Japonski parlament je odobril načrt za ustanovitev "druge prestolnice", ki naj bi zagotovila, da lahko država deluje, tudi če Tokio utrpi veliko katastrofo.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja razvoj druge prestolnice kot strateško politično in gospodarsko odločitev, namenjeno zmanjšanju osrednje vloge Tokija.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article accurately reports that Japan's parliament approved a plan to create a 'second capital' outside Tokyo, citing the goal of ensuring continuity in case of disaster. While it mentions Osaka as the front-runner, it does not overstate this claim beyond what can be inferred from the cross-sour
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a largely neutral tone, presenting the development as a strategic move without overtly favoring any particular perspective. It avoids emotional language and provides a straightforward account of the event.


![[EDITORIAL] Ang patlang sa retoriko at realidad ni Pangulong Marcos](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2F27july2026sona111.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)


