The United States military has reportedly attacked two bridges in southern Iran, according to Iranian media reports citing provincial authorities. The attacks targeted the Kahurestan and Gariveh bridges in the province of Hormozgan, critical routes connecting the port city of Bandar Abbas with nearby cities such as Chamir and Lar. These bridges were part of key transportation arteries linking the Persian Gulf coast with the interior of the country. According to the semi-official Iranian news agency Fars, the roads between Bandar Abbas and these cities have been completely closed, along with another route in the region. Two civilians were killed and four others injured during the strikes, though exact damage assessments remain unclear. Meanwhile, state-backed media Press TV claimed three bridges were hit in the assault. Verification of these claims is difficult due to the lack of independent confirmation from either side. The attacks come amid ongoing hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, which have escalated over several weeks. On Thursday, the U.S. Central Command announced the resumption of airstrikes against Iran for the sixth consecutive night, starting at 2 p.m. Eastern Time (9:30 p.m. local time in Iran). The stated objective of these operations, according to the command, is to further weaken Iran's military capabilities. This follows threats from U.S. President Donald Trump earlier in the week to expand attacks on Iranian infrastructure, including power plants and bridges. The conflict has intensified significantly since early July, beginning with disputes over control of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital waterway for global energy trade. Earlier in the month, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard had attacked ships in the strait, leading to mutual accusations of violating a framework agreement signed in mid-June aimed at ending the war. However, tensions have continued to rise despite the accord. Recent developments include the first confirmed deaths of U.S. soldiers in Jordan due to Iranian missile and drone attacks, marking a new escalation in the conflict. According to the U.S. Central Command, two American soldiers were killed and one is still missing after defending against Iranian attacks in Jordan. This brings the official count of U.S. service members killed in the war against Iran to 16. The incident has increased pressure on President Trump, who faces domestic criticism over the unpopular war. Trump described the deaths as “very sad” and reiterated his stance that Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, the U.S. is reportedly moving additional fighter jets from Germany and the United Kingdom to the Middle East, signaling potential preparations for expanded military operations. In Iran, the toll from U.S. attacks has been severe. Since early July, at least 50 people have died and more than 500 others have been injured, according to statements from the health ministry spokesperson, Hossein Kermanpur. The government typically only reports civilian casualties, while losses among military personnel remain unreported. Recently, ground forces in southwestern Iran reported seven fatalities. The U.S. military has focused its strikes primarily on southern coastal provinces, targeting Iran’s ability to conduct military operations in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has issued warnings of retaliation, stating that the Iranian people and resistance front would provide “unforgettable lessons” to the enemy. His comments reflect growing public anxiety in Tehran, where fears of air raids have risen following recent Israeli airstrikes in June. The situation appears increasingly volatile, with both sides escalating their rhetoric and military actions. Recent reports indicate that Iran has launched attacks on U.S. military bases in Kuwait and Bahrain, as well as on Jordanian territory near the Red Sea. Additionally, there have been explosions in Saudi Arabia, suggesting a broader regional impact. While the U.S. military has not disclosed specific targets of its strikes, Iranian state television reported detonations near Sirik, close to the Strait of Hormuz, and in Bandar Abbas. The Iranian news agency Fars also noted renewed attacks on bridges in Hormozgan province, with Press TV reporting at least three civilian deaths and eight injuries in the area. As the conflict continues to escalate, concerns grow over the possibility of a wider war. Experts warn that the situation could spiral into a full-scale conflict, even if neither side desires it. With the Strait of Hormuz once again nearly closed to shipping traffic, the economic and strategic implications are profound. Both nations appear entrenched in their positions, with little indication of diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis.
6 poročil
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 75pred 3 dnevi Liveblog Iranska vojna: Poročila o gorečih cisternah v Hormuškem potokuAmeriška vojska trdi, da je napadla iranske nadzorne objekte, podzemna skladišča orožja in drugo vojaško infrastrukturo v sedmih zaporednih noči napadov. Iranski državni mediji pa trdijo, da so ameriški napadi poškodovali civilne strukture, vključno z mostovi v južnem Iranu, kar je povzročilo žrtve. Poročila omenjajo eksplozije v Savdski Arabiji in Jordaniji, ki gostijo ameriške vojaške baze. Iranska revolucionarna straža trdi, da je sestrelila ameriški dron in poročala o dveh naftnih tankerjih, ki gorijo v Hormuškem prelivu, čeprav so ZDA te trditve zanikali. Obe strani opozarjajo na nadaljnjo eskalacijo, pri čemer grozijo Iranu z širšimi operacijami, če se nadaljujejo napadni napadi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis stališč ZDA in Irana, pri čemer navaja uradne izjave obeh strani, ne da bi očitno favoriziral eno nad drugo.
Zakaj dejstva (85): This article provides detailed accounts of US strikes on bridges in southern Iran, citing Fars and Press TV. It includes specific locations and casualty figures, which align with other reports. The mention of independent verification being difficult is also noted, which adds credibility to the repor
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The tone remains relatively neutral, focusing on the factual aspects of the strike and its consequences. It avoids emotionally charged language and presents both sides’ claims without overtly favoring one over the other.
Die ZeitNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70včeraj Eskalacija v Perzijskem zalivu: ZDA in Iran poslabšata vojno v regijiKonflikt med ZDA in Iranom se je v regiji Perzijskega zaliva še povečal, obe strani pa so intenzivirali svoje napade in grožnje. Ameriška vojska je osem zaporednih noči izvedla zračne napade v Iranu, medtem ko so iranske sile ciljale ameriške vojaške baze v Kuvajtu, Bahrajnu in Jordaniji. Ta najnovejša eskalacija se je začela v začetku tega meseca zaradi sporov, ki vključujejo strateški Hormuški preliv, ključno pot za svetovno trgovino z energijo. Iranski vrhovni vodja ajatollah Mohsen Kazemi je izdal opozorila o maščevanju in poudaril, da bi iranski narod in odporna fronta ameriškemu sovražniku prinesla "nepozabne lekcije". Na ameriški strani sta bila v Jordaniji zaradi iranskih raketnih napadov in napadov brezpilotnih letal prvi takih žrtev od začetka vojne v februarju. Predsednik Donald Trump je izrazil žalost nad smrtjo, vendar je ponovil, da Iran ne sme imeti jedrskega orožja. Medtem pa poročila kažejo, da je pripravljanje dodatnih ameriških borbenih letal na Bližnjem vzhodu znak za nadaljnjo eskalacijo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, podrobno opisuje ukrepe, ki so jih sprejele ZDA in Iran, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on US military strikes in Iran and Iranian retaliation, citing sources like the Israeli army and mentioning casualties among US soldiers in Jordan. It aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the escalation of hostilities. However, it lacks specific details on the exact l
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The tone is somewhat alarmist, using phrases like 'der Konflikt ... außer Kontrolle zu geraten' and emphasizing the threat of further escalation. The article presents the conflict as increasingly dangerous but does not balance perspectives from both sides equally.
Der SpiegelNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 70pred 4 dnevi Iran poroča o ameriških napadih na mostovePo poročilih iranskih medijev so ameriške vojaške sile med nedavnimi zračnimi napadi na provinco Hormuzgan napadle dva mosta v južnem Iranu. Mostov Kahurestan in Gariveh, ki se nahajata na glavnih cestah v provinci, je zadelo, kar je povzročilo popolno zaprtje cest med pristaniškim mestom Bandar-e Abbas in bližnjimi mesti, kot sta Chamir in Lar.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so dejanja ZDA predstavljena kot del širše strategije za oslabitev iranskih vojaških zmogljivosti, v skladu s pripovedmi, ki prikazujejo ameriške intervencije kot agresivne in ekspanzivne.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article confirms the US military's targeting of bridges in southern Iran, referencing Fars and Press TV. It aligns with other reports on the escalation and includes details about the timing and intent of the strikes. However, it lacks some contextual background compared to other articles.
Zakaj objektivnost (70): While generally neutral, the article emphasizes the potential impact of the strikes on infrastructure and energy routes, which may subtly highlight the strategic significance of the conflict. It doesn't provide a full picture of diplomatic efforts or international reactions.
Deutsche Welle (Deutsch)Državni / javniSredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 65včeraj Ameriška vojska "kazni" IranČlanek poroča o nedavnih vojaških dejanjih med Združenimi državami in Iranom, poudarja pa ameriške zračne napade na iranske objekte v odziv na napade na ameriške čete v Jordaniji. Ameriško osrednje poveljstvo trdi, da so ti napadi namenjeni oslabitvi sposobnosti Irana, da bi ogrozil ladijsko plovbo v Ormuškem prelivu. Iran se je maščeval z napadom na dve ameriški bazi v Kuvajtu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis stališč ZDA in Irana, pri čemer navaja uradne izjave obeh strani, ne da bi očitno naklonil eni strani.
Zakaj dejstva (80): This article provides information from both US and Iranian sources, including quotes from CENTCOM and Tasnim. It mentions casualties among US troops in Jordan and aligns with other reports on the escalation. However, it omits some details present in other articles, such as civilian casualties report
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The language has a slightly more confrontational tone, especially when describing the US actions as 'bestrafen' (punish) and quoting Trump’s reaction. This suggests a slight bias towards portraying the US as responding to provocation rather than presenting a neutral account.
Frankfurter Allgemeine (FAZ)Neodvisen🔒SredinaDejstva 80Objektivnost 65predvčerajšnjim Iran: Ali so uničili ameriška letala?Po navedbah ameriških uradnikov je ameriška vojska izvedla zračne napade na iranske nadzorne objekte, podzemno skladiščenje orožja in drugo vojaško infrastrukturo. Iranski državni mediji so poročali o napadih na civilno infrastrukturo. V maščevanju je Iran sprožil napade proti zalivskim državam, vključno s Kuvajtom in Bahreinom, s poročili o eksplozijah v Savdski Arabiji in Jordaniji, ki gostijo ameriške vojaške baze. Iranska državna televizija Press TV je poročala o detonacijah v bližini Hormusovega preliva in v Bandar Abbasu, pri čemer je navedla žrtve. Medtem je iranska revolucionarna straža trdila, da je sestrelila ameriški brezpilotni letalnik blizu Bušehra in streljala na dva naftna tankerja v prelivu, čeprav je ameriški tanker zanikal te trditve. Iran je opozarjal, da bo vstopil v širšo fazo ofenzivnih operacij, če ZDA nadaljujejo z napadom na Kuvajt in Bahrein.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen opis situacije, citira ameriške vojaške izjave in iranske vire, vključno z državnimi mediji in uradniki.
Zakaj dejstva (80): Similar to the previous FAZ article, this piece reports on US attacks and Iranian retaliation, including explosions in Saudi Arabia and Jordan. It references statements from Iranian state media and contradicts them with official US statements. While it covers similar facts, it repeats content from e
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article maintains a somewhat neutral tone overall but leans toward reporting the US perspective more prominently, particularly in its emphasis on US military operations and the denial of civilian casualties. There is less focus on the broader geopolitical implications.
Die ZeitNeodvisenSredinavčeraj Konflikt med ZDA in Iranom: ZDA in Iran ponovno poslabšajo razmere v zalivuSpopad med ZDA in Iranom se je ponovno stopnjeval, ZDA pa v osmi zaporedni noči izvajajo zračne napade v Iranu. To je prvič v mesecih, da so iranske sile po maščevalnih napadih Irana v regiji ubile ameriške vojake. Obe strani sta okrepili svoje grožnje in diplomatska prizadevanja ostajajo odsotna.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek objektivno predstavlja situacijo, osredotočen na dejanja ZDA in Irana, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik