, parties) are correct and consistent with the consensus. However, it relies on secondary attribution ('The New York Times reports', 'WSJ reports') rather than direct sourcing, and adds background on Cambridge Analytica's origins (SLC Group) which, while likely true, is extra

Zakaj objektivnost (75): Uses informal and somewhat sensationalist language ('gargantuan sums', 'keeps costing'). The opening sentence frames the story as a recurring negative trend ('long... keeps costing'), introducing a narrative slant toward corporate culpability rather than a neutral report of the judicial outcome.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe

Skandal z zasebnostjo: Facebookova skupina Meta bo plačala milijardo dolarjev kazni

Sredina6 viripred 10 urami

Meta mora plačati 25 milijard dolarjev državi New Mexico, ker je lagala prebivalcem o uporabi njihovih osebnih podatkov.

Sredina4 viripred 12 urami

Meta je morala plačati 25 milijard dolarjev New Mexicu zaradi odločbe o zasebnosti podatkov.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (2)

3 poročil

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

progresivno

sredina

konservativno

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Poročanje po svetu

Poročanje po svetu

Preverjanje trditev

Preverjanje trditev

Ohranimo novice poštene.

Povezane zgodbe

Skandal z zasebnostjo: Facebookova skupina Meta bo plačala milijardo dolarjev kazni

Družba Meta obsojena na 25 milijard dolarjev kazni

Facebookova matica Meta obsojena na 25 milijard dolarjev kazni

Meta mora plačati 25 milijard dolarjev v primeru zasebnosti uporabnikov

Škandal Cambridge Analytica: Nova Mehika zahteva od Meta 25 milijard dolarjev

Meta mora plačati 25 milijard dolarjev državi New Mexico, ker je lagala prebivalcem o uporabi njihovih osebnih podatkov.