ON
← Nazaj na pregled
Zdravnik je bil obsojen zaradi strašne kontrolne zveze s partnerjem, ki ga je preverjal vsakih 15 minut.
United Kingdom🏛️ PolitikaProgresivnopred 15 urami

Zdravnik je bil obsojen zaradi strašne kontrolne zveze s partnerjem, ki ga je preverjal vsakih 15 minut.

Dr. Walid Ahmed, splošni zdravnik, je izgubil licenco, ker je bil obsojen za nadzorovanje in prisilno ravnanje do svoje mlajše punce, gospe A. Med enoletnim razmerjem je dr. Ahmed pokazal skrajno kontrolo, tako da je zahteval pogoste sporočila vsakih 15 minut, namestil sledilne naprave na njen telefon, izbrisal njene stike na družabnih omrežjih in ji narekoval oblačila in dejavnosti. Izoliral jo je od prijateljev in družine, omejil njeno neodvisnost in povzročil hudo čustveno stisko, kar je privedlo do tega, da je postala "krogla njenega nekdanjega sebe". Dr. Ahmed je bil zaradi teh dejanj obsojen na tri leta zapora in dobil 10-letni prepoved približevanja. Čeprav se je izrekel za nedolžnega, je sodišče ugotovilo, da je njegovo vedenje padlo v najhujšo kategorijo znatne škode, kar je povzročilo psihološko škodo gospe A.

A general practitioner has been removed from the medical register following a disciplinary hearing after being found to have engaged in a controlling and coercive relationship with his younger partner. The case, which has drawn attention due to its severity, involves Dr. Walid Ahmed, a GP based in Bournemouth, Dorset, who was previously of good character and had no prior criminal record. He was convicted in 2025 of engaging in abusive behavior toward his partner, Ms. A, and sentenced to three years in prison, though he has yet to serve any portion of his sentence. According to court records, Dr. Ahmed's relationship with Ms. A began under seemingly normal circumstances, but soon escalated into a pattern of control and manipulation. Over the course of nearly a year, he imposed increasingly restrictive measures on her daily life. This included requiring her to send messages every 15 minutes while they were apart, installing tracking software on her mobile device, and limiting her access to social media and personal contacts. He also dictated what she wore, controlled her use of makeup and perfume, and even monitored her activities such as using the restroom or obtaining drinks. When he suspected infidelity, he demanded video calls or photographs to verify her location. The court heard testimony describing how these actions led to severe emotional and psychological harm for Ms. A. She reportedly withdrew from friends and family, lost employment, and experienced a profound loss of autonomy. During the trial, the judge described the case as falling into the highest category of harm, citing the extensive distress and lasting psychological damage inflicted upon Ms. A, as confirmed by her family, friends, and former coworkers. Dr. Ahmed pleaded not guilty to the charges but was ultimately found guilty of engaging in controlling and coercive behavior. His sentence of three years was handed down in October 2025, although he has not returned to the UK and has not begun serving his term. Since December 2020, he has ceased practicing medicine, raising concerns about the potential risks posed by someone with a history of such behavior continuing in the healthcare profession. Following his conviction, the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (MPTS) reviewed the case and determined that Dr. Ahmed's actions warranted removal from the medical register. The tribunal highlighted the premeditated and abhorrent nature of his conduct, noting that he had not shown any signs of reflection or efforts to mitigate the risk of future misconduct. Sean Ell, chairing the hearing, emphasized that Dr. Ahmed's behavior was predatory and involved isolating Ms. A from her support network, eroding her independence and mental well-being. The tribunal concluded that the risk of recurrence was still significant, particularly given the lack of demonstrated change in Dr. Ahmed's behavior. As a result, the decision was made to strike him off the register, effectively barring him from practicing as a GP in the UK. The ruling underscores the gravity of the situation and the need for stringent oversight in cases involving professionals whose conduct poses a threat to public safety and trust.

1 poročil

The Independent logoThe IndependentNeodvisenProgresivnoDejstva 85Objektivnost 70pred 15 urami
Zdravnik je bil obsojen zaradi strašne kontrolne zveze s partnerjem, ki ga je preverjal vsakih 15 minut.

Dr. Walid Ahmed, splošni zdravnik, je izgubil licenco, ker je bil obsojen za nadzorovanje in prisilno ravnanje do svoje mlajše punce, gospe A. Med enoletnim razmerjem je dr. Ahmed pokazal skrajno kontrolo, tako da je zahteval pogoste sporočila vsakih 15 minut, namestil sledilne naprave na njen telefon, izbrisal njene stike na družabnih omrežjih in ji narekoval oblačila in dejavnosti. Izoliral jo je od prijateljev in družine, omejil njeno neodvisnost in povzročil hudo čustveno stisko, kar je privedlo do tega, da je postala "krogla njenega nekdanjega sebe". Dr. Ahmed je bil zaradi teh dejanj obsojen na tri leta zapora in dobil 10-letni prepoved približevanja. Čeprav se je izrekel za nedolžnega, je sodišče ugotovilo, da je njegovo vedenje padlo v najhujšo kategorijo znatne škode, kar je povzročilo psihološko škodo gospe A.

Ocena pristranskosti (Progresivno): V članku je ta incident označen kot jasen primer zlorabe v družini in prisilnega nadzora, s poudarkom na resnosti obnašanja in njegovem vplivu na žrtev.

Zakaj dejstva (85): The article provides detailed allegations against Dr. Walid Ahmed, including controlling behavior, installation of tracking devices, isolation from friends and family, and legal consequences. While these claims are presented as facts, there is no primary source document to verify them directly. The

Zakaj objektivnost (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'horrific,' 'appalling,' and 'shell of her former self,' which suggests a subjective interpretation of events. It also frames the situation primarily from the perspective of the victim, potentially biasing the narrative toward portraying Dr. Ahme

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Isti dogodek, razvrščen po političnem nagibu medijev, ki so o njem poročali.

Kako je poročala vsaka stran

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Poročanje po svetu

Isti dogodek, kot so ga poročali v drugih državah.

Poročanje po svetu

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Preverjanje trditev

Ključne dejanske trditve in koliko virov jih potrjuje oz. zavrača.

Preverjanje trditev

Podprite neodvisne novice z zavedanjem pristranskosti in odklenite družbeni utrip, glasovanje skupnosti in vse druge funkcije za podpornike.

Postani podpornik

Ohranimo novice poštene.

ObjectiveNews financirajo bralci in je brez oglasov – pristranskost vam pokažemo, ne skrijemo. Podprite neodvisno novinarstvo za 4 €/mesec.

Postani podpornik

Povezane zgodbe