Obranila sem se: stavek obtožene za Julián Alvarez in štiri ključne kamere

The murder of Matías Julián Álvarez Guardia has taken a new turn as the family of the victim formally steps forward as the complainant, introducing a theory that the attack was sudden and unexpected. The case involves Victoria Luz Cantero, the sole person currently detained, who is charged with aggravated homicide due to the relationship. According to the lawyer representing the family, Juan Arreguín, initial evidence does not show signs of defensive injuries on the victim’s hands or forearms, suggesting he might have been caught off guard during the assault. Arreguín stated that the absence of such injuries raises questions about whether Alvarez Guardia had time to react or even realized he was being attacked. He plans to request a new inspection of the residence, a complete reconstruction of the victim's phone activity, and a technical analysis of how he was transported to the Julio C. Perrando Hospital. The family is also questioning the decision to transport the victim in a private vehicle instead of waiting for an ambulance. A relative of Cantero, along with his partner, reportedly attempted to call emergency services but mistakenly dialed the wrong number in their distress. The investigation into the crime has centered around four security cameras that could help reconstruct the sequence of events before, during, and after the attack. The prosecutor, Ana Graciela González, confirmed that Cantero told police she had engaged in a fight with her partner and acted in self-defense. However, this account has yet to be supported by the evidence collected so far. The prosecution must cross-check this statement against video footage, witness accounts, medical reports, and forensic findings from the scene. Cantero did not speak during her appearance before the Equipo Fiscal N.º 2, where she was informed of the charges against her. Her attorney, Lucas Bosch, noted that the case still lacks substantial evidence and that the defense is still reviewing the materials. He emphasized that the current evidence does not constitute a strong body of proof and that the outcome could change based on further investigations, including the results of the security camera footage, medical exams, and phone records. One key piece of evidence is a kitchen knife found inside the home, which has a serrated blade and a black plastic handle. Forensic experts will need to determine if this weapon was used in the attack, whether biological traces belong to the victim, and if there are fingerprints or genetic material that can identify those who handled it. The knife is one of several items under scrutiny, alongside the victim’s mobile phone, which was initially thought to be missing but later turned over to investigators. The family claims that the phone was among the belongings removed during the emergency and remained off until the authorities took control. Arreguín wants a full extraction of all data from the device, including calls, messages, location history, and other activities before and after the incident. This information could reveal who called for help and what happened during the minutes following the attack. Another point of focus is the transportation of the victim to the hospital. The family argues that using a private car instead of an ambulance raises concerns. Bosch explained that the relative of Cantero and his partner tried to contact emergency services but were too distressed to dial correctly. They decided to transport the injured man immediately, believing they were acting in his best interest. Bosch maintains that these actions were intended to save his life and that there is no evidence of criminal liability for them. The investigation continues to rely heavily on the security footage, which includes two cameras installed in the property, one facing the front entrance and another capturing internal areas. These devices were seized and are being analyzed by the cybercrime unit. Additional recordings from neighboring homes may provide further insight, though one camera failed to capture images. Investigators aim to establish the timing of Cantero’s arrival, the nature of the argument, and any movements involving others in the hours leading up to the victim’s death. As the case unfolds, the family and legal representatives remain focused on uncovering the full truth through forensic analysis, digital evidence, and witness statements. The outcome of the investigation could significantly impact the charges against Cantero and the broader understanding of the circumstances surrounding the tragic incident.