ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Iran po ameriških obstreljevanjih napadel oporišča v Bahrajnu in Kuvajtu
Slovenia🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnoSpregledano pri konservativnihvčeraj

Iran po ameriških obstreljevanjih napadel oporišča v Bahrajnu in Kuvajtu

Iran je v sredo napadel ameriške vojaške cilje v Bahrajnu v Kuvajtu, kar je bil odgovor na ameriške vojaške napade na Iran, ki so se zgodili v preteklosti. Ameriška vojska je v noči na sredo izvedla napade na več kot 80 ciljev v Iranu, kar je bil neposreden odgovor na iranske napade na tri tovorne ladje v Hormuški ožini. Iranska revolucionarna garda je sporočila, da je z raketami v brezpilotniki napadla vojaške cilje v Kuvajtu v Bahrajnu, sprožila alarm proti zračnemu napadu aktiviral protiletalsko obrambo. Ameriška vojska je napade opisala kotenzivne in jo označila za neupravičeno agresijo, ki ogroža svobodo plovbe. Teheran je obsodil ameriške napade kot "neobvezno dejanje agresije" v opozorilu, da ne bo pustil vodstva ZDA v ozadju.

On Wednesday, July 8, 2026, Iran launched attacks on U.S. military targets in Bahrain and Kuwait following American strikes against Iranian positions in response to earlier incidents involving tankers in the Strait of Hormuz. According to reports, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed responsibility for launching rockets and drones targeting military installations in Bandar Salman and the Al-Salem Air Base in Kuwait. The attack reportedly destroyed an American drone, prompting air raid alerts in both Bahrain and Kuwait. The Kuwaiti military stated it had activated its anti-air defenses to counter the assault.

The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed that American forces conducted attacks on more than 80 targets within Iran during the night preceding the incident. These included Iranian air defense systems, command and communication networks, coastal radar systems, anti-ship missiles, and over 60 fast boats belonging to the IRGC in the Strait of Hormuz and surrounding areas. The operation aimed to hinder further Iranian attacks on international maritime traffic through one of the world's most critical trade routes. According to CENTCOM, these actions were classified as offensive rather than defensive, unlike previous operations in late June which were described as self-defense measures. The U.S. military emphasized that these attacks were in response to what they deemed an unprovoked aggression by Iranian forces, a violation of the ceasefire agreement, and a threat to freedom of navigation.

According to two unnamed U.S. officials, the current operation was significantly broader than the previous ones in late June when the United States took military action due to Iranian activities in the Strait of Hormuz. However, those earlier actions were limited to avoid jeopardizing the memorandum of understanding between the two countries. The U.S. assessed that this latest operation targeted port infrastructure, missile and drone bases, coastal surveillance systems, and air defense capabilities.

In response to the U.S. attacks, Iran’s Supreme Council for National Security, known as the Kata' al-Anbia headquarters, condemned the actions as “clear acts of aggression” and warned of a “destructive response.” It also asserted that Tehran would not allow U.S. interference in the management of the strait. Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf, the head of Iran’s parliament, accused the United States of violating the ceasefire agreement, citing not only recent U.S. military strikes but also renewed sanctions on oil, Iran’s adjustments in the Strait of Hormuz, and Israeli attacks on Lebanon. He declared on social media that the era of intimidation and coercion had ended and that Iran would not yield.

An official from Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, according to state media agency Fars, labeled the U.S. operation a serious breach of the memorandum of understanding signed last month. He stated that Iran would take decisive measures to protect its national interests and security while seriously warning about the consequences of the U.S. violation of the agreement.

Meanwhile, the Iranian government criticized the decision by Washington to revoke the permit for the sale of Iranian oil, which was one of the key elements of the memorandum. This move has been seen as a significant escalation in tensions between the two nations.

Earlier in the week, on Monday, July 7, 2026, an unknown projectile struck a tanker near the coast of Oman close to the Strait of Hormuz, causing a fire aboard the vessel. The UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported the incident, noting that there were no casualties or environmental damage reported. The incident occurred approximately 14 kilometers off the northernmost part of Oman near the town of Limah. The tanker, traveling southward, reported that its left side had been hit by an unidentified projectile, leading to a fire. The French news agency AFP cited the incident, urging ships to exercise caution and report any suspicious activity.

American media outlet Axios reported that Iran had fired at least two missiles at commercial vessels passing through the Strait of Hormuz. This comes amid ongoing tensions in the region since the start of the war in the Middle East, which began with U.S.-Israeli aggression in late February. At that time, Iran closed the strategic waterway, causing a surge in global energy prices. In response, the United States imposed blockades on Iranian ports.

Following the signing of a memorandum of understanding between the United States and Iran, the strategic maritime route was reopened. However, Tehran insists that the arrangement will not be the same as before the conflict, when ships could freely pass through the strait. This ongoing dispute highlights the fragile nature of the current ceasefire and the potential for further escalations in the region.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in svoj prilagojen pregled Zame.

Postani podpornik

Pojdite k primarnim virom (3)

Uradni viri, na katerih temelji poročanje. Preberite jih neposredno in se izognite uokvirjanju.

3 poročil

RTV Slovenija (MMC) logoRTV Slovenija (MMC)Državni / javniProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70včeraj
Iran po ameriških obstreljevanjih napadel oporišča v Bahrajnu in Kuvajtu

Iran je v sredo napadel ameriške vojaške cilje v Bahrajnu v Kuvajtu, kar je bil odgovor na ameriške vojaške napade na Iran, ki so se zgodili v preteklosti. Ameriška vojska je v noči na sredo izvedla napade na več kot 80 ciljev v Iranu, kar je bil neposreden odgovor na iranske napade na tri tovorne ladje v Hormuški ožini. Iranska revolucionarna garda je sporočila, da je z raketami v brezpilotniki napadla vojaške cilje v Kuvajtu v Bahrajnu, sprožila alarm proti zračnemu napadu aktiviral protiletalsko obrambo. Ameriška vojska je napade opisala kotenzivne in jo označila za neupravičeno agresijo, ki ogroža svobodo plovbe. Teheran je obsodil ameriške napade kot "neobvezno dejanje agresije" v opozorilu, da ne bo pustil vodstva ZDA v ozadju.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Artikel podrobno opisuje iranske napade kot odgovor na ameriške akcije, kar kaže na podporo iranskemu stanju. Uporaba izrazov kot "neupravičena agresija", "ogrožanje svobode plovbe" in opomin na "dогovorjenih zavez" podpira levičarsko perspektivo. Tudi izjava iranskega vodilnega pogajalca, predsedni

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 85 · Objektivnost 70): Factuality is high as it reports on military actions between Iran and the US, aligning with cross-source consensus. Objectivity is lower due to emotionally charged language like 'neupravičena agresija' and potential bias towards the US perspective.

Delo logoDeloNeodvisen🔒ProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjim
Neznani izstrelek zadel tanker v Hormuški ožini; Američani krivijo Iran

Britanska agencija za pomorsko varnost (UKMTO) poroča, da je naftni tanker v ponedeljek izstrelil najmanj dve raketi na trgovsko ladjo, kar je povzročilo požar. Incident se je zgodil približno 14 km od omanskega obalnega kraja Limah. Oblasti preiskujejo dogodek, medtem ko so trgovske ladje v regiji že večkrat bile tarče napadov. Ameriški mediji Axios poročajo, da je Iran izstrelil najmanj dve raketi na trgovsko ladjo, kar je del širše politične napetosti med Zdanimi v Iranu. Hormuška je ena najpomembnejših točk za prevoz energentov, zaradi česar je imela globalni vpliv na globalne cene.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Artikel opisuje napad na tanker, kjer poudarjajo iransko odgovornost, kar kaže na levi nagib. Čeprav se ne poda jasen stališčenik, se iranska akcija povezuje z večjim političnim kontekstom, kar vodi k levi orientaciji.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 75): Factuality is good with reporting from reputable sources like UKMTO and Axios. Objectivity is slightly better as it presents both sides of the attribution issue without clear bias.

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 80Objektivnost 75predvčerajšnjim
Nova zaostritev v Hormuški ožini? Neznan izstrelek zadel naftni tanker

Nov varnostni incident se je zgodil v bližini Hormuške ceste, kjer je neznan izstrelek zadel naftni tanker ob obali Omana in povzročil požar. Britanska agencija za pomorsko varnost UKMTO je sporočila, da se je incident zgodil približno 14 km od omanskega obalnega kraja Limah. Po navedbah UKMTO v francoski agenciji AFP je tanker poročal o uničenju na levem boku v požaru. Ameriški medij Axios je poročal, da je Iran izstrelil vsaj dve raketi na trgovski ladji, ki so pluli skozi Hormuško cesto.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): Članek opisuje incident v kontekstu mednarodnih napetosti z ZDA v Iranu, ki ima politične razsežnosti.

Zakaj te ocene (Dejstva 80 · Objektivnost 75): Factuality is solid with alignment to international reports. Objectivity is similar to article 1, maintaining a neutral tone while acknowledging the ongoing tensions between the US and Iran.

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 5 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe