ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.
Australia🏛️ PolitikaSredinapred 16 dnevi

Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese spremenil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačajo za uporabo novičarskih vsebin. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5-odstotno zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has reversed a controversial last-minute adjustment to a groundbreaking news funding scheme, securing a bipartisan agreement with Opposition Leader Angus Taylor that could generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue for media companies. The move follows intense backlash from major news publishers, including Nine and News Corp, who opposed a reduction in the share of funds allocated to individual media outlets. Albanese's reversal of the change has restored confidence among industry leaders and brought renewed momentum to the News Bargaining Incentive (NBI), a policy initially introduced under the previous government. The initial proposal saw the government reduce the percentage of a tech company’s levy that would go to any one media outlet from 25 percent to 17 percent. This change, implemented unilaterally by the government, sparked outrage among major publishers, who argued it devalued their contributions to the national conversation. After private discussions with Albanese, the reduction was rescinded, and the original allocation structure reinstated. The revised plan aims to distribute the financial burden more evenly, with a focus on supporting both larger and smaller publishers. Albanese engaged directly with leading figures in the news industry, working alongside Taylor to forge a consensus that would ensure the NBI’s survival. The agreement has reinvigorated cross-party support for the initiative, which seeks to compel digital giants to compensate news organizations for using their content on social media platforms. Communications Minister Anika Wells emphasized that the government is “delivering for journalists,” while Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino acknowledged the societal value of robust journalism. A separate undisclosed modification to the NBI involves guaranteeing a 5 percent share of payments to the Australian Associated Press (AAP), a not-for-profit newswire. While this provision has raised eyebrows within the industry due to AAP’s relatively modest size compared to other publishers, it appears unlikely to provoke widespread objection, especially after Albanese’s intervention to restore the original terms. The NBI operates by imposing a 2.5 percent levy on the local ad revenue of tech firms. In exchange for voluntarily entering into agreements with media companies, these platforms receive a discount on the levy. The goal is to inject up to $250 million into the media sector, which has struggled as advertising budgets have shifted toward digital platforms. However, tech firms have resisted the measure, arguing that they derive substantial value from the exposure provided by news outlets sharing their content on social media. The U.S. government has criticized the policy as a form of “foreign extortion,” prompting calls from American tech companies for retaliatory measures against Australian exports. Trade Minister Don Farrell recently addressed concerns with U.S. officials regarding a 12.5 percent tariff imposed on Australian goods by the Trump administration. Meanwhile, the government has adjusted the accounting methodology used to calculate the NBI, expanding the portion of tech firms' revenue subject to the levy. Additionally, the number of mandatory deals each firm must enter into has risen from six to eight. Legislation outlining the final version of the NBI is scheduled for introduction in parliament on Thursday, with expectations that it will pass the Senate in the following week. This development is expected to intensify pressure on Meta, which owns Instagram and Facebook, to engage in negotiations. Earlier this year, Meta had warned of blocking news content on its platforms unless it reached a financial settlement. In contrast, Google has shown greater willingness to participate in such arrangements. Separately, Albanese has also been involved in discussions concerning the gambling industry, where he has sought to balance regulatory oversight with public demand for recreational betting. Meetings with Taylor focused on refining legislation intended to restrict inducements offered by gaming companies to attract gamblers. These include limits on promotional activities and stricter controls on advertising timing and streaming service provisions. The government anticipates bipartisan backing for these changes, although critics remain unconvinced of their adequacy in addressing the issue of problem gambling. The gambling legislation, along with reforms to the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS), has undergone scrutiny by parliamentary committees, which are set to release their findings shortly. Former Prime Minister John Howard expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of an opt-out system for advertisements, advocating instead for an opt-in approach. As the government moves forward with its legislative agenda, the success of these initiatives will depend heavily on maintaining cooperation across political lines.

Pojdite k primarnim virom (6)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

5 poročil

The Conversation (AU) logoThe Conversation (AU)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 88Objektivnost 75pred 16 dnevi
Albanska vlada bo sprejela nov medijski kodeks pogajanj

Albanska vlada namerava uvesti novo zakonodajo, ki bo zahtevala, da tehnološka podjetja plačajo za uporabo avstralskih novic, ki so del širšega medijskega pogajalskega kodeksa. Predlagani zakoni, pod naslovom News Bargaining Incentive in News Journalism Payments, bi na podlagi avstralskih digitalnih prihodkov od oglasov, če ne morejo pogajati z založniki, naložili davek na platforme, kot so Google, Meta in TikTok. Ključne spremembe vključujejo dvig minimalnega števila zahtevanih poslov od šestih na osem, ponovno uvedbo 25% predhodne meje, prilagoditev obdobja izračuna za osnovno stopnjo in dodelitev 5% spodbudnih sredstev avstralskemu Associated Press (AAP). Kritičniki trdijo, da bi te spremembe lahko škodovale manjšim medijskim organizacijam, medtem ko vlada trdi, da spodbujajo pravičnost in krepijo celoten medijski sektor.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene vladne argumente in kritike, ne da bi se očitno zagovarjala katera koli stran.

Zakaj dejstva (88): The article accurately outlines the new media bargaining code, including the requirements for tech companies, the changes from the previous draft, and the rationale behind the adjustments. It references the ACCC and the legislative timeline, aligning with the primary source document. Minor discrepan

Zakaj objektivnost (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, explaining the changes and the reasoning behind them. It acknowledges potential criticisms but frames them as perspectives rather than outright criticism. The language remains objective, focusing on the legislative process and stakeholder reactions.

The Conversation (AU) logoThe Conversation (AU)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 88pred 19 dnevi
Vlada se je odločila za kompromis pri zakonu o igrah na srečo, z omejitvijo spodbud

Avstralska vlada se pripravlja na uvedbo kompromisov v svoji zakonodaji o igrah na srečo, s ciljem omejiti spodbude, ki jih igralne družbe uporabljajo za privabljanje kockarjev. Premier Anthony Albanese je sodeloval v razpravah z vodjo opozicije Angusom Taylorjem, da bi obravnaval zakon o igrah na srečo in druge zakonodajne prednostne naloge, vključno z reformami nacionalne sheme zavarovanja za invalide (NDIS). Predlagane spremembe vključujejo omejitve časov oglaševanja in določb za storitve pretakanja. Medtem ko vlada poudarja doseganje ravnovesja med rekreacijskimi igrami na srečo in obravnavanjem problemov z igranjem na srečo, kritiki trdijo, da zakonodaja ostaja nezadostna. Zeleni zagovarjajo popolno prepoved spodbude, medtem ko opozicija išče uravnotežen pristop. Nekdanji premier John Howard je kritiziral predlagani sistem izločanja za oglase in namesto tega predlagal model izločanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča vlade in kritike različnih deležnikov, vključno z Zeleni in opozicijo.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides specific details about the government's planned compromises on the gambling bill, including limits on inducements, timing of ads, and streaming service provisions. These claims align with the general consensus found in other articles covering the same event. The mention of Alban

Zakaj objektivnost (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. It includes quotes from Albanese and mentions both sides of the issue (e.g., gaming companies denying some claims). The language is measured and avoids strong emotive terms, though it does frame the government's ac

The Conversation (AU) logoThe Conversation (AU)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 16 dnevi
Nove zakone, ki bodo tehnološke družbe prisilile, da bodo plačevale za novice, bodo pomagale, vendar obstajajo štiri ključne težave:

Avstralska vlada je uvedla novo zakonodajo o spodbujanju pogajanj z novicami, katere namen je zagotoviti, da velika tehnološka podjetja nadomestijo novinske organizacije za uporabo njihove vsebine. To sledi prejšnjemu Kodeksu pogajanj z novicami, ki je letno ustvaril med 200 in 250 milijoni dolarjev, vendar je imel luknje, ki so platformam, kot sta Meta in Google, omogočile, da se izognejo dogovorom, tako da ne prikazujejo novic. Novi zakoni zahtevajo, da tehnološka podjetja z več kot 250 milijoni dolarjev letnih avstralskih digitalnih prihodkov od oglasov bodisi pogajajo dogovore z vsaj osmimi upravičenimi novinarji ali plačajo 2,5% pristojbine za svoje prihodke od oglasov, ki se nato razdelijo prek sheme plačila za novinarstvo. Shema daje prednost financiranju novičnic na podlagi števila polnočasnih novinarjev in vključuje širše opredelitve "novinarja", da bi pokrivala vloge, kot so fotožurnalisti in uredniki.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja namen in omejitve nove zakonodaje, ne da bi odkrito podprl ali kritiziral določene politične frakcije.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes the News Bargaining Incentive legislation, referencing the original News Media Bargaining Code and its limitations. It mentions the financial implications and the structure of the new law, aligning with the primary source document. However, it does not mention the AC

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the new legislation as a positive development but acknowledges its imperfections. It uses terms like 'welcome move' and 'far from perfect,' indicating a somewhat supportive stance. While it provides a balanced overview, it leans slightly towards highlighting the positives of the

The Age logoThe AgeNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 17 dnevi
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese obrnil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačujejo za uporabo novice. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5% zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje, ki vključuje vladno politiko in industrijsko lobiranje, vendar je okvir uravnotežen.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately covers the reversal of the late change to the news scheme, detailing the backlash from major media outlets and the resulting compromise. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the legislative changes and the impact on media firms. However, it lacks some contextua

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article maintains a neutral tone but highlights the positive outcome of the compromise, emphasizing the bipartisan support and the benefits for journalists. While it reports the events objectively, it frames the resolution in a way that suggests a favorable outcome for the government and the med

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 17 dnevi
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese spremenil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačajo za uporabo novičarskih vsebin. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5-odstotno zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje, ki vključuje vladno politiko in industrijsko lobiranje, predstavlja obe strani razprave, vodje medijev kritizirajo politiko in tehnološka podjetja trdijo proti njej.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes the reversal of the late change to the news scheme, mentioning the reaction from major news organizations and the subsequent deal with the opposition leader. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the legislative changes and the impact on media firms. H

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the situation from the perspective of media executives and political leaders, suggesting a somewhat biased viewpoint favoring the outcome that satisfies the industry. While it reports the events objectively, it emphasizes the positive resolution and the bipartisan support, which

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe