ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.
Australia🏛️ PolitikaSredina12. 8. 2026

Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese spremenil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačajo za uporabo novičarskih vsebin. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5-odstotno zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has reversed a late change to a scheme requiring tech giants to pay for news, securing a deal with Opposition Leader Angus Taylor that media firms hope will generate hundreds of millions of dollars in new revenue. Powerful news executives from Nine and News Corp had strongly opposed a reduction in the share of payouts each media outlet would receive from tech firms, from 25 per cent to 17 per cent. This change, made unilaterally by the government, has now been rescinded. The modification to the News Bargaining Incentive was intended to spread the financial benefits more widely and support smaller publishers. However, larger media outlets argued that the adjustment devalued their operations, which employ the majority of journalists. Albanese engaged in discussions with leading news executives and collaborated with Taylor to restore bipartisan backing for the groundbreaking initiative originally introduced under the Morrison government. The updated model compels digital giants to compensate news organizations for content shared on their platforms. Communications Minister Anika Wells stated the government was “delivering for journalists,” while Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino acknowledged “the significant benefits strong journalism brings to communities across the nation.” Another undisclosed change involves guaranteeing that Australian Associated Press, a newswire operated by a not-for-profit organization, will receive 5 per cent of any payments made by technology companies. Industry insiders questioned whether this allocation was appropriate for a smaller publisher, although they anticipated no complaints from news executives given Albanese's reversal of the major alteration. The News Bargaining Incentive imposes a 2.5 per cent charge on tech firms' local ad revenue. To encourage voluntary agreements between digital platforms and media entities, the government provides an offset against this charge. The goal is to provide up to $250 million to media companies affected by the shift of advertising funds toward tech giants. Digital platforms argue that the policy lacks justification since news outlets benefit from disseminating their content on social media. The Trump administration labels the tax as a form of “foreign extortion,” prompting calls from the U.S. tech sector for higher tariffs on Australian exports as a punitive measure. On Tuesday, Trade Minister Don Farrell lobbied the United States regarding President Donald Trump’s imposition of a 12.5 per cent tariff on Australian goods. Additionally, the government adjusted the accounting method for the News Bargaining Incentive, expanding the base of tech firms' revenue subject to the charge. The number of mandatory deals each company must enter into has risen from six to eight. Legislation introducing these changes will be presented to parliament on Thursday and is expected to pass the Senate the following week, increasing pressure on Meta, owner of Instagram and Facebook, to engage in negotiations. Last year, Meta threatened to block news articles on its platforms unless it was exempt from any charges. Google, however, has shown willingness to negotiate terms. Separately, the government is poised to introduce compromises on gambling legislation, including restrictions on inducements used to attract gamblers. Albanese met with Taylor to address both the gambling legislation and the proposed reforms to the National Disability Insurance Scheme. Discussions also touched upon the News Bargaining Incentive, aiming to ensure that digital platforms must engage in commercial agreements with media organizations to utilize their content. Efforts to limit inducements, tighten advertising times, and adjust provisions for streaming services are reportedly part of the concessions on the gambling legislation. These proposals are expected to garner bipartisan support, reflecting a balance between accommodating recreational gamblers and addressing concerns related to problem gambling. Critics, however, argue that the legislation remains insufficient, with the Greens advocating for a complete prohibition on inducements. Former Prime Minister John Howard expressed skepticism about Labor’s proposed opt-out system for advertisements, suggesting an opt-in system would be more effective. During the meeting between Albanese and Taylor, the NDIS was discussed briefly, emphasizing the importance of passing the reforms promptly to realize budget savings associated with the program. The government aims to finalize the gambling legislation by the end of the parliamentary session, with the Coalition expressing openness to the process, albeit with a commitment to seek approval from the full party room. Advocates for gambling harm reduction within the Coalition are pushing for an independent review mechanism to assess the effectiveness of the legislation in subsequent years.

Kako je nastalo to poročilo. Objektivne novice je to poročilo napisal iz 3 izvornih člankov s pomočjo umetne inteligence po naši metodologiji. Gre za naše lastno besedilo, ne za kopijo posameznega medija. Preberite našo metodologijo.

Odgovorni urednik: Matej BašaSte opazili napako? Sporočite jo

3 poročil

The Conversation (AU) logoThe Conversation (AU)NeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 8810. 8. 2026
Vlada se je odločila za kompromis pri zakonu o igrah na srečo, z omejitvijo spodbud

Avstralska vlada se pripravlja na uvedbo kompromisov v svoji zakonodaji o igrah na srečo, s ciljem omejiti spodbude, ki jih igralne družbe uporabljajo za privabljanje kockarjev. Premier Anthony Albanese je sodeloval v razpravah z vodjo opozicije Angusom Taylorjem, da bi obravnaval zakon o igrah na srečo in druge zakonodajne prednostne naloge, vključno z reformami nacionalne sheme zavarovanja za invalide (NDIS). Predlagane spremembe vključujejo omejitve časov oglaševanja in določb za storitve pretakanja. Medtem ko vlada poudarja doseganje ravnovesja med rekreacijskimi igrami na srečo in obravnavanjem problemov z igranjem na srečo, kritiki trdijo, da zakonodaja ostaja nezadostna. Zeleni zagovarjajo popolno prepoved spodbude, medtem ko opozicija išče uravnotežen pristop. Nekdanji premier John Howard je kritiziral predlagani sistem izločanja za oglase in namesto tega predlagal model izločanja.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni stališča vlade in kritike različnih deležnikov, vključno z Zeleni in opozicijo.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides specific details about the government's planned compromises on the gambling bill, including limits on inducements, timing of ads, and streaming service provisions. These claims align with the general consensus found in other articles covering the same event. The mention of Alban

Zakaj objektivnost (88): The article maintains a relatively neutral tone, presenting facts without overt bias. It includes quotes from Albanese and mentions both sides of the issue (e.g., gaming companies denying some claims). The language is measured and avoids strong emotive terms, though it does frame the government's ac

The Age logoThe AgeNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 7012. 8. 2026
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese obrnil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačujejo za uporabo novice. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5% zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje, ki vključuje vladno politiko in industrijsko lobiranje, vendar je okvir uravnotežen.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately covers the reversal of the late change to the news scheme, detailing the backlash from major media outlets and the resulting compromise. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the legislative changes and the impact on media firms. However, it lacks some contextua

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article maintains a neutral tone but highlights the positive outcome of the compromise, emphasizing the bipartisan support and the benefits for journalists. While it reports the events objectively, it frames the resolution in a way that suggests a favorable outcome for the government and the med

The Sydney Morning Herald logoThe Sydney Morning HeraldNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 7012. 8. 2026
Laburisti se umikajo od poznih sprememb, da bi dobili novice.

12. avgusta 2026 je premier Anthony Albanese spremenil sporno spremembo avstralske sheme spodbude za pogajanja z novicami (NBI), ki zahteva, da tehnološka podjetja plačajo za uporabo novičarskih vsebin. Začetno zmanjšanje deleža plačil medijev z 25% na 17%, naloženo brez posvetovanja, je sprožilo odziv velikih lastnikov medijev, kot sta Nine in News Corp. Albanese in vodja opozicije Angus Taylor sta pogajali o revidiranem sporazumu, ki je obnovil 25-odstotni delež in dodal 5-odstotno zagotovljeno plačilo za avstralski Associated Press.

Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Medtem ko članek obravnava politično občutljivo vprašanje, ki vključuje vladno politiko in industrijsko lobiranje, predstavlja obe strani razprave, vodje medijev kritizirajo politiko in tehnološka podjetja trdijo proti njej.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately describes the reversal of the late change to the news scheme, mentioning the reaction from major news organizations and the subsequent deal with the opposition leader. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the legislative changes and the impact on media firms. H

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the situation from the perspective of media executives and political leaders, suggesting a somewhat biased viewpoint favoring the outcome that satisfies the industry. While it reports the events objectively, it emphasizes the positive resolution and the bipartisan support, which

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe