ON
← Nazaj na pregled
"Mao je največji zločinec v zgodovini": kontroverzni Kylian Mbappé, kot ga vidi komunistični strokovnjak Thierry Wolton
France🏛️ PolitikaBolj konservativno

"Mao je največji zločinec v zgodovini": kontroverzni Kylian Mbappé, kot ga vidi komunistični strokovnjak Thierry Wolton

Francoski komunistični zgodovinski strokovnjak Thierry Wolton kritizira politike La France Insoumise (LFI) zaradi njihovega odziva na komentarje Kyliana Mbappéja o Mao Zedungu. Po tem, ko je Mbappé v videu Mao označil za kitajskega diktatorja, se je soočil z gospodarskim pritiskom Kitajske in se opravičil. Wolton trdi, da je Mathilde Panot, namestnica LFI, pokazala ideološko slabo voljo, ko je zavrnila, da bi Maoa označila za diktatorja, medtem ko je njen kolega Antoine Léaument zagovarjal tesnejše vezi s Kitajsko. Léaument je nadalje trdil, da je med avtoritarnim enopartijskim sistemom na Kitajskem in v Franciji pod predsednikom Emmanuelom Macronom malo razlike. V članku so te politične reakcije označene kot dokaz neznanja o zgodovinskih grozodejstvih.

Kylian Mbappé has formally apologized to China for labeling Mao Zedong a dictator, a remark that triggered severe diplomatic friction and resulted in the loss of major commercial partnerships. The French footballer admitted his comment was ill-judged in a statement released in three languages, following intense backlash from Chinese institutions and brands. Real Madrid, his current club, also issued a separate apology expressing deep respect for China and its citizens. The controversy stems from a video clip aired on the French talk show The Bridge, where Mbappé discussed internet memes featuring his face superimposed on images of historical figures. He identified the version with Mao as his favorite, referring to the former leader as a Chinese dictator. The incident began when behind-the-scenes footage from a podcast filmed in March was posted online. In the clip, Mbappé explained that he found certain memes amusing, specifically pointing to the one involving Mao. This description sparked immediate outrage on Chinese social media platforms, particularly Weibo, where users demanded an apology. The reaction was swift and severe. Several Chinese broadcasters halted coverage of La Liga matches and content related to Mbappé. Specifically, sports channels on the state-owned CCTV network suspended broadcasts of La Liga games. Consequently, Real Madrid’s match against Racing Santander scheduled for Sunday will not be shown in China. Commercial repercussions followed immediately. Mbappé lost sponsorship agreements with Eastroc Beverage, a Chinese energy drinks company, and Mengniu Dairy. Additionally, the Swiss sportswear brand On removed all references to the athlete from its communications within China. These actions occurred before Mbappé’s formal apology was released. A spokesperson for China’s Foreign Ministry stated prior to the apology that words and deeds hurting the feelings of the Chinese people would meet opposition from all sectors of society. The sensitivity surrounding the topic is rooted in the official Communist Party assessment of Mao, which characterizes him as seventy percent good and thirty percent bad. The negative aspects include the Great Leap Forward, an economic experiment linked to a famine that killed tens of millions, and the Cultural Revolution, a decade-long purge that encouraged children to denounce family members. Despite this official critique, Mao remains revered in China, with his portrait displayed prominently in Tiananmen Square in Beijing. In France, the incident generated political debate. Mathilde Panot, a deputy for the Left Front party, declined to qualify Mao as a dictator when questioned on TF1 television, stating she preferred to discuss other topics. Her colleague Antoine Léaument defended a closer relationship with China, suggesting little difference existed between the authoritarian regime with a single party and France under President Emmanuel Macron. However, Thierry Wolton, a specialist in communism and author of a global history of the ideology, criticized these responses. He argued that Panot and her party demonstrated ignorance and ideological bad faith by refusing to label Mao a dictator or compare the Chinese system to contemporary France. Mbappé had previously addressed the meme phenomenon in an interview with the French magazine L’Equipe. While acknowledging some memes were funny, he noted that others showed a lack of political and human awareness. He expressed discomfort at being compared to individuals responsible for mass suffering, stating he had never done anything similar in his life. His teammate Ousmane Dembélé had also joked about the nickname during the 2026 World Cup, referencing Mobutu Sese Seko, the former ruler of the Democratic Republic of Congo. The Bridge program itself apologized to both Chinese fans and Mbappé, and subsequently removed the clip from its social media accounts. The term dictator in this context refers to Mbappé’s perceived authority over football clubs and media, a nickname used by fans. The removal of the video and the series of apologies aim to mitigate the damage to sporting relations and commercial interests in the region.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

Les Échos logoLes ÉchosNeodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 90
Kylian Mbappé se opravičuje zaradi obsodbe več kitajskih sponzorjev

Kylian Mbappé se je opravičil, ker je na nedavnem nastopu uporabil izraz "diktator" za kitajskega vodjo Mao Ce-tung. Ta pripomba je sprožila veliko polemiko na Kitajskem, zaradi česar je več glavnih sponzorjev, ki delujejo v državi, javno obsodilo komentarje francoske nogometne zvezde. V odgovoru na odziv teh poslovnih partnerjev je Mbappé izrazil obžalovanje za izbiro besed. Incident poudarja občutljivost, ki obdaja zgodovinske osebnosti v kitajskem diskurzu in potencialni vpliv takšnih pripomb na mednarodne športne osebnosti z močnimi komercialnimi vezami v regiji.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek se osredotoča predvsem na javno izjavo športne osebnosti in naknadne komercialne posledice, ki vključujejo sponzorje. Medtem ko komentar vključuje politično/zgodovinsko osebnost (Mao Zedong), je osrednja pripoved o padcih v športnem/poslovnem svetu in ne o razpravi o

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (90): The title uses the word 'Polémique' (controversy) and quotes the term 'dictateur', but this reflects the actual subject matter rather than injecting bias. The phrasing is standard journalistic practice for reporting on public disputes.

L'Express logoL'ExpressNeodvisen🔒KonservativnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 40
"Mao je največji zločinec v zgodovini": kontroverzni Kylian Mbappé, kot ga vidi komunistični strokovnjak Thierry Wolton

Francoski komunistični zgodovinski strokovnjak Thierry Wolton kritizira politike La France Insoumise (LFI) zaradi njihovega odziva na komentarje Kyliana Mbappéja o Mao Zedungu. Po tem, ko je Mbappé v videu Mao označil za kitajskega diktatorja, se je soočil z gospodarskim pritiskom Kitajske in se opravičil. Wolton trdi, da je Mathilde Panot, namestnica LFI, pokazala ideološko slabo voljo, ko je zavrnila, da bi Maoa označila za diktatorja, medtem ko je njen kolega Antoine Léaument zagovarjal tesnejše vezi s Kitajsko. Léaument je nadalje trdil, da je med avtoritarnim enopartijskim sistemom na Kitajskem in v Franciji pod predsednikom Emmanuelom Macronom malo razlike. V članku so te politične reakcije označene kot dokaz neznanja o zgodovinskih grozodejstvih.

Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je močno kritično stališče do levičarske stranke La France Insoumise (LFI) opisano kot "ideološka slaba vera" in "neznanje". V njem je poudarjena primerjava, ki jo je član LFI naredil med kitajskim režimom in sedanjo francosko vlado pod Emmanuelom,

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (40): Heavily biased. The text explicitly labels critics as showing 'ignorance and ideological bad faith' and describes Mao as one of history's most lethal tyrants. It frames the political debate not neutrally, but through a strong ideological lens that condemns the opposing view.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe