ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Lokalne volitve 2026: pet anket v Tshwaneju daje DA prednost pri pogajanjih o koaliciji
ZA🏛️ PolitikaSredina

Lokalne volitve 2026: pet anket v Tshwaneju daje DA prednost pri pogajanjih o koaliciji

Pet nedavnih anket javnega mnenja, ki so bile opravljene med junijem in oktobrom, kažejo, da ima Demokratična zveza (DA) majhno prednost pri oblikovanju vladajoče koalicije v Tshwaneju pred lokalnimi volitvami leta 2026. Medtem ko vse ankete dajejo DA na prvo mesto in Afriški nacionalni kongres (ANC) na drugo, nobena ne kaže, da bi DA zagotovila samostojno večino, kar zahteva partnerstvo z manjšimi strankami, kot sta Freedom Fighters Plus (FF +) in ActionSA. Ankete kažejo, da zavezništvo DA-FF + običajno premaga blok ANC-EFF v številu sedežev, čeprav je izid odvisen od podpore ključnih manjših strank, kot sta ActionSA in Patriotska zaveza. Metodološke razlike med volilnimi podjetji, zlasti glede kategorizacije neodločenih volivcev, ustvarjajo razlike v predvideni porazdelitvi sedežev, pri čemer nekateri modeli kažejo, da je trenutna koalicija, ki jo vodi ANC, bližje večini kot drugi. Podatki kažejo na razdrobljeno politično okolje, kjer noben tabor ne zagotavlja moči brez pogajanj med strankami.

South Africa’s African National Congress enters the November four local government elections facing a potential historic defeat, with recent polling indicating the ruling party may see its support drop into the mid-thirties percent range. The ANC, which secured sixty-five percent of the vote in the twenty-six municipal elections, recorded forty-point-two percent in the twenty-four national polls. Analysts warn that the upcoming vote serves as a critical test for the liberation movement’s ability to halt its electoral slide before the twenty-nine national elections. If the party fails to regain lost ground, it risks relegation to the opposition benches and eventual political obscurity. The campaign has been marked by internal turmoil and external challenges. The party struggled to field mayoral candidates in certain areas and faced tensions within its tripartite alliance. Public attention was also drawn to the health of Deputy President Paul Mashatile and the physical collapse of Secretary-General Fikile Mbalula following a Constitutional Court judgment that reinstated one hundred eighty-one candidates the ANC had missed registering before the Electoral Commission deadline. Political analyst Wayne Sussman noted that this will be the final local election cycle under President Cyril Ramaphosa’s party leadership, making the outcome vital for the party’s future strategy. He described the recent campaign as difficult, citing public disputes involving former leader Gwede Mantashe and the aforementioned health issues of senior officials. Projections suggest a highly fragmented political landscape where no single party secures an outright majority in major metropolitan areas. The number of hung councils increased from twenty-seven in the sixteen local elections to seventy in twenty-one. Following the twenty-one vote, the Democratic Alliance controlled twenty-four councils, while the Inkatha Freedom Party governed sixteen. Current forecasts indicate the ANC could lose at least six percentage points from its twenty-four baseline. Key battlegrounds such as Johannesburg, Tshwane, Ekurhuleni, Nelson Mandela Bay, Buffalo City, and eThekwini are expected to produce no clear winner. The ANC already sits in opposition in Cape Town and Nelson Mandela Bay. In Gauteng, the Democratic Alliance holds a strong position against the ANC. In Johannesburg, Markdata projects the DA will lead with thirty-five percent support, compared to the ANC’s twenty-two percent. In Tshwane, the DA is projected to secure thirty-two percent, followed by the ANC at twenty-four percent, the Economic Freedom Fighters at fourteen percent, and ActionSA at eleven percent. The MK Party poses a significant threat in KwaZulu-Natal, where the ANC might fall below thirty percent. While rural support has historically remained resilient for the ANC, the rise of smaller regional parties and ongoing complaints regarding water and electricity supplies threaten to erode this base. Coalition building will likely define the post-election period. Ipsos polling places the ANC at thirty-one percent, the DA at twenty-five percent, the MK Party at fourteen percent, the EFF at eleven percent, ActionSA at six percent, the IFP at three percent, and the Patriotic Alliance at two percent. These figures necessitate multiparty agreements to govern several municipal councils. In Tshwane, five separate polls conducted between June and October consistently placed the DA in first place and the ANC in second. Only one poll from the Social Research Foundation gave the DA more than a third of the vote. Other surveys varied on the ranking of the EFF and ActionSA for third and fourth positions. The Freedom Plus party remains an important player in Tshwane, having traditionally aligned with the DA. Analysis of the aggregated data suggests that a DA-Freedom Plus coalition often holds a slight numerical advantage over an ANC-EFF bloc. However, ActionSA emerges as the pivotal kingmaker capable of tipping the balance toward either side. In some scenarios, a DA-ActionSA-Freedom Plus combination forms a clear majority, while an ANC-EFF-ActionSA grouping requires additional support from smaller parties. One specific projection indicated the current ANC-led coalition was three seats short of a majority, needing assistance from minor parties. Another scenario suggested a DA-ActionSA-Freedom Plus alliance would require similar boosts. Assumptions underlying these calculations generally exclude cooperation between the DA and the EFF or the Patriotic Alliance, as well as any involvement of the MK Party with the major contenders. Despite the statistical margins, analysts caution that differences of five to ten seats could represent statistical noise. The political environment has shifted significantly in the past month, affecting the viability of certain alliances. The proliferation of smaller parties has made it increasingly difficult for any single entity to command power independently, transforming coalition governance from a reactive measure into a standard feature of South African local politics. The final outcome will depend heavily on post-election negotiations among these fragmented factions.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 2 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

2 poročil

Mail & Guardian logoMail & GuardianNeodvisenSredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 90
ANC je zadnji met kocke.

Južnoafriški Afriški narodni kongres (ANC) se sooča z velikimi izzivi pred lokalnimi volitvami 4. novembra, saj nedavne ankete kažejo na nadaljnji upad njegove volilne podpore. Delež glasov stranke se je zmanjšal s 65% leta 2006 na 40,2% na nacionalnih volitvah leta 2024, trenutne napovedi pa kažejo, da se lahko še naprej zmanjša v sredini 30-ih let na nacionalni ravni. Pričakuje se, da bodo ključna metropolitanska območja, kot so Johannesburg, Tshwane in Ekurhuleni, privedla do zasedanj, kar bo zahtevalo večstranske koalicijske vlade, ne pa enostranskega nadzora. Tekmovalci, med katerimi so Demokratska zveza (DA), uMkhonto weSizwe Party (MK Party) in Borci za ekonomsko svobodo (EFF), pridobivajo moč, zlasti v mestnih središčih, kjer še vedno obstajajo težave z zagotavljanjem storitev, kot sta pomanjkanje vode in električne energije. Analitiki opozarjajo, da če ANC ne bo mogel obrniti tega trenda, bo tvegal, da bo odšel v opozicijo in se soočil s politično marginalizacijo pred naslednjimi nacionalnimi volitvami leta 2029.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je predstavljena analiza volilnih trendov, ki temelji na podatkih, pri čemer se uporabljajo več neodvisnih volilnih podjetij (Ipsos, Markdata, Sabi). Navede posebne odstotke in zgodovinske primerjave, ne da bi uporabil čustveno nabite pridevke ali sprejel normativno stališče o tem, kateri izid je boljši. S strani

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (90): The tone is largely analytical and journalistic. Phrases like 'last throw of the dice' and 'fights to remain relevant' add slight dramatic flair but do not constitute heavy bias. The piece presents multiple perspectives on the ANC's future (coalition vs. opposition) without taking a definitive parti

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickNeodvisenSredinaDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 85
Lokalne volitve 2026: pet anket v Tshwaneju daje DA prednost pri pogajanjih o koaliciji

Pet nedavnih anket javnega mnenja, ki so bile opravljene med junijem in oktobrom, kažejo, da ima Demokratična zveza (DA) majhno prednost pri oblikovanju vladajoče koalicije v Tshwaneju pred lokalnimi volitvami leta 2026. Medtem ko vse ankete dajejo DA na prvo mesto in Afriški nacionalni kongres (ANC) na drugo, nobena ne kaže, da bi DA zagotovila samostojno večino, kar zahteva partnerstvo z manjšimi strankami, kot sta Freedom Fighters Plus (FF +) in ActionSA. Ankete kažejo, da zavezništvo DA-FF + običajno premaga blok ANC-EFF v številu sedežev, čeprav je izid odvisen od podpore ključnih manjših strank, kot sta ActionSA in Patriotska zaveza. Metodološke razlike med volilnimi podjetji, zlasti glede kategorizacije neodločenih volivcev, ustvarjajo razlike v predvideni porazdelitvi sedežev, pri čemer nekateri modeli kažejo, da je trenutna koalicija, ki jo vodi ANC, bližje večini kot drugi. Podatki kažejo na razdrobljeno politično okolje, kjer noben tabor ne zagotavlja moči brez pogajanj med strankami.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja primerjalno analizo več neodvisnih podatkovnih zbirk o volilnih anketah, ne da bi favoriziral en specifičen politični izid ali stranko. Neutralno poroča o statističnih ugotovitvah, metodoloških omejitvah različnih anketarjev in matematičnih možnostih za različne koalicijske raziskave.

Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan

Zakaj objektivnost (85): The writing style is somewhat informal ('kingmakers', 'scare') and includes subjective commentary on polling methodologies ('allocates far too many seats'). However, it does not explicitly favor one political party over another in terms of policy or legitimacy, maintaining a focus on coalition dynam

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe