Dve tretjini Britancev predvideva, da bodo laburisti v proračunu dvignili davke pred "kritičnim testom" za kanclerja
Nova anketa Ipsosa kaže, da skoraj dve tretjini britanskih državljanov pričakuje, da bodo laburisti v prvem proračunu kanclerja Johna Healeya kot del vlade premierja Andyja Burnhama dvignili davke. Raziskava razkriva široko zaskrbljenost zaradi gospodarstva, pri čemer 58% vprašanih verjame, da se država premika v "narobe smer". Javna pričakovanja vključujejo potencialno povečanje davkov na banke, kapitalske dobičke in stavnice, kljub temu, da je laburistična stranka že dvignila davčno breme na povojno najvišjo raven. Medtem pa druga anketa, ki jo je naročil sindikat UNISON, kaže na močno podporo javnosti za obdavčevanje bogatih, velikih korporacij in bank za financiranje javnih storitev.
Chancellor John Healey is preparing to increase taxes on the United Kingdom’s banking sector in his upcoming Budget, senior industry executives have indicated. The move aims to generate additional revenue to repair public finances strained by the ongoing conflict in the Middle East and rising government borrowing costs. Healey, who is currently attending International Monetary Fund meetings in Bangkok, stated that he has decisions to make regarding the sector ahead of the Budget scheduled for October 28. While he praised banks as integral to the nation’s economic fabric, he acknowledged that the sector is likely to face higher levies. This potential tax hike follows a period of exceptional profitability for major lenders, driven by elevated interest rates, and responds to sustained pressure from trade unions and think tanks demanding that banks contribute a larger share of tax revenue. The primary mechanism under consideration involves reversing a reduction in the surcharge applied to bank profits. In 2023, the previous Conservative government, led by Chancellor Jeremy Hunt, lowered this surcharge from 8 percent to 3 percent. Treasury officials are reportedly leaning toward restoring the surcharge closer to its previous level, as modifying an existing tax is administratively simpler than introducing a new windfall tax. Reversing the 2023 cut entirely would raise approximately £2 billion annually. However, concerns remain that imposing the full 8 percent surcharge on top of the standard 25 percent corporation tax could render UK banks less competitive compared to European and American rivals. Consequently, the final rate may settle somewhere between the current 3 percent and the historical 8 percent. For banks with profits exceeding £100 million, the combined tax burden currently stands at 28 percent; a return to the 8 percent surcharge would raise this combined rate to 33 percent. Market reaction to the anticipated changes began immediately upon the emergence of these reports. Shares in Lloyds Banking Group and NatWest fell by more than 2 percent on Friday, placing them among the worst performers on the UK stock market. In contrast, shares in Barclays dipped only slightly, while HSBC shares actually rose. Analysts noted that Barclays and HSBC maintain substantial international operations, which insulates them partially from a UK-specific tax increase. The banking industry trade body, UK Finance, issued a warning that further tax increases would weaken the sector’s competitiveness, discourage investment, and hinder job creation, arguing such measures run counter to the government’s goal of delivering growth across all regions. Support for the proposed tax hike is evident among labour representatives and certain policy groups. Paul Nowak, general secretary of the Trades Union Congress, highlighted that the four largest banks are generating roughly £1 billion in profit weekly, with bonuses reaching post-crisis highs. Nowak attributed these profits to high interest rates and the financial strain placed on households through mortgages. He argued that the Treasury has already lost £6 billion in revenue due to the previous administration’s tax cuts and that it is time for banks to pay their fair share. The TUC has previously advocated for an even more aggressive approach, proposing a 16 percent surcharge that could yield £24 billion in revenue over four years. Similarly, the Institute for Public Policy Research recommended a temporary surcharge on commercial banks’ windfall profits as part of a broader package to raise £16 billion to assist struggling households. The think tank noted that the Chancellor’s fiscal buffer has shrunk by up to £15 billion since the spring. Public sentiment appears divided but leans toward acceptance of higher taxes on the wealthy and corporate entities. An Ipsos poll conducted recently found that 65 percent of Britons expect Labour to announce tax rises in the coming Budget, compared to just 5 percent who anticipate tax cuts. The same survey revealed that 58 percent of respondents believe the country is heading in the wrong direction, while only 18 percent feel things are improving. Conversely, a separate YouGov poll commissioned by the trade union UNISON showed stronger support for specific targets, with 69 percent of people backing increased taxes on the wealthiest individuals to fund public services. Additionally, three-quarters of respondents supported larger contributions from large corporations, and 61 percent favored tax rises specifically for banks. UNISON general secretary Andrea Egan described the potential move as encouraging, stating that massive investment to rebuild public services should be funded by taxing the wealthiest. The political context for the Budget is complex. Chancellor Healey operates under constraints imposed by Labour’s 2024 manifesto, which pledged not to raise income tax, value added tax, or national insurance. This limits his options for raising revenue, pushing attention toward sectors like banking, capital gains tax, and potentially family business inheritance rules. The urgency of the situation is underscored by the UK’s high debt levels, with net accumulated public sector debt reaching 93.8 percent of gross domestic product by the end of August. Rising borrowing costs, exacerbated by inflationary pressures linked to the Middle East conflict, have threatened to halve the £24 billion fiscal cushion established in the March spring forecast. A Treasury spokesperson declined to comment on specific proposals, stating that tax decisions are matters for the Chancellor to outline at fiscal events rather than responding to speculation. Industry experts offer mixed views on the feasibility of the hike. Sir Philip Augar, a former banker and author, suggested there is room for a moderate increase that could raise up to £3 billion annually, citing the booming conditions in the lending market. He criticized the notion that banks are simultaneously too big to fail and too big to tax, arguing that taxpayers should not bear the burden during downturns while banks enjoy special treatment during booms. On the other hand, Louise Hellem, chief economist at the Confederation of British Industries, warned that the Budget should avoid measures that undermine competitiveness. She emphasized that the business tax contribution is already at a record share of receipts and that further sector-specific taxation could weaken incentives to invest and deepen UK capital markets. As the October 28 deadline approaches, the focus remains on how Healey balances the need for revenue against the risks of stifling the financial sector’s growth.
Pojdite k primarnim virom (1)
Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.
Višji bančni direktorji so za BBC povedali, da pričakujejo, da se bodo soočili z večjimi davki v prihodnjem proračunskem napovedi kanclerke Rachel Reeves. Izjava kaže, da vlada preučuje ukrepe, ki bi lahko vplivali na bančne dobičke. To se je zgodilo med tekočimi razpravami o fiskalnih politikah in morebitnih spremembah davčnih struktur. Zaskrbljenost bank odraža širše gospodarske razloge in možne odzive na predpise v finančnem sektorju.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja nevtralno poročilo o pričakovanjih bančnih direktorjev glede morebitnih davčnih sprememb v proračunu. V njem ni očitno pristranskega jezika, enostranskega iskanja virov ali uredništva. Osredotočen je na posredovanje pričakovanj bančnega sektorja in ne na spodbujanje
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides detailed information about potential tax changes targeting the banking sector, citing sources such as UK Finance and mentioning specific figures like the £15bn profit of the four major banks. It references the possible reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and mentions the im
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article presents the situation in a relatively neutral manner, discussing both the potential tax increases and the concerns raised by the banking sector. It avoids overtly biased language but does mention the drop in bank shares, which may subtly imply negative consequences.
Britanski kancler John Healey naj bi v okviru svojih načrtov za reševanje finančnih izzivov v državi razmišljal o povečanju davkov na bančne dobičke. Ta potencialni ukrep prihaja pred njegovo prvo napovedanje proračuna, ki je predvideno za 28. oktober. Takšna odločitev bi bila del širših fiskalnih strategij, namenjenih stabilizaciji nacionalnega gospodarstva.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejansko poročilo o morebitnih davčnih ukrepih, ki jih preučuje kanclerka, ne da bi očitno podpirala katero koli določeno politično stališče. Ne vključuje pristranskega jezika, enostranskih virov ali opustitev, ki bi kazali na jasno ideološko nagnjenost.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports that Healey is considering increasing taxes on banks, referencing the TUC and polling data. It mentions the reversal of the 2023 surcharge reduction and the potential £2bn raise. However, it lacks some specifics found in other articles, such as the exact figures for ba
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article leans slightly toward supporting the idea of taxing banks, citing public opinion and union pressure. It includes direct quotes from Healey and the TUC leader, but the overall tone suggests a positive view of the proposed tax measures.
Nova anketa Ipsosa kaže, da skoraj dve tretjini britanskih državljanov pričakuje, da bodo laburisti v prvem proračunu kanclerja Johna Healeya kot del vlade premierja Andyja Burnhama dvignili davke. Raziskava razkriva široko zaskrbljenost zaradi gospodarstva, pri čemer 58% vprašanih verjame, da se država premika v "narobe smer". Javna pričakovanja vključujejo potencialno povečanje davkov na banke, kapitalske dobičke in stavnice, kljub temu, da je laburistična stranka že dvignila davčno breme na povojno najvišjo raven. Medtem pa druga anketa, ki jo je naročil sindikat UNISON, kaže na močno podporo javnosti za obdavčevanje bogatih, velikih korporacij in bank za financiranje javnih storitev.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene ugotovitve iz dveh anket z uravnoteženimi pogledi: ena poudarja zaskrbljenost javnosti zaradi morebitnih dvigov davkov in gospodarske zaskrbljenosti, druga pa kaže javno podporo obdavčevanju bogatih in korporacij. Ni očitno pristranskega jezika, enostranskega pridobivanja ali opustitve.
Zakaj dejstva (80): The article accurately reports the Ipsos poll findings regarding public expectations of tax increases and the critical test facing Chancellor John Healey. It references the previous tax hikes by Rachel Reeves and mentions potential areas of focus for the Budget. However, it lacks specific details ab
Zakaj objektivnost (65): The article uses emotive language such as 'pain to come' and 'stubbornly subdued by historic standards' which may influence reader perception. While it presents poll data objectively, the phrasing suggests a somewhat negative outlook on the government's economic policies.
Financial TimesNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 85
Kanclerka Združenega kraljestva je v prihodnjem proračunu navedla načrte za zvišanje davkov na bančni sektor, kar nakazuje na morebitne nove finančne obremenitve za industrijo. Sektor finančnih storitev se pripravlja na morebitne višje dajatve, ki bi lahko vplivale na poslovanje in dobičkonosnost. Ta ukrep prihaja med tekočimi razpravami o fiskalnih politikah in vlogi bančnega sektorja v gospodarstvu. Objava poudarja, da se vlada osredotoča na ustvarjanje dodatnih prihodkov s ciljnimi davčnimi ukrepi.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku so predlagane davčne povečanja za banke označene kot proaktivni ukrep vlade za reševanje fiskalnih potreb, s čimer se predlaga progresivno stališče glede prerazporeditve bogastva in povečanja državnih prihodkov z obdavčevanjem finančnih institucij. Poudarek na "raiding" banke pomeni kritiko
Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains neutral in tone, simply stating that Healey has signaled potential tax changes without expressing approval or criticism. It presents the facts without editorializing or taking a clear stance.
Daily MailNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 75
V članku so obravnavane morebitne spremembe davčne politike, ki vplivajo na družinska podjetja v Združenem kraljestvu, s posebnim poudarkom na možnosti povečanja davkov, povezanih s prenosom podjetja na naslednjo generacijo. Po poročilu bi lahko kancler John Healey predlagal take ukrepe v prihodnjem proračunu, da bi ustvaril dodatne prihodke. Članek vabi bralce, naj sodelujejo v anketi o tem, ali menijo, da je treba ta davek povečati. Rezultati ankete bodo objavljeni naslednji dan v novicam Morning Mail.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je predlagano povišanje davkov označeno kot "dajatev za delavce", kar pomeni kritiko fiskalnega pristopa laburistične stranke. Ta fraza kaže na negativno perspektivo politike, ki se ujema z levičarsko kritiko morebitnega povečanja obdavčitve družinskih podjetij.
Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan
Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article remains neutral in its presentation, inviting reader input without taking a stance on the proposed tax changes. Its interactive nature allows readers to form their own opinions, maintaining a balanced approach.
Daily MailNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznanObjektivnost 60
V članku se razpravlja o vse večjih špekulacijah, da bi britanski kancler Jeremy Healey lahko v prihodnjem proračunu uvedel nov davek na bančne dobičke. Ta potencialni ukrep je namenjen ustvarjanju dodatnih prihodkov, vendar je vzbudil zaskrbljenost, da bi lahko privedel do povečanih stroškov poslovanja in višjih hipotekarnih obrestnih mer. Predlog predlaga uvedbo dodatnega dajatve na obstoječi davek od dohodkov pravnih oseb, kar bi znatno vplivalo na bančni sektor. Medtem ko se ta poteza obravnava kot način za obravnavo dobičkonosnosti finančnega sektorja, kritiki opozarjajo na možne negativne gospodarske učinke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je predlagani davek označen kot možen "proračunski davčni napad" na banke, kar kaže na kritično stališče do finančnega sektorja in namiguje, da je ukrep bolj politično motiviran kot ekonomsko potreben. Poudarek na "strah, da bo dvignil stroške poslovanja in hipotekarne obrestne mere
Zakaj dejstva: uradni vir/dokument ni zaznan
Zakaj objektivnost (60): The article takes a more critical stance, highlighting the potential negative effects of the tax increase on business costs and mortgage rates. It uses phrases like 'clobber' which suggest a negative view of the proposed tax measures.
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.
progresivno
sredina
konservativno
★
Kako je poročala vsaka stran
Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.
United Kingdom
