Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu secured a major victory on Monday when Likud’s Central Committee approved a proposal granting him expanded control over the party’s Knesset slate. The decision allows Netanyahu to claim eight reserved slots in the top 29 places on the list ahead of the October 27 election, significantly increasing his influence over the party’s candidate selection process. The approval came after months of internal debate and Netanyahu’s unsuccessful attempt to eliminate the party’s primaries altogether in favor of a committee-controlled selection process. More than 3,400 members of the Central Committee, which has approximately 4,500 members, participated in the vote, with the proposal passing despite vocal opposition from some factions within the party. The move grants Netanyahu control over specific positions on the party list, specifically the 3rd, 5th, 9th, 11th, 15th, 18th, 26th, and 29th spots, giving him unprecedented power over nearly a third of the party’s realistic slate. A realistic slate refers to the number of candidates from a party that are likely to win Knesset seats, depending on the party’s share of the overall vote. With Likud currently polling at 21–23 seats, even if the party performs better than expected and secures 30 seats, the eight reserved slots would leave only 18 positions to be filled via the party’s primary process. This means more than twice as many incumbent lawmakers and ministers would be competing for fewer spots, potentially pushing some further down the list. The decision follows a contentious period within Likud, marked by disputes over the role of primaries in determining the party’s Knesset slate. Earlier this month, Likud’s internal court rejected Netanyahu’s proposal to cancel the August 17 primaries in the event of a “wartime situation,” emphasizing that the party must adhere to its constitutional obligations and maintain its democratic processes. The court ruled that if security conditions made it impossible to hold the vote as planned, the preferred alternatives would be to delay the election or implement electronic voting, rather than abandon the process entirely. Internal tensions within the party have grown sharper in recent weeks, with some members opposing Netanyahu’s push for greater control. Senior Likud MK David Bitan voiced strong criticism of the proposal, releasing a video urging Central Committee members to vote against it. He accused Likud Constitution Committee chairman Haim Katz of forming a faction within the party to support Netanyahu’s agenda, suggesting that Katz might have traded his support for a reserved spot for himself or an ally. Bitan also raised concerns that the move would prioritize Netanyahu’s handpicked candidates over existing lawmakers, potentially marginalizing some within the party. Support for Netanyahu’s proposal came from several prominent Likud figures, including Defense Minister Israel Katz, Transportation Minister Miri Regev, Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar, and Energy Minister Eli Cohen. These ministers and other Likud MKs released videos expressing their backing for the changes, emphasizing their commitment to strengthening Netanyahu’s leadership. Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana and coalition whip Ofir Katz also endorsed the proposal in similar clips. Netanyahu’s push for reserved slots is partly driven by concerns that the party’s primaries could elevate candidates popular among the Likud base but less appealing to moderate right-wing and swing voters. Internal polling suggests that figures such as MK Tally Gotliv and ministers Shlomo Karhi and May Golan may resonate more with the party’s core supporters but struggle to attract broader appeal. By securing reserved spots, Netanyahu aims to ensure that his preferred candidates are positioned higher on the list, improving their chances of winning Knesset seats. The decision also raises questions about the potential inclusion of candidates from allied parties on Likud’s slate. Reports suggest that Netanyahu may allocate some of the reserved slots to members of the New Hope faction, which merged with Likud last year, or to politicians from the Religious Zionism and Otzma Yehudit parties. This strategy could help consolidate support from these smaller factions, which have struggled to meet the electoral threshold in recent elections. As the October election approaches, the outcome of Likud’s internal decisions will play a crucial role in shaping the final composition of the Knesset. With Netanyahu’s influence over the party’s slate now firmly established, the battle for parliamentary dominance continues to unfold.
11 poročil
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 90pred 8 dneviIzraelski volitvi bodo po pričakovanjih zelo sporni, zaznamovani z zaskrbljenostjo zaradi integritete volivcev, politične retorike in notranjih koalicijskih konfliktov. Predsednik Isaac Herzog je opozoril, da je Shin Bet ugotovil morebitne grožnje volilnemu procesu, medtem ko se je stranka Likud soočila s kritiko zaradi uporabe kampanjskih videoposnetkov, ki jih je ustvarila AI, ki so ciljali na opozicijskega vodjo Gadija Eisenkota.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je uravnotežen pregled različnih političnih dogajanj, brez očitne pristranskosti do katere koli posebne strani.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article provides accurate information about the Religious Zionism primary results, including Strock's second-place finish and Smotrich's leadership role. It also mentions the settlement expansion agenda and the number of new settlements approved, which is consistent with other reporting on the t
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article is generally neutral in tone, focusing on the outcomes of the primary and the policies of the party. There is no clear bias toward any particular candidate or policy, though the focus on settlement expansion might reflect the party's priorities rather than an inherent bias.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 95Objektivnost 85pred 4 dnevi Likud glasuje za razširitev Netanjahujevega nadzora nad seznamom strank, da bi zagotovil vrhunske položajeCentralni odbor Likuda je glasoval, da bi premieru Benjaminu Netanjahu dal večji nadzor nad stranko v Knesetu, tako da mu dovoli, da odloči o osmih prvih 30 mestih pred notranjimi primarnimi volitvami, predvidenimi za 17. avgust.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene obe strani razprave, vključno z nasprotovanjem poslanca Davida Bitana in podporo različnih ministrov in osebnosti stranke.
Zakaj dejstva (95): The article accurately describes the Likud Central Committee's approval of Netanyahu's proposal to assign eight slots in the first 30 spots on the party list. This aligns with other sources like article 6, which confirms the approval and details the specific reserved slots. The mention of internal t
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article presents the facts neutrally, describing the vote and the resulting tensions without overt bias. However, the title slightly emphasizes Netanyahu's control, which may subtly frame the story in his favor. Overall, the tone remains mostly objective.
HaaretzNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 90Objektivnost 90pred 5 dneviIzraelski časopis Haaretz poroča, da je stranka Likud zavrnila poskus premierja Benjamina Netanjahua, da bi ukinil notranje primarne volitve stranke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je Netanyahujev predlog predstavljen kot poskus utrditve moči, kar nakazuje morebitne avtoritarne težnje.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article correctly states that Likud blocked Netanyahu's attempt to scrap primaries, which matches with other sources such as article 4 and 6. While it does not provide detailed specifics about the vote or the exact nature of the proposal, it aligns with the broader consensus that Netanyahu faced
Zakaj objektivnost (90): The article maintains a balanced tone, presenting the outcome without taking sides. The headline uses strong language ('Not a One-man Party') but the content itself remains neutral and factual, avoiding overt bias.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 5 dneviSodišče izraelske Likudske stranke je zavrnilo poskus predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua, da prekliče prihajajoče primarne volitve, če jih ne bo mogoče organizirati zaradi možnega "vojnega stanja". Sodišče je poudarilo, da bi moral Likud ostati kolektivna entiteta, namesto da bi postal enosebna stranka, ki jo nadzira izključno Netanjahu. Nekateri člani so izrazili zaskrbljenost, da je Netanjahu poskušal obiti primarne volitve, da bi ohranil absolutni nadzor nad stranko v Knesetu, kar bi lahko marginaliziralo druge zakonodajalce. Sodišče je predlagalo alternative, kot je preloženje primarne volitve ali uporaba elektronskega glasovanja, ki oba trenutno nista dovoljena v skladu z ustavo stranke. Ta odločitev je preklicala predhodno odobritev Likudskega ustavnega odbora, ki bi Netanjahuju omogočila pomemben vpliv na izborni proces.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku je sodna odločba proti Netanijahujevemu predlogu predstavljena nevtralno, s sklicevanjem na njegove argumente in argumente sodišča.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article briefly summarizes the court's rejection of Netanyahu's bid to cancel the primary, matching the details found in article 3. While it lacks some of the contextual details present in other articles, it still conveys the correct outcome of the court's decision.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is concise and factual, but the brevity may reduce the depth of analysis. The tone is neutral overall, though the lack of elaboration on the court's reasoning or the implications of the decision may affect the perceived balance.
i24NEWSNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 90Objektivnost 85pred 5 dneviIzraelsko sodišče je razveljavilo poskus predsednika vlade Benjamina Netanjahua, da prekliče primarne volitve v svoji stranki Likud, ki jih je želel nadomestiti z imenovanim odborom.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek poroča o sodni odločitvi v zvezi z notranjo stranko, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobeni strani, in predstavlja sodno dejanje kot krepitev demokratičnih procesov znotraj stranke, ne da bi uporabljal pristranski jezik ali selektivno poudarjal eno perspektivo nad drugo.
Zakaj dejstva (90): The article accurately reports that the Likud court overturned Netanyahu's bid to cancel the primary in favor of an appointed committee. This aligns with the details presented in article 3 and 4. The article is brief but factually sound.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article is straightforward and factual, but its brevity limits the depth of analysis. The tone is neutral, though the lack of additional context or perspective may affect the perception of balance.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 85včeraj Eisenkotova ekipa je poslala Shin Bet, da ga opozorijo, da je ogrožen, nima oboroženih varnostnikov.Po poročanju izraelske televizije je nekdanji vodja IDF Gadi Eisenkot zaradi skrbi za svojo varnost pred prihajajočimi izraelskimi volitvami najel zasebne, neoborožene telesne stražarje.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljene dejanske informacije o Eisenkotovih varnostnih ureditvah in navedeni pomisleki glede morebitnih groženj iz Irana.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on Eisenkot hiring private bodyguards based on an Israeli TV report, citing a letter to security officials. It provides specific details about the situation and quotes from the letter, which aligns with the cross-source consensus. No conflicting information is present.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, reporting the events without taking sides. It presents the facts about Eisenkot's security concerns and actions without expressing judgment or emotional language.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 85pred 3 dnevi Anketa kaže, da sta Eisenkot in Netanjahu enakovredni kot priljubljeni premierji.Nedavna anketa Kanal 12 kaže, da sta izraelski premier Benjamin Netanjahu in njegov glavni tekmec, nekdanji vodja IDF Gadi Eisenkot, med volivci za vlogo predsednika vlade izenačena na 38% vsak. To označuje premik od prejšnje ankete, kjer je Eisenkot vodil Netanjahu. Anketa kaže, da bi proti-Netanyahu blok, razen arabskih strank, zagotovil 60 sedežev v Knessetu, kar je malo manj od večine, medtem ko bi pro-Netanyahu blok pridobil 50 sedežev. Arabske stranke naj bi osvojile 10 sedežev. Po anketi bi bila Eisenkotova stranka Yashar največja posamezna stranka z 23 sedeži, sledila Netanyahujeva Likud z 22 sedeži.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni podatki o anketah, ne da bi očitno naklonjeni Netanjahuju ali Eisenkotu.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on a poll showing Netanyahu and Eisenkot tied at 38%, with specific seat allocations and predictions for the Knesset election. It aligns with the cross-source consensus and provides detailed breakdowns of party standings without contradicting other sources.
Zakaj objektivnost (85): The article remains objective, presenting the poll results and analysis without bias. It explains the implications of the poll without inserting subjective commentary or emotional tone.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 85Objektivnost 80pred 9 dnevi Yashar! je največja stranka, Eisenkot je za PM, če se bodo volitve odvijale danes - anketaAnketa, ki jo je izvedel inštitut Midgam, kaže, da bi bila stranka Gadija Eisenkota Yashar! največja v Knessetu z 24 sedeži, če bi se volitve odvijale danes.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so nevtralno predstavljeni rezultati anketiranja, ki prikazujejo tako Eisenkotovo vodstvo kot Netanjahujevo stališče, ne da bi očitno podpirali katero koli stran. Vključuje uravnoteženo poročanje o preferencah volivcev in koalicijski dinamiki brez pomembnega uredniškega ali obremenjenega jezika.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article cites a Channel 12 poll with specific details about seat counts and preferred candidates, providing clear sourcing. The information aligns with cross-source consensus, enhancing factual accuracy.
Zakaj objektivnost (80): While the article provides detailed information, it mentions Shas potentially supporting Eisenkot, which could be seen as slightly more favorable toward Eisenkot. However, it remains largely neutral in tone.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinaDejstva 75Objektivnost 80včeraj Bennett izgublja kot Eisenkot, Netanjahu je v dvoboju za prihajajoče volitve - anketaNedavna anketa je pokazala, da sta Benjamin Netanjahu in Gadi Eisenkot v primerjavi s prejšnjo anketo povečana za dva mandata. Naftali Bennett, nekdanji premier in vodja stranke "Skupaj", še naprej izgublja podporo, saj je zagotovil samo 13 mandatov - najnižji v tej seriji anket.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja uravnotežen pregled podatkov o volilnih anketah, ne da bi očitno naklonil nobenemu kandidatu ali stranki.Označuje numerične rezultate in izbire volivcev objektivno, pri čemer se izogiba obremenjenemu jeziku ali pristranski razlagi.
Zakaj dejstva (75): The article presents a poll showing Netanyahu and Eisenkot tied with 23 seats each, based on a Channel 13 News poll. It provides specific numbers and mentions other parties' seat counts, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it lacks mention of the exact methodology or sample size of th
Zakaj objektivnost (80): The article remains neutral in tone, presenting the poll results without overt bias. It reports facts about the political landscape and party standings without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.
The Jerusalem PostNeodvisenSredinapred 13 urami Eisenkot vodi Netanjahuja z 10 točkami, Likud dobi dva sedeža na zadnjih volitvahNedavna anketa Maariv, ki jo je izvedla Lazar Research, kaže, da je stranka Likud pridobila dva sedeža, kar je skupno 22, medtem ko bi lahko potencialna nova srednjo desna stranka, ki jo vodijo Benny Gantz, Ayelet Shaked, Yuli Edelstein in Dedi Simchi, zagotovila štiri sedeže.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): V članku so predstavljeni rezultati ankete, ne da bi se očitno naklonjeni kateri koli določeni stranki ali vodji.
The Times of IsraelNeodvisenKonservativnopred 4 dnevi Likud odobri Netanjahujev načrt za razširitev njegovega nadzora nad strankamiCentralni odbor stranke Likud je odobril predlog, ki znatno poveča nadzor premierja Benjamina Netanjahua nad seznamom kandidatov za Knesset. Po novih pravilih bo Netanjahu imel osem rezerviranih mest na prvih 29 položajih, kar mu bo omogočilo vplivati na več kot tretjino realnega seznama stranke.
Ocena pristranskosti (Konservativno): V članku je razširitev Netanjahujevega nadzora opredeljena kot strateški korak za zagotovitev volilnega uspeha, pri čemer je poudarjena zaskrbljenost zaradi možnih izzivov priljubljenih, vendar manj privlačnih kandidatov.
★
Ohranimo novice poštene.
ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.
Postani podpornik
IL
