Za kemični inštitut v Ljubljani je bilo ugotovljeno, da je na svoji lokaciji na ulici Hajdrihove brez pridobitve potrebnega gradbenega dovoljenja zgradil masivno diafragmo iz železnega betona. To nezakonito gradnjo je odkril gradbeni inšpektorat, ki je ukazal njeno odstranitev. Diafragma, zasnovana za zaščito okoliških stavb med rušenjem stare strukture, je bila zgrajena brez ustreznega dovoljenja in krši gradbeni zakon.
Ocena pristranskosti (Sredina): Članek predstavlja dejanske informacije o nezakonitem gradbenem projektu in pravnih ukrepih, sprejetih proti njemu.
Zakaj dejstva (85): The article reports on an inspection finding that construction of the GenTech Center at the Chemistry Institute in Ljubljana was illegal due to lack of building permits. It cites the inspector’s findings and mentions the estimated cost of over 2 million euros. The article references local practices
Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article presents the situation as a legal violation but frames it through the perspective of a local hotel owner who has a vested interest in the area. There is some emotional language around the 'deception' by the authorities and the impact on nearby properties. The tone leans slightly towards




