Iranska vojska trdi, da je letalo brezpilotnikov napadlo letalsko bazo Al Minhad v ZAE.

Iran’s military claimed responsibility for drone attacks targeting the UAE’s Al Minhad Air Base, marking another escalation in the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Iran. The strikes occurred early on Monday, according to state media reports, and were described as retaliation for a U.S. airstrike on Iran’s Larak Island, which reportedly resulted in casualties among Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) personnel and civilians. The attack on Al Minhad Air Base was confirmed by Iran’s Army Public Relations Department, which stated that the drone strikes were a direct response to the U.S. bombing of two rocket launchers on Larak Island. This incident followed a series of tensions in the region, with both sides accusing each other of escalating hostilities. The U.S. Central Command had previously announced that its forces targeted the rocket launchers, citing intelligence assessments that they posed a threat to regional stability. Separately, the IRGC also claimed it had launched ballistic missiles against U.S. military installations in Jordan, specifically the King Hussein and al-Azraq bases. These strikes were also attributed to the U.S. attack on Larak Island, which the IRGC alleged caused significant loss of life and injury. In a statement released through state media, the IRGC emphasized its determination to counter perceived aggression, warning that “aggression and crime will not solve the enemy's desperation to weaken the Islamic Republic's control over the Strait of Hormuz.” It further pledged that “every shot will be met with a more crushing response.” The U.S. military presence in the Gulf continues to be a focal point of regional tensions, particularly concerning the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz. The area is critical for global oil transit, making it a flashpoint for geopolitical maneuvering. The recent attacks underscore the volatility of the situation, with both sides engaging in increasingly assertive actions. The U.S. has maintained a firm stance, asserting that its operations are aimed at deterring threats to national security and regional stability. Iranian officials have consistently framed their military activities as defensive measures, emphasizing the need to protect national sovereignty and territorial integrity. The IRGC’s statements reflect this narrative, portraying the attacks as necessary responses to what it describes as U.S. provocations. Meanwhile, the U.S. has reiterated its commitment to maintaining freedom of navigation in the region and has called for de-escalation through diplomatic channels. Regional allies and international observers have expressed concern over the rising level of hostilities. The conflict has already led to increased military posturing and heightened risks of accidental clashes. Analysts warn that the current trajectory could lead to broader regional instability, with implications beyond the immediate parties involved. As the situation develops, the focus will likely shift toward assessing the impact of these attacks on military capabilities and the potential for further escalations. Both sides are expected to continue their respective narratives, with Iran reinforcing its position as a defender of regional interests and the U.S. reaffirming its role as a stabilizing force in the Gulf. The coming days will be crucial in determining whether efforts to de-escalate can succeed or if the cycle of retaliation continues.