In late December 2025, Russian President Vladimir Putin made public statements about the military progress of Russian forces on several fronts in Ukraine. During an interview with propagandist Pavel Zaruvin, published on the Kremlin’s website, Putin outlined the proximity of Russian troops to key Ukrainian cities. He noted that Russian forces were approximately 10.5 kilometers away from Sumy, a city in northern Ukraine, and between 2.5 to 5 kilometers from Kupiansk, which had been previously liberated by Ukrainian forces but was under renewed attack by Russian forces in autumn 2025.
Putin emphasized that the objective of Russian operations in the Sumy and Vovchansk directions was to create a “security zone” along Russia's borders, a goal set after the alleged incursion of Ukrainian forces into the Kursk region and attacks on Russia’s border areas. Despite this, he claimed there were no political plans regarding these cities or regions, stating that decisions would be based on proposals from the Ministry of Defense and General Staff. He also mentioned that Russian forces were advancing actively and decisively on these fronts.
Regarding Kupiansk, Putin highlighted its significance as a location where representatives of the Kyiv regime often held photo sessions against the backdrop of a monument. He stated that Russian forces were within 2.5 to 4–5 kilometers of the western edge of the city, noting that the enemy had launched several counterattacks without success. This statement came just days after reports indicated that Ukrainian forces had successfully conducted a counterattack near Kupiansk in Kharkiv Oblast and encircled a Russian group in the city. Following this, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy visited the Kupiansk direction and recorded a video near the partially destroyed monument in the city.
Putin also mentioned other locations such as Cheremoshnyy Lyman and Sloviansk, stating that Russian forces were approximately 8–9 kilometers away from Cheremoshnyy Lyman and 4 kilometers from Sloviansk. However, he did not mention the failure of Russian forces to reach the borders of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts over four years of full-scale war.
The internal dynamics within the Russian military and security apparatus have become increasingly complex. According to reports from European intelligence sources cited by UNIAN, the deaths of high-ranking Russian generals have intensified tensions between the Russian army and the Federal Security Service (FSB). These conflicts reflect deeper rivalries within the system, where the FSB traditionally holds a more privileged position compared to the armed forces. The FSB has been reluctant to provide physical protection for Russian generals, despite their vulnerability to attacks from drones, missiles, car bombings, plane crashes, and combat actions on the front lines.
This situation has raised concerns among analysts who note that the loss of prominent Russian generals could further impact the morale of the Russian army, already weakened by ongoing warfare. Opposition politician Maxim Katz pointed out that the war has elevated the importance of the army on the battlefield, yet the political structure in Moscow continues to view generals as potential threats. As a result, the Kremlin finds itself in a paradoxical position: needing experienced commanders to continue the war while the dominant FSB does not wish to take responsibility for their safety.
Additionally, there have been reports of sabotage operations within Russia, including an operation in winter that targeted six Gazprom gas distribution stations near Moscow, causing losses exceeding $6 million. Such incidents highlight the complexity and danger faced by both military personnel and intelligence operatives operating within Russia.
Analysts from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) have criticized Putin's recent claims of military victories as rhetorical tactics aimed at influencing Western perceptions and pressuring Ukraine to concede to Russian demands. They argue that despite these assertions, Russia's ability to achieve its military objectives remains questionable, especially given the continued decline in its combat effectiveness in 2026. While acknowledging the impact of Ukraine's long-range strike campaign on Russia, Putin attempted to downplay economic and social challenges facing the country, suggesting a nuanced awareness of these issues without directly addressing them.
As the conflict continues, the interplay between military operations, internal politics, and external pressures will likely shape future developments. The situation underscores the multifaceted nature of the ongoing war, involving not only direct combat but also intricate power struggles within Russia's leadership and the broader geopolitical landscape.
5 poročil
Ukrainska PravdaNeodvisenDesnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 70pred 7 dneviČlanek poroča o pripombah ruskega predsednika Vladimira Putina glede vojaškega napredka v teku konflikta v Ukrajini. Po navedbah vira, povezanega s Kremlom, so ruske sile napredovale blizu mest Sumy (približno 10,5 km stran) in Kupiansk (med 2,5 in 5 km stran), s sklicevanjem na fotografijo ukrajinskega predsednika Zelenskega, posneto na delno uničeno streho v Kupiansku decembra 2025. V poročilu so poudarjene trditve Rusije o aktivnih vojaških operacijah in ozemeljskih dobičkih, hkrati pa je navedeno, da so ukrajinske sile konec leta 2025 uspešno napadle v bližini Kupianska. Prav tako omenja druge lokacije, kot so Chernoye Liman, Slaviansk in Kramatorsk, z razdaljami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Desno): Članek pripoveduje iz virov, ki jih nadzoruje ruska država, poudarja ruske vojaške napredke in prikazuje ukrajinske ukrepe kot obrambne ali simbolične (npr. Zelenskijev video na uničeno streho).
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 90 · Objektivnost 70): This article accurately reports quotes from Putin’s interview with ZARUBIN, including distances to Sumy and Kupiansk. It provides clear sourcing through the Kremlin website. However, the language has a somewhat propagandistic tone, especially when describing Russian military actions.
UNIANStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 6 dneviČlanek poroča, da je bil konvoj, vključno z jahto "Graceful", povezana z ruskim voditeljem Vladimirjem Putinom, opažen blizu obale Danske. Danske pomorske sile in nemška obalna straža so sledile plovilu, ki je predhodno onemogočil svoj avtomatski identifikacijski sistem (AIS), zaradi česar je bil manj viden v mednarodnih sistemih za sledenje. Jahta je prešla skozi ožino Velikega pasu in se približala otoku Anholt, preden se je odpravila proti polotoku Skagen. Spremljala sta jo ruska fregata in patruljska ladja. Novinarji ugotavljajo, da je jahta, dolga več kot 80 metrov, ocenjena na več kot 750 milijonov danskih kron. V poročilu je tudi omenjen prejšnji incident, ko je ruska fregata streljala na britansko jahto v Lamanšu.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o gibanju jahte, povezane s politično osebnostjo, ne da bi javno podprli ali kritizirali katero koli stran.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 80): Factual accuracy is high, aligning closely with the primary source document. It reports on the movement of the Graceful convoy through Danish waters, mentions the AIS shutdown since August 2022, and notes the involvement of Danish and German authorities. However, it includes some additional context
UNIANStrankarsko povezanSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 4 dnevi Likvidacija ruskih generalov razkriva naraščajoči razkol v Putinovi oblastiV članku se razpravlja o naraščajočih napetostih v ruskem varnostnem aparatu, zlasti med vojsko in Zvezno varnostno službo (FSB), po smrti več visokih ruskih generalov od začetka vojne na Ukrajini. Te izgube so okrepile notranje konflikte, pri čemer je FSB zgodovinsko imela več moči in vpliva v primerjavi z oboroženimi silami.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene informacije iz več virov, vključno z neimenovanim evropskim obveščevalnim virom in opozicijsko osebnostjo Maksimom Katzom, ki ponuja stališča tako FSB-ja kot vojske.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): Factual accuracy aligns with the primary source document, covering the assassination of Russian generals and internal tensions. However, the article uses emotionally charged language ('pure hell') and presents information in a biased manner favoring Ukrainian perspectives.
UNIANStrankarsko povezanLevoDejstva 80Objektivnost 65pred 6 dnevi "Ritorični pristop": ISW razkriva Putinove "zmagovalne" izjaveČlanek obravnava nedavne pripombe Vladimira Putina v govoru 28. junija 2026, v katerem je zavrnil diplomatske rešitve za končanje vojne na Ukrajini in poudaril ruske vojaške zmogljivosti. Analitiki iz Inštituta za preučevanje vojne (ISW) ugotavljajo, da so te izjave del ponavljajočega se vzorca Kremlja, ki prikazuje ruski vojaški uspeh kot neizogiben in ukrajinske sile kot na robu propada. Trdijo, da ima takšna retorika za cilj vplivati tako na zahodne narode kot na Ukrajino, da izpolnjujejo ruske zahteve, še posebej, ker se je učinkovitost ruskega bojnega polja zmanjšala. Medtem ko je Putin priznal vpliv dolgoročnih napadov Ukrajine na Rusijo, se je izognil neposrednemu obravnavanju širših izzivov, kot so pomanjkanje goriva ali gospodarska napetost. Članek poudarja, kako ti komentarji odražajo tekoče prizadevanja ruskega vodstva za ohranjanje narativnega nadzora nad konfliktom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): V članku so Putinove izjave označene kot del strateškega retoričnega prizadevanja Kremlja za manipulacijo dojemanja, kar se ujema s kritičnim pogledom na rusko propagando.
Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 65): Accurate in reporting on the fuel crisis and its causes, but the tone is highly critical of Russia and leans towards Ukrainian perspective, reducing objectivity.
UNIANStrankarsko povezanLevopred 7 urami Napad na Sankt Peterburg je izjemno ponižujoč za Putina.An analyst suggests that Ukraine’s attacks on Saint Petersburg, including strikes on an oil depot and military base, are part of a broader strategy to increase Russia’s war costs. These attacks, which occurred shortly after a previous strike during an economic forum, have intensified pressure on Russian air defenses and logistics, forcing Moscow to make difficult decisions about where to allocate resources. The attack on Saint Petersburg, a city historically significant to Russia and home to Putin’s family estate, is seen as a symbolic humiliation. Analyst Jonathan Singh notes that such strikes could encourage Western allies like the U.S. to provide more defensive systems to protect Ukrainian cities. He argues that these actions demonstrate Ukraine’s growing strategic capabilities and suggest a potential turning point in the conflict.
Ocena pristranskosti (Levo): The article frames the Ukrainian attacks as a strategic move by Kyiv aimed at increasing Russia’s war costs and influencing international support, particularly from the U.S. It emphasizes the psychological impact on Putin and portrays Ukraine’s military actions as effective and strategically sound.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
UA
